This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
User:reillyd read your edit, where you put a uncategorised tag. I'm new (duh!) but don't know what to do to assign it a category. Any chance of sending a message, or writing one on my talk page?
User:Shyamsunder told me you were the guy for Lok sabha election templates. I'm copying the message I gave to Shyamsunder below:
Guna (Lok Sabha Constituency). I dont know where you get the results for elections, could you fill out the page in the same manner as the other constituencies? Bakaman Bakatalk 02:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Bakaman Bakatalk 02:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Shyam,
I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed unanimously with a final tally of 38/0/0. I appreciate your trust, and will do my best to uphold it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you ever need anything. — TKD:: Talk 05:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Shyam! Thank you for the confidence shown in me during my recently concluded RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 77/2/0 . I'm still exploring the new tools, so feel free to tell me of any mistakes I might make. In case you need help with anything, just drop me a message. Thanks again; and here's wishing you and your loved ones a very happy Diwali!-- thunderboltz (Deepu) 10:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC) |
File:Diwalipuja.jpg |
|
-- Ch e z ( Discuss / Email) • 11:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bir Singh Mahato.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a free image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nilfanion ( talk) 01:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Shyam Bihari, thank you so much for your support for my RfA. I passed with a vote tally of 61/0/1. I am honored that the consensus was to allow me the added privilege of the admin mop. I appreciate your support and kind words on my RFA! -- plange 22:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC) |
Sorry, I was doing the renaming manually, and I didn't get a chance to do the second one yet. It will be completed in the next day or two. Thanks =) Nishkid 64 21:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
As it's been a while since you signed up for admin coaching, I am just checking that you still wish to receive it. Leave a note on my talk page, and I'll assign you some of our free coaches. Let me know (on my talk page) if you have any questions. Cheers, H ig hway Grammar Enforcer! 08:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for the comment in the FAC. However, your suggestion of using short names for the institutions has a problem - international audience may fail to understand (of course wikilinks will take any user to respective articles, still it's better that a FA be as self-sufficient as possible). On over-wikification, yes there are some. I am trying to dewikilink as much as posible. Please see the FAC for my reply there. Regards.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 09:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Your coaches are NCurse and Mr. Lefty. Exactly what form the admin coaching takes is up to you and the coaches to decide, but a general piece of advice I give is to set up a user subpage (for example User:EXAMPLE/Admin coaching) to keep coaching discussion together. That prevents things getting split up over three talk pages, which can get confusing! Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. Cheers, H ig hway Grammar Enforcer! 22:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
So after answring those questions, you can insert your nomination into the main RfA page. Good luck! :) NCurs e work 20:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
BTW: conservation -> conversation in your Q3. :) NCurs e work 07:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Shyam. I see that you are nominated for administrator. That is great, and I wish you the best of luck. I was looking through your contributions, though, and see a couple problems with your uploads that you may want to fix, if for no other reason than to set a good example.
All the best. × Meegs 04:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Here is the link which claims GNU License, but the image doesn't seem to be copied fro here. Shyam ( T/ C) 12:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Nice to meet u and thanks.
Prarthana mol 12:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
I assume you were trying to revert a vandalism here, but reverted to a wrong version instead? I had already reverted it, and then realized a linkspam preceded my revert, so reverted to last clean version by blnguyen instead. -- Ragib 06:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Shyam Bihari. If you can offer some tips on the respective portal talk pages about how to improve Cats and Dogs up to "featured" quality, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Rfrisbie talk 18:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Shyam, thanks a lot for your support to my RFA... Yours seems headed towards a delightful conclusion:). I am sure we will be seeing lots of each other in the Indian wikiprojects and portals... All the best! -- Lost (talk) 11:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
You're now an admin. Have fun with the new tools to help improve the project, but use them conservatively, especially at first. It's often better to de-escalate a situation than block if possible. Again congrats - Taxman Talk 20:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
Hey Shyam, congratulations!! Well done! -- Lost (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your promotion, and you're very welcome! -- Merovingian ※ Talk 22:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
I distinctly remember the process I went through to get those pictures - a history buff (I can't remember who - it was a long time ago) scanned a bunch of pictures from this PD book (it was PD because he specifically mentioned the publication date, and it was well before the limit - I think it might even have been published in the late 19th century) about British history that he had. He mentioned this on IRC, and so I helped him crop and rotate the images. I can't remember who this user was, though, or else I could point you to him to ask him specifically... that's the best I can say, sorry :( ugen64 04:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, [Not sure what's going on? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Michael_Ignatieff&diff=87160323&oldid=87156051] 64.229.31.197 16:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Shyam, I've just reprotected Michael Ignatieff. The person making these requests uses numerous sockpuppets and is currently evading a block. Also, you'll notice that they tried earlier today under the name User:Canuckster and the requst was declined by Steel here due to the fact the person making these requests has repeatedly vandalised this set of articles. If you have a look at the talk page, you'll get a better idea of what has been going on. They also filed a spurious RFC against me (details are on WP:AN/I here). Please let me know if you require further information but I would ask that it not be unprotected at the present time. I will try lowering the protection to s-protection in a couple of days but due to sockpuppet activity I believe it should remain protected at the present time. Thanks, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 17:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I removed the s-protection from the talk page just a few minutes ago. I haven't removed the tag yet as I've been trying to do several things at once and haven't had a chance. I know you don't mean harm and I didn't mean to imply otherwise, I'm just trying to let you know that there are ongoing issues and unprotecting the pages at the request of someone who is supposed to be blocked and has a long history of vandalising the Michael Ignatieff and Liberal Party of Canada leadership convention, 2006 is a bad idea. When protection is removed, I believe it should be lowered to s-protection rather than fully unprotected because this person uses Bell Sympatico which uses dynamic IP addresses and so they often vandalised using their IP. Also, I think when someone requests unprotection of a page and they speak on behalf of an admin claiming that the admin will keep an eye on the page, as this person did in their request for unprotection, you should verify with the other admin before accepting the claims. Thanks, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 17:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I do not like protecting articles at alI and I agree that we don't want pages protected for too long. But this article should not be fully unprotected at the present time. I don't think you understand what has been happening on and around these pages and I'm asking you please do not unprotect it at the moment. This is a WP:BLP issue. I will lower protection of the article to s-protect in a few days if there is no problems. The last time the talk page was unprotected, this person repeatedly vandalised the talk page with defamatory comments about the subject of the article. So CJCurrie had to s-protect the article and then he eventually had to fully protect it when they started using sleeper accounts. The vandal then began attacking and harassing CJ and even created attack pages about him, so I put the s-protection into my name to try to help Cj but they then began attacking me. This person who is asking for unprotection is not allowed to be using this site at present because they are blocked but they are using dynamic IPs and sockpuppet accounts to evade the block.
Please call me Sarah. Ewart is my surname and Ottawaman (one of the names the vandal uses) just calls me that to be rude. Thanks, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 18:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
No, no need to apologise, Shyam. I think it's just a busy time of year for everyone and you weren't interrupting me. Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 18:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Good luck with your exams, Shyam. I hope they go well. I apologise if I seemed brusk before; I didn't intend to. The problems with this person have been going on since June and the constant flood of sockpuppets gets very tedious. I just realised that your RfA only finished on Friday and I feel bad that this happened on your first day. Thanks for your help and good luck with your studies. Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 19:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
copied from my talk page — Charles P._ (Mirv) 19:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello Mirv, you uploaded this image long time back and tagged it with {{ PD}} which is an obsolete tag. Could you provide some copyright information, so that a suitable tag could be put on. Regards, Shyam ( T/ C) 16:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
My pleasure and congatulations! Jayjg (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
My pleasure and hearty congatulations! I have watched ur contributions on the biographies of Loksabha Members. It should be expanded with the help of local inputs(with the help of regional wikipedians) .
Nileena joseph (
Talk|
Contribs) 05:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations! Great to have you aboard -- Samir धर्म 05:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Heh, this rollback tool is really useful:) -- Lost (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
You may wish to update your licensing template advice stuff: [[CC]] links to a disambiguation page and does not redirect to Creative Commons. -- Gwern (contribs) 18:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Shyam, I dont know why the newsletter was not delivered to you. I had made the list automatically through AWB from the members page. Anyway, delivering it to you now... -- Lost (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
|
|
What are you talking about? The image is tagged as public domain (the subject of the photo DIED in 1829 so this is a no brainer), and it is clearly sourced as coming from the archives of the Université de Montréal. Jeez. Please be more careful. Fawcett5 15:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Please verify the uploader before posting to user pages. I did NOT upload this image. RedWolf 15:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
The mop |
Congratulations on becoming an admin!
Enjoy your new-found powers, and remember to use them only for good, and not for evil. If you would like to try out your new mop, here are some spots that always need loving care:
All the best! - Quadell |
The flamethrower |
Google hits must not be taken as a yardstick in Asian related AfD's. Newspapers of Vernacular Languages may have millions of readership. For example, in India every state has its own language. There are more than 20 widely speaking native languages in India. But the news reports from the newspapers of such languages are not available in google search.Take the case of Malayala Manorama Newspaper. Currently this Malayalam language newspaper has a readership of over 9 million, with a circulation base of over 1.4 million copies according to Audit Beureu of Circulations. Manorama is one of the India's largest selling and most widely read news paper. There are more than 50 such newspapers in India. News reports from such dailies are not available in google eventhough it have millions of readership. But news reports from English dailies with 1000 or 2000 copies are available in google search. It is really misleading...Isn't it...? In this context of notability tests based on google hits may be a worthless, foolish effort. In such circumstances we must consider the words of native wikipedians with more importance. What is ur opinion ……? Nileena joseph ( Talk| Contribs) 05:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have updated the source and licence on both en (which I still think was a pointless exercice) and commons. Can you have a look at the proposed deletion again ? Thanks, Schutz 07:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Sir, I have added useful info into the "In Popular Culture" section that you requested. Please take a look and see if this is ok. Dineshkannambadi 16:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
User:reillyd read your edit, where you put a uncategorised tag. I'm new (duh!) but don't know what to do to assign it a category. Any chance of sending a message, or writing one on my talk page?
User:Shyamsunder told me you were the guy for Lok sabha election templates. I'm copying the message I gave to Shyamsunder below:
Guna (Lok Sabha Constituency). I dont know where you get the results for elections, could you fill out the page in the same manner as the other constituencies? Bakaman Bakatalk 02:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Bakaman Bakatalk 02:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Shyam,
I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed unanimously with a final tally of 38/0/0. I appreciate your trust, and will do my best to uphold it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you ever need anything. — TKD:: Talk 05:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Shyam! Thank you for the confidence shown in me during my recently concluded RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 77/2/0 . I'm still exploring the new tools, so feel free to tell me of any mistakes I might make. In case you need help with anything, just drop me a message. Thanks again; and here's wishing you and your loved ones a very happy Diwali!-- thunderboltz (Deepu) 10:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC) |
File:Diwalipuja.jpg |
|
-- Ch e z ( Discuss / Email) • 11:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bir Singh Mahato.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a free image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nilfanion ( talk) 01:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Shyam Bihari, thank you so much for your support for my RfA. I passed with a vote tally of 61/0/1. I am honored that the consensus was to allow me the added privilege of the admin mop. I appreciate your support and kind words on my RFA! -- plange 22:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC) |
Sorry, I was doing the renaming manually, and I didn't get a chance to do the second one yet. It will be completed in the next day or two. Thanks =) Nishkid 64 21:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
As it's been a while since you signed up for admin coaching, I am just checking that you still wish to receive it. Leave a note on my talk page, and I'll assign you some of our free coaches. Let me know (on my talk page) if you have any questions. Cheers, H ig hway Grammar Enforcer! 08:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for the comment in the FAC. However, your suggestion of using short names for the institutions has a problem - international audience may fail to understand (of course wikilinks will take any user to respective articles, still it's better that a FA be as self-sufficient as possible). On over-wikification, yes there are some. I am trying to dewikilink as much as posible. Please see the FAC for my reply there. Regards.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 09:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Your coaches are NCurse and Mr. Lefty. Exactly what form the admin coaching takes is up to you and the coaches to decide, but a general piece of advice I give is to set up a user subpage (for example User:EXAMPLE/Admin coaching) to keep coaching discussion together. That prevents things getting split up over three talk pages, which can get confusing! Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. Cheers, H ig hway Grammar Enforcer! 22:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
So after answring those questions, you can insert your nomination into the main RfA page. Good luck! :) NCurs e work 20:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
BTW: conservation -> conversation in your Q3. :) NCurs e work 07:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Shyam. I see that you are nominated for administrator. That is great, and I wish you the best of luck. I was looking through your contributions, though, and see a couple problems with your uploads that you may want to fix, if for no other reason than to set a good example.
All the best. × Meegs 04:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Here is the link which claims GNU License, but the image doesn't seem to be copied fro here. Shyam ( T/ C) 12:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Nice to meet u and thanks.
Prarthana mol 12:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
I assume you were trying to revert a vandalism here, but reverted to a wrong version instead? I had already reverted it, and then realized a linkspam preceded my revert, so reverted to last clean version by blnguyen instead. -- Ragib 06:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Shyam Bihari. If you can offer some tips on the respective portal talk pages about how to improve Cats and Dogs up to "featured" quality, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Rfrisbie talk 18:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Shyam, thanks a lot for your support to my RFA... Yours seems headed towards a delightful conclusion:). I am sure we will be seeing lots of each other in the Indian wikiprojects and portals... All the best! -- Lost (talk) 11:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
You're now an admin. Have fun with the new tools to help improve the project, but use them conservatively, especially at first. It's often better to de-escalate a situation than block if possible. Again congrats - Taxman Talk 20:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
Hey Shyam, congratulations!! Well done! -- Lost (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your promotion, and you're very welcome! -- Merovingian ※ Talk 22:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
I distinctly remember the process I went through to get those pictures - a history buff (I can't remember who - it was a long time ago) scanned a bunch of pictures from this PD book (it was PD because he specifically mentioned the publication date, and it was well before the limit - I think it might even have been published in the late 19th century) about British history that he had. He mentioned this on IRC, and so I helped him crop and rotate the images. I can't remember who this user was, though, or else I could point you to him to ask him specifically... that's the best I can say, sorry :( ugen64 04:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, [Not sure what's going on? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Michael_Ignatieff&diff=87160323&oldid=87156051] 64.229.31.197 16:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Shyam, I've just reprotected Michael Ignatieff. The person making these requests uses numerous sockpuppets and is currently evading a block. Also, you'll notice that they tried earlier today under the name User:Canuckster and the requst was declined by Steel here due to the fact the person making these requests has repeatedly vandalised this set of articles. If you have a look at the talk page, you'll get a better idea of what has been going on. They also filed a spurious RFC against me (details are on WP:AN/I here). Please let me know if you require further information but I would ask that it not be unprotected at the present time. I will try lowering the protection to s-protection in a couple of days but due to sockpuppet activity I believe it should remain protected at the present time. Thanks, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 17:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I removed the s-protection from the talk page just a few minutes ago. I haven't removed the tag yet as I've been trying to do several things at once and haven't had a chance. I know you don't mean harm and I didn't mean to imply otherwise, I'm just trying to let you know that there are ongoing issues and unprotecting the pages at the request of someone who is supposed to be blocked and has a long history of vandalising the Michael Ignatieff and Liberal Party of Canada leadership convention, 2006 is a bad idea. When protection is removed, I believe it should be lowered to s-protection rather than fully unprotected because this person uses Bell Sympatico which uses dynamic IP addresses and so they often vandalised using their IP. Also, I think when someone requests unprotection of a page and they speak on behalf of an admin claiming that the admin will keep an eye on the page, as this person did in their request for unprotection, you should verify with the other admin before accepting the claims. Thanks, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 17:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I do not like protecting articles at alI and I agree that we don't want pages protected for too long. But this article should not be fully unprotected at the present time. I don't think you understand what has been happening on and around these pages and I'm asking you please do not unprotect it at the moment. This is a WP:BLP issue. I will lower protection of the article to s-protect in a few days if there is no problems. The last time the talk page was unprotected, this person repeatedly vandalised the talk page with defamatory comments about the subject of the article. So CJCurrie had to s-protect the article and then he eventually had to fully protect it when they started using sleeper accounts. The vandal then began attacking and harassing CJ and even created attack pages about him, so I put the s-protection into my name to try to help Cj but they then began attacking me. This person who is asking for unprotection is not allowed to be using this site at present because they are blocked but they are using dynamic IPs and sockpuppet accounts to evade the block.
Please call me Sarah. Ewart is my surname and Ottawaman (one of the names the vandal uses) just calls me that to be rude. Thanks, Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 18:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
No, no need to apologise, Shyam. I think it's just a busy time of year for everyone and you weren't interrupting me. Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 18:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Good luck with your exams, Shyam. I hope they go well. I apologise if I seemed brusk before; I didn't intend to. The problems with this person have been going on since June and the constant flood of sockpuppets gets very tedious. I just realised that your RfA only finished on Friday and I feel bad that this happened on your first day. Thanks for your help and good luck with your studies. Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 19:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
copied from my talk page — Charles P._ (Mirv) 19:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello Mirv, you uploaded this image long time back and tagged it with {{ PD}} which is an obsolete tag. Could you provide some copyright information, so that a suitable tag could be put on. Regards, Shyam ( T/ C) 16:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
My pleasure and congatulations! Jayjg (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
My pleasure and hearty congatulations! I have watched ur contributions on the biographies of Loksabha Members. It should be expanded with the help of local inputs(with the help of regional wikipedians) .
Nileena joseph (
Talk|
Contribs) 05:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations! Great to have you aboard -- Samir धर्म 05:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Heh, this rollback tool is really useful:) -- Lost (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
You may wish to update your licensing template advice stuff: [[CC]] links to a disambiguation page and does not redirect to Creative Commons. -- Gwern (contribs) 18:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Shyam, I dont know why the newsletter was not delivered to you. I had made the list automatically through AWB from the members page. Anyway, delivering it to you now... -- Lost (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
What are you talking about? The image is tagged as public domain (the subject of the photo DIED in 1829 so this is a no brainer), and it is clearly sourced as coming from the archives of the Université de Montréal. Jeez. Please be more careful. Fawcett5 15:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Please verify the uploader before posting to user pages. I did NOT upload this image. RedWolf 15:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
The mop |
Congratulations on becoming an admin!
Enjoy your new-found powers, and remember to use them only for good, and not for evil. If you would like to try out your new mop, here are some spots that always need loving care:
All the best! - Quadell |
The flamethrower |
Google hits must not be taken as a yardstick in Asian related AfD's. Newspapers of Vernacular Languages may have millions of readership. For example, in India every state has its own language. There are more than 20 widely speaking native languages in India. But the news reports from the newspapers of such languages are not available in google search.Take the case of Malayala Manorama Newspaper. Currently this Malayalam language newspaper has a readership of over 9 million, with a circulation base of over 1.4 million copies according to Audit Beureu of Circulations. Manorama is one of the India's largest selling and most widely read news paper. There are more than 50 such newspapers in India. News reports from such dailies are not available in google eventhough it have millions of readership. But news reports from English dailies with 1000 or 2000 copies are available in google search. It is really misleading...Isn't it...? In this context of notability tests based on google hits may be a worthless, foolish effort. In such circumstances we must consider the words of native wikipedians with more importance. What is ur opinion ……? Nileena joseph ( Talk| Contribs) 05:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have updated the source and licence on both en (which I still think was a pointless exercice) and commons. Can you have a look at the proposed deletion again ? Thanks, Schutz 07:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Sir, I have added useful info into the "In Popular Culture" section that you requested. Please take a look and see if this is ok. Dineshkannambadi 16:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)