This is Sillaro Valley's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello! Sillaro Valley,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk) 19:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi Sillaro Valley! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Resolved as irrelevant
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 18:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
|
---|
Hello Sillaro Valley. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's
mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of
conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on
neutral point of view and what
Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to
black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Sillaro Valley. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: |
___
Reply: I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Therefore, there is not category of COI. The draft has been submitted through the articles of creation. Sillaro Valley ( talk) 21:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Sillaro Valley
Hello! I am here to help with the Bonetti Kozerski Architecture page. I am not being compensated in this nor am I financially involved with them. I understand we need to make more edits to make it editorially work for you. Can you please let me know specifically I can do to help this process? Thank you in advance!!!
( Sillaro Valley ( talk) 15:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)).
Hello:
I wanted to edit the Bonetti Kozerski page for Wikipedia and understand some edit might need to be made. I am not an employee of theirs nor are they compensating me for this effort. Thank you in advance for your assistance!
MD
Sillaro Valley ( talk) 16:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Also see the reviewer's message above, please. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:ToBeFree, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CLCStudent ( talk) 18:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Loksmythe ( talk) 20:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)This is Sillaro Valley's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello! Sillaro Valley,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk) 19:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi Sillaro Valley! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Resolved as irrelevant
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 18:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
|
---|
Hello Sillaro Valley. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's
mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of
conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on
neutral point of view and what
Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to
black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Sillaro Valley. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: |
___
Reply: I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Therefore, there is not category of COI. The draft has been submitted through the articles of creation. Sillaro Valley ( talk) 21:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Sillaro Valley
Hello! I am here to help with the Bonetti Kozerski Architecture page. I am not being compensated in this nor am I financially involved with them. I understand we need to make more edits to make it editorially work for you. Can you please let me know specifically I can do to help this process? Thank you in advance!!!
( Sillaro Valley ( talk) 15:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)).
Hello:
I wanted to edit the Bonetti Kozerski page for Wikipedia and understand some edit might need to be made. I am not an employee of theirs nor are they compensating me for this effort. Thank you in advance for your assistance!
MD
Sillaro Valley ( talk) 16:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Also see the reviewer's message above, please. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:39, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:ToBeFree, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CLCStudent ( talk) 18:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Loksmythe ( talk) 20:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)