Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kristi Noem, you may be blocked from editing. InaMaka ( talk) 14:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
It is well documented that Racota Valley Ranch (Kristi's ranch) has received $2,598,827 in farm subsidies since 1995. This is fact and as such is unbiased information. If you don't believe this should be a part of this page then please explain your logic. Otherwise the continued removal of this section will be reported to the admin page as persistent vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sodapaps ( talk • contribs) 05:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you.-- InaMaka ( talk) 00:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- InaMaka ( talk) 00:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
It is well documented that Racota Valley Ranch (Kristi's ranch) has received $2,598,827 in farm subsidies since 1995. This is fact and as such is unbiased information. If you don't believe this should be a part of this page then please explain your logic. Otherwise the continued removal of this section will be reported to the admin page as persistent vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sodapaps ( talk • contribs) 05:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
First off, I am not sockpuppet. I did create the original edits for the controversy portion as well as removing the "alma matter" section as it is misleading and biased in its own way. However, I was not signed in at the time so only my IP appears. Fortunately for me, others have stepped in to help revert your blatant vandalism of Kristi's page. The farm subsidies she has received are well documented facts and are not POV or biased. They are what they are. It's as if I said she was female, and you complained that that was POV. As of this moment, I am reverting the page back and keeping the Alma Matter section. Sodapaps ( talk) 23:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
First, I appreciate you finally allowing the farm subsidy issue to stand and i don't mind it's current form. Second, I am not a sockpuppet. Whether you choose to believe it or not this is my only Wikipedia identity. I'm glad to see some have called you on this. Anyway, have a nice day. Sodapaps ( talk) 18:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Ckatz
chat
spy
09:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Sodapaps ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I find it interesting that InaMaka calls me a nubie, a liar, and a sockpuppet over and over (which simply is not true and to which I have provided ample evidence of this fact), refuses to work with me on edits I wished to make to Kristi Noem's page, would not answer my questions about his concerns on Kristi's talk page, and when I finally have had enough of his repeated personal attacks you block me. Well, I have learned a valuable lesson, and that is that you should never trust anything on Wikipedia because it is not only biased bull shit, but the administrators are complete fucktards. I don't really care at this point if I am blocked or not, so fuck you.
Decline reason:
Thanks for sharing. None of this appears to be a valid reason to unblock you and so I'll decline to do that; this sort of message may contribute to a longer block in the future, FYI. Accounting4Taste: talk 16:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sodapaps ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Oooo... god forbid you block me longer. What a fucking joke. lol.
Decline reason:
you have not asked to be unblocked, still less given a reason why you should be. JohnCD ( talk) 18:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Just so that you know, a sockpuppet investigation (SPI) has been opened. You can review it here: Sodapaps sockpuppet investigation-- InaMaka ( talk) 16:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you are serious about contributing, please desist from your current activities and focus on adding useful content. Ckatz chat spy 02:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make
personal attacks on other people, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Ckatz
chat
spy
18:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:20, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kristi Noem, you may be blocked from editing. InaMaka ( talk) 14:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
It is well documented that Racota Valley Ranch (Kristi's ranch) has received $2,598,827 in farm subsidies since 1995. This is fact and as such is unbiased information. If you don't believe this should be a part of this page then please explain your logic. Otherwise the continued removal of this section will be reported to the admin page as persistent vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sodapaps ( talk • contribs) 05:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you.-- InaMaka ( talk) 00:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- InaMaka ( talk) 00:20, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
It is well documented that Racota Valley Ranch (Kristi's ranch) has received $2,598,827 in farm subsidies since 1995. This is fact and as such is unbiased information. If you don't believe this should be a part of this page then please explain your logic. Otherwise the continued removal of this section will be reported to the admin page as persistent vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sodapaps ( talk • contribs) 05:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
First off, I am not sockpuppet. I did create the original edits for the controversy portion as well as removing the "alma matter" section as it is misleading and biased in its own way. However, I was not signed in at the time so only my IP appears. Fortunately for me, others have stepped in to help revert your blatant vandalism of Kristi's page. The farm subsidies she has received are well documented facts and are not POV or biased. They are what they are. It's as if I said she was female, and you complained that that was POV. As of this moment, I am reverting the page back and keeping the Alma Matter section. Sodapaps ( talk) 23:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
First, I appreciate you finally allowing the farm subsidy issue to stand and i don't mind it's current form. Second, I am not a sockpuppet. Whether you choose to believe it or not this is my only Wikipedia identity. I'm glad to see some have called you on this. Anyway, have a nice day. Sodapaps ( talk) 18:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Ckatz
chat
spy
09:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Sodapaps ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I find it interesting that InaMaka calls me a nubie, a liar, and a sockpuppet over and over (which simply is not true and to which I have provided ample evidence of this fact), refuses to work with me on edits I wished to make to Kristi Noem's page, would not answer my questions about his concerns on Kristi's talk page, and when I finally have had enough of his repeated personal attacks you block me. Well, I have learned a valuable lesson, and that is that you should never trust anything on Wikipedia because it is not only biased bull shit, but the administrators are complete fucktards. I don't really care at this point if I am blocked or not, so fuck you.
Decline reason:
Thanks for sharing. None of this appears to be a valid reason to unblock you and so I'll decline to do that; this sort of message may contribute to a longer block in the future, FYI. Accounting4Taste: talk 16:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sodapaps ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Oooo... god forbid you block me longer. What a fucking joke. lol.
Decline reason:
you have not asked to be unblocked, still less given a reason why you should be. JohnCD ( talk) 18:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Just so that you know, a sockpuppet investigation (SPI) has been opened. You can review it here: Sodapaps sockpuppet investigation-- InaMaka ( talk) 16:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you are serious about contributing, please desist from your current activities and focus on adding useful content. Ckatz chat spy 02:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make
personal attacks on other people, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Ckatz
chat
spy
18:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:20, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.