This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

excuse me mate but the saints are pride of the south so please keep it this way many thanks Ralphisthegoat69 ( talk) 00:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Ralphisthegoat69 That may be the case, however please refrain from adding incorrect information. If you have a news article that states that “the saints are pride of the south“ then please cite that. -- Skingo12 ( talk) 00:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

well we clapped pompey 4 mil last year u neek Ralphisthegoat69 ( talk) 00:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

'Intrests' should be 'Interests', 'Refrences' should be 'References' I hope this helps. J850NK ( talk) 19:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar ( talk) 19:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

i love you!!! appreciate ya work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.94.150.42 ( talk) 11:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

In reference to the “criticisms of socialism” page, I justified the changes in the description. Kind Regards, Ford — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.81.112.59 ( talk) 11:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi 5.81.112.59, the reason I removed your edit the first time was because you didn't give any reason for the removal. I see that now you've done it again with a description. I'm not entirely sure about your edit summary so ill take another look later. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 11:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

	thank you for giving me advice
	thank you Dmpenugin ( talk) 18:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

You are most welcome and I welcome you to wikipedia! Skingo12 ( talk) 18:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Skingo12, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! DoebLoggs ( talk)

11:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

? Karan kathi ( talk) 16:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Karan kathi, is there something I can help you with? Skingo12 ( talk) 16:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Can you give me your social media id to talk with you about this? Karan kathi ( talk) 16:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry Karan kathi you will find that most editors on Wikipedia don’t want to give out any personal information, so I’m afraid that I don’t really want to discuss this off wiki. However if you like I can give you the talk page guide, or a link to discord or IRC (a sort of social media) that lots of editors use (including me) where you can get help? Skingo12 ( talk) 16:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

...thank you for your thank you! Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove the previous edit. It links to the Wikipedia page for the Astros scandal, which has many, many sources. I don't know how you could remove it for "lack of sources" when those sources are very clearly laid out. I am restoring it.

Hi 148.85.255.127 thanks for letting me know, I didn't see the wikilink there.  Self-trout. Cheers, Skingo12 ( talk) 18:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments on my recent edits. Here is the other point of view:

The original edits were all inserted by a single user AugustB1914 over a period of time. Here are some of the issues I have with them:

1. They are constantly disparaging. For instance the phrase "In 2016, Ford was ranked as one of the top ten most influential members of the European Parliament by Politico Europe, particularly for her work on digital policy" was replaced by "In 2016, Ford was ranked as one of the top ten most influential members of the European Parliament by Niche Media Outlet Politico Europe, particularly for her work on digital policy. This is clearly intended to undermine the opinion. Politico Europe according to its own Wikipedia entry is "European edition of the American news organization Politico reporting and supporting the European Union. Its headquarters are located in Brussels with additional offices in London, Berlin, Warsaw, Paris, and Frankfurt." You'd have to say the description of it as niche is at best an opinion

2. the latest addition includes the following phrasing: "During her tenure, which has coincided with the Covid-19 pandemic, the Department has found itself facing a number of political controversies, including the summer 2020 examinations volte-face; ; and the feeding of children, with Ms Ford voting against an opposition motion to provide food for poor children during the half-term holidays .. The latter case saw the Government back down in face of public outrage and campaigning by the Manchester United footballer Marcus Rashford."

This is actually just political propaganda. To take it bit by bit:

During her tenure, which has coincided with the Covid-19 pandemic, the Department has found itself facing a number of political controversies, including the summer 2020 examinations volte-face; the piecemeal provision of laptops to pupils without home technology..." -This is nothing to do with the subject, whose portfolio does not include examinations, curriculum or provision of laptops in schools

"and the feeding of children, with Ms Ford voting against an opposition motion to provide food for poor children during the half-term holidays." This references an opposition day debate. ." [In point of fact Mrs Ford was the first minister of any side to provide free school meals during the holidays, and local authorities had been given funding to provide support to poor families.]

Saying "Mrs ford voted against a motion to provide food for poor children during the half term holidays to prevent a million children going hungry is pure political propaganda. The Government always vote against opposition day motions. An explanation of why this is so can be found at for example https://politicsteaching.com/2020/09/11/do-opposition-days-in-parliament-really-matter/ . So it could say "As with all government ministers and all opposition day debates..."

But if you are going to include this vote why not how MPS vote on every single motion? All this is available through standard websites like theyworkforyou. It does not need to be duplicated in Wikipedia. It is not included in the wikipedia pages for the secretary of state in charge of the department or other ministers. It is purely there to try an discredit and embarrass the subject

"The issue managed to unite both those who saw it as evidence of the Conservatives spending tax-payers’ money poorly (£5 of produce costing the public purse £30), and those who questioned the morality of providing children with such miserly amounts of food. Ms Ford tweeted her dissatisfaction, [2] but not before Rashford and the celebrity chef and anti-food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe urged the Government to act." 'This is comment and opinion not fact'

Parliamentary Expenses: While I have no particular issue with these being included they are not a standard part of the Wikipedia pages on MPs, and again are freely available elsewhere. Mrs Ford's expenses are not high by comparison with other MPs, and again the only reason they are included is to score political points

To be honest I could rewrite the article correcting the errors and removing matters of opinion, but the real point is that this this is being repeatedly edited by someone (AugustB1914) with an axe to grind and there seems little point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrFixed ( talk • contribs) 17:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi MrFixed, having read your comment, I do believe that the article should be reworded to comply with WP:NPOV. However this is not really my area, so I will tag it. Feel free to reword sentences, or bring up removals on the talk page. I just reverted your removals as I didn’t think the your reason at the time was satisfactory and that there was a better way to improve it than just blanking it. Cheers, Skingo12 ( talk) 17:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Skingo12. Thanks for the comment. I noticed that the page in Seattle Film Critics Society was too long than the other film critics awards so I decided to separate it to the other categories and ceremonies to do the same. For example, in Washington D.C. Area Film Critics Association, they have shorten the page so it won't worry about scrolling down as what you will find the awards you put at. Tell me I didn't do any wrong because I help to migrated into separate pages, you can leave me a message here. Thank you! — Preceding undated comment added 10:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Skingo12. I just wanted to say a quick thank you for changing my edit. I promise I won’t change it again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.242.22 ( talk) 10:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ip user. I'm glad to hear it! The reason I reverted your edit was that it is usually not policy to include age rating in the plot. I really hope you keep editing and I encourage you to make any changes you think necessary (that follow policy) to that page. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 10:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

No, not a test. Actor's name was Peter Sellers, not Peter Seller - hence Peter Sellers' character... You reinstate or shall I? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.65.226.51 ( talk) 08:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh sorry,  Self-trout. You can reinstate it if you want. Apologies. Skingo12 ( talk) 09:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Will do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.65.226.51 ( talk) 09:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi I want to say that ...some people creat page like (gopa ) they give very wrong information. In yadav community gop gwal gopal is same as they are synonym to each other...but in this page the writer pretending that only some community gorta like krisnut majrot are only gop .and the gwala are servant..but reality is than goalla caste divided into six clan this above two community outcome from goalla as per bihar gazeteers government.....actually gop _gopal gwal gwala ahir yadav all are synonym in Indian hindi belt Yaduvanshireal ( talk) 11:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Yaduvanshireal I am not quite sure what you mean. If I reverted your change it was probably because I didn’t think you gave a good enough reason. If you think that the information is false then please add sources on the article talk page. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 13:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

It's not explicitly stated in WP:SALT but generally it's only at the fourth deletion that pages get salted. In the case of Mohittandonchicago1, he's now blocked so unlikely to recreate the page. Hope that helps, Cabayi ( talk) 13:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cabayi, thanks for that and yes that does help. Cheers, Skingo12 ( talk) 13:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

"Neutral tone" was exactly what I was aiming for when I changed it. "Murder" is an unlawful premeditated killing, and it could be argued that the Cayuse were acting in self-defense. Using the word "murder" is a very white/euro-centric evaluation of the situation. Whether or not the killing of the Whitmans was justified depends entirely on your point of view. If Indians moved to London, and began building homes on British peoples' land, stealing their food, spreading deadly diseases, lying and breaking agreements, and then poisoning people, I guarantee the British would've done the same thing. "Vengeful killing" is MUCH more neutral, and therefore more appropriate for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C1:C280:9260:0:0:0:E386 ( talk) 22:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi E386, ive had a look at the edit and would "retaliatory killing" be acceptable? Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 23:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, why do you keep removing changes I make on page of Nebojsa Stefanovic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimaster2242 ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Wikimaster2242, as I explained on your talk page I removed your edit as you didn’t explain why you removed the content. Next time if you inclue a reason in the edit summary no one will revert it. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 15:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I wanted to put a new image and change marital status, it says he is married, but he's been divorced since 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimaster2242 ( talk • contribs) 15:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Wikimaster2242 that would be fine and very helpful actually, I’m sorry if you thought my reversion was unfair but just inclue a description saying you intend to replace it and then anyone patrolling won’t revert it. Cheers, Skingo12 ( talk) 15:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Okay, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimaster2242 ( talk • contribs) 15:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

No problem Wikimaster2242! Happy editing! :) Skingo12 ( talk) 15:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Good afternoon! Skingo12, I read information about Dmitry Soin on various sources, there is no such information anywhere, everything that is indicated in the author's book, his fantasies. It is possible to edit the sentence about 1994, I read that the case was created specifically, but it is not related to the murder, you can not write about a person so sharply, for everyone to see. Please replace the quote from the book

Please see my above response. If you want the information removed then please reach consensus on the talk page. Skingo12 ( talk) 12:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Добрый день! Дмитрий Соин просит изменить информацию о нем, не соответствующей действительности: В 1994 году Молдовы возбудили уголовное дело в убийстве против Соина, который убил жителя Тирасполя из служебного оружия в заявленном акте самообороны. Соин был объявлен Интерполом в международный розыск в 2004 году. Эта информация, которая порочит честь и достоинство личности, предлагаю заменить ее на: В 1993–2007 годах работал в органах госбезопасности Приднестровья, последняя должность начальник Управления защиты Конституции. В 2004 году объявлен властями Молдовы в международный розыск по сфабрикованному уголовному делу.

Как это сделать? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Сергей Пи ( talk • contribs) 16:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

English:

Hi Сергей Пи, sorry it took so long to get back to you. I don’t think that this information needs or should be changed. Please also read WP:NPOV and WP:COI. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 00:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

русский язык:

Привет, Сергей Пи, извини, что так долго не отвечал тебе. Я не думаю, что эту информацию нужно или нужно менять. Также прочтите WP: NPOV и WP: COI. Спасибо, Skingo12 ( talk) 00:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey i removed the sections, because i was trying to make it look more in accordance with other academics wikipedia pages. If i explain this next time is that alright? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.184.80 ( talk) 15:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi {u:70.72.184.80}, Yes of course, no problem just explain next time! :) Cheers, Skingo12 ( talk) 15:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

It says ie vandalised on McShane’s page just then when I didn’t it’s true how is it vandalism? Sroba23 ( talk) 23:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sroba23, describing someone as “literal god” is not neutral and doing it repeatedly after being asked to stop indicates bad faith. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 23:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 21:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I apologize for not explaining why I removed certain parts from Ivan Duque´s page, I wasn´t aware that they had to be justified. If you follow the sourced material that I removed, however, you will notice that the information in the page was presented in a biased manner and most of the sources lead to tabloid journalism (most of the accusations are speculative). The whole Ivan Duque article is structured as a subtle attack to this man, it doesn´t even include the positive aspects of his administration (which are plenty). If you would be so kind as to remove the parts you restored, I promise I´ll get working on including some factual and unbiased information that will make the article look less despicable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.145.219.15 ( talk) 14:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Thats no problem, any contributions at all are always appreciated! Just make sure you follow policy :-) Skingo12 ( talk) 00:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Sir, can you create a section regarding this? Reason- The film appear in the List of highest-grossing horror films and also in a section named highest grossing horror film 2020 of the same article. Can you help me regarding this ? I will be thankful if you could help? いちか かすが ( talk) 12:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, and so sorry for the delayed response. I would love to help you, however I dont really have a lot of experience in that area, so there are probably better qualified people to help you. Best wishes, Skingo12 ( talk) 00:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

the f35 is an american fighter but the the be variant is an anglo american project that is not stated at all on the page can u check the b variant facts , thank you-- SmartboiUK ( talk) 17:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

shall i write about china camps SmartlilMan ( talk) 10:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I assume its the same user as before so please see my response above. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 22:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Can you please share a comment in the talk page of Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba the Movie: Mugen Train regarding the proposed new sections in the article. Your comment is necessary for the success of the discussion. いちか かすが ( talk) 13:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

skingo12 shall i create a page dedicated to concentration camps in china — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indiaindia123 ( talk • contribs) 10:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Sure, if you think you're ready go ahead and make a draft! Just make sure you've read the appropriate guidelines first. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 22:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your kind response. Have a wonderful day. いちか かすが ( talk) 13:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Can we be good friends ? いちか かすが ( talk) 13:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ichika Kasuga, of course! I hope to see you around! If you ever need anything, I'm always happy to help! Skingo12 ( talk) 23:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Skingo12. I’m not sure of the policys of editing. Could you maybe post them? Don’t worry, I’ll continue editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.242.22 ( talk) 11:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I’ve left a list of links on your talk page. Please don’t hesitate to ask me or any other editor for help! :-) Skingo12 ( talk) 11:37, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Sir, I would like your opinion in conversion of revenue the anime film as per the subject in the film Demon Slayer Mugen Train. PLease share your thoughts as soon as possible to initiate the plan for better article in the talk page /info/en/?search=Talk:Demon_Slayer:_Kimetsu_no_Yaiba_the_Movie:_Mugen_Train Ichika Kasuga 6:24 Tuesday, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

I am sorry I was researching for a project and on my screen, the North Korea section was removed so I re-added it (probably in the wrong spot) and I was attempting to fix it, thank you for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prestige.Spooky ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Prestige.Spooky, no problem! Most of the time content removals are a good faith accident. That’s why it’s always helpful to leave an edit summary. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 23:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

You removed the edit I made where Scripture in Song is referred to as being an Australian company. That is inaccurate. It is a New Zealand company established by David & Dale Garratt. You can add back the link should you choose. I was simply trying to correct the error, and thought the link would be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.62.255 ( talk) 17:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, firstly thanks for engaging and not just adding it again. Secondly, I’m afraid that even if it was helpful it breached our external links policy. If you like you can re read the guidance and add it in the appropriate place? Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 17:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I deleted some content because I'm trying to get the page to a better quality content page. What I removed was what I thought to be less encyclopedic. The page is listed as a "Start" and I would like to make the page better.

I would really like some help going over the page and get feedback on what needs to be changed. Can you help with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justin30995 ( talk • contribs) 18:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Justin30995 I will be happy to help you, just give me a day or two. Thanks, Skingo12 ( talk) 23:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Looking forward to it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justin3099 ( talk • contribs)

What references should i use that would be considered notable? She has a lot that has been written about her and quoted that are independent, reliable, published sources.

Happy birthday! Hi Skingo12! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:59, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, Skingo12! -- Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:17, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, Skingo12.

Polly. Polly Kiersten ( talk) 14:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, Skngo12.

Polly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polly Kiersten ( talk • contribs) 09:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Skingo12,

I'm not sure if I should be asking you this, but I'm looking for a mentor to help me finalise my Preston Likely page. I've looked at the mentor links, but I cannot find a way of contacting any of the mentors.

Thanks, Polly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polly Kiersten ( talk • contribs) 10:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Polly Kiersten, unfortunately that's not really my area. However, here is the list of adopters: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee%27s_Area/Adopters . Good luck! Skingo12 ( talk) 13:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, my friend. I should have stated why I changed 'program' to 'programme'.

Because the Red Guitars are an English band, I thought it would have been more consistent to use the British English spelling 'programme', as the word 'program' to most British people, means a computer operation or application.

I hope that makes sense.

Thank you for responding so quickly.

Polly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polly Kiersten ( talk • contribs) 17:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Polly Kiersten, no problem: all is clear now. Just remember to use summaries! Skingo12 ( talk) 22:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello,

This is Dr. Lynnae Quick. I'm editing my wikipedia page at the moment and will be sure to add in appropriate references later. I was in fact, greatly influenced by Dr. Benita Bell and would prefer that that information not be edited out or erased.

Thank you! Lynnae C Quick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.172.62.228 ( talk) 21:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, you may wish to read WP:COI. I completely understand that it was in good faith and encourage you to continue editing as long as it's compliant with policy. Skingo12 ( talk) 22:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

I've removed the more citations needed template from Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse - there are 201 refs and no mention in the talk page about any statements requiring additional citations. Please comment there if there are unreferenced statements. Newystats ( talk) 23:09, 30 April 2023 (UTC)