Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — C.Fred ( talk) 20:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Craig Overton, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk)
21:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
Based off your comment on my talk page, I assume you are jatamanagement. I didn't issue that block, Nihonjoe did. The reason for why they blocked you is spelt out in that big blue box.
Now, as it was a "soft" block, which notes "creating a new account" as an option, this account's username is fine. However, the obligation to disclose your paid link before editing is still required, as is using the edit request wizard.
The reasoning for not allowing the original edit was as I said then. You either need to lay out how the secondary source does not match up with the policy text or you need to find other secondary sources that back up an alternate text.
You just claiming it doesn't match actual events is not an acceptable way of amending.
I suggest finding some sources and taking them to the talk page. Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — C.Fred ( talk) 20:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Craig Overton, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk)
21:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
Based off your comment on my talk page, I assume you are jatamanagement. I didn't issue that block, Nihonjoe did. The reason for why they blocked you is spelt out in that big blue box.
Now, as it was a "soft" block, which notes "creating a new account" as an option, this account's username is fine. However, the obligation to disclose your paid link before editing is still required, as is using the edit request wizard.
The reasoning for not allowing the original edit was as I said then. You either need to lay out how the secondary source does not match up with the policy text or you need to find other secondary sources that back up an alternate text.
You just claiming it doesn't match actual events is not an acceptable way of amending.
I suggest finding some sources and taking them to the talk page. Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)