![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
So what is this {{ db-fpcfail-notice}} that you used five times on User talk:FloridaFinest? — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 05:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
I wanted to block User:EasyIME, but accidentally blocked you instead; I've immediately reversed my action, explaining I had made a mistake. I'm extremely sorry I soiled your block log; please, accept my most sincere apology. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Your proposed speedy deletion of Archiving Talk Center of Gravity. I intended to archive prior discussion. If that was no properly done by me, then I would not object to it being corrected. If an article now appears improperly in the Article Namespace, I do not object to its summary deletion. In fact, thanks for catching the error. GenKnowitall ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC).
{{db-g7}}
at the top of the article.
Singularity42 (
talk)
17:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
You are welcome, and thanks for the acknowledgment! Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt ( talk) 02:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for catching my mistake! You are quite right: RHsimard/fribble was indeed experimenting, and supposed to be in my user namespace. I'll have to watch out for that in the future.
Rhsimard ( talk) 00:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Why did you set a speedy deletion on this article?? I was not ready yet. You could set a Temp on it instead a will create a new one, just you know, and answer the talk next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napule ( talk • contribs) 16:19, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Reason there is no information on our site is because we were hacked and it was all deleted. I am rebuilding it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starburst1 ( talk • contribs) 20:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Not questioning your judgement, I am not quite sure I understand the process or why it was deleted. So was it because it had a lack of information on? Can you advise me what is needed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starburst1 ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
I just used it. And I really don't care if it has a user's username. Or if it's misleading. Other people use diferrent ones. Why can't I? The Chosen ONE ( talk) 15:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate all that people like you do for Wikipedia. As you can tell I'm sure, I am new to this milieu.
I am, however, not new to the concept of diversity consciousness. As you recommended it for deletion, you remarked that it is found on the Internet only as a book. This term is used in academia and diversity circles irrespective of the book. Some examples follow. These examples are from the world of business, academia, blogs, a textbook and general interest pages to show you the variety of places the term is used.
I posted these links here: http://diversityconsciousness.com/divconlinks.html
I wanted to post this on the discussion of whether or not the term should be deleted, but try as I a may, I simply could not figure out how.
Thank you for your consideration, Bucherpa ( talk) 17:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Pat Bucher
*
(which creates a bullet point), followed by the word Keep (just that one word in bold), followed by why you believe the article should not be deleted (i.e. "the neologism is notable, and here are references demonstrating that...).Thank you for your helpfulness!
Bucherpa ( talk) 20:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Pat Bucher
Hello Singularity42, I see that archiving appears to be working again however I'm not fully sure which one of two things that I did yesterday got it working again. It was either the collapsed thread interfering or the size adjustment allowing more threads to be archived. If it is the latter then I'm not sure we are out of the woods yet. It may cap out when it reaches 125K. I would suggest setting the time from 31 days to 14 days to get more threads to archive even if it is only for a temporary time period...I'd like to see the bot create the 2nd archive page to be sure everything is okay. Then you could re-adjust the timing to suit. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕))
18:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Singularity42, I just came to say that Dlkrabs has made vandilism on the SpongeBob's Greatest Hits page. I reverted the edit and I'm going to see if he's vandilized any other pages. Keep your eyes peeled! Thanks!
Easy4me ( talk) 15:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
He has also vandalized on The Black Eyed Peas page before. Still checking. Thanks!
Easy4me ( talk) 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
The speedy tag you reasonably enough placed on the article was removed by an i.p.editor. I've sent it to AfD. DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
singularity42- i can assuer you that this page does not attack anybody. this book is a real story in which all my friends love. i created this page to greaten the knowledge of the wikipedia system. this page is also to warn guardians of the dagers of the playground and does not mean to offend sincerly- septer231 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Septer231 ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Singularity 42. Is there no end of trouble I have incurred by writing about the pentagram map?!? In the course of the past 24 hours, I have been accused of vandalism by several editors, and my work has been reverted several times. Quite a bit of my time was wasted. (Those editors have now apologized). I thought that, finally, I could rest easy knowing that I had done a good service with this article. It seems that I am having yet another misunderstanding with a wiki editor.
Let me explain the situation. I am a research mathematician -- see Richard Schwartz -- and the originator of the subject of the pentagram map wiki. I am widely recognized as one of the world authorities about this small topic in mathematics. For some time, my colleagues and I have known that the nascent pentagram map wiki page was both sketchy and inaccurate. We finally agreed that an authority needed to clean up the article, making it accurate, up-to-date, and carefully referenced.
Owing to the nature of the topic, a specialized piece of mathematics, it is unlikely that a person uninvolved in the research could write about it in a competent way. While I cannot hope to be completely neutral about the subject, I have tried my best to be fair and accurate in my citations, in my account of the history, and in my weighting of the importance of the various contributions. Indeed, I have been a professional mathematician for more than 20 years, and I am used to writing about topics both fairly and authoritatively. Moreover, I have shared the wiki page with various of my colleagues, and they all seem quite happy with it.
You should know that I consider the editing of a wiki page about mathematics to be an extension of my scholarly work. I aim to apply the same standards of scholarship and fairness to this endeavor that I would apply to my usual article-writing. Please take this into account before reverting the edits I made. I would be quite disappointed, and (after having so much trouble) I would appeal to whatever governing body necessary in order to have a fair hearing and to reinstate the work.
My experience with wiki editors so far has been mostly disappointing, and you message has added to this. If I didn't love wikipedia and think that it was a fabulous internet resource, I would simply wash my hands of it and walk away in disgust. As it is, I hope that I can learn how to edit these pages without raising so many red flags.
Best, RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 00:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
A
request for comment has been filed concerning the username of
I Jethrobot (
talk ·
contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion
here.
I Jethrobot (
talk)
04:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Give me a reason why my page has been deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarzParty42 ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Mr. Singularity42...Would any of these Google hits on this page be sufficient proof you require?
http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Starship+Ajax%22&num=50
Robert Simmons100 Robert Simmons100 ( talk) 02:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
I got your notice, but am trouble finding the discussion in progress. Please help. New here.
Robert Simmons100 Robert Simmons100 ( talk) 02:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Is this the area where I reply in the edit field? New concept of editing a window for a ongoing discussion.
Robert Simmons100 Robert Simmons100 ( talk) 02:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep.'''
followed by your comments on the same line. Make sure to sign off with ~~~
(you do not have to manually type your name at the end of your comments).
Singularity42 (
talk)
03:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Thanks! I've copy/pasted it to where it needed to be.
Singularity42 (
talk)
12:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
|
---|
DiscussionDiscussion about the issues listed above take place here. Remember to keep discussions calm, brief, and focused on the issues at hand. Resolution |
-- Versa geek 05:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Would it matter? the page has been deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarzParty42 ( talk • contribs) 19:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Singularity42. I am just letting you know that I deleted Delta Eta Iota, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 00:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
I received a notice about the above in regards to a draft article I'm working on. This is on behalf of my company for the production I am responsible which is copyrighted. I have permission to create this article, and currently only intended to keep it in draft form for my marketing and legal department to review.
Can you please advise how I can proceed?
NilsSorenson ( talk) 20:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
hi... i initially created a page under the "composer" category but was told it did not meet the criteria to qualify. i would like to try and re submit the page under the category of "musician" as i have read the requirements and find that my subject would be perfectly suited for it... i just don't have a clue as to where to begin! any advice would be greatly appreciated! thank-you! ( Mouser Hyde ( talk) 22:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)).
if you do not feel the individual meets the requirements then i won't push it… thanks, i appreciate you looking! ( Mouser Hyde ( talk) 00:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC))
Hello Singularity42. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Church of the Messiah (Ottawa), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
I've added a comment - a clerk or CU can close the case now. If any other accounts pop up, report them. Keep up the good work! Cheers, m.o.p 02:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Any discussion on AfD should be on that AfD page, you make a valid point. Yet I think follow wikipedia protocol is a valid discussion for the user Mtking.
There is a pattern in Mtking's wikipedia usage of making multiple deletion requests in a short period of time. Some of those are reasonable. Some are not.
I hope that through a discussion on the user page, Mtking can learn a bit more about wikipedia policy in order to use better discretion in the future. you will notice that I did not delete the tag, yet Mtking did delete an AfD tag today at
Casino Madrid a page that was created by Mtking (and has since been deleted).
Brad Wilkins (
talk)
03:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've created a page for Soapbox, a portuguese band, and it was deleted. I understand that you want to protect wikipedia from garage band without notability, but this particular band is getting big in portugal - they already went to tv channels (for their videoclip) and to the radio. Now, they released their first EP, but without the support of a record company. I hope you could allow me to publish this page on wikipedia, because it's a great place to find information about them (biography, discography, videos, etc).
Here you have some links to support my argumentation: www.myspace.com/bandsoapbox http://www.discogs.com/artist/Soapbox+%283%29 http://blitz.aeiou.pt/gen.pl?p=artistas&op=detalhe&fokey=bz.bands/3390 http://www.espalhafactos.com/2011/06/07/soapboxing-a-musica-nacional/ http://sic.sapo.pt/sicradical/programas/curto-circuito/videos?videoId={3573102E-2C8D-4692-B795-D40B872341DF} http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=327Mh0HqW3k http://whosplayingatmyhouse.blogspot.com/2011/06/soapbox-daylight-dont-come-too-soon.html
Best regards, Spring Manta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Springmanta ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I checked the criterion for the notability and:
-the band won a big music competition in 2009, having played before Peter, Bjorn and John, Nouvelle Vague and Depeche Mode.
I find the deletion strange because I was updating the information step by step and I had no time to insert all the details. I hope you can repost the article so than I can update all the info and translate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Springmanta ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
Fine, it was invented 24 hours ago! (Your seconding of my prod gave me a good chuckle :) ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb 22:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
I would like to know my page "The Unknown One" was removed. Was it because i had no references? Nothing was innapropiate about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanx51 ( talk • contribs) 01:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
The band conforms with WP:BAND: Has won or placed in a major music competition. This band was in the semi-finals of the Dutch National band contest as the only one in its genre, representing the entire genre for that year in the category Rock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michielvv ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Well you could of at least bothered to sign your post to my talk but nevermind. I was rather offended when he just went ahead and deleted the page , even though the keep's outnumbered the delete's; Like i said previously so much for fair democracy. Anyway do you really think ive got time to waste campaigning for it to be brought back , Pfft not likely. Its your guys who are missing out on that article anyway , i couldnt really care less. All it needed was a cleanup tag and before long it would be a decent article. Oh well. Crap happens. Goldblooded ( talk) 20:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I believe that this article is misleading and does not adhere to an academical standard. Especially the heavy bias in favor of the political pressure group ADL does not help to get an adequate description. Please consider these data:
Why did you withdraw this nomination? Redirects from User page to anything except that User's talk page are explicitly forbidden at WP:USERPAGE. - RunningOnBrains( talk) 02:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
I deleted the article as a hoax. The whole thing is made up. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:$200inaire subpages. I suspect they meant to put it into their user space, but messed up the link. So since it was in main space, deletion can be done immediately. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Dear Authority,
Please help me out. I am new to Wikipedia. I want 'help' for formation process of this article. this article was place under 'proposed for deletion' due to some reasons. Please do not delete any information as its each n every line is true no resources are been taken, since I'm a family member of this person. All this are hand typed by me itself. As only our family was close to Acharya Bhagwant Shrimad Buddhisagar Suriswarji Maharaj Saheb, I delightful to write about him. I am writing this page on behalf of Mahudi Trust.
And about 'Reference' there is no such links and reference link on internet to share. All this is written by me. And please help me out for restructuring this article.
Thanking You, — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Maitrikvora21 (
talk •
contribs)
18:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
i had edited as per your requirement.. now which error has left?? ( Maitrikvora21 ( talk) 05:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC))
Thank you for redirecting to appropriate page. Go Phightins! ( talk) 14:12, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor barnstar |
I award you this because of your commitment (if I can spell to save my life) toward making things easy to read and make sense. Go Phightins! ( talk) 02:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC) |
Let's get this one off of mainspace by userfying it back to its newb auhor? From my talk page author User:Filmingnz appears willing to continue working on it, and I am willing to advise him as he does so. I think getting it out of mainspace, but in a friendly fashion, will work to best advantage. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Singularity42, and thank you for welcoming words. What I was attempting - and what I needed to know - is how to do a quick correction or convey a quick heads-up.
The error was in the article on Zero Mostel. I wondered why his daily sketchings amused the museum patrons. (I'm always looking for a smile.) The link provided no answer but I found one online; a quick delete of the words "for Woman" was all that was needed.
Is there an easy way to learn what to do next time? I have visual problems and trouble navigating through the site.
If you are able to write back, thank you; if this is too minor a matter, no worries. Thanks again, Dot1958 Dot1958 ( talk) 19:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
I don't know which tag you used for the deleted article Francisco Royeca, but user copied the page more or less to his user page now: User:KikoRoyeca. I am quite sure this is out of scope as well. Could you have a look at it? Thanks. Jan Arkesteijn ( talk) 20:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Encouragement Award |
Thank you, Singularity42. I felt discouraged but your messages have me thinking "I can do this" ... even if it will be a step at a time.
I am grateful for your direction and encouragement. Dot1958 ( talk) 20:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
i decied to look at your page and is the Ntc logo copyrighted there ? if so by who? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rancalred ( talk • contribs) 23:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
is Ntc logo coyrighted in canada? if so by who? Rancalred ( talk) 23:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
i Was doing because a different wikipedia user made a sugestion i think that my image is meaningful because of this differnce i think that causal resecarch browser should see a neutral point of view i think that all the resaon's that there are constinue a new version i want a netural point of view a third-party should decide as i see it there a three party's involed in the libyan conflict 1.Gafafii 2.Rebels 3.Coaltion in the real conflict the rebels and Nato fighters get along out of nessecity for the rebels, to them The ntc is seen as the lesser of two evils. the other image will soon be deleted i will replace "Department" with "Committee" hopefully that will solve the problem -- Rancalred ( talk) 01:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
I apologize I am new to Wiki. I was trying to start a Wiki page to reference a local radio program called "The Donkey Show" on 101.5 Kfly in Eugene Oregon. It is a notable show broadcast on several affiliates owned by Bi-Costal Media (they own a lot of mid-small market stations). The show is in the mold of a show also listed on your site called the "the playhouse" a morning radio program that was canceled in 2009. The Donkey Show radio program has been voted the top radio program in Eugene for the last 3 years (see biocostal link below). Tanner the shows host is also a talent with Clearchannel Portland on 105.9 the Brew. I apologize for trying to repost the show. I wasn't aware of the policies. Again, my apologies.
http://www.bicoastalmedia.com/news.shtml http://www.radioratingz.com/ratings/3922/Radio-Show-Donkey-Show.html http://www.kzze.com/pages/DONK_SHOW/ http://kflyfm.com http://www.eugeneweekly.com/2009/10/29/coverstory7.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnaught480 ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Firstly, I don't understand why the Page on Lodge Panania was deleted. 1) it is content that is particular to Lodge Pananai 2) it is a group of people 3) it was referenced to UGL of NSW & ACT 4) if it is because it is for a specific lodge, then why can American lodges have their own pages? Wiki is supposed to be an international site, not just for Americans. Point in case: Pheonix Lodge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeeroo ( talk • contribs) 07:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
I am making more changes to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gottschalk.l ( talk • contribs)
Hello
we have just submitted a page on the history and activity of the art collective SOOPA, and we've been notified of its possible deletion. We'd like to point out that SOOPA is not a band or an individual project, but rather a collective entity assembling numerous artists and researchers within various fields, with a longstanding activity that manifests itself in collaboration with important institutions such as the Serralves Museum of Contemporary Art. Below we send some links that further illustrate some of the activities SOOPA has been involved in; there is a number of material in Portuguese that we are not including.
http://www.soopa.org/archive/ (an archive of events from the past 4 years)
http://www.serralves.pt/actividades/detalhes.php?id=1222 (page from the Serralves Museum website about the performance "Day Of The Sputnik")
http://www.serralves.pt/actividades/detalhes.php?id=1865 (page from the Serralves Museum website about the performance "Crystal World/Jungle Machine")
http://issuu.com/ruis/docs/ruis2011-01 (interview - in Dutch - with members of SOOPA)
http://www.mimaroglumusicsales.com/labels/soopa.html (label page for SOOPA on the website of the well-established online music store, Mimaroglu)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Mackay (Wikipedia page for the sax player Steve Mackay, where SOOPA is linked and referenced)
We hope to be able to clear any doubts that might have arisen concerning our submission, and we will include more information so to make our page more informative.
Thank you and best regards, Filipe Silva / www.soopa.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sputnik echo ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know I switched your Prod to a CSD-G4 as this is a repost of a previously deleted article via AfD. Wildthing61476 ( talk) 20:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
I have soft-blocked User:Skyvalley Rovers FC and deleted the article but I am not convinced it was a hoax (the content of the article, yes, but not the existence of the team). I find several references for this team including on Facebook and YouTube videos of matches, as well as news items such as this one. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 19:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
I have submitted an article about the NTU http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Time_Unit
User Kinu has declared all of my contribution as as a blatant and obvious hoax.
I am not sure what I can do (if anything) please help and make kinu stop.
Dale Noble — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalenoble ( talk • contribs)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I have made substantial changes to the page as well as adding ELEVEN sources... WHY is this not enough to keep a page on Wikipedia? I have seen some BS pages on this site that dont make ANY sense... yet I spend hours doing research on this and it gets deleted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeisterXfahrer ( talk • contribs) 02:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I have changed the page content since the discussion between the admins on its deletion. I though I provided plently of information and citations. I dont understand why its come under such scrutiny. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeisterXfahrer ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry I ran out of time to complete this page before it was deleted. Maxim Garant Rousseau is a professional downhill skateboarder sponsored by Orangatang Wheels, Loaded Boards, Fullbag Skateboards, Free For All Skateshop, and Gencola. He is responsible for much of the growth of the sport in Eastern Canada and compete world wide in races as an ambassador of the sport.
Please allow me the chance to finish a page dedicated to him. -Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonguelb ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
You're right almost of the time. But Professor at Harvard is an indication of possible importance. More information was of course needed, but if indeed a full professor, I can't imagine that anyone in that such a position would turn out to be actually notable under WP:PROF. I think the Prod was inappropriate, also, unless you were unable to verify. How can you say does not meet WP:PROF when you have not checked for information? A BLP prod would however have been appropriate, since there were no refs. . I left a specific note to the editor about writing such seriously incomplete articles--I think that's better than the formal notices. I shall now look myself for sources. DGG ( talk ) 16:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I'm flummoxed I can't watch all of both documentaries. Maybe it's posted somewhere other than on CBC. Probably not. It's much better now, but needs to be built better to represent the events after, especially more substantial new coverage and coverage of the documentarian efforts and response. If it weren't for the ongoing investigation, this story would be best told as articles on the two documentaries. BusterD ( talk) 16:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Please be more careful with your speedy deletion tagging. As DGG pointed out, DB-A7 is not used when someone "isn't notable". DB-A7 is for articles which have no claim of significance. It's a much much lower threshold than notability. On this particular article, the author said that the subject "was an Austrian Righteous among the Nations." A claim of significance doesn't get any more clear than that.--v/r - T P 20:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Dear Singularity42, Thanks a lot for your advise on the new created article "Ludger Fischer". It is true that the topic is myself which is not absolutely in line with the wiki rules, but I took it from the German wiki which was created by someone I don't know. It is online in the German Wiki for years and many independent contributions have been made. So the content is absolutely objective and independently written. You and some other editors have already worked on the "English" article and I would be very glad if you could keep it. You have already detected that the translation was not done by a machine but it was done by someone who is not a native English speaker. Perhaps you could help to make it better. Thanks again for your help and advise! All the best, Ludger Fischer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drludgerfischer ( talk • contribs) 17:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
hi actualy i am new to wikipedia pls hel me how can i improove my page... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkieychawla ( talk • contribs) 06:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
It had been tagged {{db-g6|rationale=To move [[National Transitional Council (Libya)]] back to this namespace}} which asserts non-controversial move by User:Russavia. I had no idea that this was not the case, no malice intended. It was virtually the last edit I made last night, hence the lack of a reply, apologies Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
I dont know English so much... my problem is when i try to go on to the wikipedia in spanish leanguage and appears this screen... What is suppose that i must to do?
es.wikipedia.org
, which is the address for the Spanish Wikipedia. The address for the English Wikipedia is en.wikipedia.org
. That should fix the problem.
Singularity42 (
talk)
00:48, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Regarding the proposed deletion of this page ... say what? Every other CFL team has a all time records page?
Why don't the Ottawa Renegades have one? Especially since the team will be returning to the league next year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottawarene ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Singularity42, I've just spamublocked Myriadeditions; neither 4 a.m. (novel) nor Interpreters (novel) could be speedied, despite their apparent lack of notability, because A7 does not apply to books. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
On my own talk page I made a suggestion that there are often occasions where a one-page or maximum two-page article is needed at the simplified level for children. Obviously if this were to happen then this could lead into all sorts of complication and argument as to what age /level is being targetted. My concern so far is that I have had not a single reaction and I do not know how to ask this question at a higher level. Do you have any suggestions to make ? Nojoking 4 Oct 2011 Nojoking ( talk) 11:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 12:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, i've added a page for Raymond Leonard. But its saying there are copyright issues with a page on his website? Can you be more specific as to which parts, because i cannot see any direct quotes that are the same? I'd really appreciate any other feed back you can give.
Many thanks, Layla May — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creative-captures ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Singularity42! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 05:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 16:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 08:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi sir, Please in need your help, i am trying to write an article on hackalone, created it here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackalone but it nominated for speedy deletion, can you please help me, i would like to have this article here, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shitansh ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
User:ChristianHistory has now accused you of "lying" on the discussion board of the report I made of her/his personal attacks against me. I assume that you are an administrator and it is pretty low and inconsistent for a user to accuse an administrator of "lying" when that user is defending themselves from a claim that they have engaged in personal attacks. ChristianHistory appears totally out of control and is slandering anyone whom he/she deems is against him. Based on ChristianHistory's total contempt for Wikipedia's guidelines and basic decency to other users, I would support a proposal to have her/him completely banned from Wikipedia.-- R-41 ( talk) 19:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
The reason why I edited this comment ( [7]) and removed these ( [8], [9]) is because they expressly did not add to improving the relevant entries but rather revealed what I considered to be a clear bias (even as the users themselves were claiming to be supposedly eliminating bias) against some of the relevant issues pertaining to those entries. For instance, a user who writes, "Please let me apologize for the behaviour of the MRM on the internet as a whole" shows a clear bias against and possible aversion towards such related topics. I removed and edited them because I didn't consider them to be acutally helping the discussion or the articles but possibly hindering them.
However, in the future, I shall perhaps be less forward and simply point out what I consider to be their bias by replying in kind. Alialiac ( talk) 16:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 15:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
So what is this {{ db-fpcfail-notice}} that you used five times on User talk:FloridaFinest? — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 05:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
I wanted to block User:EasyIME, but accidentally blocked you instead; I've immediately reversed my action, explaining I had made a mistake. I'm extremely sorry I soiled your block log; please, accept my most sincere apology. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Your proposed speedy deletion of Archiving Talk Center of Gravity. I intended to archive prior discussion. If that was no properly done by me, then I would not object to it being corrected. If an article now appears improperly in the Article Namespace, I do not object to its summary deletion. In fact, thanks for catching the error. GenKnowitall ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC).
{{db-g7}}
at the top of the article.
Singularity42 (
talk)
17:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
You are welcome, and thanks for the acknowledgment! Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt ( talk) 02:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for catching my mistake! You are quite right: RHsimard/fribble was indeed experimenting, and supposed to be in my user namespace. I'll have to watch out for that in the future.
Rhsimard ( talk) 00:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Why did you set a speedy deletion on this article?? I was not ready yet. You could set a Temp on it instead a will create a new one, just you know, and answer the talk next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napule ( talk • contribs) 16:19, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Reason there is no information on our site is because we were hacked and it was all deleted. I am rebuilding it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starburst1 ( talk • contribs) 20:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Not questioning your judgement, I am not quite sure I understand the process or why it was deleted. So was it because it had a lack of information on? Can you advise me what is needed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starburst1 ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
I just used it. And I really don't care if it has a user's username. Or if it's misleading. Other people use diferrent ones. Why can't I? The Chosen ONE ( talk) 15:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate all that people like you do for Wikipedia. As you can tell I'm sure, I am new to this milieu.
I am, however, not new to the concept of diversity consciousness. As you recommended it for deletion, you remarked that it is found on the Internet only as a book. This term is used in academia and diversity circles irrespective of the book. Some examples follow. These examples are from the world of business, academia, blogs, a textbook and general interest pages to show you the variety of places the term is used.
I posted these links here: http://diversityconsciousness.com/divconlinks.html
I wanted to post this on the discussion of whether or not the term should be deleted, but try as I a may, I simply could not figure out how.
Thank you for your consideration, Bucherpa ( talk) 17:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Pat Bucher
*
(which creates a bullet point), followed by the word Keep (just that one word in bold), followed by why you believe the article should not be deleted (i.e. "the neologism is notable, and here are references demonstrating that...).Thank you for your helpfulness!
Bucherpa ( talk) 20:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Pat Bucher
Hello Singularity42, I see that archiving appears to be working again however I'm not fully sure which one of two things that I did yesterday got it working again. It was either the collapsed thread interfering or the size adjustment allowing more threads to be archived. If it is the latter then I'm not sure we are out of the woods yet. It may cap out when it reaches 125K. I would suggest setting the time from 31 days to 14 days to get more threads to archive even if it is only for a temporary time period...I'd like to see the bot create the 2nd archive page to be sure everything is okay. Then you could re-adjust the timing to suit. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕))
18:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Singularity42, I just came to say that Dlkrabs has made vandilism on the SpongeBob's Greatest Hits page. I reverted the edit and I'm going to see if he's vandilized any other pages. Keep your eyes peeled! Thanks!
Easy4me ( talk) 15:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
He has also vandalized on The Black Eyed Peas page before. Still checking. Thanks!
Easy4me ( talk) 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
The speedy tag you reasonably enough placed on the article was removed by an i.p.editor. I've sent it to AfD. DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
singularity42- i can assuer you that this page does not attack anybody. this book is a real story in which all my friends love. i created this page to greaten the knowledge of the wikipedia system. this page is also to warn guardians of the dagers of the playground and does not mean to offend sincerly- septer231 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Septer231 ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Singularity 42. Is there no end of trouble I have incurred by writing about the pentagram map?!? In the course of the past 24 hours, I have been accused of vandalism by several editors, and my work has been reverted several times. Quite a bit of my time was wasted. (Those editors have now apologized). I thought that, finally, I could rest easy knowing that I had done a good service with this article. It seems that I am having yet another misunderstanding with a wiki editor.
Let me explain the situation. I am a research mathematician -- see Richard Schwartz -- and the originator of the subject of the pentagram map wiki. I am widely recognized as one of the world authorities about this small topic in mathematics. For some time, my colleagues and I have known that the nascent pentagram map wiki page was both sketchy and inaccurate. We finally agreed that an authority needed to clean up the article, making it accurate, up-to-date, and carefully referenced.
Owing to the nature of the topic, a specialized piece of mathematics, it is unlikely that a person uninvolved in the research could write about it in a competent way. While I cannot hope to be completely neutral about the subject, I have tried my best to be fair and accurate in my citations, in my account of the history, and in my weighting of the importance of the various contributions. Indeed, I have been a professional mathematician for more than 20 years, and I am used to writing about topics both fairly and authoritatively. Moreover, I have shared the wiki page with various of my colleagues, and they all seem quite happy with it.
You should know that I consider the editing of a wiki page about mathematics to be an extension of my scholarly work. I aim to apply the same standards of scholarship and fairness to this endeavor that I would apply to my usual article-writing. Please take this into account before reverting the edits I made. I would be quite disappointed, and (after having so much trouble) I would appeal to whatever governing body necessary in order to have a fair hearing and to reinstate the work.
My experience with wiki editors so far has been mostly disappointing, and you message has added to this. If I didn't love wikipedia and think that it was a fabulous internet resource, I would simply wash my hands of it and walk away in disgust. As it is, I hope that I can learn how to edit these pages without raising so many red flags.
Best, RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 00:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
A
request for comment has been filed concerning the username of
I Jethrobot (
talk ·
contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion
here.
I Jethrobot (
talk)
04:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Give me a reason why my page has been deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarzParty42 ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Mr. Singularity42...Would any of these Google hits on this page be sufficient proof you require?
http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Starship+Ajax%22&num=50
Robert Simmons100 Robert Simmons100 ( talk) 02:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
I got your notice, but am trouble finding the discussion in progress. Please help. New here.
Robert Simmons100 Robert Simmons100 ( talk) 02:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Is this the area where I reply in the edit field? New concept of editing a window for a ongoing discussion.
Robert Simmons100 Robert Simmons100 ( talk) 02:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep.'''
followed by your comments on the same line. Make sure to sign off with ~~~
(you do not have to manually type your name at the end of your comments).
Singularity42 (
talk)
03:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Thanks! I've copy/pasted it to where it needed to be.
Singularity42 (
talk)
12:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
|
---|
DiscussionDiscussion about the issues listed above take place here. Remember to keep discussions calm, brief, and focused on the issues at hand. Resolution |
-- Versa geek 05:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Would it matter? the page has been deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarzParty42 ( talk • contribs) 19:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Singularity42. I am just letting you know that I deleted Delta Eta Iota, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 00:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
I received a notice about the above in regards to a draft article I'm working on. This is on behalf of my company for the production I am responsible which is copyrighted. I have permission to create this article, and currently only intended to keep it in draft form for my marketing and legal department to review.
Can you please advise how I can proceed?
NilsSorenson ( talk) 20:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
hi... i initially created a page under the "composer" category but was told it did not meet the criteria to qualify. i would like to try and re submit the page under the category of "musician" as i have read the requirements and find that my subject would be perfectly suited for it... i just don't have a clue as to where to begin! any advice would be greatly appreciated! thank-you! ( Mouser Hyde ( talk) 22:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)).
if you do not feel the individual meets the requirements then i won't push it… thanks, i appreciate you looking! ( Mouser Hyde ( talk) 00:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC))
Hello Singularity42. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Church of the Messiah (Ottawa), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
I've added a comment - a clerk or CU can close the case now. If any other accounts pop up, report them. Keep up the good work! Cheers, m.o.p 02:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Any discussion on AfD should be on that AfD page, you make a valid point. Yet I think follow wikipedia protocol is a valid discussion for the user Mtking.
There is a pattern in Mtking's wikipedia usage of making multiple deletion requests in a short period of time. Some of those are reasonable. Some are not.
I hope that through a discussion on the user page, Mtking can learn a bit more about wikipedia policy in order to use better discretion in the future. you will notice that I did not delete the tag, yet Mtking did delete an AfD tag today at
Casino Madrid a page that was created by Mtking (and has since been deleted).
Brad Wilkins (
talk)
03:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've created a page for Soapbox, a portuguese band, and it was deleted. I understand that you want to protect wikipedia from garage band without notability, but this particular band is getting big in portugal - they already went to tv channels (for their videoclip) and to the radio. Now, they released their first EP, but without the support of a record company. I hope you could allow me to publish this page on wikipedia, because it's a great place to find information about them (biography, discography, videos, etc).
Here you have some links to support my argumentation: www.myspace.com/bandsoapbox http://www.discogs.com/artist/Soapbox+%283%29 http://blitz.aeiou.pt/gen.pl?p=artistas&op=detalhe&fokey=bz.bands/3390 http://www.espalhafactos.com/2011/06/07/soapboxing-a-musica-nacional/ http://sic.sapo.pt/sicradical/programas/curto-circuito/videos?videoId={3573102E-2C8D-4692-B795-D40B872341DF} http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=327Mh0HqW3k http://whosplayingatmyhouse.blogspot.com/2011/06/soapbox-daylight-dont-come-too-soon.html
Best regards, Spring Manta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Springmanta ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I checked the criterion for the notability and:
-the band won a big music competition in 2009, having played before Peter, Bjorn and John, Nouvelle Vague and Depeche Mode.
I find the deletion strange because I was updating the information step by step and I had no time to insert all the details. I hope you can repost the article so than I can update all the info and translate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Springmanta ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
Fine, it was invented 24 hours ago! (Your seconding of my prod gave me a good chuckle :) ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb 22:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
I would like to know my page "The Unknown One" was removed. Was it because i had no references? Nothing was innapropiate about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanx51 ( talk • contribs) 01:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
The band conforms with WP:BAND: Has won or placed in a major music competition. This band was in the semi-finals of the Dutch National band contest as the only one in its genre, representing the entire genre for that year in the category Rock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michielvv ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Well you could of at least bothered to sign your post to my talk but nevermind. I was rather offended when he just went ahead and deleted the page , even though the keep's outnumbered the delete's; Like i said previously so much for fair democracy. Anyway do you really think ive got time to waste campaigning for it to be brought back , Pfft not likely. Its your guys who are missing out on that article anyway , i couldnt really care less. All it needed was a cleanup tag and before long it would be a decent article. Oh well. Crap happens. Goldblooded ( talk) 20:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I believe that this article is misleading and does not adhere to an academical standard. Especially the heavy bias in favor of the political pressure group ADL does not help to get an adequate description. Please consider these data:
Why did you withdraw this nomination? Redirects from User page to anything except that User's talk page are explicitly forbidden at WP:USERPAGE. - RunningOnBrains( talk) 02:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
I deleted the article as a hoax. The whole thing is made up. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:$200inaire subpages. I suspect they meant to put it into their user space, but messed up the link. So since it was in main space, deletion can be done immediately. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Dear Authority,
Please help me out. I am new to Wikipedia. I want 'help' for formation process of this article. this article was place under 'proposed for deletion' due to some reasons. Please do not delete any information as its each n every line is true no resources are been taken, since I'm a family member of this person. All this are hand typed by me itself. As only our family was close to Acharya Bhagwant Shrimad Buddhisagar Suriswarji Maharaj Saheb, I delightful to write about him. I am writing this page on behalf of Mahudi Trust.
And about 'Reference' there is no such links and reference link on internet to share. All this is written by me. And please help me out for restructuring this article.
Thanking You, — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Maitrikvora21 (
talk •
contribs)
18:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
i had edited as per your requirement.. now which error has left?? ( Maitrikvora21 ( talk) 05:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC))
Thank you for redirecting to appropriate page. Go Phightins! ( talk) 14:12, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor barnstar |
I award you this because of your commitment (if I can spell to save my life) toward making things easy to read and make sense. Go Phightins! ( talk) 02:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC) |
Let's get this one off of mainspace by userfying it back to its newb auhor? From my talk page author User:Filmingnz appears willing to continue working on it, and I am willing to advise him as he does so. I think getting it out of mainspace, but in a friendly fashion, will work to best advantage. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Singularity42, and thank you for welcoming words. What I was attempting - and what I needed to know - is how to do a quick correction or convey a quick heads-up.
The error was in the article on Zero Mostel. I wondered why his daily sketchings amused the museum patrons. (I'm always looking for a smile.) The link provided no answer but I found one online; a quick delete of the words "for Woman" was all that was needed.
Is there an easy way to learn what to do next time? I have visual problems and trouble navigating through the site.
If you are able to write back, thank you; if this is too minor a matter, no worries. Thanks again, Dot1958 Dot1958 ( talk) 19:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
I don't know which tag you used for the deleted article Francisco Royeca, but user copied the page more or less to his user page now: User:KikoRoyeca. I am quite sure this is out of scope as well. Could you have a look at it? Thanks. Jan Arkesteijn ( talk) 20:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Encouragement Award |
Thank you, Singularity42. I felt discouraged but your messages have me thinking "I can do this" ... even if it will be a step at a time.
I am grateful for your direction and encouragement. Dot1958 ( talk) 20:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
i decied to look at your page and is the Ntc logo copyrighted there ? if so by who? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rancalred ( talk • contribs) 23:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
is Ntc logo coyrighted in canada? if so by who? Rancalred ( talk) 23:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
i Was doing because a different wikipedia user made a sugestion i think that my image is meaningful because of this differnce i think that causal resecarch browser should see a neutral point of view i think that all the resaon's that there are constinue a new version i want a netural point of view a third-party should decide as i see it there a three party's involed in the libyan conflict 1.Gafafii 2.Rebels 3.Coaltion in the real conflict the rebels and Nato fighters get along out of nessecity for the rebels, to them The ntc is seen as the lesser of two evils. the other image will soon be deleted i will replace "Department" with "Committee" hopefully that will solve the problem -- Rancalred ( talk) 01:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
I apologize I am new to Wiki. I was trying to start a Wiki page to reference a local radio program called "The Donkey Show" on 101.5 Kfly in Eugene Oregon. It is a notable show broadcast on several affiliates owned by Bi-Costal Media (they own a lot of mid-small market stations). The show is in the mold of a show also listed on your site called the "the playhouse" a morning radio program that was canceled in 2009. The Donkey Show radio program has been voted the top radio program in Eugene for the last 3 years (see biocostal link below). Tanner the shows host is also a talent with Clearchannel Portland on 105.9 the Brew. I apologize for trying to repost the show. I wasn't aware of the policies. Again, my apologies.
http://www.bicoastalmedia.com/news.shtml http://www.radioratingz.com/ratings/3922/Radio-Show-Donkey-Show.html http://www.kzze.com/pages/DONK_SHOW/ http://kflyfm.com http://www.eugeneweekly.com/2009/10/29/coverstory7.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnaught480 ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Firstly, I don't understand why the Page on Lodge Panania was deleted. 1) it is content that is particular to Lodge Pananai 2) it is a group of people 3) it was referenced to UGL of NSW & ACT 4) if it is because it is for a specific lodge, then why can American lodges have their own pages? Wiki is supposed to be an international site, not just for Americans. Point in case: Pheonix Lodge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeeroo ( talk • contribs) 07:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
I am making more changes to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gottschalk.l ( talk • contribs)
Hello
we have just submitted a page on the history and activity of the art collective SOOPA, and we've been notified of its possible deletion. We'd like to point out that SOOPA is not a band or an individual project, but rather a collective entity assembling numerous artists and researchers within various fields, with a longstanding activity that manifests itself in collaboration with important institutions such as the Serralves Museum of Contemporary Art. Below we send some links that further illustrate some of the activities SOOPA has been involved in; there is a number of material in Portuguese that we are not including.
http://www.soopa.org/archive/ (an archive of events from the past 4 years)
http://www.serralves.pt/actividades/detalhes.php?id=1222 (page from the Serralves Museum website about the performance "Day Of The Sputnik")
http://www.serralves.pt/actividades/detalhes.php?id=1865 (page from the Serralves Museum website about the performance "Crystal World/Jungle Machine")
http://issuu.com/ruis/docs/ruis2011-01 (interview - in Dutch - with members of SOOPA)
http://www.mimaroglumusicsales.com/labels/soopa.html (label page for SOOPA on the website of the well-established online music store, Mimaroglu)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Mackay (Wikipedia page for the sax player Steve Mackay, where SOOPA is linked and referenced)
We hope to be able to clear any doubts that might have arisen concerning our submission, and we will include more information so to make our page more informative.
Thank you and best regards, Filipe Silva / www.soopa.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sputnik echo ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know I switched your Prod to a CSD-G4 as this is a repost of a previously deleted article via AfD. Wildthing61476 ( talk) 20:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
I have soft-blocked User:Skyvalley Rovers FC and deleted the article but I am not convinced it was a hoax (the content of the article, yes, but not the existence of the team). I find several references for this team including on Facebook and YouTube videos of matches, as well as news items such as this one. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 19:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
I have submitted an article about the NTU http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Time_Unit
User Kinu has declared all of my contribution as as a blatant and obvious hoax.
I am not sure what I can do (if anything) please help and make kinu stop.
Dale Noble — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalenoble ( talk • contribs)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I have made substantial changes to the page as well as adding ELEVEN sources... WHY is this not enough to keep a page on Wikipedia? I have seen some BS pages on this site that dont make ANY sense... yet I spend hours doing research on this and it gets deleted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeisterXfahrer ( talk • contribs) 02:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I have changed the page content since the discussion between the admins on its deletion. I though I provided plently of information and citations. I dont understand why its come under such scrutiny. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeisterXfahrer ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry I ran out of time to complete this page before it was deleted. Maxim Garant Rousseau is a professional downhill skateboarder sponsored by Orangatang Wheels, Loaded Boards, Fullbag Skateboards, Free For All Skateshop, and Gencola. He is responsible for much of the growth of the sport in Eastern Canada and compete world wide in races as an ambassador of the sport.
Please allow me the chance to finish a page dedicated to him. -Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonguelb ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
You're right almost of the time. But Professor at Harvard is an indication of possible importance. More information was of course needed, but if indeed a full professor, I can't imagine that anyone in that such a position would turn out to be actually notable under WP:PROF. I think the Prod was inappropriate, also, unless you were unable to verify. How can you say does not meet WP:PROF when you have not checked for information? A BLP prod would however have been appropriate, since there were no refs. . I left a specific note to the editor about writing such seriously incomplete articles--I think that's better than the formal notices. I shall now look myself for sources. DGG ( talk ) 16:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
I'm flummoxed I can't watch all of both documentaries. Maybe it's posted somewhere other than on CBC. Probably not. It's much better now, but needs to be built better to represent the events after, especially more substantial new coverage and coverage of the documentarian efforts and response. If it weren't for the ongoing investigation, this story would be best told as articles on the two documentaries. BusterD ( talk) 16:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Please be more careful with your speedy deletion tagging. As DGG pointed out, DB-A7 is not used when someone "isn't notable". DB-A7 is for articles which have no claim of significance. It's a much much lower threshold than notability. On this particular article, the author said that the subject "was an Austrian Righteous among the Nations." A claim of significance doesn't get any more clear than that.--v/r - T P 20:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Dear Singularity42, Thanks a lot for your advise on the new created article "Ludger Fischer". It is true that the topic is myself which is not absolutely in line with the wiki rules, but I took it from the German wiki which was created by someone I don't know. It is online in the German Wiki for years and many independent contributions have been made. So the content is absolutely objective and independently written. You and some other editors have already worked on the "English" article and I would be very glad if you could keep it. You have already detected that the translation was not done by a machine but it was done by someone who is not a native English speaker. Perhaps you could help to make it better. Thanks again for your help and advise! All the best, Ludger Fischer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drludgerfischer ( talk • contribs) 17:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
hi actualy i am new to wikipedia pls hel me how can i improove my page... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkieychawla ( talk • contribs) 06:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
It had been tagged {{db-g6|rationale=To move [[National Transitional Council (Libya)]] back to this namespace}} which asserts non-controversial move by User:Russavia. I had no idea that this was not the case, no malice intended. It was virtually the last edit I made last night, hence the lack of a reply, apologies Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
I dont know English so much... my problem is when i try to go on to the wikipedia in spanish leanguage and appears this screen... What is suppose that i must to do?
es.wikipedia.org
, which is the address for the Spanish Wikipedia. The address for the English Wikipedia is en.wikipedia.org
. That should fix the problem.
Singularity42 (
talk)
00:48, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Regarding the proposed deletion of this page ... say what? Every other CFL team has a all time records page?
Why don't the Ottawa Renegades have one? Especially since the team will be returning to the league next year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottawarene ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello Singularity42, I've just spamublocked Myriadeditions; neither 4 a.m. (novel) nor Interpreters (novel) could be speedied, despite their apparent lack of notability, because A7 does not apply to books. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:11, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
On my own talk page I made a suggestion that there are often occasions where a one-page or maximum two-page article is needed at the simplified level for children. Obviously if this were to happen then this could lead into all sorts of complication and argument as to what age /level is being targetted. My concern so far is that I have had not a single reaction and I do not know how to ask this question at a higher level. Do you have any suggestions to make ? Nojoking 4 Oct 2011 Nojoking ( talk) 11:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 12:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, i've added a page for Raymond Leonard. But its saying there are copyright issues with a page on his website? Can you be more specific as to which parts, because i cannot see any direct quotes that are the same? I'd really appreciate any other feed back you can give.
Many thanks, Layla May — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creative-captures ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Singularity42! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 05:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 16:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 08:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi sir, Please in need your help, i am trying to write an article on hackalone, created it here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackalone but it nominated for speedy deletion, can you please help me, i would like to have this article here, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shitansh ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
User:ChristianHistory has now accused you of "lying" on the discussion board of the report I made of her/his personal attacks against me. I assume that you are an administrator and it is pretty low and inconsistent for a user to accuse an administrator of "lying" when that user is defending themselves from a claim that they have engaged in personal attacks. ChristianHistory appears totally out of control and is slandering anyone whom he/she deems is against him. Based on ChristianHistory's total contempt for Wikipedia's guidelines and basic decency to other users, I would support a proposal to have her/him completely banned from Wikipedia.-- R-41 ( talk) 19:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
The reason why I edited this comment ( [7]) and removed these ( [8], [9]) is because they expressly did not add to improving the relevant entries but rather revealed what I considered to be a clear bias (even as the users themselves were claiming to be supposedly eliminating bias) against some of the relevant issues pertaining to those entries. For instance, a user who writes, "Please let me apologize for the behaviour of the MRM on the internet as a whole" shows a clear bias against and possible aversion towards such related topics. I removed and edited them because I didn't consider them to be acutally helping the discussion or the articles but possibly hindering them.
However, in the future, I shall perhaps be less forward and simply point out what I consider to be their bias by replying in kind. Alialiac ( talk) 16:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 15:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)