![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk) 18:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC) |
@ Bbb23 I notice you blocked my account for "multiple account abuse". This is my first and only account here and if there is an objective way of verifying it it will be verified. I would like it done quickly. If you don't like the way I contribute to Wikipedia it's a different problem we can discuss. Thank you. Sira Aspera ( talk) 19:31, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Sira Aspera ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I notice blocked my account for "multiple account abuse". This is my first and only account here and if there is an objective way of verifying it it will be verified. I would like it done quickly. Thank you. Sira Aspera ( talk) 19:38, 20 August 2022 (UTC) Sira Aspera ( talk) 19:38, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Either you are using multiple accounts, or this is meat puppetry. Either way, the result is the same. 331dot ( talk) 21:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sira Aspera ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for account abuse. In particular, as a sock of MuhammetFurkan1. This is simply not true. I have a single account, this one, and I contribute on wikis in multiple languages, but this is not a crime. I pointed this out, inviting you to verify it objectively, and I was told, quite rudely, that if this was the case then I was acting as a different natural person but in league with the first account. All without proof, because being the false accusation there cannot be any, except that we both have an interest in Ottoman history. The only possible indirect contact with this account is having reverted some unsuitable changes and the latest version that seemed ok to me was his. I suspect that I simply made some changes that I didn't like and it was decided to freeze completely, not to mention the specific problem even though I had offered to do so. Apparently, the reason for the block is that I made a couple of edits on Turkish wikipedia, where the pages on the Ottoman dynasty are in a bad state and full of bogus information, as anyone with knowledge on the subject can confirm, and a touchy user decided that instead of talking to me he had to report me for "account abuse" and "vandalism", leave me without the possibility of defending myself and let me also be targeted by en wiki, that blocked me without asking for any proof or anything but on principle. All without proof, verify or without warning for heard my version. Honestly, I am very disappointed that I was not only falsely accused, but also nearly unable to defend myself although apparently the burden of proof lies with me, accused of absurd things and conspiracies and cut off simply because two editors were interested in the same subject. Sira Aspera ( talk) 11:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Accept reason:
@ Bbb23 Thank you. I'm happy this inconvenience is end. Is it possible to get the unlock also on wiki tr? I don't really care as en wiki, but it bothers me that I got blocked for a fake reason by a segnalation by random user who didn't like my contributions. Sira Aspera ( talk) 20:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Sira Aspera. Thank you for your work on Laura Orsini. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:33, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
All sources clearly confirm that Şivekar Sultan and Şekerpare Hatun were the same person! Take a look at Turkish Wikipedia. Why do you say otherwise? IgnacyPL ( talk) 14:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
What evidence do you have that Şivekar Sultan and Şekerpare Hatun were not the same person? IgnacyPL ( talk) 07:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk) 18:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC) |
@ Bbb23 I notice you blocked my account for "multiple account abuse". This is my first and only account here and if there is an objective way of verifying it it will be verified. I would like it done quickly. If you don't like the way I contribute to Wikipedia it's a different problem we can discuss. Thank you. Sira Aspera ( talk) 19:31, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Sira Aspera ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I notice blocked my account for "multiple account abuse". This is my first and only account here and if there is an objective way of verifying it it will be verified. I would like it done quickly. Thank you. Sira Aspera ( talk) 19:38, 20 August 2022 (UTC) Sira Aspera ( talk) 19:38, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Either you are using multiple accounts, or this is meat puppetry. Either way, the result is the same. 331dot ( talk) 21:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sira Aspera ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for account abuse. In particular, as a sock of MuhammetFurkan1. This is simply not true. I have a single account, this one, and I contribute on wikis in multiple languages, but this is not a crime. I pointed this out, inviting you to verify it objectively, and I was told, quite rudely, that if this was the case then I was acting as a different natural person but in league with the first account. All without proof, because being the false accusation there cannot be any, except that we both have an interest in Ottoman history. The only possible indirect contact with this account is having reverted some unsuitable changes and the latest version that seemed ok to me was his. I suspect that I simply made some changes that I didn't like and it was decided to freeze completely, not to mention the specific problem even though I had offered to do so. Apparently, the reason for the block is that I made a couple of edits on Turkish wikipedia, where the pages on the Ottoman dynasty are in a bad state and full of bogus information, as anyone with knowledge on the subject can confirm, and a touchy user decided that instead of talking to me he had to report me for "account abuse" and "vandalism", leave me without the possibility of defending myself and let me also be targeted by en wiki, that blocked me without asking for any proof or anything but on principle. All without proof, verify or without warning for heard my version. Honestly, I am very disappointed that I was not only falsely accused, but also nearly unable to defend myself although apparently the burden of proof lies with me, accused of absurd things and conspiracies and cut off simply because two editors were interested in the same subject. Sira Aspera ( talk) 11:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Accept reason:
@ Bbb23 Thank you. I'm happy this inconvenience is end. Is it possible to get the unlock also on wiki tr? I don't really care as en wiki, but it bothers me that I got blocked for a fake reason by a segnalation by random user who didn't like my contributions. Sira Aspera ( talk) 20:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Sira Aspera. Thank you for your work on Laura Orsini. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:33, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
All sources clearly confirm that Şivekar Sultan and Şekerpare Hatun were the same person! Take a look at Turkish Wikipedia. Why do you say otherwise? IgnacyPL ( talk) 14:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
What evidence do you have that Şivekar Sultan and Şekerpare Hatun were not the same person? IgnacyPL ( talk) 07:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)