Hello, I'm Andrew.schalk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ryan Jaunzemis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Andrew.schalk ( talk) 18:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ryan Jaunzemis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andrew.schalk ( talk) 18:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ryan Jaunzemis, you may be blocked from editing. Serols ( talk) 18:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ryan Jaunzemis. Serols ( talk) 18:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist ( talk) 19:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply