Hi ShashakiroSH! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! RFD ( talk) 20:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
02:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC) |
ShashakiroSH ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This block is based on mistaken premises; I have no alternate accounts and indeed have barely even edited on the one I do have. I go by "Shashakiro" on nearly all other websites (it was taken on this one back in 2009 when I made the account). My reddit account is https://www.reddit.com/user/Shashakiro/ and my Bulbapedia account is https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Special:Contributions/Shashakiro. I've edited the most recent post made on my Reddit account and my Bulbapedia userpage https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/User:Shashakiro to hopefully help show that I'm "real". Additionally, this post https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:BrownHairedGirl&diff=prev&oldid=1020394877 made in April explains my interest in Arbcom and why I watch the case pages. I welcome a "CheckUser" on myself as well, which should not show any other account on this IP. While I have not edited Wikipedia mainspace very much as of yet, I would appreciate having the ability to do so in the future. Thanks for your consideration. ShashakiroSH ShashakiroSH ( talk) 03:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't like to play guess the sockmaster either. Even if I assumed good faith and believed this explanation(I'm not sure if I do or not), I would concur with TonyBallioni that NOTHERE applies, at least right now. Perhaps if you described some contributions you might make to the main encyclopedia, that would help. I'm declining your request, but won't stand it the way if you make another and another admin accepts it. 331dot ( talk) 10:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
We don't need to play the "guess my main account game". these are obviously the contributions of someone who is deeply familiar with Wikipedias sanctions regime who is editing under an undeclared alternate account to engage with those participating in backend discussions about sanctions and other internal items. Most likely to evade a block. If you prefer, I have no problem changing the rationale to WP:NOTHERE, but the ultimate thought process is the same: an account that only exists to comment on user talk pages about arbitration matters is not an account that is participating in building up the project. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
ShashakiroSH ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
To address the NOTHERE component of the block as 331dot suggested: if unblocked I intend to make improvements to articles in my current areas of interest, such as NFL football, video games, and puzzle hunts such as the MIT Mystery Hunt. I will pledge not to make any further unsolicited comments of any kind on "backroom" elements such as Arbcom cases or discretionary sanctions until I have first made article-space contributions sufficient to demonstrate that I am here to build an encyclopedia. I have no other account and wish to edit constructively, so I request the block be lifted. Thanks again for your consideration. ShashakiroSH (talk) 07:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Okie dokie. El_C 01:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
@ TonyBallioni and 331dot: I realize you both said that you wouldn't stand in the way of an unblock, but I'm placing it on-hold and will nonetheless hold-on (← see what I did there?) in case either of you have any concerns. With ShashakiroSH's new commitment and with Soni's vouch, I see no harm in giving them a chance. Also, they seem to be a pretty chill person (/biased). Thank you. El_C 18:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi ShashakiroSH! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! RFD ( talk) 20:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
02:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC) |
ShashakiroSH ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This block is based on mistaken premises; I have no alternate accounts and indeed have barely even edited on the one I do have. I go by "Shashakiro" on nearly all other websites (it was taken on this one back in 2009 when I made the account). My reddit account is https://www.reddit.com/user/Shashakiro/ and my Bulbapedia account is https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Special:Contributions/Shashakiro. I've edited the most recent post made on my Reddit account and my Bulbapedia userpage https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/User:Shashakiro to hopefully help show that I'm "real". Additionally, this post https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:BrownHairedGirl&diff=prev&oldid=1020394877 made in April explains my interest in Arbcom and why I watch the case pages. I welcome a "CheckUser" on myself as well, which should not show any other account on this IP. While I have not edited Wikipedia mainspace very much as of yet, I would appreciate having the ability to do so in the future. Thanks for your consideration. ShashakiroSH ShashakiroSH ( talk) 03:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't like to play guess the sockmaster either. Even if I assumed good faith and believed this explanation(I'm not sure if I do or not), I would concur with TonyBallioni that NOTHERE applies, at least right now. Perhaps if you described some contributions you might make to the main encyclopedia, that would help. I'm declining your request, but won't stand it the way if you make another and another admin accepts it. 331dot ( talk) 10:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
We don't need to play the "guess my main account game". these are obviously the contributions of someone who is deeply familiar with Wikipedias sanctions regime who is editing under an undeclared alternate account to engage with those participating in backend discussions about sanctions and other internal items. Most likely to evade a block. If you prefer, I have no problem changing the rationale to WP:NOTHERE, but the ultimate thought process is the same: an account that only exists to comment on user talk pages about arbitration matters is not an account that is participating in building up the project. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
ShashakiroSH ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
To address the NOTHERE component of the block as 331dot suggested: if unblocked I intend to make improvements to articles in my current areas of interest, such as NFL football, video games, and puzzle hunts such as the MIT Mystery Hunt. I will pledge not to make any further unsolicited comments of any kind on "backroom" elements such as Arbcom cases or discretionary sanctions until I have first made article-space contributions sufficient to demonstrate that I am here to build an encyclopedia. I have no other account and wish to edit constructively, so I request the block be lifted. Thanks again for your consideration. ShashakiroSH (talk) 07:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Okie dokie. El_C 01:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
@ TonyBallioni and 331dot: I realize you both said that you wouldn't stand in the way of an unblock, but I'm placing it on-hold and will nonetheless hold-on (← see what I did there?) in case either of you have any concerns. With ShashakiroSH's new commitment and with Soni's vouch, I see no harm in giving them a chance. Also, they seem to be a pretty chill person (/biased). Thank you. El_C 18:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)