Hello, Sisodia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes at some point, here is what Wikipedia is not, which might help you out. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing! M y s e k u r i t y 05:34, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rajput has been accepted. Please place evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rajput/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be placed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rajput/Workshop. Fred Bauder 01:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
A final decision has been reached in this case and it has been closed.
For the arbitration committee. -- Tony Sidaway 21:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Somehow you are created a bunch new articles when you are intending to participate on talk pages. You created the article Talk:Talk talk:Scindia among others. Bige1977 07:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your vote on my RfA. Unfortunately there was no consensus reached at 43 support, 18 oppose and 8 neutral. I've just found out that there is a feature in "my preferences" that forces me to use edit summaries. I've now got it enabled :) Thanks again. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 15:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Sisodia
Thanks for your kind words and support of the article - Martyrdom of Guru Tegh Bahadar. It's great when historic events of this nature can be shared with the rest of the world. I'm also sorry to hear about the Rajput article. I don't think it is a religious divide - I put it down to fanatic people generally.
You look after yourself and keep your spirit HIGH – Remain in Chardikala!!! -- Hari Singh 11:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi , I am WIN and thanks for your support.My opposers are telling that I was banned for 20 hours. But the administator himself/herself says that he/she don't know about this topic.It was done because 3 persons have made gang to oppose me and delete my any writings. They are deleting from talk pages and same is done in main article which is written based on their POV. WIN 07:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk pages are not for general discussion or debate about whether a given theory is right or wrong, that violates WP:NOR. They are for deciding how the article can better reflect outside scholarly opinion--and since many scholars do support the Indo-Aryan migration theory theory, the editors can't just delete all arguments in favour from the article no matter how much WIN or others desire. If you have anything to contribute, from formal research and from formal publications (too many Wikipedia articles are derived from amateur websites), please add it to the article and source it. Trying to use the Talk page as a chat room and deciding the truth of the issue oneself isn't how things are supposed to work. Haven't you noticed that WIN never edits the article, he just goes on and on on the Talk page? It's for that that he is held in low esteem, not because of his viewpoints on Indian history. CRCulver 02:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
If "patriotic Indians" for you are those who hold a conservative Hindu viewpoint, do you then say that non-Hindus are not patriotic Indians? My biggest objection to the category you are supporting is that you seem to suggest that millions of your compatriots are traitors just because they don't agree with you. CRCulver 00:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
to in coming days. All I am really attempting here is create a forum for all like minded editors where they can discuss stuff of common interest freely. thats all. What is so hair-raising about maintaining a simple list of articles and editors. Think dispassionately and you will realize that this really is a harmless idea.
I've responded to your suggestions on the deletion page, but as I say, I'm not offended, but humoured. Blnguyen | rant-line 01:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm setting up this project as a child project of Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias in religion. Will you be a part of this? -- Babub→ Talk 11:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw your edits in the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Dbachmann. I was just wondering if more appropriate place for your comments might be in section Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Dbachmann#Outside_view. Since you were not directly involved in the current dispute, but you had a similar dispute earlier, more appropriate place would be Outside view. You can quote all the evidence there. I am still trying to work mediation with Dab, but he is not cooperating. Thanks. Sbhushan 21:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding. I am also trying to keep the issue focused. I believe they will be stonger in Outside view, as that shows the issue/problem is widespread. I would prefer if you could move the comments. Sbhushan 21:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you have any image/painting of Nagabhatta Pratihara for the Battle of Rajasthan page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarkar2 ( talk • contribs) 22:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC).
Please have a look here: [1]-- Scheibenzahl 21:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Regarding a complaint here: [2] I request two things:
Since you commented on the afd, it has been re-Afd'd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindutva pseudoscience (2nd nomination). Baka man 19:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Any info/pics of the Khanda?
The Indian Military History page on Khanda only talks about the Sikhs...but its use goes back to a more ancient period.
Please add info about Rajputs, Marathas, etc using the Khanda and any pictures if you can obtain them from Rajasthan. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarkar2 ( talk • contribs) 22:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for uploading Image:Khanda-sword.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Sisodia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes at some point, here is what Wikipedia is not, which might help you out. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Happy editing! M y s e k u r i t y 05:34, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rajput has been accepted. Please place evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rajput/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be placed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rajput/Workshop. Fred Bauder 01:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
A final decision has been reached in this case and it has been closed.
For the arbitration committee. -- Tony Sidaway 21:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Somehow you are created a bunch new articles when you are intending to participate on talk pages. You created the article Talk:Talk talk:Scindia among others. Bige1977 07:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your vote on my RfA. Unfortunately there was no consensus reached at 43 support, 18 oppose and 8 neutral. I've just found out that there is a feature in "my preferences" that forces me to use edit summaries. I've now got it enabled :) Thanks again. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 15:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Sisodia
Thanks for your kind words and support of the article - Martyrdom of Guru Tegh Bahadar. It's great when historic events of this nature can be shared with the rest of the world. I'm also sorry to hear about the Rajput article. I don't think it is a religious divide - I put it down to fanatic people generally.
You look after yourself and keep your spirit HIGH – Remain in Chardikala!!! -- Hari Singh 11:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi , I am WIN and thanks for your support.My opposers are telling that I was banned for 20 hours. But the administator himself/herself says that he/she don't know about this topic.It was done because 3 persons have made gang to oppose me and delete my any writings. They are deleting from talk pages and same is done in main article which is written based on their POV. WIN 07:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk pages are not for general discussion or debate about whether a given theory is right or wrong, that violates WP:NOR. They are for deciding how the article can better reflect outside scholarly opinion--and since many scholars do support the Indo-Aryan migration theory theory, the editors can't just delete all arguments in favour from the article no matter how much WIN or others desire. If you have anything to contribute, from formal research and from formal publications (too many Wikipedia articles are derived from amateur websites), please add it to the article and source it. Trying to use the Talk page as a chat room and deciding the truth of the issue oneself isn't how things are supposed to work. Haven't you noticed that WIN never edits the article, he just goes on and on on the Talk page? It's for that that he is held in low esteem, not because of his viewpoints on Indian history. CRCulver 02:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
If "patriotic Indians" for you are those who hold a conservative Hindu viewpoint, do you then say that non-Hindus are not patriotic Indians? My biggest objection to the category you are supporting is that you seem to suggest that millions of your compatriots are traitors just because they don't agree with you. CRCulver 00:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
to in coming days. All I am really attempting here is create a forum for all like minded editors where they can discuss stuff of common interest freely. thats all. What is so hair-raising about maintaining a simple list of articles and editors. Think dispassionately and you will realize that this really is a harmless idea.
I've responded to your suggestions on the deletion page, but as I say, I'm not offended, but humoured. Blnguyen | rant-line 01:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm setting up this project as a child project of Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias in religion. Will you be a part of this? -- Babub→ Talk 11:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw your edits in the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Dbachmann. I was just wondering if more appropriate place for your comments might be in section Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Dbachmann#Outside_view. Since you were not directly involved in the current dispute, but you had a similar dispute earlier, more appropriate place would be Outside view. You can quote all the evidence there. I am still trying to work mediation with Dab, but he is not cooperating. Thanks. Sbhushan 21:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding. I am also trying to keep the issue focused. I believe they will be stonger in Outside view, as that shows the issue/problem is widespread. I would prefer if you could move the comments. Sbhushan 21:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you have any image/painting of Nagabhatta Pratihara for the Battle of Rajasthan page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarkar2 ( talk • contribs) 22:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC).
Please have a look here: [1]-- Scheibenzahl 21:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Regarding a complaint here: [2] I request two things:
Since you commented on the afd, it has been re-Afd'd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindutva pseudoscience (2nd nomination). Baka man 19:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Any info/pics of the Khanda?
The Indian Military History page on Khanda only talks about the Sikhs...but its use goes back to a more ancient period.
Please add info about Rajputs, Marathas, etc using the Khanda and any pictures if you can obtain them from Rajasthan. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarkar2 ( talk • contribs) 22:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for uploading Image:Khanda-sword.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)