Asset-based community development (ABCD) is a methodology for the sustainable development of communities based on their strengths and potentials. It involves assessing the resources, skills and experience available in a community; organizing the community around issues that are moving its members into action; -- determining and then taking appropriate action.[1]
The ABCD approach was developed by John McKnight and John Kretzmann at the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. They co-authored a book in 1993, “Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing A Community’s Assets,” which outlined their asset-based approach to community development[2]. The Community Development Program at Northwestern University’s Institute for Policy Research established the Asset-Based Community Development Institute based on three decades of research and community work by -- Kretzmann and -- McKnight.
Guiding Principles[3]
Asset-based community development (ABCD) differs from needs-based community development in that it focuses primarily on honing and leveraging existing strengths within a community, rather than bolstering community deficiencies. Related to tenets of empowerment, it postulates that solutions to community problems already exist within a community’s assets. Principles that guide ABCD include:
1. Everyone has gifts: each person in a community has something to contribute
2. Relationships build a community: people must be connected in order for sustainable community development to take place
3. Citizens at the center: citizens should be viewed as actors--not recipients--in development
4. Leaders involve others: community development is strongest when it involves a broad base of community action
5. People care: challenge notions of "apathy" by listening to people's interests
7. Listen: decisions should come from conversations where people are heard
8. Ask: asking for ideas is more sustainable than giving solutions
Examples of ABCD Tools
The ABCD approach utilizes several tools to assess and mobilize communities.
The Capacity Inventory[4] There is a format variation, here: in the last section, no caps after colon. Here, caps after colon. Either way; just standardize. 1. Skills Information: Lists the many skills the person has gained at home, work, in the community, or elsewhere. Examples of these skills can include internet knowledge, hair-cutting, listening, wallpapering, carpentry, sewing, babysitting, etc.[5]
2. Community Skills: Lists the community work (s)he has participated in to determine what work they may be interested in in the future.
3. Enterprising Interests and Experience: Lists past experience in business and determines interest in starting a business.
4. Personal Information: Lists minimum information for follow-up
Asset Mapping[4]
There are five key assets in any given community: individuals, associations, institutions, physical assets, and connections[6]. These assets are broken down into three categories: Gifts of individuals, Citizens’ Associations, and Local Institutions[4]. Asset maps are used in lieu of needs maps that focus solely on negative aspects of communities. Asset maps, on the other hand, focus on community assets, abilities, skills, and strengths in order to build its future.
Asset map Time Banks
Time banks are an example of using community assets to connect individuals' assets to one another[7]. Neighbors share skills with one another and earn ‘credits’ in the process, allowing an hour of child care to equal an hour of home repair.
Ethics
Because ABCD relies on existing community assets to create change, it has been criticized for implying that disadvantaged communities have all the resources they need to solve community problems.[8] According the the ABCD Institute, however, ABCD methodology recognizes that systemic injustice may require disadvantaged communities to seek assistance from outside the community. ABCD maintains that interventions from exterior sources will be most effective when a community’s assets are leveraged at full capacity[4]. ABCD is described as a more sustainable model of community development than needs-based community development, because needs-based approaches may perpetuate community problems by emphasizing deficiencies and the necessity for reliance on outside assistance. By contrast, ABCD aims to build capacity within communities by expanding their [social capital][4].
See also
Allotment gardens Community advisory board Community-based participatory research (CBPR) Community development Time banks Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) Praxis intervention Progress in Community Health Partnerships Southeast Asia Rural Social Leadership Institute (SERSOLIN)
Asset-based community development (ABCD) is a methodology for the sustainable development of communities based on their strengths and potentials. It involves assessing the resources, skills and experience available in a community; organizing the community around issues that are moving its members into action; -- determining and then taking appropriate action.[1]
The ABCD approach was developed by John McKnight and John Kretzmann at the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. They co-authored a book in 1993, “Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing A Community’s Assets,” which outlined their asset-based approach to community development[2]. The Community Development Program at Northwestern University’s Institute for Policy Research established the Asset-Based Community Development Institute based on three decades of research and community work by -- Kretzmann and -- McKnight.
Guiding Principles[3]
Asset-based community development (ABCD) differs from needs-based community development in that it focuses primarily on honing and leveraging existing strengths within a community, rather than bolstering community deficiencies. Related to tenets of empowerment, it postulates that solutions to community problems already exist within a community’s assets. Principles that guide ABCD include:
1. Everyone has gifts: each person in a community has something to contribute
2. Relationships build a community: people must be connected in order for sustainable community development to take place
3. Citizens at the center: citizens should be viewed as actors--not recipients--in development
4. Leaders involve others: community development is strongest when it involves a broad base of community action
5. People care: challenge notions of "apathy" by listening to people's interests
7. Listen: decisions should come from conversations where people are heard
8. Ask: asking for ideas is more sustainable than giving solutions
Examples of ABCD Tools
The ABCD approach utilizes several tools to assess and mobilize communities.
The Capacity Inventory[4] There is a format variation, here: in the last section, no caps after colon. Here, caps after colon. Either way; just standardize. 1. Skills Information: Lists the many skills the person has gained at home, work, in the community, or elsewhere. Examples of these skills can include internet knowledge, hair-cutting, listening, wallpapering, carpentry, sewing, babysitting, etc.[5]
2. Community Skills: Lists the community work (s)he has participated in to determine what work they may be interested in in the future.
3. Enterprising Interests and Experience: Lists past experience in business and determines interest in starting a business.
4. Personal Information: Lists minimum information for follow-up
Asset Mapping[4]
There are five key assets in any given community: individuals, associations, institutions, physical assets, and connections[6]. These assets are broken down into three categories: Gifts of individuals, Citizens’ Associations, and Local Institutions[4]. Asset maps are used in lieu of needs maps that focus solely on negative aspects of communities. Asset maps, on the other hand, focus on community assets, abilities, skills, and strengths in order to build its future.
Asset map Time Banks
Time banks are an example of using community assets to connect individuals' assets to one another[7]. Neighbors share skills with one another and earn ‘credits’ in the process, allowing an hour of child care to equal an hour of home repair.
Ethics
Because ABCD relies on existing community assets to create change, it has been criticized for implying that disadvantaged communities have all the resources they need to solve community problems.[8] According the the ABCD Institute, however, ABCD methodology recognizes that systemic injustice may require disadvantaged communities to seek assistance from outside the community. ABCD maintains that interventions from exterior sources will be most effective when a community’s assets are leveraged at full capacity[4]. ABCD is described as a more sustainable model of community development than needs-based community development, because needs-based approaches may perpetuate community problems by emphasizing deficiencies and the necessity for reliance on outside assistance. By contrast, ABCD aims to build capacity within communities by expanding their [social capital][4].
See also
Allotment gardens Community advisory board Community-based participatory research (CBPR) Community development Time banks Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) Praxis intervention Progress in Community Health Partnerships Southeast Asia Rural Social Leadership Institute (SERSOLIN)