Looking for which characteristics define a personality disorder, I was directed to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases and found some odd word usages there. Apparently U3964057 user, believes they have the only correct summary and also have the time to fiercely protect their mis-apprehension. The entry 'Moral "Luck' is clearly a misnomer, as there is no luck involved. it is very misleading title , as luck is not part of the action here. Probably this user wrote this one, and are protecting it, aggressively. Perhaps U3964057 is subject to many of the fallacies listed on this page - illogic in the face of information. The title is supposed to summarize the issue; in this one, the claim one makes of being better than someone else after an event went in their favor, therefore one is of higher moral standing, or conversely that someone is worse than someone after the fact of an event's passed; it has to do with false pretenses, assuming a title, a status, is an act of aggression, it is not a function of luck or happenstance. Think of a better word, I don't care, but that one is not very accurate. Has any psych person considered 'luck' to be part of what makes up a cognitive disorder? Sprezzissimo ( talk) 13:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Looking for which characteristics define a personality disorder, I was directed to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases and found some odd word usages there. Apparently U3964057 user, believes they have the only correct summary and also have the time to fiercely protect their mis-apprehension. The entry 'Moral "Luck' is clearly a misnomer, as there is no luck involved. it is very misleading title , as luck is not part of the action here. Probably this user wrote this one, and are protecting it, aggressively. Perhaps U3964057 is subject to many of the fallacies listed on this page - illogic in the face of information. The title is supposed to summarize the issue; in this one, the claim one makes of being better than someone else after an event went in their favor, therefore one is of higher moral standing, or conversely that someone is worse than someone after the fact of an event's passed; it has to do with false pretenses, assuming a title, a status, is an act of aggression, it is not a function of luck or happenstance. Think of a better word, I don't care, but that one is not very accurate. Has any psych person considered 'luck' to be part of what makes up a cognitive disorder? Sprezzissimo ( talk) 13:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)