This user is busy in real life due to being in school, or on a date, gone to a war, am tired, observing holiday, might be kidnapped, could be in jail, may be asleep, or perhaps dead, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
On a date? I can dream of it! If you should find I don't reply quickly, then I shall probably be tired or asleep. Or doing something else. Perhaps playing chess. Or perhaps reading the Bible. Or perhaps checking emails. Or something. Whatever. Probably not school, though, because I'm on holidays now. Well, anyway, I think you guys have got the idea.
This user is in school. This user is taking a
wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time. |
vn-1 | This user talk page has been vandalized 1 time. |
One time, someone vandalised this talk page. They inserted a comment, which you can see on the sixth section of this talk page.
If you wish to vandalise it again, would you please update this counter? Thanks! :)
And now, if you wish to talk to me in a civil manner, please start a new section here and post your comment. I'll be glad to read it as soon as I can!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Sim(ã)o(n)! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
David1217 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! David 1217 What I've done 02:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Olá Simão,
De facto, na Internet aparece a informação de que o mirandês e a língua gestual são línguas oficiais em Portugal. Mas é somente uma força de expressão, talvez com o significado de serem reconhecidas oficialmente. Língua oficial há só uma, aquela em são redigidos os documentos oficiais (há países onde são duas e mais). Tem graça, conheço bem uma pessoa que fez o texto de vários programas "Cuidado com a língua" e eu próprio colaborei em dois! Cumprimentos, Alvesgaspar ( talk) 00:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
As normas legais que regulam o assunto são a Constituição e a Lei 7/99, que já referi. No artigo também há uma nota a referir o Mirandês e a Língua gestual portuguesa, veja com atenção na caixa à direita. Não há qualquer problema em falarmos em português! O uso doutras línguas é muito comum quando se conversa nas talk pages. Os meus contributos são sobretudo em imagens (flora, fauna, edifícios, paisagem, etc.). Veja na Commons, que é o meu poiso habitual: [1]. Alvesgaspar ( talk) 20:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi- I have made edits on User:Sim(ã)o(n)/sandbox and left comments at User_talk:Sim(ã)o(n)/sandbox. Please let me know what you think. Please feel free to undo/revert anything you don't like. Best-- Godot13 ( talk) 01:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Your solution sounds fine to me. Hot Stop talk- contribs 15:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Please take a moment to review that the audio recording from the Death tape article was moved into Jonestown#Deaths in Jonestown section of the parent article ( Jonestown, Revision as of 13:27, August 24, 2013). Additionally, your reversion to the Death tape article reintroduced several statements that fall under WP:WEASEL and WP:OR, including "Some debate has been raised as to the authenticity of the tape", and "In the background of the tape, there is what sounds like organ music and/or a choir singing. After careful analysis, however, it appears the music actually consists of a number of soul tunes". There is no sourced information within the Death tape article that is not already contained within Jonestown#Deaths in Jonestown, and the lack of sources show that this article is not independently notable of Jonestown. AldezD ( talk) 12:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. Here are some of my own additional comments in response:
I'm not sure what you mean about being "reset" even though the redirect will stay in-place. Can you explain? AldezD ( talk) 17:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Based on your last comments looks like we are in agreement with authenticity. I think it'd be fine to say "widely accepted" regarding the recording date without having a definite source. Regarding the separate article, I don't feel this specific recording meets WP:GNG nor is it independently notable from Jonestown. If you want to merge anything into Jonestown we discussed above and are in agreement about including, go for it. See you around! AldezD ( talk) 12:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
How dare you edit other people's post to reflect your own personal religious beliefs? Are you insane?? By inserting this text into your personal page I am showing you the same sort of disrespect you display with your religiously motivated censorship. Would it be acceptable to you if people who find your religion offensive went into your posts and removed or altered your references to it? I can only assume it would not, and rightly so. Hypocritically, you do not show others the same basic regard/respect.
Despite my familiarity with the penchant religious folk have for imposing their magical "belief systems" on others, it still shocks me to see people like yourself so shamelessly attacking the work of others. Your sanctimonious patronizing condescension notwithstanding ('You see, I'm a Christian...[therefore it's okay for me to attack your work and change it according to my own personal opinions]'), your actions are aggressive. They are overtly aggressive acts committed against other people, and they are by definition antithetical to Wikipedian ideals.
Shame on you!!
ps - Because I am a devoted AntiChoclatarian, I have decided your reference to chocolate is offensive to my personal religion. Obviously, if it is offensive to me personally, that means it's okay for me to vandalize your page and alter your reference to it.
See how that works?
Hello Sim(ã)o(n). I have declined the latest edit request at Template talk:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2014. These continued requests with no real discussion about what to do with the template are becoming disruptive, and if you reactivate it again without a consensus to make an edit I will block you from editing for a length of time at my discretion. So please actually discuss the issue, rather than simply reactivating the edit request template without waiting for input from other editors. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Agreed.-- Jetstreamer Talk 23:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Would you please translate the entry " pt:Críticas à Rede Globo" for the wiki-en? Thankfully. 177.182.54.27 ( talk) 14:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Caro Simão. Eu não perderia tempo com este pedido. Primeiro, o autor não apresenta nenhuma justificativa, mas pronto, não é o maior pecado. O pedido vem de um IP, geralmente este tipo de pedido vem de editores mais sérios. Mas também isto não é pecado. O que realmente me preocupa é que este pedido é a soma de tudo que editor algum dia contribuiu, como podem aqui. Para quem nunca nada fez por aqui, o que quer ele agora fazer com a tradução da página? Ou é algum espertinho que tem de fazer isso de trabalho de casa durante as férias e pensou que ia aqui encontrar um trouxa para fazer isso por ele? Deixou o pedido na página de 88 editores!!! E ainda por cima nem tem uma página de discussão para receber qualquer resposta. Na WP portuguesa também apareceu hoje do nada e fez isto Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 20:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
In my capacity as the manager of the largest website on Jonestown and Peoples Temple at jonestown.sdsu.edu, I have updated the URLs from the old addresses on this page to the new ones. Fielding M. McGehee III Remoore24 ( talk) 01:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Remoore24
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Sim(ã)o(n). Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This user is busy in real life due to being in school, or on a date, gone to a war, am tired, observing holiday, might be kidnapped, could be in jail, may be asleep, or perhaps dead, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
On a date? I can dream of it! If you should find I don't reply quickly, then I shall probably be tired or asleep. Or doing something else. Perhaps playing chess. Or perhaps reading the Bible. Or perhaps checking emails. Or something. Whatever. Probably not school, though, because I'm on holidays now. Well, anyway, I think you guys have got the idea.
This user is in school. This user is taking a
wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time. |
vn-1 | This user talk page has been vandalized 1 time. |
One time, someone vandalised this talk page. They inserted a comment, which you can see on the sixth section of this talk page.
If you wish to vandalise it again, would you please update this counter? Thanks! :)
And now, if you wish to talk to me in a civil manner, please start a new section here and post your comment. I'll be glad to read it as soon as I can!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Sim(ã)o(n)! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
David1217 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! David 1217 What I've done 02:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Olá Simão,
De facto, na Internet aparece a informação de que o mirandês e a língua gestual são línguas oficiais em Portugal. Mas é somente uma força de expressão, talvez com o significado de serem reconhecidas oficialmente. Língua oficial há só uma, aquela em são redigidos os documentos oficiais (há países onde são duas e mais). Tem graça, conheço bem uma pessoa que fez o texto de vários programas "Cuidado com a língua" e eu próprio colaborei em dois! Cumprimentos, Alvesgaspar ( talk) 00:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
As normas legais que regulam o assunto são a Constituição e a Lei 7/99, que já referi. No artigo também há uma nota a referir o Mirandês e a Língua gestual portuguesa, veja com atenção na caixa à direita. Não há qualquer problema em falarmos em português! O uso doutras línguas é muito comum quando se conversa nas talk pages. Os meus contributos são sobretudo em imagens (flora, fauna, edifícios, paisagem, etc.). Veja na Commons, que é o meu poiso habitual: [1]. Alvesgaspar ( talk) 20:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi- I have made edits on User:Sim(ã)o(n)/sandbox and left comments at User_talk:Sim(ã)o(n)/sandbox. Please let me know what you think. Please feel free to undo/revert anything you don't like. Best-- Godot13 ( talk) 01:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Your solution sounds fine to me. Hot Stop talk- contribs 15:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Please take a moment to review that the audio recording from the Death tape article was moved into Jonestown#Deaths in Jonestown section of the parent article ( Jonestown, Revision as of 13:27, August 24, 2013). Additionally, your reversion to the Death tape article reintroduced several statements that fall under WP:WEASEL and WP:OR, including "Some debate has been raised as to the authenticity of the tape", and "In the background of the tape, there is what sounds like organ music and/or a choir singing. After careful analysis, however, it appears the music actually consists of a number of soul tunes". There is no sourced information within the Death tape article that is not already contained within Jonestown#Deaths in Jonestown, and the lack of sources show that this article is not independently notable of Jonestown. AldezD ( talk) 12:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. Here are some of my own additional comments in response:
I'm not sure what you mean about being "reset" even though the redirect will stay in-place. Can you explain? AldezD ( talk) 17:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Based on your last comments looks like we are in agreement with authenticity. I think it'd be fine to say "widely accepted" regarding the recording date without having a definite source. Regarding the separate article, I don't feel this specific recording meets WP:GNG nor is it independently notable from Jonestown. If you want to merge anything into Jonestown we discussed above and are in agreement about including, go for it. See you around! AldezD ( talk) 12:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
How dare you edit other people's post to reflect your own personal religious beliefs? Are you insane?? By inserting this text into your personal page I am showing you the same sort of disrespect you display with your religiously motivated censorship. Would it be acceptable to you if people who find your religion offensive went into your posts and removed or altered your references to it? I can only assume it would not, and rightly so. Hypocritically, you do not show others the same basic regard/respect.
Despite my familiarity with the penchant religious folk have for imposing their magical "belief systems" on others, it still shocks me to see people like yourself so shamelessly attacking the work of others. Your sanctimonious patronizing condescension notwithstanding ('You see, I'm a Christian...[therefore it's okay for me to attack your work and change it according to my own personal opinions]'), your actions are aggressive. They are overtly aggressive acts committed against other people, and they are by definition antithetical to Wikipedian ideals.
Shame on you!!
ps - Because I am a devoted AntiChoclatarian, I have decided your reference to chocolate is offensive to my personal religion. Obviously, if it is offensive to me personally, that means it's okay for me to vandalize your page and alter your reference to it.
See how that works?
Hello Sim(ã)o(n). I have declined the latest edit request at Template talk:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2014. These continued requests with no real discussion about what to do with the template are becoming disruptive, and if you reactivate it again without a consensus to make an edit I will block you from editing for a length of time at my discretion. So please actually discuss the issue, rather than simply reactivating the edit request template without waiting for input from other editors. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Agreed.-- Jetstreamer Talk 23:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Would you please translate the entry " pt:Críticas à Rede Globo" for the wiki-en? Thankfully. 177.182.54.27 ( talk) 14:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Caro Simão. Eu não perderia tempo com este pedido. Primeiro, o autor não apresenta nenhuma justificativa, mas pronto, não é o maior pecado. O pedido vem de um IP, geralmente este tipo de pedido vem de editores mais sérios. Mas também isto não é pecado. O que realmente me preocupa é que este pedido é a soma de tudo que editor algum dia contribuiu, como podem aqui. Para quem nunca nada fez por aqui, o que quer ele agora fazer com a tradução da página? Ou é algum espertinho que tem de fazer isso de trabalho de casa durante as férias e pensou que ia aqui encontrar um trouxa para fazer isso por ele? Deixou o pedido na página de 88 editores!!! E ainda por cima nem tem uma página de discussão para receber qualquer resposta. Na WP portuguesa também apareceu hoje do nada e fez isto Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 20:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
In my capacity as the manager of the largest website on Jonestown and Peoples Temple at jonestown.sdsu.edu, I have updated the URLs from the old addresses on this page to the new ones. Fielding M. McGehee III Remoore24 ( talk) 01:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Remoore24
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Sim(ã)o(n). Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)