Great call for deletion!
D. J. Bracey
(talk)
22:58, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Dear Sneftel, you have removed a sentence from Amdahl's Law page with the comment (rv controversial claim without a reliable source). The sentence was added based on a scientific study published in a paper by a recognized faculty at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. May you please describe your definition of "controversial claim" and "reliable source" in this context. Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbeAlshareef ( talk • contribs) 04:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
I didn't read as carefully as I usually do. Autodidact1 ( talk) 10:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Great call for deletion!
D. J. Bracey
(talk)
22:58, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Dear Sneftel, you have removed a sentence from Amdahl's Law page with the comment (rv controversial claim without a reliable source). The sentence was added based on a scientific study published in a paper by a recognized faculty at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. May you please describe your definition of "controversial claim" and "reliable source" in this context. Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbeAlshareef ( talk • contribs) 04:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
I didn't read as carefully as I usually do. Autodidact1 ( talk) 10:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)