Hello Shilpi Saini,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Coverfox.com for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tushi Talk To Me 10:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for your message. I have written the Wikipedia entry with as many secondary links as possible. If it is the tonality of the text that makes it sound promotional. I'd like to hear more from you on that. Thanks in advance.
![]() |
Hi Shilpi Saini! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coverfox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverfox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tushi Talk To Me 06:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Coverfox logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Shilpi Saini,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Coverfox.com for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tushi Talk To Me 10:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for your message. I have written the Wikipedia entry with as many secondary links as possible. If it is the tonality of the text that makes it sound promotional. I'd like to hear more from you on that. Thanks in advance.
![]() |
Hi Shilpi Saini! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coverfox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverfox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tushi Talk To Me 06:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Coverfox logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)