This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello and welcome to my February to April archive. As usual, please do not edit the archives but if you want to reopen the archive please either copy or cut, and then paste onto my current talk page
Interesting events occurred here including 2 nominations for RfA and my 1 year anniversary.
PS: I haven't created the page yet, I'm waiting for your reply. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
(sorry I've added it in the wrong sections, but I'd support your RFA too.)
It doesn't matter. If you feel you have a need to expand into other topics, by all means do so. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I followed the link from the Tyne and Wear Page and it must have went to the wrong article and I incorrectly added the template there, please accept my utmost apologies! Telly addict Editor review! 13:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. See my reply in the TIS talk page. Pyrotec 20:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I have made a small amend to the infobox to make platforms a non-compulsory fierld. Could you have a check of any staions you amended to amke sure they still work with the amended template? Ta
DrFrench 11:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I see that this article has lost its Articles for deletion vote and has now gone. I suggest material from the article is added into the main Hertfordshire article under appropriate categories describing the most significant cultural sites within the county. eg Antiquities Religeous monuments Museums etc.
Minor items can be included under the various sub categories for Hertfordshire.
Any comments? Lumos3 15:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Don't beleve Saintrotter's personal attack on Homer slips. Saintrotter is a right wing radical, who also layes in to Hayford Peirce. Steer well clear of Saintrotter.-- Longend. 05:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Watch out, Saitrotter put a right wing slur on my user page. -- Homer slips. 05:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Saintrotter claimed they both had a vendetta on him.I wiped it from there user pages.-- Lilidor 12:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
He's put it back, so I and my 2 frends are chosing to leave this 'Nazi-pedia'.-- Lilidor 01:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Remember, Wikipedia's policy on personal attacks states that users' affiliations are irrelelant to their contributions and should never be used to dismiss their views. It further notes to comment on article content and not the character of other Wikipedian users. Ok Don't beleve[sic] my "personal attack" lets berry our heads in the sand and ignore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Irma_Grese#War_Crimes.3F where homer uses foul language and swears... after all it's only right wing lies -- Saintrotter 11 March 2007
I don't know that the 'no fewer words than 50' rule needs changing, I personally like the idea of longer branches as it lessens the chance of a huge number being created, as was the situation with the last main game. If that's the reason for the rule, then I'd keep it, and possibly embolden it on the page with an explanation. It's more than likely that someone created the shorter branch without seeing the rule at the top; maybe it would be okay to change the word limit on the rogue branch, I doubt the branch's creator would mind. Phileas 20:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my my recent RfA in which I withdrew because the oppose votes were almost equalling the supporters. I then decided to leave my account (Tellyaddict) and start fresh under a new username, however I quickly decided to reconsider after another user persuaded me not to leave the account - I am now glad I did reconsider because leaving that account and creating a new one was too hasty so I've decided to improve rather than starting again! I hope we can remain civil and that there were no negative feelings caused. Again, thanks for your support even though I withdrew it, your vote is much appreciated! Regards - Tellyaddict ( Talk) 19:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
I'd be extremely grateful if you could take a look at the Class 378 page and leave your opinion. It has been listed as an AfD on the basis that I have not provided evidence confirming the Class number. I have done this now, but those who are promoting its deletion are not prepared to accept the sources I have given. Given your attempts to provide civility during the whole {{ British TOCs}} incident, I respect your opinion and would appreciate you contributing to the debate on this particular issue. Thanks Hammersfan 11/03/07, 13.10 GMT
I realise it's very cheeky of me to ask, but do you think you could direct some others to the discussion so that their opinions can be garnered as well? I'd be most grateful - grateful enough to possibly even buy you a pint :-) Hammersfan 11/03/07, 20.10 GMT
Thanks for creating this cat, it was overdue for consistency with other articles. I don't know want the conventional qualifications are for entry to this generic cat: if you have a mo, could look at Milton Keynes Grid Road System, Milton Keynes redway system, Wolverton railway works, Wolverton and Stony Stratford Tramway and even Grand Union Canal to see if they should be added, please? -- Concrete Cowboy 13:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Signalhead and myself have been working on these this evening for various Scottish lines and railways. Callander and Oban Railway, West Highland Line, Far North Line, Cathcart Circle Lines, Aberdeen Railway, Argyle Line and North Clyde Line worked on to date. -- Stewart 21:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Template revised to accomadate Nottingham setup. -- Stewart 22:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Midland Main Line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This is an extract. -- Stewart 22:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Midland Main Line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This should work now. -- Stewart 22:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't see a particular need to move the Wikipediholic test as it is a piece of humor and not actual policy. It's well-known at its current location and moving it, in my opinion, would only cause more trouble than it's worth. Where would you like to move it to and why? - Mgm| (talk) 08:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, as one of the more prolific contributers to the Word Association game, I just want to point you in the direction of my suggestion on the Wikipedia talk:Sandbox/Word Association page. Any ideas/comments gratefully received. Phileas 21:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Rather than edit the old template, I thought I might as well start from scratch as the title is rather specific and also too long to type from memory! I have left the old one for the time being in case someone objects to the change (S-rail, anyone?). Geof Sheppard 08:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Essjay's edit counter doesn't work anymore due to his departure from wikipedia, you may want to choose a new counter. -- ROASTY TOAST 02:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't know whether Pickle's talk page is on your watchlist, but I thought I should echo here the comment I made there, that use of "same" at junctions on these boxes should probably be avoided. Chris cheese whine 15:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Actually, the lines shown there include *all* existing dedciated high-speed lines and lines under construction that have articles on Wikipedia. (The French and Japanese lines aren't linked seperately, due to there being an "overview" type article). So, the title is valid. Tompw ( talk) 13:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Nothing further, unless there's anything else "wrong" with the redirect in question; redirects can be "orphans", without any need to do anything about them. Alai 15:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
I feel now i am asking a really random question but can this animation be slowed down as i cannot read all the messages...?! Simply south 01:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I am pretty sure what you have created would count more as an rf than an lg. Simply south 17:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, thinking about it that would be better. I've added the Junction names and linked to the lines they connect with directly. MRSC • Talk 12:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I got the Grays population from the following page: neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk - WOSlinker 19:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
You are one of the "lead editors"? I am correct, am I not. It being so, you should simply admit it, rather than hide in shadow. It is not "decent" of you to claim glory and recognition for an article which has failed the test. Sheepcot 07:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words, I'll pop the references in over the next couple of days. Regards, Nick. Nick 19:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia? I can't imagine why that would be worrying, why? Did something I or someone else said indicate that it would be worrying? What specifically would you be worried about? Peace, delldot talk 21:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, actually its not working, I saved the page and tried it on the sandbox by using show preview and it was not displaying properly, maybe you could contact User:Froth as he is apparently very good with template work, sorry I couldn't get it working but I'm sure it'll work eventually. Regards - Telly addict 15:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can I invite you to a discussion on the future of this template, and the possibility of creating two template from this one at Template talk:Midland Main Line. L.J.Skinner wot| I did 18:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick note... I fixed two code problems on this template that were causing things to display weird on transclusions. Once you finalize the assessment and importance categories, let me know and I can update {{ TrainsWikiProject}} as well. Slambo (Speak) 19:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you please let me know why you tagged this ( Island Gardens DLR station). Thanks, Stephennt
I wish you and your family a Happy and enjoyable Holiday/Easter and although its a little early I'm sure you will enjoy it!! Dont forget that its April Fools Day soon and I also hope you enjoy that as well.
|
Don't just give up on WA! Would you support a mediation request, as per the discussion at the talk page? -- Perimosocordiae 18:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
(You may not fool me above but we'll see)
Do you think the way it is linked is okay on the 24hr motto? Simply south 12:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Self-Explanatory —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sethdoe92 ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation are not the same as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). SSSIs are legally protected and are nationally important for wildlife. Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation are important at the county level and have no statutory protection and do not necessarily support protected species. I don't think a move is needed. MRSC • Talk 17:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I would say they were less well known buildings, places and organisations that are significant,(mid) rather than key articles about important buildings, districts or topics(high) or all other less important buildings, places and stations etc. (low) MRSC • Talk 22:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure what you're question was. The bot will create the categories, so that you can place articles in them via your wikiproject banner. The category will be named Category:Scotland Transport articles by quality, for consistency with Category:London Transport articles by quality. Mahanga Talk 03:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Just an error, thanks for finding it. Next time, you don't need to alert me, just fixing it is fine :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Not at all. ;) Good call. – Luna Santin ( talk) 18:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
When I read your review and the actual sentence I actually laughed! Opps, I've changed it, I accidentaly added an e onto the end and it make it say I was an editor review, thanks for that! Telly addict 20:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I am still amazed at how these work. How do you get the images to act as links to other articles? Or is that your little secret? Simply south 23:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I didn't see anything wrong with the edit you made, did someone have a problem with it? I didn't see any discussion on that talk page or on Talk:Kings Cross, London. Did it get discussed on someone's talk page or something? Why do you say it was a kind of conflict? Show me the difs and I'll review. So far I didn't see anything wrong with anything you did, my advice so far is to of course stay civil and discuss, discuss, discuss. Peace, delldot talk 19:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
To which table of contents are you referring; are you talking about my talk page headers? Oh, and another thing, I noticed your reversion of my edit at MOTD. I was not deleting archives, the section that you reverted is not even the archives. The section that you reverted, the "Decisions to be acted on" section, is a place from which old nominations are archived.
~
Step
trip 13:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't understand your comment: lets shorten it to BNS. Pyrotec 11:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, where you talking about me when you mentioned a discussion on ANI? It was me who requested move protection of Newcastle Central Station at WP:RFP, is that what you meant? Telly addict 19:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I think its very close to perfect -- keep it non-specific, so that you don't seem to be "targeting" any candidate -- and I'd like to see it on more RfAs. Wish I'd thought of it! :) Best wishes, Xoloz 23:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
But yeah, I've been around for awhile. >Radiant< 08:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
On a small note, i've put Final Fantasy (series) up for WP:RM to Final Fantasy. Simply south 11:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I was thinking about doing that already. I made it the same size as is displayed on {{ WPTIS}} for consistency. Slambo (Speak) 19:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to take so long to get back to you. I didn't see any inappropriateness in anything in the links you showed me. You didn't seem unfriendly, you explained your position, you even apologized and it looks like you ended up compromising: model behavior. It looks from the history that there were a couple of reverts, which it is of course best to avoid; you should come to a compromise first. But this was a while ago anyway. Overall if this is your worst conflict you're in excellent shape. Peace, delldot talk 19:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Other people answered it before I got there, but I see it the same way as them ... you sound as if you're getting the horcrux number confused with the number of soul pieces he has. DD reckons he created six horcruxes to make a seven-part soul. Six soul pieces then reside in his horcruxes, and one stays in his body. If we ask how many horcruxes he has made, the answer is definitely six (according to DD).
In a practical sense, though, it works out to the same end: Harry needs to destroy seven things; the six horcruxes, and then Voldemort. It's just that saying seven horcruxes in the article isn't quite right. Daggoth S 01:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help! Andy Mabbett 20:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
.
You rejected an offer two months ago. Don't know if you changed your mind or not. You are a great user, and will make a helpful admin. AQu01rius ( User • Talk) 01:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for notifiying me that my page was to be kept. Cheers Thenthornthing 11:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I saw your reply on the Hythe talk page. I don't know what you're suggesting though - we're not responsible for the content of external websites; presumably you're suggesting we change the article to refer to Hythe as a town. As I said on the talk page, there's no town council and there's no borough named after it, and since there's ambiguity on the official websites we're safer calling Hythe a village. After all, presumably the parish council are more familiar with the place than the county council. Waggers 13:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi. The capital "L" denotes a title word and distinguishes it from the other article. Tim Long 03:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert to the vandalism on my user page! Dismas| (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
IMHO there arent any hard rules to what should be put on the noticeboard. Certainly moves should be fine. I just created for issues that were worth bringing to the attention of other memnbers, where there wasnt already a suitable place. Pit-yacker 23:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey Simply south. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. -- TeckWiz Parlate Contribs @(Lets go Yankees!) 01:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I think I'd call the template LB Westminster, it is an LB, and then would be consistent with the list of others. There already is a template Wards of the City of London, so don't bother with that. Cheers. Kbthompson 17:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, when Andonic accepts the RfA, he will add the correct closing date. Nishkid 64 20:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_Arts Please teach me how to add to list Wikipedia:Project_shortcuts. Tkjazzer 00:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Why then is it "redirects for discussion" if it is about deletions? Simply south 22:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I'm done for the night, well until much later. So, no more conflicts. Puzzled, why so many redlinks in the list? I've tried to avoid them, as if they're not important enough to have an article, they're probably not worth listing .... Where I have included redlinks, I've gone back and created an article - hint. Someone in south London is already adding postcodes to the templates, why, I wonder? (PS I changed the Hounslow P&OS->P&OS in Hounslow, otherwise, we'd need a title). Hope that's OK with you? Kbthompson 17:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
See here. --TeckWiz is now R Parlate Contribs @(Let's go Yankees!) 19:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Ouch, I know how you feel. I'm growing concerned with the way people are nominating FARs; they shouldn't blindside the writers when they are busy on other projects. FARs should be planned well in advanced for a time that the writers can be free to work on the article. — Deckill er 22:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for alerting me on my mistake. Hope you got a laugh out of that one like I did. -- Random Say it here! 00:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I know that there are enough people working on bus articles for a project. -- NE2 18:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
The UIC definition (which I agree with) states "speeds in excess of 200 km/h (125mph)". The WCML travels at, not over, 125mph. Therefore it isn't a high-speed line. Tompw ( talk) ( review) 18:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I put Mid importance on that article because I felt it fit better in that rating for TWP. While it is one of the oldest systems, I didn't think it is vital for a thorough understanding of the history and technology of rail transport on a worldwide scale. After re-reading the criteria on Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Assessment#Importance scale, I feel the subject is on the upper end of Mid importance, but still Mid. It may be High importance for WPRT or WPTIS (maybe even Top importance for WPTIS), but for rail transport in general... Slambo (Speak) 19:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Sure, just replace on the talk page with the results from here. ~ Magnus animum ( aka Steptrip) 20:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello and welcome to my February to April archive. As usual, please do not edit the archives but if you want to reopen the archive please either copy or cut, and then paste onto my current talk page
Interesting events occurred here including 2 nominations for RfA and my 1 year anniversary.
PS: I haven't created the page yet, I'm waiting for your reply. bibliomaniac 1 5 01:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
(sorry I've added it in the wrong sections, but I'd support your RFA too.)
It doesn't matter. If you feel you have a need to expand into other topics, by all means do so. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I followed the link from the Tyne and Wear Page and it must have went to the wrong article and I incorrectly added the template there, please accept my utmost apologies! Telly addict Editor review! 13:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. See my reply in the TIS talk page. Pyrotec 20:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I have made a small amend to the infobox to make platforms a non-compulsory fierld. Could you have a check of any staions you amended to amke sure they still work with the amended template? Ta
DrFrench 11:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I see that this article has lost its Articles for deletion vote and has now gone. I suggest material from the article is added into the main Hertfordshire article under appropriate categories describing the most significant cultural sites within the county. eg Antiquities Religeous monuments Museums etc.
Minor items can be included under the various sub categories for Hertfordshire.
Any comments? Lumos3 15:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Don't beleve Saintrotter's personal attack on Homer slips. Saintrotter is a right wing radical, who also layes in to Hayford Peirce. Steer well clear of Saintrotter.-- Longend. 05:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Watch out, Saitrotter put a right wing slur on my user page. -- Homer slips. 05:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Saintrotter claimed they both had a vendetta on him.I wiped it from there user pages.-- Lilidor 12:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
He's put it back, so I and my 2 frends are chosing to leave this 'Nazi-pedia'.-- Lilidor 01:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Remember, Wikipedia's policy on personal attacks states that users' affiliations are irrelelant to their contributions and should never be used to dismiss their views. It further notes to comment on article content and not the character of other Wikipedian users. Ok Don't beleve[sic] my "personal attack" lets berry our heads in the sand and ignore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Irma_Grese#War_Crimes.3F where homer uses foul language and swears... after all it's only right wing lies -- Saintrotter 11 March 2007
I don't know that the 'no fewer words than 50' rule needs changing, I personally like the idea of longer branches as it lessens the chance of a huge number being created, as was the situation with the last main game. If that's the reason for the rule, then I'd keep it, and possibly embolden it on the page with an explanation. It's more than likely that someone created the shorter branch without seeing the rule at the top; maybe it would be okay to change the word limit on the rogue branch, I doubt the branch's creator would mind. Phileas 20:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my my recent RfA in which I withdrew because the oppose votes were almost equalling the supporters. I then decided to leave my account (Tellyaddict) and start fresh under a new username, however I quickly decided to reconsider after another user persuaded me not to leave the account - I am now glad I did reconsider because leaving that account and creating a new one was too hasty so I've decided to improve rather than starting again! I hope we can remain civil and that there were no negative feelings caused. Again, thanks for your support even though I withdrew it, your vote is much appreciated! Regards - Tellyaddict ( Talk) 19:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
I'd be extremely grateful if you could take a look at the Class 378 page and leave your opinion. It has been listed as an AfD on the basis that I have not provided evidence confirming the Class number. I have done this now, but those who are promoting its deletion are not prepared to accept the sources I have given. Given your attempts to provide civility during the whole {{ British TOCs}} incident, I respect your opinion and would appreciate you contributing to the debate on this particular issue. Thanks Hammersfan 11/03/07, 13.10 GMT
I realise it's very cheeky of me to ask, but do you think you could direct some others to the discussion so that their opinions can be garnered as well? I'd be most grateful - grateful enough to possibly even buy you a pint :-) Hammersfan 11/03/07, 20.10 GMT
Thanks for creating this cat, it was overdue for consistency with other articles. I don't know want the conventional qualifications are for entry to this generic cat: if you have a mo, could look at Milton Keynes Grid Road System, Milton Keynes redway system, Wolverton railway works, Wolverton and Stony Stratford Tramway and even Grand Union Canal to see if they should be added, please? -- Concrete Cowboy 13:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Signalhead and myself have been working on these this evening for various Scottish lines and railways. Callander and Oban Railway, West Highland Line, Far North Line, Cathcart Circle Lines, Aberdeen Railway, Argyle Line and North Clyde Line worked on to date. -- Stewart 21:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Template revised to accomadate Nottingham setup. -- Stewart 22:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Midland Main Line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This is an extract. -- Stewart 22:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Midland Main Line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This should work now. -- Stewart 22:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't see a particular need to move the Wikipediholic test as it is a piece of humor and not actual policy. It's well-known at its current location and moving it, in my opinion, would only cause more trouble than it's worth. Where would you like to move it to and why? - Mgm| (talk) 08:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, as one of the more prolific contributers to the Word Association game, I just want to point you in the direction of my suggestion on the Wikipedia talk:Sandbox/Word Association page. Any ideas/comments gratefully received. Phileas 21:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Rather than edit the old template, I thought I might as well start from scratch as the title is rather specific and also too long to type from memory! I have left the old one for the time being in case someone objects to the change (S-rail, anyone?). Geof Sheppard 08:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Essjay's edit counter doesn't work anymore due to his departure from wikipedia, you may want to choose a new counter. -- ROASTY TOAST 02:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't know whether Pickle's talk page is on your watchlist, but I thought I should echo here the comment I made there, that use of "same" at junctions on these boxes should probably be avoided. Chris cheese whine 15:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Actually, the lines shown there include *all* existing dedciated high-speed lines and lines under construction that have articles on Wikipedia. (The French and Japanese lines aren't linked seperately, due to there being an "overview" type article). So, the title is valid. Tompw ( talk) 13:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Nothing further, unless there's anything else "wrong" with the redirect in question; redirects can be "orphans", without any need to do anything about them. Alai 15:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
I feel now i am asking a really random question but can this animation be slowed down as i cannot read all the messages...?! Simply south 01:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I am pretty sure what you have created would count more as an rf than an lg. Simply south 17:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, thinking about it that would be better. I've added the Junction names and linked to the lines they connect with directly. MRSC • Talk 12:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I got the Grays population from the following page: neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk - WOSlinker 19:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
You are one of the "lead editors"? I am correct, am I not. It being so, you should simply admit it, rather than hide in shadow. It is not "decent" of you to claim glory and recognition for an article which has failed the test. Sheepcot 07:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words, I'll pop the references in over the next couple of days. Regards, Nick. Nick 19:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia? I can't imagine why that would be worrying, why? Did something I or someone else said indicate that it would be worrying? What specifically would you be worried about? Peace, delldot talk 21:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, actually its not working, I saved the page and tried it on the sandbox by using show preview and it was not displaying properly, maybe you could contact User:Froth as he is apparently very good with template work, sorry I couldn't get it working but I'm sure it'll work eventually. Regards - Telly addict 15:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can I invite you to a discussion on the future of this template, and the possibility of creating two template from this one at Template talk:Midland Main Line. L.J.Skinner wot| I did 18:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick note... I fixed two code problems on this template that were causing things to display weird on transclusions. Once you finalize the assessment and importance categories, let me know and I can update {{ TrainsWikiProject}} as well. Slambo (Speak) 19:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you please let me know why you tagged this ( Island Gardens DLR station). Thanks, Stephennt
I wish you and your family a Happy and enjoyable Holiday/Easter and although its a little early I'm sure you will enjoy it!! Dont forget that its April Fools Day soon and I also hope you enjoy that as well.
|
Don't just give up on WA! Would you support a mediation request, as per the discussion at the talk page? -- Perimosocordiae 18:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
(You may not fool me above but we'll see)
Do you think the way it is linked is okay on the 24hr motto? Simply south 12:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Self-Explanatory —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sethdoe92 ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation are not the same as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). SSSIs are legally protected and are nationally important for wildlife. Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation are important at the county level and have no statutory protection and do not necessarily support protected species. I don't think a move is needed. MRSC • Talk 17:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I would say they were less well known buildings, places and organisations that are significant,(mid) rather than key articles about important buildings, districts or topics(high) or all other less important buildings, places and stations etc. (low) MRSC • Talk 22:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure what you're question was. The bot will create the categories, so that you can place articles in them via your wikiproject banner. The category will be named Category:Scotland Transport articles by quality, for consistency with Category:London Transport articles by quality. Mahanga Talk 03:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Just an error, thanks for finding it. Next time, you don't need to alert me, just fixing it is fine :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Not at all. ;) Good call. – Luna Santin ( talk) 18:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
When I read your review and the actual sentence I actually laughed! Opps, I've changed it, I accidentaly added an e onto the end and it make it say I was an editor review, thanks for that! Telly addict 20:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I am still amazed at how these work. How do you get the images to act as links to other articles? Or is that your little secret? Simply south 23:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I didn't see anything wrong with the edit you made, did someone have a problem with it? I didn't see any discussion on that talk page or on Talk:Kings Cross, London. Did it get discussed on someone's talk page or something? Why do you say it was a kind of conflict? Show me the difs and I'll review. So far I didn't see anything wrong with anything you did, my advice so far is to of course stay civil and discuss, discuss, discuss. Peace, delldot talk 19:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
To which table of contents are you referring; are you talking about my talk page headers? Oh, and another thing, I noticed your reversion of my edit at MOTD. I was not deleting archives, the section that you reverted is not even the archives. The section that you reverted, the "Decisions to be acted on" section, is a place from which old nominations are archived.
~
Step
trip 13:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't understand your comment: lets shorten it to BNS. Pyrotec 11:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, where you talking about me when you mentioned a discussion on ANI? It was me who requested move protection of Newcastle Central Station at WP:RFP, is that what you meant? Telly addict 19:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I think its very close to perfect -- keep it non-specific, so that you don't seem to be "targeting" any candidate -- and I'd like to see it on more RfAs. Wish I'd thought of it! :) Best wishes, Xoloz 23:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
But yeah, I've been around for awhile. >Radiant< 08:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
On a small note, i've put Final Fantasy (series) up for WP:RM to Final Fantasy. Simply south 11:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I was thinking about doing that already. I made it the same size as is displayed on {{ WPTIS}} for consistency. Slambo (Speak) 19:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to take so long to get back to you. I didn't see any inappropriateness in anything in the links you showed me. You didn't seem unfriendly, you explained your position, you even apologized and it looks like you ended up compromising: model behavior. It looks from the history that there were a couple of reverts, which it is of course best to avoid; you should come to a compromise first. But this was a while ago anyway. Overall if this is your worst conflict you're in excellent shape. Peace, delldot talk 19:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Other people answered it before I got there, but I see it the same way as them ... you sound as if you're getting the horcrux number confused with the number of soul pieces he has. DD reckons he created six horcruxes to make a seven-part soul. Six soul pieces then reside in his horcruxes, and one stays in his body. If we ask how many horcruxes he has made, the answer is definitely six (according to DD).
In a practical sense, though, it works out to the same end: Harry needs to destroy seven things; the six horcruxes, and then Voldemort. It's just that saying seven horcruxes in the article isn't quite right. Daggoth S 01:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help! Andy Mabbett 20:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
.
You rejected an offer two months ago. Don't know if you changed your mind or not. You are a great user, and will make a helpful admin. AQu01rius ( User • Talk) 01:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for notifiying me that my page was to be kept. Cheers Thenthornthing 11:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I saw your reply on the Hythe talk page. I don't know what you're suggesting though - we're not responsible for the content of external websites; presumably you're suggesting we change the article to refer to Hythe as a town. As I said on the talk page, there's no town council and there's no borough named after it, and since there's ambiguity on the official websites we're safer calling Hythe a village. After all, presumably the parish council are more familiar with the place than the county council. Waggers 13:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi. The capital "L" denotes a title word and distinguishes it from the other article. Tim Long 03:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert to the vandalism on my user page! Dismas| (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
IMHO there arent any hard rules to what should be put on the noticeboard. Certainly moves should be fine. I just created for issues that were worth bringing to the attention of other memnbers, where there wasnt already a suitable place. Pit-yacker 23:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey Simply south. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. -- TeckWiz Parlate Contribs @(Lets go Yankees!) 01:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I think I'd call the template LB Westminster, it is an LB, and then would be consistent with the list of others. There already is a template Wards of the City of London, so don't bother with that. Cheers. Kbthompson 17:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, when Andonic accepts the RfA, he will add the correct closing date. Nishkid 64 20:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_Arts Please teach me how to add to list Wikipedia:Project_shortcuts. Tkjazzer 00:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Why then is it "redirects for discussion" if it is about deletions? Simply south 22:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I'm done for the night, well until much later. So, no more conflicts. Puzzled, why so many redlinks in the list? I've tried to avoid them, as if they're not important enough to have an article, they're probably not worth listing .... Where I have included redlinks, I've gone back and created an article - hint. Someone in south London is already adding postcodes to the templates, why, I wonder? (PS I changed the Hounslow P&OS->P&OS in Hounslow, otherwise, we'd need a title). Hope that's OK with you? Kbthompson 17:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
See here. --TeckWiz is now R Parlate Contribs @(Let's go Yankees!) 19:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Ouch, I know how you feel. I'm growing concerned with the way people are nominating FARs; they shouldn't blindside the writers when they are busy on other projects. FARs should be planned well in advanced for a time that the writers can be free to work on the article. — Deckill er 22:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for alerting me on my mistake. Hope you got a laugh out of that one like I did. -- Random Say it here! 00:26, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I know that there are enough people working on bus articles for a project. -- NE2 18:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
The UIC definition (which I agree with) states "speeds in excess of 200 km/h (125mph)". The WCML travels at, not over, 125mph. Therefore it isn't a high-speed line. Tompw ( talk) ( review) 18:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I put Mid importance on that article because I felt it fit better in that rating for TWP. While it is one of the oldest systems, I didn't think it is vital for a thorough understanding of the history and technology of rail transport on a worldwide scale. After re-reading the criteria on Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Assessment#Importance scale, I feel the subject is on the upper end of Mid importance, but still Mid. It may be High importance for WPRT or WPTIS (maybe even Top importance for WPTIS), but for rail transport in general... Slambo (Speak) 19:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Sure, just replace on the talk page with the results from here. ~ Magnus animum ( aka Steptrip) 20:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)