![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ok
I really have no wish to get into a major dispute. But Auschwitz I, which is the camp in the photo at the top of the article, was not an extermination camp. Auschwitz-Birkenau certainly was. But let us be clear as to what the article refers to, and indeed, what the Polish Government referred to. Both refer to Auschwitz-Birkenau, not to Auschwitz I.-- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 23:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Made some changes to the Freshman article. Check it out and see if it is ok. Garyguitarist 13:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi - as you have seen I have added a few more historic lines this evening. I would welcome you casting you eye over the Inverness and Perth Junction Railway. Decided that the Aberfeldy Branch was best incorporated.
My next targets are Perth and Dunkeld Railway and Scottish Midland Junction Railway to complete the route between Inverness and Perth, this will be followed by the Inverness and Aberdeen Junction Railway and associated lines heading east.. -- Stewart 22:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the input into this article. Do you have a source for the information you changed? I was only going by the source I had, which was quite comprehensive in its coverage of the subject. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 10:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Two more Historical Railways added today - Perth and Dunkeld Railway and Scottish Midland Junction Railway. Not happy with the SMJR route with respect to the lines to Newtyle. My information indicates that these lines were absorbed and "upgraded" to form part of the SMJR.
Also not sure how to develop an article for the SNER as it is essentially an amalgamation of various companies, prior to becoming part of the Caledonian Railway. Should there also be a section added to the CR article?
Your thoughts would be very helpful. -- Stewart 21:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Can you help with this? RAILSCOT identifies a Fairlie (Low) station just to the north of the tunnel. Jowett identifies a Goods station as Fairlie Harbour. In 1971 Fairlie Pier station was closed, leaving the only remaining station Fairlie which at one time was called Fairlie High. Can you shed any light on Fairlie (Low)? Discussion with Dreamer84 has put a doubt in my mind. -- Stewart 22:03, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, would you be so kind as to provide an indepenant neutral opinion of the image Construccionkaiserrick.jpg at the section of the same name on the talk page of Richmond Medical Center here please? Thank you very much as this may help to alleviate a current debate over its inclusion.Cholga talK! 01:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting my typos - the dreaded copy and paste got to me and you then picked up some of my errors just before I did. -- Stewart (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Stewart. The above article currently has wikilinks to Shields Road railway station and Shields railway station, which redirect back to Pollokshields railway station. My first thought was to remove these self-links, or is it the intention to eventually have separate articles for each station? Signalhead 19:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
An anonymous editor is stating that this station was closed due to a train crash. I cannot find any reference to a crash here. I have put a query on the talk page, can you help? -- Stewart (talk) 21:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction. Was a bit confused by the description in the Crianlarich Lower railway station article. For the area covered two boxes seemed a bit excessive. Having read the article again I guess this was my misunderstanding of the description, thinking that the Upper junction was the East junction. -- Stewart (talk) 21:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Ref: Borlänge Airport Hello The coordinates are those for Arvika Airport some 160 km SW of Borlänge! I found that when I flew Google earth over my birthplace. Do you know how to change this? Regards Holger Joné
Stenbacksstigen 12 SE 181 62 Lidingö, Sweden Tel +468 76 61 261 mobile +4670 653 8150 E-mail: holger@racken.com Homepage:[www.racken.com] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.67.158.19 ( talk) 09:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I added an image to Centralized traffic control. I believe what I've said in the caption is correct, but I'm pretty ignorant of the subject, I just happen to have taken the photo. Could you please check my work? Also, you might want to click through to the image page on Commons and see if you can add usefully to the description. Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 01:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Please see this discussion: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MilesM11. It appears User:MilesM11 has modified his userpage to possibly attack you, against Wikipedia:User page policy. You're invited to comment. - Mtmelendez ( Talk| UB| Home) 22:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting my spelling. -- Stewart (talk) 23:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I have left a message at User talk:82.26.178.148 following the reversion of the number of platforms at Waverley and Haymarket. This user has also amended the numbers at Thirsk and Markinch, however I do not have enough knowledge to be sure of thses. You might wish to take a look. -- Stewart (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for turning this round. Still having difficulty with the legacy arrangement back in the days of the Slamannan and Borrowstounness Railway. -- Stewart (talk) 15:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I suggest you find out something about the subject before reverting articles to incorrect information. I B Wright 12:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know, awhile is a perfectly valid word in many contexts. Most of your edits seem to be changing this word in quotes, which is a no-no. CloudNine 23:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
I understand that Ismism dosent sound like a real reliegon but in all honesty it is. Please do not delete my contributions to the Ism page. Thank you.
I saw your userbox saying your userpage was vandalized 8 times. If I were to edit that userbox to say your userpage was vandalized 9 times, would you revert it as vandalism? If you did, then you would then have to put down that it had been vandalized 9 times, in which case why would you even revert the edit? But if you didn't, that means it isn't vandalism, in which case your userpage would still have been vandalized 8 times, so it is vandalism, so it should be reverted. But if it is vandalism, it shouldn't be reverted because it's true. So, can you solve this paradox? Smartyllama 19:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Good evening!
I've not contributed to wikipedia for a while and will probably continue to not do so, but I'm just saying hello as an S&T man myself :-)
Cleaned up treadle (railway) a bit earlier.
-- BesigedB ( talk) 22:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok I was sent by my priest to add an Ismism page to wikipedia. My priest is however a technaphobe and is for the moment unwilling to get an e-mail so that you can confirm that Ismism is a real reliegon. I am attempting to get him to make an e-mail adress. Thank you for your cooperation.
Rusty Shakelford 18:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I will bow to your more recent knowledge, however I was taking information from O.S. Nock's book Electric Euston to Glasgow (Plate 18 and page 140) which identifies the junction as Strawfrank. When was it renamed (and why??) -- Stewart (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
than you for help in editing my page!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.107.65 ( talk) 00:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
I am experiencing a degree of fustration with this editor, as he is making inaccurate edits and not taking care when creating wikilinks and with his spelling. His recent comment about deleted images make me think that he is unaware of image policy. Your responses make me think have a similar fustration. Any thoughts? -- Stewart (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I've ran several changes you've made through formal grammar check and the change is personal preference on your part, not grammatically incorrect. IrishLass 21:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Oops - thanks for correcting the title. I did the template yesterday whilst waiting for a flight home from Heathrow and as always I welcome your peer checking of my work. -- Stewart (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Do you fancy looking at this route map. Jowett and RAILSCOT disagree with the branches off this route. -- Stewart (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ok
I really have no wish to get into a major dispute. But Auschwitz I, which is the camp in the photo at the top of the article, was not an extermination camp. Auschwitz-Birkenau certainly was. But let us be clear as to what the article refers to, and indeed, what the Polish Government referred to. Both refer to Auschwitz-Birkenau, not to Auschwitz I.-- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 23:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Made some changes to the Freshman article. Check it out and see if it is ok. Garyguitarist 13:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi - as you have seen I have added a few more historic lines this evening. I would welcome you casting you eye over the Inverness and Perth Junction Railway. Decided that the Aberfeldy Branch was best incorporated.
My next targets are Perth and Dunkeld Railway and Scottish Midland Junction Railway to complete the route between Inverness and Perth, this will be followed by the Inverness and Aberdeen Junction Railway and associated lines heading east.. -- Stewart 22:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the input into this article. Do you have a source for the information you changed? I was only going by the source I had, which was quite comprehensive in its coverage of the subject. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 10:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Two more Historical Railways added today - Perth and Dunkeld Railway and Scottish Midland Junction Railway. Not happy with the SMJR route with respect to the lines to Newtyle. My information indicates that these lines were absorbed and "upgraded" to form part of the SMJR.
Also not sure how to develop an article for the SNER as it is essentially an amalgamation of various companies, prior to becoming part of the Caledonian Railway. Should there also be a section added to the CR article?
Your thoughts would be very helpful. -- Stewart 21:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Can you help with this? RAILSCOT identifies a Fairlie (Low) station just to the north of the tunnel. Jowett identifies a Goods station as Fairlie Harbour. In 1971 Fairlie Pier station was closed, leaving the only remaining station Fairlie which at one time was called Fairlie High. Can you shed any light on Fairlie (Low)? Discussion with Dreamer84 has put a doubt in my mind. -- Stewart 22:03, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, would you be so kind as to provide an indepenant neutral opinion of the image Construccionkaiserrick.jpg at the section of the same name on the talk page of Richmond Medical Center here please? Thank you very much as this may help to alleviate a current debate over its inclusion.Cholga talK! 01:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting my typos - the dreaded copy and paste got to me and you then picked up some of my errors just before I did. -- Stewart (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Stewart. The above article currently has wikilinks to Shields Road railway station and Shields railway station, which redirect back to Pollokshields railway station. My first thought was to remove these self-links, or is it the intention to eventually have separate articles for each station? Signalhead 19:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
An anonymous editor is stating that this station was closed due to a train crash. I cannot find any reference to a crash here. I have put a query on the talk page, can you help? -- Stewart (talk) 21:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction. Was a bit confused by the description in the Crianlarich Lower railway station article. For the area covered two boxes seemed a bit excessive. Having read the article again I guess this was my misunderstanding of the description, thinking that the Upper junction was the East junction. -- Stewart (talk) 21:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Ref: Borlänge Airport Hello The coordinates are those for Arvika Airport some 160 km SW of Borlänge! I found that when I flew Google earth over my birthplace. Do you know how to change this? Regards Holger Joné
Stenbacksstigen 12 SE 181 62 Lidingö, Sweden Tel +468 76 61 261 mobile +4670 653 8150 E-mail: holger@racken.com Homepage:[www.racken.com] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.67.158.19 ( talk) 09:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I added an image to Centralized traffic control. I believe what I've said in the caption is correct, but I'm pretty ignorant of the subject, I just happen to have taken the photo. Could you please check my work? Also, you might want to click through to the image page on Commons and see if you can add usefully to the description. Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 01:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Please see this discussion: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MilesM11. It appears User:MilesM11 has modified his userpage to possibly attack you, against Wikipedia:User page policy. You're invited to comment. - Mtmelendez ( Talk| UB| Home) 22:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting my spelling. -- Stewart (talk) 23:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I have left a message at User talk:82.26.178.148 following the reversion of the number of platforms at Waverley and Haymarket. This user has also amended the numbers at Thirsk and Markinch, however I do not have enough knowledge to be sure of thses. You might wish to take a look. -- Stewart (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for turning this round. Still having difficulty with the legacy arrangement back in the days of the Slamannan and Borrowstounness Railway. -- Stewart (talk) 15:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I suggest you find out something about the subject before reverting articles to incorrect information. I B Wright 12:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know, awhile is a perfectly valid word in many contexts. Most of your edits seem to be changing this word in quotes, which is a no-no. CloudNine 23:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
I understand that Ismism dosent sound like a real reliegon but in all honesty it is. Please do not delete my contributions to the Ism page. Thank you.
I saw your userbox saying your userpage was vandalized 8 times. If I were to edit that userbox to say your userpage was vandalized 9 times, would you revert it as vandalism? If you did, then you would then have to put down that it had been vandalized 9 times, in which case why would you even revert the edit? But if you didn't, that means it isn't vandalism, in which case your userpage would still have been vandalized 8 times, so it is vandalism, so it should be reverted. But if it is vandalism, it shouldn't be reverted because it's true. So, can you solve this paradox? Smartyllama 19:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Good evening!
I've not contributed to wikipedia for a while and will probably continue to not do so, but I'm just saying hello as an S&T man myself :-)
Cleaned up treadle (railway) a bit earlier.
-- BesigedB ( talk) 22:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok I was sent by my priest to add an Ismism page to wikipedia. My priest is however a technaphobe and is for the moment unwilling to get an e-mail so that you can confirm that Ismism is a real reliegon. I am attempting to get him to make an e-mail adress. Thank you for your cooperation.
Rusty Shakelford 18:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I will bow to your more recent knowledge, however I was taking information from O.S. Nock's book Electric Euston to Glasgow (Plate 18 and page 140) which identifies the junction as Strawfrank. When was it renamed (and why??) -- Stewart (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
than you for help in editing my page!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.107.65 ( talk) 00:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
I am experiencing a degree of fustration with this editor, as he is making inaccurate edits and not taking care when creating wikilinks and with his spelling. His recent comment about deleted images make me think that he is unaware of image policy. Your responses make me think have a similar fustration. Any thoughts? -- Stewart (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I've ran several changes you've made through formal grammar check and the change is personal preference on your part, not grammatically incorrect. IrishLass 21:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Oops - thanks for correcting the title. I did the template yesterday whilst waiting for a flight home from Heathrow and as always I welcome your peer checking of my work. -- Stewart (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Do you fancy looking at this route map. Jowett and RAILSCOT disagree with the branches off this route. -- Stewart (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |