Hello, Shivlingam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
[1]--
Shivlingam (
talk)
12:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
|
Welcome on behalf on Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism. Your contributions will help Hinduism articles grow.-- Redtigerxyz Talk 13:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Shivlingam. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse_of_barnstars. Thank you. -- NeilN talk ♦ contribs 00:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Until you have a successful RFA or RFB, kindly do not add categories that may lead users to believe that you are an administrator or bureaucrat. Misrepresentation of this nature is disruptive. – xeno talk 13:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi.. some of what you're doing is what we call "ruleslawyering" - see WP:LAWYER. It's not a very helpful way to behave. It would be best if you just stayed away from the administrator's noticeboard, until you're more familiar with how Wikipedia works. Friday (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
If you bought a "Congressional Medal of Honor" from eBay, would you be entitled to actually wear it? Barnstars are earned, not taken. Same thing with adminship and ownership of Wikipedia. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
SarekOfVulcan (
talk)
14:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Shivlingam ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What's the reason behind this ban I (Allegedly } disruptively edited my talk page COME on it's my page which I can edit ,Apparent sp? -- I do not own [[WP]] ( talk) 15:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your signature implies you're here to make a WP:POINT, your edits imply you're unusually familiar with Wikipedia for a new user, and your edits are similar to those of a banned user. I'm going to take a look now to see what other accounts I can find. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shivlingam ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
No valid unblock reason given; no evidence that you have disavowed your disruptive behavior. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shivlingam ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ani#58.174.227.190 BAN my SOCKMASTER [[User:Shivlingam|I do not own WP ]] ( talk) 18:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No unblock request made. – xeno talk 18:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Check out the timings of this users edits I think banning him was uncalled for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#58.174.227.190 -- I do not own [[WP]] ( talk) 15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Do I know you?-- NotedGrant Talk 19:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Shivlingam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
[1]--
Shivlingam (
talk)
12:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
|
Welcome on behalf on Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism. Your contributions will help Hinduism articles grow.-- Redtigerxyz Talk 13:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Shivlingam. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Abuse_of_barnstars. Thank you. -- NeilN talk ♦ contribs 00:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Until you have a successful RFA or RFB, kindly do not add categories that may lead users to believe that you are an administrator or bureaucrat. Misrepresentation of this nature is disruptive. – xeno talk 13:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi.. some of what you're doing is what we call "ruleslawyering" - see WP:LAWYER. It's not a very helpful way to behave. It would be best if you just stayed away from the administrator's noticeboard, until you're more familiar with how Wikipedia works. Friday (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
If you bought a "Congressional Medal of Honor" from eBay, would you be entitled to actually wear it? Barnstars are earned, not taken. Same thing with adminship and ownership of Wikipedia. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
SarekOfVulcan (
talk)
14:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Shivlingam ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What's the reason behind this ban I (Allegedly } disruptively edited my talk page COME on it's my page which I can edit ,Apparent sp? -- I do not own [[WP]] ( talk) 15:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your signature implies you're here to make a WP:POINT, your edits imply you're unusually familiar with Wikipedia for a new user, and your edits are similar to those of a banned user. I'm going to take a look now to see what other accounts I can find. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shivlingam ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
No valid unblock reason given; no evidence that you have disavowed your disruptive behavior. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shivlingam ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ani#58.174.227.190 BAN my SOCKMASTER [[User:Shivlingam|I do not own WP ]] ( talk) 18:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No unblock request made. – xeno talk 18:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Check out the timings of this users edits I think banning him was uncalled for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#58.174.227.190 -- I do not own [[WP]] ( talk) 15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Do I know you?-- NotedGrant Talk 19:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)