I cannot change your user name, as that requires "bureaucrat" privileges, but it isn't that difficult:
Then, in due course, your name will be changed. Favonian ( talk) 10:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Dude, your stuff on Lahore is awesome! Keep it up :) Mar4d ( talk) 07:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
I notice that after Corensearchbot left a message about the similarities between Lahore Model Town and an article you created today ( Model Town, Lahore), you went and redirected the older article to your article. As you are new, I am assuming you are not aware that you should have asked for a history merge, so that the contributions of other authors are not hidden away. Also I want to make you aware that whilst images in an article are a good thing, they should not be allowed to overshadow the article. The relevant guidelines are found -> here and here. Green Giant ( talk) 17:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Mughal Era in Lahore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Kudpung (
talk)
03:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I cannot change your user name, as that requires "bureaucrat" privileges, but it isn't that difficult:
Then, in due course, your name will be changed. Favonian ( talk) 10:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Dude, your stuff on Lahore is awesome! Keep it up :) Mar4d ( talk) 07:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
I notice that after Corensearchbot left a message about the similarities between Lahore Model Town and an article you created today ( Model Town, Lahore), you went and redirected the older article to your article. As you are new, I am assuming you are not aware that you should have asked for a history merge, so that the contributions of other authors are not hidden away. Also I want to make you aware that whilst images in an article are a good thing, they should not be allowed to overshadow the article. The relevant guidelines are found -> here and here. Green Giant ( talk) 17:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Mughal Era in Lahore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Kudpung (
talk)
03:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)