OH GOD THE AGONY | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
something is wrong with them. Lir 03:47 Oct 20, 2002 (UTC)
Hi Ashibaka, I'm not familiar with the usage of the template you added to Talk:Share taxi, but it appears to require a notification at WP:AN/I, which I can't seem to find. If you've already done this and I missed it when I searched the page, please ignore this message. Cheers, Banyan Tree 20:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
If u r, ask me ANY question at all regarding Star Wars. I will answer. Live long and prosper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Philber 22 ( talk • contribs)
Hi dear sysop Ashibaka! I've seen your removal editions regarding the mentioned image, from its templates. As you know, lots of articles in Wikipedia have images, looked as symbols, each one trying to represent a concept given in article. This particular symbol relates itself to esoteric philosophies and the inner planes, as it can be concluded from its description. As a Buddhist you will find the conception of planes of existence as "Deva lokas" (or other that I am not deeply acquainted to). On the other hand, related to each one, you have description of exalted Beings far advanced from our human evolution (which evolves through the cycle of rebirth), as taught, among others, in Buddhism and esoteric philosophies. It is taught also that there are beings from our own evolution Who have gone far beyond the cycle of rebirth into Divine spheres "above". Now, if these beings became liberated from the "chain" that bound us here, it should be logical to deduct that they may have joined the gods Who aid us in our evolutionary steps here. Some even do expect such an advanced being, liberated from our evolution cycle, to rebirth here among us in order to bring a new age of spiritual upliftment... Suppose these Beings have already, in silence, been preparing the way in the world for such an event, as previously spoken, and that they teach us that - above all working with our evolution - there is a far higher Spiritual Being - not from human evolution, but from the evolution of a life wave that to our 'eyes' would be as gods - Who aids and directs mankind's evolution. This exalted Spiritual Being would be the One we call Christ, Whom the " The Winged Self" symbol represents in the central White Rose. Blessed be, -- 62.169.119.157 16:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
what do you do if you have cheeted on your boyfriend
Hi!
re: Poor Summary — Many of us would appreciate a comment like "Applied ACCURACY Template because...". We'd appreciate it even more if you annote the talk:Davy Crockett with a prominent section title and notes as is implied by the template: "See Talk..." For example a heading like the below would be in order:
Because ...
I'm removing the Template now. If you don't like it, put it back with such documented reasons if you are too lazy or disinterested in cleaning up the article yourself. Best regards, Fra nkB 18:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for taking action. But I'm afraid the block would not be able to actually help the situation. Please consider to help bring the disputed matters towards discussion, the parties to talk pages and the dispute towards resolution. I've been requesting user:Alanmak to talk, but all effort was in vain. He simply deleted my requests and other messages from his user talk page with edit summary like " disregard bullshit " or not summary at all. — Insta ntnood 20:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Not at all. That's what every responsible user is obliged to do whenever she/he notices it. — Insta ntnood 20:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Just to let you know user:SchmuckyTheCat is deleting it again, together with a new message of mine.
[1] What we can do? —
Insta
ntnood 13:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
srry 4 not sayin' my name up there. I'm the guy who asked if ur a Star Wars fan. Write back soon plz! Philber 22 23:08, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Philber 22
Sigh. I'll have a word to them tonight when I get home from uni, although I don't think I will be able to become deeply involved in any mediation because it's assignment time at uni... Cheers. enochlau ( talk) 23:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi. In reference to the email you received from Jamie Miller. Assuming he doesn't want his contact details revealed publically, could you do the massive favour of asking him to contact me. I am the creator of the Game Tree and have been trying to track down the origins of The Game for over a year now. If you could tell him to email me at jonty@losethegame.com it would be much appreciated. Out of interest, how did you find the post about him? Thanks, Kernow 22:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, he has got in touch. I was also wondering whether it would be possible for you to paste me a copy of The Game article before it was moved to The Game (game). I believe it was under Forgetting Game but I am not sure. Is there anyway I can access the history of an article that has been moved? Because I am interested in all the edits and the users that made them. Thanks. Kernow 12:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Can I just clarify about your contact with Jamie Miller. How did he get your email address and what reason did he give for contacting you? Kernow 20:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Earlier you asked me if "live long and prosper" from Star TREK, not Star WARS. I knew this, i just think it's cool ;)
(i keep forgetting 2 use the 4 ~'s, srry :( )
I'm disappointed with your remarks at user talk:Enochlau [2]. You're already informed [3] that I did request user:Alanmak to talk. Just that he refused to respond. Furthermore, those are not merely stylistic issues, but reflections of points of view that are deviated from the reality. The disagreements are not only between user:Alanmak and I, but with user:SchmuckyTheCat as well. Please kindly refrain from commenting if you're not familiar enough with the matter, since it could be leading to unnecessary and undesirable troubles, and could be unfair to any or all of the parties involved. Thanks for your attention. — Insta ntnood 12:17, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
How was my response a personal attack on Kernow? I merely responded the same way he posted on my Talk page. I assume that you read his posting there, & because you felt my comments violated WP:NPA, you also warned him. If not, may I state that I found his comments insulting, & ask that you also warn him. Whether you do this or not, I'm happy to let the entire matter drop -- which I had after my original comment to JoshuaZ. -- llywrch 23:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm going to have to ask you two to take this to your respective talk pages... Ashibaka tock 21:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
You are invited to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). The issue of the name has not been resolved and therefore people are now recruiting others to delete. Feel free to make your judgement known, thank you. Nomen Nescio 21:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
nuther one. NoSeptember talk 12:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
For your information, there are still some red links in the list. Plus stubby articles aren't really encyclopaedic articles AFAIK so it is useful to push these articles to GA or FA status or even 0.5 or 1.0 status. Lincher 02:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I am a wikipedian born in 1987! Kiptrev please add me to the list!
Hello, kindly accept my greetings on the occasion of Buddha Purnima. -- Bhadani 15:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
I am not a sockpuppet of General eisenhower. -- GeorgeMoney T· C 04:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
(Although, now that I think of it you don't join all of his projects so you might simply be two of a kind.) Ashibaka tock 04:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Addendum: RFCU proved me wrong, serve up some of that humble pie! Ashibaka tock 03:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Please do not undo people's admin actions without discussion. See WP:AN/I for the report about this, where the protection has support. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
If you don't want your comments to be changed, don't write things like that. I'd have taken it as a joke from any other admin, but given you restored H's user page because he asked someone to on WR, it seems you're trying to make a point. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey -- I deprodded this, b/c they really do appear to have multiple albums out, so they might meet WP:MUSIC. Just letting you know. Mango juice talk 17:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Please discuss and vote at Talk:History_of_the_world#Name_ambiguity Thank you, __ Maysara 12:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
With regards to your recent edit to the article LOL (Internet slang). Could you please point out of a few of these needed citations, preferably on the article talk page? To many users requisition action nowadays without giving any reason or instruction, which hurts wikipedia far more than it helps. It does no good to throw the credibility of an article into question unless you can provide evidence as to why (such as with the {{ Citation needed}} tags, or on a talk page), so that the article may be fixed, and so that the template addition does not seem malicious or unwarranted. If you wish the tag to stay so that progress may be made, please provide a reasoning for it more than globally claiming analysis on the article, which is really more of a WP:NOR violation than a WP:CITE violation in any regard. -- Oni Ookami Alfador Talk| @ 04:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Please discuss at Women's suffrage#Grand merging and reforms!. Thank you, __ Maysara 20:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi you did this merge [6] and this one [7]. Was it merged or agreed upon. You're an admin so you pay more attention to changes. The article was unmerged by SchmuckyTheCat. Please clue me in???? Is it supposed to be merged? DyslexicEditor 21:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
May I ask you to motivate this? notwist 09:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just randomly declaring my love for the wikipe-tan on the top of your page. Are there any more pics of her?
*Beats myself away from her so I can go back to editting.* orz deadkid_dk 08:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Orlowski.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Ashibaka, why did you move the Moe article again, without any calls for consensus first? Nowhere in the world do "general usage rules" instigate Moé as the more popular spelling, and since Wikipedia uses Hepburn romanization (and not あるオタクの好み) Moé is completely uncalled for in every way. freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 00:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
It's not a vote, it's a discussion. I came in late but I still wanted a reply. Ashibaka tock 03:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I still prefer my version. But you do have a legitimate point and I wouldn't argue further if anyone else reverted it. Ashibaka tock 03:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
When I edit something it is usually to a version that I like better. I like the English name used online, you like the Hepburn name. Both are backed up by their own contradictory guidelines. If you want to change it back I will not revert! Ashibaka tock 04:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello again. I apologize for being insistant but as I have said, I don't approve of your conduct on this issue ("I still think it's better") and since you refuse to give any proper reason for your actions I can only consider you uncooperative. Since you performed a series of reversions based on your single edit I feel it unfair to demand of me to clean up after your mistakes, of which you yourself claim unable to defend. I decided to ask you politely once again instead of bringing this to RfC. It's a small matter but it reflects largely on your conduct as an admin, and I will not hesistate again. Thank you. freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 06:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes. I hate Hepburn. I hardly ever act on it but in this case I thought it would do the article some good. If you disagree, revert me and I will not change it back. Ashibaka tock 04:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Ashibaka. Thank you for introducing Wikipe-tan to English Wikipedia!
By the way, there are Wikipe's oekaki that I drew in Futaba, besides standard-type and Sockpuppet Show. I uploaded also rest of them on Commons. If you are interested, please check them. Image:Wikipe-tan_she_needs_your_help.png, Image:Wikipe-tan_donations.png. -- Kasuga 14:26, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
The drawing that was deleted was drawn by me using colored pencil and watercolor.
It was modeled after the picture you refer to indeed. But I dont think that is a problem, as mine has obvious differences from the original. Just like the Elfen Lied drawings were modeled off of Gustav Klimt: See here: [8]
Please restore my drawing back. It took me a week to draw it. I'd like to have it displayed. And we can say who I modeled the drawing after in the caption of the image so that no doubts will remain.-- Zereshk 21:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for undeleting my sub-page. As you can see, MONGO deleted it again and propsed you should talk to him personaly before doing the undelete. Do you agree with him that the page should not be undeleted without him having something to say about it, specialy considering he deleted it as a speedy, twice, ignoring your decision? -- Striver 22:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
So what...stop messing around with it...figure out who is a troll and who isn't and Striver is one of the worst POV pushers Wikipedia has.-- MONGO 00:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Ashibaka, thank you for assisting with the Brian Bruns article. The pageblock is good because Bruns is trying to have it deleted just because he doesn't want things known about him and he is very notable as you can see from my comments on the talk page. Cheers. -- Chakabuh 02:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
"Restored" pages are picked up as unprotected. A time corrections for restore->reprotect (if reprotected) is hard to implement. I can try to fix del. log limits to minimize that problem though. Voice-of-All Talk 07:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
User_talk:Doc_glasgow#Thanks Ashibaka tock 18:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Just so you know I am not agruing with you (go ahead and oppose, I don't care anymore), I would just like to understand why you opposed better (because I don't understand). I don't understand what you mean by "Your most recent edit that gave me misgivings". Thanks for the help. ILovePlankton 23:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Could you unlink Danny and change it to Danny Wool or change it to Danny? I'm not sure it even needs to because he has at least denied that it was an OFFICE action (and it wasn't User:Dannyisme), but I'm beyond caring really. The news agency doesn't get much sources--but that isn't the case with Joel Leyden... hey look there is a tangent... Kotepho 22:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Please do not redirect this page. Thank you. Sophia 17:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Please do not edit protected pages. -- Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 20:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, you kind of ignored the talk page where you might find discussion of things like that Ashibaka tock 00:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
It had nothing to do with the dispute, someone just requested the link and used {{ editprotected}}, and there was no disagreement, so I went and edited it. WP:OWN Ashibaka tock 20:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for adjusting the categorization. -- Avi 22:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
I case you were wondering, I semi-protected the template because of vandalism like this, which went unfixed for an hour. Since it's such a high visibility template, I thought that was rather silly. But there hasn't been much vandalism since, so it's probably better unprotected. Cheers, jaco♫ plane 18:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
( in re:)
I have been entrusted to use the tool appropriately, and do so. Any specific concerns are discussed on the Arbitration Committee mailing list and with Jimbo; this discussion has included my own use of the tool. Jayjg (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I think every successful one will qualify from here on out, fortunately there aren't too many of them ;-). NoSeptember 16:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Justice Court is not a policy proposal, it is a group that promotes accountability of administrators by posting irresponsible on a list. Please remove it from proposals. If you need other reasons, please post on my talk page. I will put a notice that it is not a proposal on the page. Geo.plrd 23:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I'm a fairly long time wikipedia editor. Recently wikipedia seems to have undergone a huge change. There are now messages such as "Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abaddon"" every time I visit a page, leading me to believe that wikipedia has been backed up or something like that.
The search/find box is now at the bottom of the page, the link for editing an entire page (rather than a section) is at the bottom and looks different, and generally wikipedia looks worse.
However I recently reinstalled Windows on my computer, and it could be that my computer is messing things up. I don't have access to the internet anywhere else, at least not until next Friday at the earliest, so I can't really confirm that it's not just my computer messing things up.
Has there been an announcement of a big change at wikipedia? If so, is there a link to the announcement? Does wikipedia look the way it normally does on your computer? I hope you don't mind that I asked you. I figured I should ask an administrator and couldn't find any info on this in the village pump. Kimera757 17:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, — Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you.
Links are not commercial personal or spam and if recommended by MGA itself in customer service message responses to myself as useful resources then they are useful to this Bratz article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.109.150 ( talk)
Please review the deletion of Names of European cities in different languages, and the related articles Names of Asian cities in different languages and Names of African cities in different languages. These were discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of European cities in different languages, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of Asian cities in different languages, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of African cities in different languages.
The vote was: Keep: Future Perfect at Sunrise Interlingua Trialsanderrors Atillios Carlossuarez46 (me) Kierant Adam78 Khoikhoi Goldom Pasquale Eivind F Øyangen Fastifex Aguerriero Slowmover Lambiam Irpen Olessi Travelbird Nightstallion Agathoclea Folks at 137 Lethe Qviri Riadlem Peteris Cedrins Reimelt Nick C
Delete: Motor Theoldanarchist Mangojuice Dawson Isotope23 WicketheWok Centrx Angus McLellan Masterhatch Tychocat
That is: 27-10 to keep. While I know that it’s not a strict vote-counting exercise, the usual rule of thumb is not to delete unless there is a strong consensus expressed to do so – i.e., give the benefit of the doubt toward keeping. Here, process was thwarted.
The administrator closing the AfD acted contrary to the consensus expressed at the AfD by making his/her own judgment that the content was not encyclopedic. The whole issue of alternate placenames is very much encyclopedic and has been the subject on ongoing debate among Wikipedians, for example at: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names) and the various disputes about whether to use “Danzig” or “Gdansk” for that city near the Baltic, etc.. Also, similar articles remain extant in several other Interwiki’s (since the article is deleted, the interwiki links are gone too, otherwise I could cite which), so they appear encyclopedic to people who speak other languages. Please restore the articles. Carlossuarez46 18:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
This is not like the SCAG. G eo. 21:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
G eo. 21:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
organization provided that I deal with the issues resulting in deletion?G eo. 23:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello; I noticed you have recently contributed to the current events portal and thought you would be interested in looking at a proposal for redesigning the page. If you can, please take a look at a redesign proposal I created and provide some feedback on its talk page. So far, very little feedback has been received, and so the additional input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. joturn e r 05:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Pls explain why did you reveted my edit. Those links are imortant and relevant. -- Haham hanuka 17:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar and the kind words re Vincent van Gogh. I think we're probably a month or two from peer review, depending on how much time I can find to get through the material, and possibly break out some subsidiary main articles if sections get too unwieldy. Thanks again. Stumps 06:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Evidently you tried to send me a message. It was blocked by the firewall, I don't know why. Until I have found the reason, you'd better leave a note on my user page. Thank you. -- R.P.D. 19:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for voting! Hello Shii/History5, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC) |
thanks for looking at my new article. I put another reference in as requested SenorKristobbal 12:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:SportsCenter Nice closing statement! Do you follow copyright caselaw for kicks? - CrazyRougeian talk/ email 20:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I just wanted to say thank you for opening up the Chelsy Davy page for me! I've got a first draft up which hopefully shall not need to be deleted. Thank you for all your help. Vickser 21:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your support in the Esperance Elections, Ashibaka! I am truly honored by your support, and look foward to helping Esperanza continue to run well. -- Nataly a 01:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Though Afshar's work is still the subject of ongoing interpretation and discussion, a significant portion of the scientific community is of the opinion that Afshar's experiment does not refute complementarity.
Some general criticisms are:
As Michael claims, those statments are supposedly "popular views" that preexisted my experiment, and as such must be present in peer-reviewed publication predating my work. All I have asked him to do is to provide such valid ref.s but he has persistently avoided doing so and instead engaged in personal attacks. He seems to have a lot of time on his hands to be on Wikipeida constatntly, but I don't. This is turning to oneupmanship, and I don't have time for such antcis. Maybe he would heed your request. Thanks!-- Prof. Afshar 13:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I have emailed you about something that others have been preventing people from telling you. If you do not receive it, please respond on your talk page. Dagedzil 08:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
You may want to have a look. I restored this and explained myself on the talk page. Friday (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
There's discussion at Wikipedia talk:Historical information that you started. You may wish to continue it.— msh210℠ 07:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
I moved your Jimbo makes mistakes essay into your userspace at: User:Ashibaka/Jimbo makes mistakes, guessing that that's the best move for now? See if you can get some folks to help you edit it! :-)
(don't forget to delete the redirects btw.)
Kim Bruning 21:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I was hoping of asking Jimbo after a few other people had corrected it but I guess they wanted to delete it instead. C.f. my parable above. Ashibaka tock 12:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Heh, okay. Thanks. Ashibaka tock 21:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Myrtone86 sent me an e-mail regarding his block for "disruption" that I wasn't involved at WP:AN/I. I left him a message with a copy of e-mail on his talk page. Is there a reason why you unblocked him if you feel the block is inappropriate? -- ADNghiem501 23:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Why did you overturn my block when it had the approval of four other editors on WP:ANI [10] (which you did or should have seen, as I said I had provided an expanded rationale on Myrtone's talk page), with no voices against, without seeking consensus there or even doing me the courtesy of informing me on my talk page? -- Sam Blanning (talk) 11:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, go ahead and block him again. That's the sort of thanks I get for trying to do something friendly here. Ashibaka tock 21:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Ashibaka. I noticed the following message in your user page:
May I take you up on that offer? And can I ask you to look up " French popular music"? The template {{frenchmusic}} suggests that French popular music may have existed at one time and deleted, or maybe it was never created in the first place. In any case I am interested in creating that article, and any information would be helpful. Thank you very much for your help.-- Endroit 15:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
You ruined my block message on Stephencolbert... ahh, (ps, I've left a voicemail requesting confirmation, please wait) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tawker ( talk • contribs)
ok, so I did it incorrectly...please help me add the information properly? If you check the sources, you will find that it is not a joke, and deserves to be part of the article on elephants.
Sorry forgot to sign: MathStatWoman 13:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
If you have the time, help me expand this, please. -- Saoshyant 17:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks -- Saoshyant 04:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for expanding the Nicoleño article I made a stub for. We probably have the best Nicoleño article in the world now :) Ashibaka tock 02:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
That made my day. BBBBB forever! =D - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 15:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Crap, the "b" wasn't actually orange... Ashi b aka tock 15:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
GoldToeMarionette ( talk · contribs) had a WP:RFCU inappropriately completed on their account by Jayjg ( talk · contribs) and Hall Monitor ( talk · contribs) blocked the account after it was identified as a multiple account despite their being no violation of Wikipedia policy by GoldToeMarionette. These users did not respond to requests to undo the action.
Other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
GoldToeMarionette notified article contributors that illustrative examples were subject to an AfD. The account strictly followed the WP:SPAM#Internal_spamming guideline. The AfD was without controversy. GoldToeMarionette did not participate in the vote. HereToCleanup removed the posts following the AfD in accord with the widely accepted Wikipedia Guideline Wikipedia:Spam#Internal_spamming that states "Clean up your mess. For example, after engaging in cross-posting to promote some election, be sure to remove those cross-posts after the election is complete." [17]
Since GoldToeMarionette was strictly following Wikipedia Policy, there should not have been a Check User completed by Jayjg. Hall Monitor only blocked the account because it was labeled as a sockpuppet by Jayjg's completed Check User. Absent policy violation it should not have been processed in RFCU or been blocked. I am asking for your help to confirm that policy was not violated, administrative action should not have been taken, and request that the administrative action be reversed by unblocking GoldToeMarionette and unprotecting the talk page. Thank you for your time with this request. RealTime 02:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Now I am confused. You said you would read the policy pages so that you would understand Wikipedia, but then you went and blocked that account. Now I had to create another account. Why did you do that? Didn't you read and learn before blocking? WhyOhWhy 03:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
PoolGuy, let me outline my ethic of amnesty for you:
Ashi b aka tock 14:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
"Personally I think a better approach would be to post a message on their account advising them it was inappropriate and asking them to stop." But that user is you. We don't pretend that each sockpuppet is a new and unique person (although some users are rather schizophrenic about it, like saying "I am Jtdirl's Sockpuppet"). We know it's you, and you were using it to do something that is distinctly frowned upon by the community. No dice. And defending that by citing the definitions of sockpuppet and spamming as they are defined in the book of rules is definitely not enough for me, although maybe you will find some sympathetic admin way down along the line. Ashi b aka tock 01:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I looked at the ArbCom case real quick, and I think I get the idea here. If you stop making sockpuppets and accept your community ban as a ban then I'll unblock PoolGuy, and not Marionette, in two months. That's all. All your arguing will not make me any more lenient. Ashi b aka tock 02:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I firmly believe that the ArbCom ruling is correct and you should not be allowed to use that account. I agree that Wikipedia has problems but blocking extra user accounts is, quite frankly, petty business. Also, I myself would not unblock it because it was used solely for campaigning, which I disapprove of.
I don't think you understand the point here. If GoldToeMarionette were a separate person I would give them a second chance. But you are GoldToeMarionette. We don't regard you as two separate entities. Ashi b aka tock 03:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Why the self-revert? -- ChrisO 18:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
This is just to inform you that the Hilary Putnam trial has been restarted from scratch by Raul. I noticed that you voted to support during the first trial, but that vote has been annulled. This seems rather totalitarian to me. If you would like to revote, please go ahead and do so. Thank you.--- Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias 09:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I see you have controlled rjensen under a 3RR ruling. As far as I can see, this guy is a very hard working editor. Unfortunately, if someone does a lot of work on a particular article, he could also upset some others. Could you not talk with him, and make an exception in this case, and remove the block, and also evidence of the block. Thank you Wallie 08:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Just a friendly reminder to please remove the {{ move}} or {{ rename}} tags when you close out move requests. Otherwise, Category:Requested moves becomes cluttered with moves that are no longer current. Thanks. :) — Wknight94 ( talk) 13:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Long overdue... Thanks. -- David Mestel( Talk) 22:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Ashibaka, if you're confused and don't know anything about it, why would you revert me on the basis of one post from an anon using AOL? :-) It's a complicated issue, involving about two dozen accounts and perhaps the same number of IPs, which has been going on for eight months at least, and I'm discussing it with some people who already know part of the background. I'll certainly let you know the outcome. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
I managed three pages of the Hypnerotomachia (in the 1592 translation) before my eyelids slammed shut in self-defence, while my record for the Ormulum is ten lines, so I'll stand by the claim. :P — Haeleth Talk 11:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
OH GOD THE AGONY | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
something is wrong with them. Lir 03:47 Oct 20, 2002 (UTC)
Hi Ashibaka, I'm not familiar with the usage of the template you added to Talk:Share taxi, but it appears to require a notification at WP:AN/I, which I can't seem to find. If you've already done this and I missed it when I searched the page, please ignore this message. Cheers, Banyan Tree 20:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
If u r, ask me ANY question at all regarding Star Wars. I will answer. Live long and prosper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Philber 22 ( talk • contribs)
Hi dear sysop Ashibaka! I've seen your removal editions regarding the mentioned image, from its templates. As you know, lots of articles in Wikipedia have images, looked as symbols, each one trying to represent a concept given in article. This particular symbol relates itself to esoteric philosophies and the inner planes, as it can be concluded from its description. As a Buddhist you will find the conception of planes of existence as "Deva lokas" (or other that I am not deeply acquainted to). On the other hand, related to each one, you have description of exalted Beings far advanced from our human evolution (which evolves through the cycle of rebirth), as taught, among others, in Buddhism and esoteric philosophies. It is taught also that there are beings from our own evolution Who have gone far beyond the cycle of rebirth into Divine spheres "above". Now, if these beings became liberated from the "chain" that bound us here, it should be logical to deduct that they may have joined the gods Who aid us in our evolutionary steps here. Some even do expect such an advanced being, liberated from our evolution cycle, to rebirth here among us in order to bring a new age of spiritual upliftment... Suppose these Beings have already, in silence, been preparing the way in the world for such an event, as previously spoken, and that they teach us that - above all working with our evolution - there is a far higher Spiritual Being - not from human evolution, but from the evolution of a life wave that to our 'eyes' would be as gods - Who aids and directs mankind's evolution. This exalted Spiritual Being would be the One we call Christ, Whom the " The Winged Self" symbol represents in the central White Rose. Blessed be, -- 62.169.119.157 16:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
what do you do if you have cheeted on your boyfriend
Hi!
re: Poor Summary — Many of us would appreciate a comment like "Applied ACCURACY Template because...". We'd appreciate it even more if you annote the talk:Davy Crockett with a prominent section title and notes as is implied by the template: "See Talk..." For example a heading like the below would be in order:
Because ...
I'm removing the Template now. If you don't like it, put it back with such documented reasons if you are too lazy or disinterested in cleaning up the article yourself. Best regards, Fra nkB 18:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for taking action. But I'm afraid the block would not be able to actually help the situation. Please consider to help bring the disputed matters towards discussion, the parties to talk pages and the dispute towards resolution. I've been requesting user:Alanmak to talk, but all effort was in vain. He simply deleted my requests and other messages from his user talk page with edit summary like " disregard bullshit " or not summary at all. — Insta ntnood 20:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Not at all. That's what every responsible user is obliged to do whenever she/he notices it. — Insta ntnood 20:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Just to let you know user:SchmuckyTheCat is deleting it again, together with a new message of mine.
[1] What we can do? —
Insta
ntnood 13:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
srry 4 not sayin' my name up there. I'm the guy who asked if ur a Star Wars fan. Write back soon plz! Philber 22 23:08, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Philber 22
Sigh. I'll have a word to them tonight when I get home from uni, although I don't think I will be able to become deeply involved in any mediation because it's assignment time at uni... Cheers. enochlau ( talk) 23:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi. In reference to the email you received from Jamie Miller. Assuming he doesn't want his contact details revealed publically, could you do the massive favour of asking him to contact me. I am the creator of the Game Tree and have been trying to track down the origins of The Game for over a year now. If you could tell him to email me at jonty@losethegame.com it would be much appreciated. Out of interest, how did you find the post about him? Thanks, Kernow 22:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, he has got in touch. I was also wondering whether it would be possible for you to paste me a copy of The Game article before it was moved to The Game (game). I believe it was under Forgetting Game but I am not sure. Is there anyway I can access the history of an article that has been moved? Because I am interested in all the edits and the users that made them. Thanks. Kernow 12:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Can I just clarify about your contact with Jamie Miller. How did he get your email address and what reason did he give for contacting you? Kernow 20:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Earlier you asked me if "live long and prosper" from Star TREK, not Star WARS. I knew this, i just think it's cool ;)
(i keep forgetting 2 use the 4 ~'s, srry :( )
I'm disappointed with your remarks at user talk:Enochlau [2]. You're already informed [3] that I did request user:Alanmak to talk. Just that he refused to respond. Furthermore, those are not merely stylistic issues, but reflections of points of view that are deviated from the reality. The disagreements are not only between user:Alanmak and I, but with user:SchmuckyTheCat as well. Please kindly refrain from commenting if you're not familiar enough with the matter, since it could be leading to unnecessary and undesirable troubles, and could be unfair to any or all of the parties involved. Thanks for your attention. — Insta ntnood 12:17, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
How was my response a personal attack on Kernow? I merely responded the same way he posted on my Talk page. I assume that you read his posting there, & because you felt my comments violated WP:NPA, you also warned him. If not, may I state that I found his comments insulting, & ask that you also warn him. Whether you do this or not, I'm happy to let the entire matter drop -- which I had after my original comment to JoshuaZ. -- llywrch 23:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm going to have to ask you two to take this to your respective talk pages... Ashibaka tock 21:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
You are invited to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). The issue of the name has not been resolved and therefore people are now recruiting others to delete. Feel free to make your judgement known, thank you. Nomen Nescio 21:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
nuther one. NoSeptember talk 12:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
For your information, there are still some red links in the list. Plus stubby articles aren't really encyclopaedic articles AFAIK so it is useful to push these articles to GA or FA status or even 0.5 or 1.0 status. Lincher 02:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I am a wikipedian born in 1987! Kiptrev please add me to the list!
Hello, kindly accept my greetings on the occasion of Buddha Purnima. -- Bhadani 15:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
I am not a sockpuppet of General eisenhower. -- GeorgeMoney T· C 04:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
(Although, now that I think of it you don't join all of his projects so you might simply be two of a kind.) Ashibaka tock 04:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Addendum: RFCU proved me wrong, serve up some of that humble pie! Ashibaka tock 03:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Please do not undo people's admin actions without discussion. See WP:AN/I for the report about this, where the protection has support. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
If you don't want your comments to be changed, don't write things like that. I'd have taken it as a joke from any other admin, but given you restored H's user page because he asked someone to on WR, it seems you're trying to make a point. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey -- I deprodded this, b/c they really do appear to have multiple albums out, so they might meet WP:MUSIC. Just letting you know. Mango juice talk 17:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Please discuss and vote at Talk:History_of_the_world#Name_ambiguity Thank you, __ Maysara 12:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
With regards to your recent edit to the article LOL (Internet slang). Could you please point out of a few of these needed citations, preferably on the article talk page? To many users requisition action nowadays without giving any reason or instruction, which hurts wikipedia far more than it helps. It does no good to throw the credibility of an article into question unless you can provide evidence as to why (such as with the {{ Citation needed}} tags, or on a talk page), so that the article may be fixed, and so that the template addition does not seem malicious or unwarranted. If you wish the tag to stay so that progress may be made, please provide a reasoning for it more than globally claiming analysis on the article, which is really more of a WP:NOR violation than a WP:CITE violation in any regard. -- Oni Ookami Alfador Talk| @ 04:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Please discuss at Women's suffrage#Grand merging and reforms!. Thank you, __ Maysara 20:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi you did this merge [6] and this one [7]. Was it merged or agreed upon. You're an admin so you pay more attention to changes. The article was unmerged by SchmuckyTheCat. Please clue me in???? Is it supposed to be merged? DyslexicEditor 21:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
May I ask you to motivate this? notwist 09:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just randomly declaring my love for the wikipe-tan on the top of your page. Are there any more pics of her?
*Beats myself away from her so I can go back to editting.* orz deadkid_dk 08:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Orlowski.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Ashibaka, why did you move the Moe article again, without any calls for consensus first? Nowhere in the world do "general usage rules" instigate Moé as the more popular spelling, and since Wikipedia uses Hepburn romanization (and not あるオタクの好み) Moé is completely uncalled for in every way. freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 00:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
It's not a vote, it's a discussion. I came in late but I still wanted a reply. Ashibaka tock 03:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I still prefer my version. But you do have a legitimate point and I wouldn't argue further if anyone else reverted it. Ashibaka tock 03:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
When I edit something it is usually to a version that I like better. I like the English name used online, you like the Hepburn name. Both are backed up by their own contradictory guidelines. If you want to change it back I will not revert! Ashibaka tock 04:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello again. I apologize for being insistant but as I have said, I don't approve of your conduct on this issue ("I still think it's better") and since you refuse to give any proper reason for your actions I can only consider you uncooperative. Since you performed a series of reversions based on your single edit I feel it unfair to demand of me to clean up after your mistakes, of which you yourself claim unable to defend. I decided to ask you politely once again instead of bringing this to RfC. It's a small matter but it reflects largely on your conduct as an admin, and I will not hesistate again. Thank you. freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 06:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes. I hate Hepburn. I hardly ever act on it but in this case I thought it would do the article some good. If you disagree, revert me and I will not change it back. Ashibaka tock 04:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Ashibaka. Thank you for introducing Wikipe-tan to English Wikipedia!
By the way, there are Wikipe's oekaki that I drew in Futaba, besides standard-type and Sockpuppet Show. I uploaded also rest of them on Commons. If you are interested, please check them. Image:Wikipe-tan_she_needs_your_help.png, Image:Wikipe-tan_donations.png. -- Kasuga 14:26, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
The drawing that was deleted was drawn by me using colored pencil and watercolor.
It was modeled after the picture you refer to indeed. But I dont think that is a problem, as mine has obvious differences from the original. Just like the Elfen Lied drawings were modeled off of Gustav Klimt: See here: [8]
Please restore my drawing back. It took me a week to draw it. I'd like to have it displayed. And we can say who I modeled the drawing after in the caption of the image so that no doubts will remain.-- Zereshk 21:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for undeleting my sub-page. As you can see, MONGO deleted it again and propsed you should talk to him personaly before doing the undelete. Do you agree with him that the page should not be undeleted without him having something to say about it, specialy considering he deleted it as a speedy, twice, ignoring your decision? -- Striver 22:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
So what...stop messing around with it...figure out who is a troll and who isn't and Striver is one of the worst POV pushers Wikipedia has.-- MONGO 00:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Ashibaka, thank you for assisting with the Brian Bruns article. The pageblock is good because Bruns is trying to have it deleted just because he doesn't want things known about him and he is very notable as you can see from my comments on the talk page. Cheers. -- Chakabuh 02:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
"Restored" pages are picked up as unprotected. A time corrections for restore->reprotect (if reprotected) is hard to implement. I can try to fix del. log limits to minimize that problem though. Voice-of-All Talk 07:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
User_talk:Doc_glasgow#Thanks Ashibaka tock 18:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Just so you know I am not agruing with you (go ahead and oppose, I don't care anymore), I would just like to understand why you opposed better (because I don't understand). I don't understand what you mean by "Your most recent edit that gave me misgivings". Thanks for the help. ILovePlankton 23:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Could you unlink Danny and change it to Danny Wool or change it to Danny? I'm not sure it even needs to because he has at least denied that it was an OFFICE action (and it wasn't User:Dannyisme), but I'm beyond caring really. The news agency doesn't get much sources--but that isn't the case with Joel Leyden... hey look there is a tangent... Kotepho 22:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Please do not redirect this page. Thank you. Sophia 17:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Please do not edit protected pages. -- Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης) 20:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, you kind of ignored the talk page where you might find discussion of things like that Ashibaka tock 00:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
It had nothing to do with the dispute, someone just requested the link and used {{ editprotected}}, and there was no disagreement, so I went and edited it. WP:OWN Ashibaka tock 20:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for adjusting the categorization. -- Avi 22:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
I case you were wondering, I semi-protected the template because of vandalism like this, which went unfixed for an hour. Since it's such a high visibility template, I thought that was rather silly. But there hasn't been much vandalism since, so it's probably better unprotected. Cheers, jaco♫ plane 18:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
( in re:)
I have been entrusted to use the tool appropriately, and do so. Any specific concerns are discussed on the Arbitration Committee mailing list and with Jimbo; this discussion has included my own use of the tool. Jayjg (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I think every successful one will qualify from here on out, fortunately there aren't too many of them ;-). NoSeptember 16:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:Justice Court is not a policy proposal, it is a group that promotes accountability of administrators by posting irresponsible on a list. Please remove it from proposals. If you need other reasons, please post on my talk page. I will put a notice that it is not a proposal on the page. Geo.plrd 23:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I'm a fairly long time wikipedia editor. Recently wikipedia seems to have undergone a huge change. There are now messages such as "Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abaddon"" every time I visit a page, leading me to believe that wikipedia has been backed up or something like that.
The search/find box is now at the bottom of the page, the link for editing an entire page (rather than a section) is at the bottom and looks different, and generally wikipedia looks worse.
However I recently reinstalled Windows on my computer, and it could be that my computer is messing things up. I don't have access to the internet anywhere else, at least not until next Friday at the earliest, so I can't really confirm that it's not just my computer messing things up.
Has there been an announcement of a big change at wikipedia? If so, is there a link to the announcement? Does wikipedia look the way it normally does on your computer? I hope you don't mind that I asked you. I figured I should ask an administrator and couldn't find any info on this in the village pump. Kimera757 17:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, — Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you.
Links are not commercial personal or spam and if recommended by MGA itself in customer service message responses to myself as useful resources then they are useful to this Bratz article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.109.150 ( talk)
Please review the deletion of Names of European cities in different languages, and the related articles Names of Asian cities in different languages and Names of African cities in different languages. These were discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of European cities in different languages, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of Asian cities in different languages, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of African cities in different languages.
The vote was: Keep: Future Perfect at Sunrise Interlingua Trialsanderrors Atillios Carlossuarez46 (me) Kierant Adam78 Khoikhoi Goldom Pasquale Eivind F Øyangen Fastifex Aguerriero Slowmover Lambiam Irpen Olessi Travelbird Nightstallion Agathoclea Folks at 137 Lethe Qviri Riadlem Peteris Cedrins Reimelt Nick C
Delete: Motor Theoldanarchist Mangojuice Dawson Isotope23 WicketheWok Centrx Angus McLellan Masterhatch Tychocat
That is: 27-10 to keep. While I know that it’s not a strict vote-counting exercise, the usual rule of thumb is not to delete unless there is a strong consensus expressed to do so – i.e., give the benefit of the doubt toward keeping. Here, process was thwarted.
The administrator closing the AfD acted contrary to the consensus expressed at the AfD by making his/her own judgment that the content was not encyclopedic. The whole issue of alternate placenames is very much encyclopedic and has been the subject on ongoing debate among Wikipedians, for example at: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names) and the various disputes about whether to use “Danzig” or “Gdansk” for that city near the Baltic, etc.. Also, similar articles remain extant in several other Interwiki’s (since the article is deleted, the interwiki links are gone too, otherwise I could cite which), so they appear encyclopedic to people who speak other languages. Please restore the articles. Carlossuarez46 18:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
This is not like the SCAG. G eo. 21:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
G eo. 21:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
organization provided that I deal with the issues resulting in deletion?G eo. 23:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello; I noticed you have recently contributed to the current events portal and thought you would be interested in looking at a proposal for redesigning the page. If you can, please take a look at a redesign proposal I created and provide some feedback on its talk page. So far, very little feedback has been received, and so the additional input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. joturn e r 05:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Pls explain why did you reveted my edit. Those links are imortant and relevant. -- Haham hanuka 17:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar and the kind words re Vincent van Gogh. I think we're probably a month or two from peer review, depending on how much time I can find to get through the material, and possibly break out some subsidiary main articles if sections get too unwieldy. Thanks again. Stumps 06:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Evidently you tried to send me a message. It was blocked by the firewall, I don't know why. Until I have found the reason, you'd better leave a note on my user page. Thank you. -- R.P.D. 19:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for voting! Hello Shii/History5, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC) |
thanks for looking at my new article. I put another reference in as requested SenorKristobbal 12:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:SportsCenter Nice closing statement! Do you follow copyright caselaw for kicks? - CrazyRougeian talk/ email 20:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I just wanted to say thank you for opening up the Chelsy Davy page for me! I've got a first draft up which hopefully shall not need to be deleted. Thank you for all your help. Vickser 21:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your support in the Esperance Elections, Ashibaka! I am truly honored by your support, and look foward to helping Esperanza continue to run well. -- Nataly a 01:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Though Afshar's work is still the subject of ongoing interpretation and discussion, a significant portion of the scientific community is of the opinion that Afshar's experiment does not refute complementarity.
Some general criticisms are:
As Michael claims, those statments are supposedly "popular views" that preexisted my experiment, and as such must be present in peer-reviewed publication predating my work. All I have asked him to do is to provide such valid ref.s but he has persistently avoided doing so and instead engaged in personal attacks. He seems to have a lot of time on his hands to be on Wikipeida constatntly, but I don't. This is turning to oneupmanship, and I don't have time for such antcis. Maybe he would heed your request. Thanks!-- Prof. Afshar 13:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I have emailed you about something that others have been preventing people from telling you. If you do not receive it, please respond on your talk page. Dagedzil 08:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
You may want to have a look. I restored this and explained myself on the talk page. Friday (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
There's discussion at Wikipedia talk:Historical information that you started. You may wish to continue it.— msh210℠ 07:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
I moved your Jimbo makes mistakes essay into your userspace at: User:Ashibaka/Jimbo makes mistakes, guessing that that's the best move for now? See if you can get some folks to help you edit it! :-)
(don't forget to delete the redirects btw.)
Kim Bruning 21:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I was hoping of asking Jimbo after a few other people had corrected it but I guess they wanted to delete it instead. C.f. my parable above. Ashibaka tock 12:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Heh, okay. Thanks. Ashibaka tock 21:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Myrtone86 sent me an e-mail regarding his block for "disruption" that I wasn't involved at WP:AN/I. I left him a message with a copy of e-mail on his talk page. Is there a reason why you unblocked him if you feel the block is inappropriate? -- ADNghiem501 23:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Why did you overturn my block when it had the approval of four other editors on WP:ANI [10] (which you did or should have seen, as I said I had provided an expanded rationale on Myrtone's talk page), with no voices against, without seeking consensus there or even doing me the courtesy of informing me on my talk page? -- Sam Blanning (talk) 11:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, go ahead and block him again. That's the sort of thanks I get for trying to do something friendly here. Ashibaka tock 21:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Ashibaka. I noticed the following message in your user page:
May I take you up on that offer? And can I ask you to look up " French popular music"? The template {{frenchmusic}} suggests that French popular music may have existed at one time and deleted, or maybe it was never created in the first place. In any case I am interested in creating that article, and any information would be helpful. Thank you very much for your help.-- Endroit 15:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
You ruined my block message on Stephencolbert... ahh, (ps, I've left a voicemail requesting confirmation, please wait) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tawker ( talk • contribs)
ok, so I did it incorrectly...please help me add the information properly? If you check the sources, you will find that it is not a joke, and deserves to be part of the article on elephants.
Sorry forgot to sign: MathStatWoman 13:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
If you have the time, help me expand this, please. -- Saoshyant 17:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks -- Saoshyant 04:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for expanding the Nicoleño article I made a stub for. We probably have the best Nicoleño article in the world now :) Ashibaka tock 02:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
That made my day. BBBBB forever! =D - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 15:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Crap, the "b" wasn't actually orange... Ashi b aka tock 15:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
GoldToeMarionette ( talk · contribs) had a WP:RFCU inappropriately completed on their account by Jayjg ( talk · contribs) and Hall Monitor ( talk · contribs) blocked the account after it was identified as a multiple account despite their being no violation of Wikipedia policy by GoldToeMarionette. These users did not respond to requests to undo the action.
Other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
GoldToeMarionette notified article contributors that illustrative examples were subject to an AfD. The account strictly followed the WP:SPAM#Internal_spamming guideline. The AfD was without controversy. GoldToeMarionette did not participate in the vote. HereToCleanup removed the posts following the AfD in accord with the widely accepted Wikipedia Guideline Wikipedia:Spam#Internal_spamming that states "Clean up your mess. For example, after engaging in cross-posting to promote some election, be sure to remove those cross-posts after the election is complete." [17]
Since GoldToeMarionette was strictly following Wikipedia Policy, there should not have been a Check User completed by Jayjg. Hall Monitor only blocked the account because it was labeled as a sockpuppet by Jayjg's completed Check User. Absent policy violation it should not have been processed in RFCU or been blocked. I am asking for your help to confirm that policy was not violated, administrative action should not have been taken, and request that the administrative action be reversed by unblocking GoldToeMarionette and unprotecting the talk page. Thank you for your time with this request. RealTime 02:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Now I am confused. You said you would read the policy pages so that you would understand Wikipedia, but then you went and blocked that account. Now I had to create another account. Why did you do that? Didn't you read and learn before blocking? WhyOhWhy 03:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
PoolGuy, let me outline my ethic of amnesty for you:
Ashi b aka tock 14:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
"Personally I think a better approach would be to post a message on their account advising them it was inappropriate and asking them to stop." But that user is you. We don't pretend that each sockpuppet is a new and unique person (although some users are rather schizophrenic about it, like saying "I am Jtdirl's Sockpuppet"). We know it's you, and you were using it to do something that is distinctly frowned upon by the community. No dice. And defending that by citing the definitions of sockpuppet and spamming as they are defined in the book of rules is definitely not enough for me, although maybe you will find some sympathetic admin way down along the line. Ashi b aka tock 01:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I looked at the ArbCom case real quick, and I think I get the idea here. If you stop making sockpuppets and accept your community ban as a ban then I'll unblock PoolGuy, and not Marionette, in two months. That's all. All your arguing will not make me any more lenient. Ashi b aka tock 02:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I firmly believe that the ArbCom ruling is correct and you should not be allowed to use that account. I agree that Wikipedia has problems but blocking extra user accounts is, quite frankly, petty business. Also, I myself would not unblock it because it was used solely for campaigning, which I disapprove of.
I don't think you understand the point here. If GoldToeMarionette were a separate person I would give them a second chance. But you are GoldToeMarionette. We don't regard you as two separate entities. Ashi b aka tock 03:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Why the self-revert? -- ChrisO 18:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
This is just to inform you that the Hilary Putnam trial has been restarted from scratch by Raul. I noticed that you voted to support during the first trial, but that vote has been annulled. This seems rather totalitarian to me. If you would like to revote, please go ahead and do so. Thank you.--- Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias 09:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I see you have controlled rjensen under a 3RR ruling. As far as I can see, this guy is a very hard working editor. Unfortunately, if someone does a lot of work on a particular article, he could also upset some others. Could you not talk with him, and make an exception in this case, and remove the block, and also evidence of the block. Thank you Wallie 08:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Just a friendly reminder to please remove the {{ move}} or {{ rename}} tags when you close out move requests. Otherwise, Category:Requested moves becomes cluttered with moves that are no longer current. Thanks. :) — Wknight94 ( talk) 13:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Long overdue... Thanks. -- David Mestel( Talk) 22:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Ashibaka, if you're confused and don't know anything about it, why would you revert me on the basis of one post from an anon using AOL? :-) It's a complicated issue, involving about two dozen accounts and perhaps the same number of IPs, which has been going on for eight months at least, and I'm discussing it with some people who already know part of the background. I'll certainly let you know the outcome. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
I managed three pages of the Hypnerotomachia (in the 1592 translation) before my eyelids slammed shut in self-defence, while my record for the Ormulum is ten lines, so I'll stand by the claim. :P — Haeleth Talk 11:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)