Hello, SpeckledHen, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome! Hello, SpeckledHen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Huw Powell (
talk)
07:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Page 3 of the newly cited article states:
Unfortunately, RationalWiki admits it, and others, have engaged in "cyber-vandalism" against Conservapedia during which they've "inserted errors, pornographic photos, and satire".
And on page 3 of the LA Times article cited:
In recent months, Conservapedia's articles have been hit frequently by interlopers from RationalWiki and elsewhere. The vandals have inserted errors, pornographic photos and satire
Both justify my wording, as does WP:WEASEL. Seregain ( talk) 18:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, SpeckledHen, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome! Hello, SpeckledHen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Huw Powell (
talk)
07:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Page 3 of the newly cited article states:
Unfortunately, RationalWiki admits it, and others, have engaged in "cyber-vandalism" against Conservapedia during which they've "inserted errors, pornographic photos, and satire".
And on page 3 of the LA Times article cited:
In recent months, Conservapedia's articles have been hit frequently by interlopers from RationalWiki and elsewhere. The vandals have inserted errors, pornographic photos and satire
Both justify my wording, as does WP:WEASEL. Seregain ( talk) 18:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)