Welcome!
Hello, Shmget, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --
Phill
talk
Edits 12:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, i just wanted to say thanks for your efforts on Adolescent sexuality in the United States. It was nice to have someone make an effort to improve it rather than just complain about what they didn't like. I did go through it to replace some information I think you accidentally deleted, as well as to correct some spelling and grammatical mistakes. Thanks again! --10:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on my talk page about binary prefixes. Fnagaton 21:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
No problem, I've done the same thing before. -- mattb 15:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
You're right, I did not notice that nuance. Apologies. -- mattb 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
The Computer program article is in need of repair. Would you comment on any improvement suggestions? I joined the talk starting with the thread talk:computer program#Definition of a computer program. Timhowardriley 00:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Sarenne know his edits are disruptive and against Wikipedia policy. It was explained to him here [1] and discussed here. [2]
He has been blocked for his edit wars more than once. [3] You may want to show this to an admin. -- SWTPC6800 00:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure, d'accord. Just give me the link to the area of discussion on French-language Wikipedia. My user page there is here. Cavenba parlez à moi 21:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you link somewhere in there to what is meant by "IEC notation"? When I first ran across this (your Common.css proposal), it took me a while to figure out what you meant. Because of course the IEC specifies zillions of standards and notations, and "IEC notation" is so broad that without context or prior knowledge, it's really hard to figure out what you're talking about. (My first reaction: "Which IEC standard are they talking about?). Even reading the Binary Prefix page, I had trouble finding an IEC standard number; but at least linking there would add some clarity. Thanks. jhawkinson 12:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
You reverted my [ Binary Prefix edit] without comment which is not very polite. I presume you do not like the term "incorrect" in context of binary sense of SI prefix. Is there another term u can stand, such as non-standard? The previous version of this page, which I edited, had removed "incorrect" on the basis that JEDEC approves such usage. Of course, JEDEC's domain is limited to memory not disk storage and all of the examples, except the last are disk storage. This distinction is particularly important with regard to the Macintosh display since that is an early and perhaps first example of a computer OS reporting disk storage using SI prefixes in a binary sense. Is there any phrase we can agree upon, I think it is important to note these usages are not IEC standard? Tom94022 19:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Response copied from [ Tom94022 Talk Page]
Response copied from [ Tom94022 Talk Page]
Courtesy notice that I have removed the links to this template and marked it for deletion because it is redundant (contained in Template:Quantities_of_bytes). -- RFST 22:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Quand tu auras le temps. Merci de te prononcer là et là. Cordialement -- Olmeque ( talk) 20:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
mabdul 17:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Torai lies here [4] --- he works for IBM in Ireland. This is why hae has done all the edits to Openoffice. 95.172.31.34 ( talk) 17:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Shmget. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The Daily Mail and New York Post are not acceptable as sources, and especially not in articles about living people. — C.Fred ( talk) 20:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Additionally, court documents should not be used as sources. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. — C.Fred ( talk) 13:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Shmget, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --
Phill
talk
Edits 12:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, i just wanted to say thanks for your efforts on Adolescent sexuality in the United States. It was nice to have someone make an effort to improve it rather than just complain about what they didn't like. I did go through it to replace some information I think you accidentally deleted, as well as to correct some spelling and grammatical mistakes. Thanks again! --10:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on my talk page about binary prefixes. Fnagaton 21:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
No problem, I've done the same thing before. -- mattb 15:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
You're right, I did not notice that nuance. Apologies. -- mattb 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
The Computer program article is in need of repair. Would you comment on any improvement suggestions? I joined the talk starting with the thread talk:computer program#Definition of a computer program. Timhowardriley 00:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Sarenne know his edits are disruptive and against Wikipedia policy. It was explained to him here [1] and discussed here. [2]
He has been blocked for his edit wars more than once. [3] You may want to show this to an admin. -- SWTPC6800 00:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure, d'accord. Just give me the link to the area of discussion on French-language Wikipedia. My user page there is here. Cavenba parlez à moi 21:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you link somewhere in there to what is meant by "IEC notation"? When I first ran across this (your Common.css proposal), it took me a while to figure out what you meant. Because of course the IEC specifies zillions of standards and notations, and "IEC notation" is so broad that without context or prior knowledge, it's really hard to figure out what you're talking about. (My first reaction: "Which IEC standard are they talking about?). Even reading the Binary Prefix page, I had trouble finding an IEC standard number; but at least linking there would add some clarity. Thanks. jhawkinson 12:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
You reverted my [ Binary Prefix edit] without comment which is not very polite. I presume you do not like the term "incorrect" in context of binary sense of SI prefix. Is there another term u can stand, such as non-standard? The previous version of this page, which I edited, had removed "incorrect" on the basis that JEDEC approves such usage. Of course, JEDEC's domain is limited to memory not disk storage and all of the examples, except the last are disk storage. This distinction is particularly important with regard to the Macintosh display since that is an early and perhaps first example of a computer OS reporting disk storage using SI prefixes in a binary sense. Is there any phrase we can agree upon, I think it is important to note these usages are not IEC standard? Tom94022 19:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Response copied from [ Tom94022 Talk Page]
Response copied from [ Tom94022 Talk Page]
Courtesy notice that I have removed the links to this template and marked it for deletion because it is redundant (contained in Template:Quantities_of_bytes). -- RFST 22:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Quand tu auras le temps. Merci de te prononcer là et là. Cordialement -- Olmeque ( talk) 20:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
mabdul 17:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Torai lies here [4] --- he works for IBM in Ireland. This is why hae has done all the edits to Openoffice. 95.172.31.34 ( talk) 17:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Shmget. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The Daily Mail and New York Post are not acceptable as sources, and especially not in articles about living people. — C.Fred ( talk) 20:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Additionally, court documents should not be used as sources. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. — C.Fred ( talk) 13:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)