Alice.S 01:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Sparsity. Apologies! I did not mean to delete anyone's comments. If I did it was an accident. I admit to another thing: trying to put my comment on "Article needs revising" first on the page. If that is wrong then I am sorry for it too and I won't do it again. Is it wrong?
Suade (
talk)
17:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to draw your attention to this policy, and ask that you read it. You frequently interrupt content disputes and other disputes by simply hurling (frivolous) accusations of civility violations at others, instead of discussing the issues at hand. And yet you frequently defend your comments about other users as civil, because you are belittling or insulting their actions and not the editors themselves. Please familiarize yourself with this policy and cite it appropriately. Regards. -- Cheeser1 ( talk) 22:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
We have never met, although there are quite a few people we both know. But that is something I only realized after I had figured out your identity using my "Internet-stalking skills". At some time there was a fairly prolific editor under a different name, of whose interests I was well aware; that different name had drawn my attention, and at some later time we even edited in short succession the same, fairly new and highly specialized related article. It was not particularly difficult to see the commonalities and make the link. -- Lambiam 14:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to edit the article but I can't see how to get into it with the lock on. Can you help? Thanks. Suade ( talk) 18:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, SparsityProblem! Sounds like a good policy. Cheers and talk to you soon. Suade ( talk) 22:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
You can fix the way those userboxes make the scratchpad link on your user page float off to the right by placing the {{clear}} template immediately after the userboxes — sort of a crappy hack as far as HTML/styles go, but it works. tgies ( talk) 13:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi SparsityProblem!
I noticed you were a homeschooler, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Homeschooling. In this "WikiProject," we have been together working on the collaboration of Homeschooling-related articles. As a member, I really hope you can join, and let me know if you need any help signing up or with anything else. If you have any questions about the project you can ask at the project's talk page. Cheers! - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 00:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, it is a word. It wasn't used correctly in the instance that you noted, but it is - in fact - a word. Cheers! -- InDeBiz1 ( talk) 22:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Well done. Thanks, CWC 17:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Hiya Sparsity. I see you and SMcCandlish were making some edits in the transgender section at WP:MOS recently; feel free to weigh in at either the latest WT:MOS thread or the latest WT:GAY thread. - Dan Dank55 ( send/receive) 15:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! I've been doing some work on the lesbian aspects of the Category:Women and sexuality and I notice you made some really good points in that debate, so I wonder if you'd weigh in on a proposal I'm working on at User:Scarykitty/LGBT Categories. Thanks! ( talk) 05:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Why not 'homosexual couples' as 'homosexual acts' and the like? Does engaging in a homosexual act make one a homosexual? Does being in a homosexual relationship make one a homosexual? -- 24.18.27.74 ( talk) 02:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just writing to let you know that me and some Wikipedian friends are launching Wikipedia Club at Berkeley, a student club for promoting participation in Wikipedia and face-to-face collaborations. If you're still living in the Bay Area and that sounds fun to you, please consider joining our mailing list. Thanks! Dcoetzee 01:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just wondering if you are still working on the Spoken Article version of Los Angeles. If not, I will be removing the article from the list in 7 days. Thanks! Cognate247 ( talk) 17:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
I must take issue with your assertion that the use of the term "female assigned at birth" is NPOV, which is what you wrote in your edit summary for James Barry (surgeon). The phrasing does not automatically endorse the idea that trans people are born into their self-identified sex, it merely describes what the doctor pronounced the infant to be without bias. Asarelah ( talk) 22:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, how long have you known Chip? I've only known him since 1978 or so, and I know whereof I speak; I just don't have his books sitting on my work desk during the day. -- Orange Mike | Talk 13:08, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Dva roga jedan jarac
Alice.S 01:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Sparsity. Apologies! I did not mean to delete anyone's comments. If I did it was an accident. I admit to another thing: trying to put my comment on "Article needs revising" first on the page. If that is wrong then I am sorry for it too and I won't do it again. Is it wrong?
Suade (
talk)
17:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to draw your attention to this policy, and ask that you read it. You frequently interrupt content disputes and other disputes by simply hurling (frivolous) accusations of civility violations at others, instead of discussing the issues at hand. And yet you frequently defend your comments about other users as civil, because you are belittling or insulting their actions and not the editors themselves. Please familiarize yourself with this policy and cite it appropriately. Regards. -- Cheeser1 ( talk) 22:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
We have never met, although there are quite a few people we both know. But that is something I only realized after I had figured out your identity using my "Internet-stalking skills". At some time there was a fairly prolific editor under a different name, of whose interests I was well aware; that different name had drawn my attention, and at some later time we even edited in short succession the same, fairly new and highly specialized related article. It was not particularly difficult to see the commonalities and make the link. -- Lambiam 14:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to edit the article but I can't see how to get into it with the lock on. Can you help? Thanks. Suade ( talk) 18:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, SparsityProblem! Sounds like a good policy. Cheers and talk to you soon. Suade ( talk) 22:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
You can fix the way those userboxes make the scratchpad link on your user page float off to the right by placing the {{clear}} template immediately after the userboxes — sort of a crappy hack as far as HTML/styles go, but it works. tgies ( talk) 13:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi SparsityProblem!
I noticed you were a homeschooler, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Homeschooling. In this "WikiProject," we have been together working on the collaboration of Homeschooling-related articles. As a member, I really hope you can join, and let me know if you need any help signing up or with anything else. If you have any questions about the project you can ask at the project's talk page. Cheers! - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 00:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, it is a word. It wasn't used correctly in the instance that you noted, but it is - in fact - a word. Cheers! -- InDeBiz1 ( talk) 22:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Well done. Thanks, CWC 17:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Hiya Sparsity. I see you and SMcCandlish were making some edits in the transgender section at WP:MOS recently; feel free to weigh in at either the latest WT:MOS thread or the latest WT:GAY thread. - Dan Dank55 ( send/receive) 15:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! I've been doing some work on the lesbian aspects of the Category:Women and sexuality and I notice you made some really good points in that debate, so I wonder if you'd weigh in on a proposal I'm working on at User:Scarykitty/LGBT Categories. Thanks! ( talk) 05:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Why not 'homosexual couples' as 'homosexual acts' and the like? Does engaging in a homosexual act make one a homosexual? Does being in a homosexual relationship make one a homosexual? -- 24.18.27.74 ( talk) 02:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just writing to let you know that me and some Wikipedian friends are launching Wikipedia Club at Berkeley, a student club for promoting participation in Wikipedia and face-to-face collaborations. If you're still living in the Bay Area and that sounds fun to you, please consider joining our mailing list. Thanks! Dcoetzee 01:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just wondering if you are still working on the Spoken Article version of Los Angeles. If not, I will be removing the article from the list in 7 days. Thanks! Cognate247 ( talk) 17:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
I must take issue with your assertion that the use of the term "female assigned at birth" is NPOV, which is what you wrote in your edit summary for James Barry (surgeon). The phrasing does not automatically endorse the idea that trans people are born into their self-identified sex, it merely describes what the doctor pronounced the infant to be without bias. Asarelah ( talk) 22:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, how long have you known Chip? I've only known him since 1978 or so, and I know whereof I speak; I just don't have his books sitting on my work desk during the day. -- Orange Mike | Talk 13:08, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Dva roga jedan jarac