|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Country Club Dispute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Clark ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 00:34, 12 November 2014 (UTC) |
Squidville1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm innocent and not a sockpuppet/the same person as JimmyTwoShoes fan because of many reasons. His activity/edits in Wikipedia was different than mine. He didn't create an account named Squidville1, I'm an independent user which means that I'm not this person who is a sockpuppeter. I was blocked by mistake by Taichi accusing me for being sockpuppet of this user and neing linked to VyacheslavMolotov, 174.91.68.16, Pollito con Papas, Stasse1984, and Székelykeve (which are not related to JimmyTwoShoes fan or other users). I'm also confused with the Spanish Wikipedia because it's not in English, it's in Spanish which I didn't understand or speak really good. In the investigation, Bernard said "relación muy clara entre todos ellos. Te dejo a ti los bloqueos" (clear relationship between them. I will leave the block to your's.) but this is a lie because I didn't have clear relationships with the JimmyTwoShoes fan and other users or being an account of JimmyTwoShoes fan. Also, I'm half autistic, I didn't meant to get block when he (Taichi) thinks that the person behind the JimmyTwoShoes fan account created Squidville1 (me) but my account was not his, this account belongs to me. Can you tell Taichi that I'm not the same person as JimmyTwoShoes fan and make an apology.
P.S. If I'm still blocked, can you extend the block by 1 or 2 years and give me an own certified block ID and not JimmyTwoShoes fan. We had nothing to do with each other. I've understand and follow the policies carefully. Thanks.
Squidville1 ( talk) 20:25, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I gather that in the above unblock request, you are trying to convince us that your first language is English, and you have a basic level of Spanish. As it happens, you've convinced me that your first language is Spanish, and that you have an intermediate level of English, which fits with you being JimmyTwoShoes. PhilKnight ( talk) 01:22, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Squidville1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I didn't fit being JimmyTwoShoes (not the character from a TV show, the user). Here are many reasons why I don't fit myself being him:
Squidville1 ( talk) 03:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon ::==( o ) 01:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
jem's comment is not totally clear to me. Does it mean "checkusers (people) say Squidville is a sock in their judgement" or does it mean "checkusers (people) confirm that Squidville is a sock based on CU results"? I cannot read the Spanish, but it sort of looks like the former, not the latter. I have posted at jem's talk page again asking for clarification. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:29, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Country Club Dispute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Clark ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 00:34, 12 November 2014 (UTC) |
Squidville1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm innocent and not a sockpuppet/the same person as JimmyTwoShoes fan because of many reasons. His activity/edits in Wikipedia was different than mine. He didn't create an account named Squidville1, I'm an independent user which means that I'm not this person who is a sockpuppeter. I was blocked by mistake by Taichi accusing me for being sockpuppet of this user and neing linked to VyacheslavMolotov, 174.91.68.16, Pollito con Papas, Stasse1984, and Székelykeve (which are not related to JimmyTwoShoes fan or other users). I'm also confused with the Spanish Wikipedia because it's not in English, it's in Spanish which I didn't understand or speak really good. In the investigation, Bernard said "relación muy clara entre todos ellos. Te dejo a ti los bloqueos" (clear relationship between them. I will leave the block to your's.) but this is a lie because I didn't have clear relationships with the JimmyTwoShoes fan and other users or being an account of JimmyTwoShoes fan. Also, I'm half autistic, I didn't meant to get block when he (Taichi) thinks that the person behind the JimmyTwoShoes fan account created Squidville1 (me) but my account was not his, this account belongs to me. Can you tell Taichi that I'm not the same person as JimmyTwoShoes fan and make an apology.
P.S. If I'm still blocked, can you extend the block by 1 or 2 years and give me an own certified block ID and not JimmyTwoShoes fan. We had nothing to do with each other. I've understand and follow the policies carefully. Thanks.
Squidville1 ( talk) 20:25, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I gather that in the above unblock request, you are trying to convince us that your first language is English, and you have a basic level of Spanish. As it happens, you've convinced me that your first language is Spanish, and that you have an intermediate level of English, which fits with you being JimmyTwoShoes. PhilKnight ( talk) 01:22, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Squidville1 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I didn't fit being JimmyTwoShoes (not the character from a TV show, the user). Here are many reasons why I don't fit myself being him:
Squidville1 ( talk) 03:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon ::==( o ) 01:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
jem's comment is not totally clear to me. Does it mean "checkusers (people) say Squidville is a sock in their judgement" or does it mean "checkusers (people) confirm that Squidville is a sock based on CU results"? I cannot read the Spanish, but it sort of looks like the former, not the latter. I have posted at jem's talk page again asking for clarification. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:29, 16 November 2014 (UTC)