THIS IS AN ARCHIVED TALK PAGE. PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE.
Welcome!
Hello, Sietse Snel/Archive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
Lst
27 18:28, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Hallo Sietse, welkom op Wikipedia. Ik werk zelf het meeste aan de Nederlandstalige wikipedia. Ik wens je veel plezier hier. Ellywa 21:00, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Nice edits on this subject! I know you are a psychologist but I feel I have to point out that the DSM-IV is published by the American Psychiatric Association. As a psychiatrist who has enjoyed working with many psychologists over the years, welcome to the multidisciplinary team! -- CloudSurfer 03:56, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
At present there is only one article on this subject. Ideally the subject of narcissism should be a separate article dealing with Freud and others on this subject looking at the theories of primary and secondary narcissism etc. Then there should be a DSM type article on Narcissistic PD. I wonder if you are interested in doing this? -- CloudSurfer 17:38, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Guys, lets's continue this conversation on my talk page - many thanks. Samvak
Verwisselen van de foto's is geen probleem! Elke verbetering is uiteraard prima. Fruggo 13:59, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)Hi, test
Valuable improvements. The original was modified from the one at the front of the DSM-IV. I have added a little to what you have said and changed your footnote into a reference for style consistency. I have been looking at adding this to each and every DSM diagnosis on Wikipedia! I guess I'll get around to it eventually. -- CloudSurfer 18:30, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I noticed you changed the category for compulsive hoarding. I have gone back and added the anxiety disorder I had added a few days ago. Just recently I have created an entire heirachy of categories under Category:Disorder. You might like to go there and add Category:Abnormal psychology to each of the sub-categories under disorder. That way you will follow down the DSM tree, if that is suitable.
Psychology Psychiatry Abnormal psychology Disorder All the others
That would then give both psychologists and psychiatrists and entry point from their own categories. Alternatively, you might want to do the simplest change and that would be to add Abnormal psychology as a category, and thus a parent category to Disorder. That would then mean the tree would be:
Psychology Psychiatry Abnormal psychology Disorder All the others
Anyway, lets work towards the same purpose if possible. If you really want to organise your categories differently then there is no reason why you can't. But please add yours rather than changing ours. If I have changed yours then I am truly sorry. I made about 50 changes or additions that day and I didn't at that time understand the psychology tree. -- CloudSurfer 12:25, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
P.S. as you would understand, unless it is in a category under "Disorder" it can't be immediately accessed from the "Psychiatry" category. -- CloudSurfer 22:33, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Dear Sietse, I have copied part of your recent question on this subject to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychopathology. Please go there to see my reply. If we keep psychopathology discussions here then the entire project is aware of them and can contribute. Mind you, its a bit of a slow group to respond at times. -- CloudSurfer 22:36, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I reverted some anon edits on your user page Geni 10:11, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Dear Sietse, I thought it sounded like nonsense too so I did a search for "Indigo children" in Google. I was surprised when I got 22,600 hits. Including this homepage. Further down on the page is a description of "Indigo children". Sounds like it could go back into the article on Insanity as an example of differing views but with a qualification. It sounds like it deserves an article of its own looking critically at the concept. As Hamlet says, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,/ than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Speaking of which, I hope you caught up with my edits to Homosexual panic. I have tried to be NPOV on it but I must say my references and coverage of it mainly suggest that it should not be used as a defence for gay bashing. Let's wait for someone to come along and challenge this. -- CloudSurfer 05:53, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Please, when you add {{notenglish}} to a page, also make a note on Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English. It's rather tedious following up on this otherwise. But thanks for doing at least step one. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:10, Oct 16, 2004 (UTC)
Just a note to say welcome to the Psychopathology Wikiproject and thanks for your contributions! - Vaughan 12:04, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hallo Sietse leuk dat je een van de artikelen die ik ooit geschreven heb hebt vertaald. De meeste artikelen in de Thailand regio op nl.wiki zijn van mijn hand. Het is 1 van de oudere artikelen die ik heb gemaakt bijna een jaar geleden. Misschien kan hij nog wel wat bijgeschaafd worden. Waerth 18:38, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Poutine actually tastes very good, so one couldn't conclude that the vandalism was a personnal attack against Grunt's mum. J/k. --[[User:Valmi|Valmi ✒]] 16:22, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
It is a truly wonderful thing to share the Legend of Beal with others. Clay Beal really does attend Texas A&M, and will walk on the team, and is 6-11. He has dubious ties to Pippen, and some people suggest that he is indeed his father. His mother is Merlene Beal. All of the "characters" actually exist, and have done all of the things that the article claims thay have. If Clay someday is in the NBA, wouldn't you like to already have a page about him, including a comprehensive history of his life?
Ok, I edit like any normal person and expect no fantasies in the articles-especially those about my royal family. This isn't the day for adding Slavic delusions of grandeur with the Danish Empire and England. They may have had greater relationship with Sweden, but not Denmark and certainly not England! It is you who has indiscriminately applied a percieved rule when none such applies. I merely corrected the disoriented versions. If I attempted to mediate with the Poles, they'd have none of it and still insert their POV as the favoured truth. Don't mess with me on this, I swear to fucking God I'll have your ass for dinner! 24.255.40.174 15:07, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks, and I apologize for my comment. I'd like you to know that I understand your position. 24.255.40.174 16:33, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of the vandalism on my user page back on 29 October. So fast I didn't even notice it until I happened to look at the history today. :) Jamesday 07:24, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. I responded via email, via wiki. Jjk 22:56, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Please don't systematically change "External links" -> "External link". — Matt 16:15, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for your support and your kind words! -- jpgordon{ gab} 06:15, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Me too! -- Woggly 21:18, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Greetings TB, Neilc, Sietse Snel, and Erik Zachte! I'm posing this message on each of your four talk pages, asking you if you're interested in unifying the different Wiki fixup projects ( User:Topbanana/Reports + User:Neilc/External links + User:Sietse_Snel/Fix_common_mistakes + Wiki Syntax Project + Erik's list of HTML problems that he emailed me a subset of).
Currently, we all have different pages at different locations listing different types of problems. What I'm wondering is whether we and the Wikipedia would all be slightly better off if we had one location that contained all of the outstanding problems from all of these different projects. It would be the ultimate clearing-house for problem-finders like us to list problems, and for contributors to go find list of things that need fixing, and fix those problems.
Consider the benefits:
What do you think? Are you interested? I'm completely open to your suggestions - and to get us started, can I just throw some ideas out there:
Maybe I'm crazy. Maybe it's a bad idea. I'd really like to think it could work. Maybe it's a good idea. You tell me.
P.s. To save lots of different messages on different pages, can we please have one location where everybody can speak their mind? How about Topbanana's talk page ?
All the best, -- Nickj 07:11, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hi Sam, I have noticed your name on Wikipedia because of your impressive amount of contributions with fixing spelling, grammar, and similar errors. I have recently started a project which also aims to improve this aspect of Wikipedia: User:Sietse_Snel/Fix_common_mistakes. I thought you might be interested in joining, or maybe you have ideas about ways to improve this project. If you don't feel like joining, maybe we could coordinate our activities a bit so that we are not both trying to fix the same things at the same time. Compliments for your work and best regards, Sietse 14:32, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
You and the rest of your team have been making excellent and much needed minor edits. In recognition of your dedication, I offer you my sincere gratitude, and this Minor Barnstar. -- [[User:ClockworkSoul| User:ClockworkSoul/sig]] 07:08, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for setting up the double-by and other error lists. I've just spent a happy half-hour fixing a couple dozen of them, and in the process read articles I never would have seen, and made a few other fixes, too. Beats the heck out of work! - DavidWBrooks 15:47, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. – Ram-Man ( comment) ( talk)[[]] 15:34, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
Hi, is it possible to put a new list of possible miscapitalisations on the page? It looks like more and more people want to do fixes! Also, you may be interested in the Wikispeling project: it is a lot less ambitious (for the moment), but I find it fun and instructive to fix articles in other languages. Regards, Sam Hocevar 00:33, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Salve, Sietse Snel!
I wanted to drop you a line to thank you for your support in my successful
RFA candidacy. It was very gratifying to see the kind remarks posted in the debate. Ave!
PedanticallySpeaking 17:45, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
THIS IS AN ARCHIVED TALK PAGE. PLEASE DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE.
Welcome!
Hello, Sietse Snel/Archive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
Lst
27 18:28, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Hallo Sietse, welkom op Wikipedia. Ik werk zelf het meeste aan de Nederlandstalige wikipedia. Ik wens je veel plezier hier. Ellywa 21:00, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Nice edits on this subject! I know you are a psychologist but I feel I have to point out that the DSM-IV is published by the American Psychiatric Association. As a psychiatrist who has enjoyed working with many psychologists over the years, welcome to the multidisciplinary team! -- CloudSurfer 03:56, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
At present there is only one article on this subject. Ideally the subject of narcissism should be a separate article dealing with Freud and others on this subject looking at the theories of primary and secondary narcissism etc. Then there should be a DSM type article on Narcissistic PD. I wonder if you are interested in doing this? -- CloudSurfer 17:38, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Guys, lets's continue this conversation on my talk page - many thanks. Samvak
Verwisselen van de foto's is geen probleem! Elke verbetering is uiteraard prima. Fruggo 13:59, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)Hi, test
Valuable improvements. The original was modified from the one at the front of the DSM-IV. I have added a little to what you have said and changed your footnote into a reference for style consistency. I have been looking at adding this to each and every DSM diagnosis on Wikipedia! I guess I'll get around to it eventually. -- CloudSurfer 18:30, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I noticed you changed the category for compulsive hoarding. I have gone back and added the anxiety disorder I had added a few days ago. Just recently I have created an entire heirachy of categories under Category:Disorder. You might like to go there and add Category:Abnormal psychology to each of the sub-categories under disorder. That way you will follow down the DSM tree, if that is suitable.
Psychology Psychiatry Abnormal psychology Disorder All the others
That would then give both psychologists and psychiatrists and entry point from their own categories. Alternatively, you might want to do the simplest change and that would be to add Abnormal psychology as a category, and thus a parent category to Disorder. That would then mean the tree would be:
Psychology Psychiatry Abnormal psychology Disorder All the others
Anyway, lets work towards the same purpose if possible. If you really want to organise your categories differently then there is no reason why you can't. But please add yours rather than changing ours. If I have changed yours then I am truly sorry. I made about 50 changes or additions that day and I didn't at that time understand the psychology tree. -- CloudSurfer 12:25, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
P.S. as you would understand, unless it is in a category under "Disorder" it can't be immediately accessed from the "Psychiatry" category. -- CloudSurfer 22:33, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Dear Sietse, I have copied part of your recent question on this subject to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychopathology. Please go there to see my reply. If we keep psychopathology discussions here then the entire project is aware of them and can contribute. Mind you, its a bit of a slow group to respond at times. -- CloudSurfer 22:36, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I reverted some anon edits on your user page Geni 10:11, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Dear Sietse, I thought it sounded like nonsense too so I did a search for "Indigo children" in Google. I was surprised when I got 22,600 hits. Including this homepage. Further down on the page is a description of "Indigo children". Sounds like it could go back into the article on Insanity as an example of differing views but with a qualification. It sounds like it deserves an article of its own looking critically at the concept. As Hamlet says, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,/ than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Speaking of which, I hope you caught up with my edits to Homosexual panic. I have tried to be NPOV on it but I must say my references and coverage of it mainly suggest that it should not be used as a defence for gay bashing. Let's wait for someone to come along and challenge this. -- CloudSurfer 05:53, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Please, when you add {{notenglish}} to a page, also make a note on Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English. It's rather tedious following up on this otherwise. But thanks for doing at least step one. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:10, Oct 16, 2004 (UTC)
Just a note to say welcome to the Psychopathology Wikiproject and thanks for your contributions! - Vaughan 12:04, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hallo Sietse leuk dat je een van de artikelen die ik ooit geschreven heb hebt vertaald. De meeste artikelen in de Thailand regio op nl.wiki zijn van mijn hand. Het is 1 van de oudere artikelen die ik heb gemaakt bijna een jaar geleden. Misschien kan hij nog wel wat bijgeschaafd worden. Waerth 18:38, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Poutine actually tastes very good, so one couldn't conclude that the vandalism was a personnal attack against Grunt's mum. J/k. --[[User:Valmi|Valmi ✒]] 16:22, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
It is a truly wonderful thing to share the Legend of Beal with others. Clay Beal really does attend Texas A&M, and will walk on the team, and is 6-11. He has dubious ties to Pippen, and some people suggest that he is indeed his father. His mother is Merlene Beal. All of the "characters" actually exist, and have done all of the things that the article claims thay have. If Clay someday is in the NBA, wouldn't you like to already have a page about him, including a comprehensive history of his life?
Ok, I edit like any normal person and expect no fantasies in the articles-especially those about my royal family. This isn't the day for adding Slavic delusions of grandeur with the Danish Empire and England. They may have had greater relationship with Sweden, but not Denmark and certainly not England! It is you who has indiscriminately applied a percieved rule when none such applies. I merely corrected the disoriented versions. If I attempted to mediate with the Poles, they'd have none of it and still insert their POV as the favoured truth. Don't mess with me on this, I swear to fucking God I'll have your ass for dinner! 24.255.40.174 15:07, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks, and I apologize for my comment. I'd like you to know that I understand your position. 24.255.40.174 16:33, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of the vandalism on my user page back on 29 October. So fast I didn't even notice it until I happened to look at the history today. :) Jamesday 07:24, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. I responded via email, via wiki. Jjk 22:56, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Please don't systematically change "External links" -> "External link". — Matt 16:15, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for your support and your kind words! -- jpgordon{ gab} 06:15, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Me too! -- Woggly 21:18, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Greetings TB, Neilc, Sietse Snel, and Erik Zachte! I'm posing this message on each of your four talk pages, asking you if you're interested in unifying the different Wiki fixup projects ( User:Topbanana/Reports + User:Neilc/External links + User:Sietse_Snel/Fix_common_mistakes + Wiki Syntax Project + Erik's list of HTML problems that he emailed me a subset of).
Currently, we all have different pages at different locations listing different types of problems. What I'm wondering is whether we and the Wikipedia would all be slightly better off if we had one location that contained all of the outstanding problems from all of these different projects. It would be the ultimate clearing-house for problem-finders like us to list problems, and for contributors to go find list of things that need fixing, and fix those problems.
Consider the benefits:
What do you think? Are you interested? I'm completely open to your suggestions - and to get us started, can I just throw some ideas out there:
Maybe I'm crazy. Maybe it's a bad idea. I'd really like to think it could work. Maybe it's a good idea. You tell me.
P.s. To save lots of different messages on different pages, can we please have one location where everybody can speak their mind? How about Topbanana's talk page ?
All the best, -- Nickj 07:11, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hi Sam, I have noticed your name on Wikipedia because of your impressive amount of contributions with fixing spelling, grammar, and similar errors. I have recently started a project which also aims to improve this aspect of Wikipedia: User:Sietse_Snel/Fix_common_mistakes. I thought you might be interested in joining, or maybe you have ideas about ways to improve this project. If you don't feel like joining, maybe we could coordinate our activities a bit so that we are not both trying to fix the same things at the same time. Compliments for your work and best regards, Sietse 14:32, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
You and the rest of your team have been making excellent and much needed minor edits. In recognition of your dedication, I offer you my sincere gratitude, and this Minor Barnstar. -- [[User:ClockworkSoul| User:ClockworkSoul/sig]] 07:08, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for setting up the double-by and other error lists. I've just spent a happy half-hour fixing a couple dozen of them, and in the process read articles I never would have seen, and made a few other fixes, too. Beats the heck out of work! - DavidWBrooks 15:47, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. – Ram-Man ( comment) ( talk)[[]] 15:34, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
Hi, is it possible to put a new list of possible miscapitalisations on the page? It looks like more and more people want to do fixes! Also, you may be interested in the Wikispeling project: it is a lot less ambitious (for the moment), but I find it fun and instructive to fix articles in other languages. Regards, Sam Hocevar 00:33, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Salve, Sietse Snel!
I wanted to drop you a line to thank you for your support in my successful
RFA candidacy. It was very gratifying to see the kind remarks posted in the debate. Ave!
PedanticallySpeaking 17:45, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)