Welcome!
Hello, Smcinerney, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.
You might like to read these pages, which helped me when I was first starting
:
Wikipedia can be kind of crazy, so if you need help, don't hesitate to ask. Check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
in a new section on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
« D. Trebbien ( talk) 20:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Are these the sorts of thing you had in mind when you asked about braces at the reference desk? If so, just click on "edit" and you'll see the TeX code. Michael Hardy ( talk) 16:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
(silly rabbit) Vieta's Formulas are an important omission in polynomials. As support, I cite MathWorld PolynomialRoots It would have been better instead of totally undoing [ my edit] to suggest a more suitable position and prominence in that article (e.g. [ also] or List of polynomial topics.
They are an important omission. We can discuss the appropriate level of prominence and best location. I see they are linked deep down on [ [1]] but I think most or all of the contents of that page should be directly promoted to Polynomial#See_also.
Let me know what you suggest.
Smcinerney ( talk) 01:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Smcinerney. Just a friendly note to let you know I've tagged Worldbench with {{notable}}, indicating that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability standards for inclusion. I'm on the fence about whether the subject possesses sufficient notability to warrant inclusion, but thought it worthwhile to open a dialog with you. Would you consider adding references that might support its notability? If you want to chat about this, just leave a note below and I'll see it. Regards & thanks, Jim Ward ( talk· stalk) 20:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!
Alpha Quadrant
talk
22:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/California 1999/SB400, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Smcinerney, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.
You might like to read these pages, which helped me when I was first starting
:
Wikipedia can be kind of crazy, so if you need help, don't hesitate to ask. Check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
in a new section on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
« D. Trebbien ( talk) 20:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Are these the sorts of thing you had in mind when you asked about braces at the reference desk? If so, just click on "edit" and you'll see the TeX code. Michael Hardy ( talk) 16:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
(silly rabbit) Vieta's Formulas are an important omission in polynomials. As support, I cite MathWorld PolynomialRoots It would have been better instead of totally undoing [ my edit] to suggest a more suitable position and prominence in that article (e.g. [ also] or List of polynomial topics.
They are an important omission. We can discuss the appropriate level of prominence and best location. I see they are linked deep down on [ [1]] but I think most or all of the contents of that page should be directly promoted to Polynomial#See_also.
Let me know what you suggest.
Smcinerney ( talk) 01:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Smcinerney. Just a friendly note to let you know I've tagged Worldbench with {{notable}}, indicating that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability standards for inclusion. I'm on the fence about whether the subject possesses sufficient notability to warrant inclusion, but thought it worthwhile to open a dialog with you. Would you consider adding references that might support its notability? If you want to chat about this, just leave a note below and I'll see it. Regards & thanks, Jim Ward ( talk· stalk) 20:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!
Alpha Quadrant
talk
22:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/California 1999/SB400, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)