An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008-100px-Flag of the Governor-General of New Zealand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama KReply? on my talk page, please 13:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi There. I had done a bit of work on New Zealand Flag Debate when I noticed that you also created a page called Flag of New Zealand Debate with identical content. Pages with duplicate content get really tricky around here, because editors start working on pages independently of each other, eventually making two pages on the same subject that are quite different. In fact, that's exactly what was starting to happen. I have consolidated the work at New Zealand Flag Debate, and created a redirect to that page from Flag of New Zealand Debate. Cheers, Steamroller Assault ( talk) 11:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Not a big problem - was just doing some quick cleanup rounds before the imminent day-long Wiki-blackout. Dl2000 ( talk) 04:59, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008-460px-Flag of the Governor-General of New Zealand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for picking up the wrong person. Just a quick note that when you edit an MP's name and you get a redlink, something is wrong, as since last year, the list of NZ MPs on Wikipedia is complete. I've fixed it up; the successful candidate's name was Alfred Renall. Schwede 66 18:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Please do not place article maintenance tags on redirects. Redirects are not articles, even though they exist in the article namespace. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 11:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm testing Template:Post-nominals however it defaults to the Canadian template even when
| QFSM = [[Queen's Fire Service Medal for Gallantry|QFSM]]
| QPM = [[Queen's Police Medal for Gallantry|QPM]]
| QFSMd = [[Queen's Fire Service Medal for Distinguished Service|QFSM]]
| QPMd = [[Queen's Police Medal for Distinguished Service|QPM]]
The expected outcome is John Smith QFSM QPM QFSM QPM
The observed outcome is John Smith QFSM QPM
QPMds and QFSMds are unique to the NZL template are missing, my conclusion is that the Canadian template is referenced even though country=NZL is the second parameter. Could you tell me what I'm missing when trying to reference a different template?
I changed your edit to Nicola Benedetti. Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire is a redirect to Order of the British Empire so it is better to link to the target page with a pipe than to link to the redirect page.-- ukexpat ( talk) 14:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
This does not appear to be working. Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
(Imported AUS-cats into documentation, discussion regarding Order of St John is on talk page.) - There is nothing at all on
Template talk:Post-nominals/AUS-cats/doc, and nothing relevant about the Order of St John on
Template talk:Post-nominals/AUS-cats.
Which talk page are you referring to? Cheers,
Pdfpdf (
talk) 11:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
0907 hrs Sunday 1 September 2013
You really need to consider why the template works with data sheets for three other countries however there is only one difference between those data sheets and the Australian data sheet.
Karl Stephens ( talk| contribs) 21:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Pdfpdf ( talk) 08:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Karl Stephens ( talk| contribs) 02:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Here comes a very long response: I've edited the dialogue into their specific points however the content of your remarks are unchanged
Karl Stephens ( talk| contribs) 08:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Wow! Yes, it is a long response. Thanks. (And I much prefer its tone to the tone of some of your previous responses.) I apologise that at the moment I don't have time to provide a reply worthy of your response - hopefully I shall be able to do this before the end of the weekend. Thanks, Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sinesurfer,
you removed Rami Ranger update as IOd Director of the Year - Large company citing Claire Black as the ultimate winner. There seems to be a misunderstanding here. Could you have a look at the nominees on that page and Claire black is not listed at all. Have a look at this link.
I have seen the award with his name on it too.
I cant find anything on the wqeb yet but will add a link once the IOD have done a press release.
Thanks
Harmeet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmeetahuja ( talk • contribs) 14:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
I confused Claire Black (recipient of the Family business Director of the Year) which is listed above Director of the Year (Large Company) which is listed as Lawrence Tomlinson, Chairman, LNT Group and refer here.
I found Ranger is a nominee for the 2013 award listed here and not as the winner unless there is a more recent citation.
Thanks for your suggestion about using templates. I will find out how to do that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmeetahuja ( talk • contribs) 11:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Karl Stephens ( talk| contribs) 08:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Category:Honorary Fellows of the Royal Society of Canada, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm assuming that your repeatedly putting Honorary British postnomials on the page of an Indian citizen, Ratan Tata, is done in good faith. Please gain consensus for that edit on WT:INDIA. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 13:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Template:NZ Parliament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 02:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sinesurfer,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Extra Lady of The Most Noble Order of the Garter for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. 🍺 Antiqueight chat 04:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
I've put the template up for deletion using Twinkle, but noticed that you didn't get an automatic notification. Schwede 66 09:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
-- Karl Stephens ( talk | contribs ) 09:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Sinesurfer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Additional Dame of the Order of Australia. Since you had some involvement with the Additional Dame of the Order of Australia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 08:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Sinesurfer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Template:Post-nominals/USA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKay ( talk) 20:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008-100px-Flag of the Governor-General of New Zealand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. O sama KReply? on my talk page, please 13:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi There. I had done a bit of work on New Zealand Flag Debate when I noticed that you also created a page called Flag of New Zealand Debate with identical content. Pages with duplicate content get really tricky around here, because editors start working on pages independently of each other, eventually making two pages on the same subject that are quite different. In fact, that's exactly what was starting to happen. I have consolidated the work at New Zealand Flag Debate, and created a redirect to that page from Flag of New Zealand Debate. Cheers, Steamroller Assault ( talk) 11:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Not a big problem - was just doing some quick cleanup rounds before the imminent day-long Wiki-blackout. Dl2000 ( talk) 04:59, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008-460px-Flag of the Governor-General of New Zealand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for picking up the wrong person. Just a quick note that when you edit an MP's name and you get a redlink, something is wrong, as since last year, the list of NZ MPs on Wikipedia is complete. I've fixed it up; the successful candidate's name was Alfred Renall. Schwede 66 18:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Please do not place article maintenance tags on redirects. Redirects are not articles, even though they exist in the article namespace. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 11:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm testing Template:Post-nominals however it defaults to the Canadian template even when
| QFSM = [[Queen's Fire Service Medal for Gallantry|QFSM]]
| QPM = [[Queen's Police Medal for Gallantry|QPM]]
| QFSMd = [[Queen's Fire Service Medal for Distinguished Service|QFSM]]
| QPMd = [[Queen's Police Medal for Distinguished Service|QPM]]
The expected outcome is John Smith QFSM QPM QFSM QPM
The observed outcome is John Smith QFSM QPM
QPMds and QFSMds are unique to the NZL template are missing, my conclusion is that the Canadian template is referenced even though country=NZL is the second parameter. Could you tell me what I'm missing when trying to reference a different template?
I changed your edit to Nicola Benedetti. Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire is a redirect to Order of the British Empire so it is better to link to the target page with a pipe than to link to the redirect page.-- ukexpat ( talk) 14:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
This does not appear to be working. Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
(Imported AUS-cats into documentation, discussion regarding Order of St John is on talk page.) - There is nothing at all on
Template talk:Post-nominals/AUS-cats/doc, and nothing relevant about the Order of St John on
Template talk:Post-nominals/AUS-cats.
Which talk page are you referring to? Cheers,
Pdfpdf (
talk) 11:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
0907 hrs Sunday 1 September 2013
You really need to consider why the template works with data sheets for three other countries however there is only one difference between those data sheets and the Australian data sheet.
Karl Stephens ( talk| contribs) 21:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Pdfpdf ( talk) 08:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Karl Stephens ( talk| contribs) 02:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Here comes a very long response: I've edited the dialogue into their specific points however the content of your remarks are unchanged
Karl Stephens ( talk| contribs) 08:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Wow! Yes, it is a long response. Thanks. (And I much prefer its tone to the tone of some of your previous responses.) I apologise that at the moment I don't have time to provide a reply worthy of your response - hopefully I shall be able to do this before the end of the weekend. Thanks, Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sinesurfer,
you removed Rami Ranger update as IOd Director of the Year - Large company citing Claire Black as the ultimate winner. There seems to be a misunderstanding here. Could you have a look at the nominees on that page and Claire black is not listed at all. Have a look at this link.
I have seen the award with his name on it too.
I cant find anything on the wqeb yet but will add a link once the IOD have done a press release.
Thanks
Harmeet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmeetahuja ( talk • contribs) 14:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
I confused Claire Black (recipient of the Family business Director of the Year) which is listed above Director of the Year (Large Company) which is listed as Lawrence Tomlinson, Chairman, LNT Group and refer here.
I found Ranger is a nominee for the 2013 award listed here and not as the winner unless there is a more recent citation.
Thanks for your suggestion about using templates. I will find out how to do that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmeetahuja ( talk • contribs) 11:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Karl Stephens ( talk| contribs) 08:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Category:Honorary Fellows of the Royal Society of Canada, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm assuming that your repeatedly putting Honorary British postnomials on the page of an Indian citizen, Ratan Tata, is done in good faith. Please gain consensus for that edit on WT:INDIA. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 13:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Template:NZ Parliament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 02:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sinesurfer,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Extra Lady of The Most Noble Order of the Garter for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. 🍺 Antiqueight chat 04:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
I've put the template up for deletion using Twinkle, but noticed that you didn't get an automatic notification. Schwede 66 09:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
-- Karl Stephens ( talk | contribs ) 09:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Sinesurfer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Additional Dame of the Order of Australia. Since you had some involvement with the Additional Dame of the Order of Australia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 08:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Sinesurfer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Template:Post-nominals/USA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKay ( talk) 20:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)