|
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - theWOLFchild 20:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Regarding your posts to User 7&6-thirteen's talk page, (and your edits in general), you are correct in that articles about sporting goods companies should not just be "corporate propaganda". Another thing they are not however, nor is Wikipedia in general, is a soapbox for an anti-gun crusade. Incidents regarding firearms, such as mass-shootings, are documented in the appropriate articles. Articles about notable corporations are about just that, the corporation. Some of those articles do note related controversies where appropriate, but only as long as the article maintains a neutral balance. This is an encyclopaedia. Please keep that in mind, if you choose to continue editing here, and please stop your disruptive editing and edit-warring on pages such as American Outdoor Brands Corporation and Smith & Wesson. Thank you - theWOLFchild 20:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
{ posted to my (thewolfchild's) talk page for some reaon): This user claimed I was disruptive for wanting to include information about the use of a corporation's products on that corporations pages, and for wanting to explain why a coporation rebranded itself. Language used was non-inflamatory. Facts were provided and cited. I am not a wikipedia insider, so forgive me if I don't follow all of the conventions here. Take care!
-sipos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sipos111 ( talk • contribs) 15:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Maybe I should ALSO be putting these comments in those places, but here I was directly responding to your comments."
FWIW, I find your characterization of my edits to be interesting. One man's "anti-gun crusade" is another's reasonable inclusion of relevant facts."
Meanwhile kids are dying and users are exploiting wikipedia's systems to prevent those deaths from being associated with a major cause of those deaths."
Sadly, I truly don't have time to learn my way around."
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Sipos111_for_WP:NOTHERE_and_WP:OUTING_myself_and_Niteshift36 Springee ( talk) 22:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
17 February 2018 (UTC)
I would only add by saying take heed of what was said here, and to join the talk page conversation here Douglas High School shooting.- 72bikers ( talk) 01:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
|
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - theWOLFchild 20:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Regarding your posts to User 7&6-thirteen's talk page, (and your edits in general), you are correct in that articles about sporting goods companies should not just be "corporate propaganda". Another thing they are not however, nor is Wikipedia in general, is a soapbox for an anti-gun crusade. Incidents regarding firearms, such as mass-shootings, are documented in the appropriate articles. Articles about notable corporations are about just that, the corporation. Some of those articles do note related controversies where appropriate, but only as long as the article maintains a neutral balance. This is an encyclopaedia. Please keep that in mind, if you choose to continue editing here, and please stop your disruptive editing and edit-warring on pages such as American Outdoor Brands Corporation and Smith & Wesson. Thank you - theWOLFchild 20:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
{ posted to my (thewolfchild's) talk page for some reaon): This user claimed I was disruptive for wanting to include information about the use of a corporation's products on that corporations pages, and for wanting to explain why a coporation rebranded itself. Language used was non-inflamatory. Facts were provided and cited. I am not a wikipedia insider, so forgive me if I don't follow all of the conventions here. Take care!
-sipos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sipos111 ( talk • contribs) 15:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Maybe I should ALSO be putting these comments in those places, but here I was directly responding to your comments."
FWIW, I find your characterization of my edits to be interesting. One man's "anti-gun crusade" is another's reasonable inclusion of relevant facts."
Meanwhile kids are dying and users are exploiting wikipedia's systems to prevent those deaths from being associated with a major cause of those deaths."
Sadly, I truly don't have time to learn my way around."
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Sipos111_for_WP:NOTHERE_and_WP:OUTING_myself_and_Niteshift36 Springee ( talk) 22:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
17 February 2018 (UTC)
I would only add by saying take heed of what was said here, and to join the talk page conversation here Douglas High School shooting.- 72bikers ( talk) 01:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.