Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
15:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering why you have been extensively tagging military history articles with "need of expert attention" and "disputed" boxes without actually leaving any reason on the talk pages. You did this with the Unified Task Force article, for example. What are your grounds for saying that this article needs expert attention and contains factual innacuracy? -- Mat Hardy ( talk) 23:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Copy_of_agreement.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot ( talk) 00:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Johor fc logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Johor fc logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted your restoration of the non-free logo to this page. As my edit summary notes, the use of the item violates WP:NFCC #10c and must be removed until it complies. Thank you, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 19:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Go to discussion page of 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup and state your reason and argument before making any edit. Thank you ( Gunkarta ( talk) 16:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)).
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
17:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Shah 88, your post on Gunkarta's page is threading WP:CIVIL. That, and the fact that you have definely crossed 3rrr, insisting on POV pushing with sources that are unacceptable by wikipedia standards. Please follow community rules here, and take this as a fair warning. Zhanzhao ( talk) 18:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Coba bahasa inggeris disini - WP:3RR - hati hati - you have broken that rule already - also - the page is now protected Satu Suro 02:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Do not call me names like "indon" and please be polite. Your recent posts can be considered violation of WP:CIVIL and Wikipedia:no personal attack. If there will be another anonymous IP attacks on me, I'll considered it was came from you, as it was happened before ( Gunkarta ( talk) 16:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)).
I don't care..pity u inferior indonesia..country without vision..even u speak english, it can't change the fact that u r indonesian..loser always loser.. Shah 88 ( talk) Shah 16:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
That should have already gone to ANI. But, there's now a number of people watching Shah. I suggest he treads carefully. -- Merbabu ( talk) 12:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Warning! Here in wikipedia we have rule against multiple account WP:SOCK. I believe you have violated this rule by creating multiple accounts next to your current account User:Shah 88: User:Shah 88/Free Aceh, User:Shah 88/Proud Johorean. Your other user page might be blocked ( Gunkarta ( talk) 12:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)).
These actually are user pages - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/User:Shah 88/ with flagcruft/userboxes - rather than alternative accounts - but note what Gunkarta says - you keep your enthusiasms to one account - and you are ok - take it to more than one account and you will be blocked if you use multiple accounts for no valid reason Satu Suro 12:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
hahaha..Am I care?? Shah 12:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Merbabu ( talk) 13:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Once again..Am I care?? hahaha Shah 13:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Moonriddengirl
(talk)
14:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Shah 88 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Moonriddengirl..Firstly. I would like to say sorry..I was frequently provoked by some person from Indonesia..They always revert my edit..I hope you revoke this block because I want to contribute to Malaysia-related and soccer-related pages.. Shah 18:16, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You do not convince me that you understand the reason for your block and will not make such edits again. See also WP:NOTTHEM. Sandstein 19:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shah 88, Wikipedia is not the place to wage battles. See WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND. One of the conditions of your contribution here — the same conditions imposed on all contributors — is that you must prioritize the well-being of Wikipedia itself, and to do that you must keep this environment civil. Given this incident, any future attacks are likely to lead to more serious sanctions, including an outright ban from the site. No matter what provocation you may receive, there is absolutely no place for that kind of behavior here. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
I found this similarly offensive user name with same modus operandi from last week. [1]. I've posted it on the ANI board and requested a check user. Also, from memory, late last year there was another account like this interacting with Shah and Gunkarta with a relatively short user name. If someone can remember who please let us know. -- Merbabu ( talk) 00:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
I have serious doubts about your capacity to maintain a WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF edit history in the future - in view of your responses to date:-
It would be good if you can actually edit without causing problems and maintaining a non antagonistic neutral edit history for a while, in other words not using offensive or combative terms or trying to blame Indonesians for your problems. Best of luck Satu Suro 23:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Moonriddengirl
(talk)
14:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)I have blocked this user from editing the talk page here. If Shah 88 wishes to be unblocked, please send an email to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org stating your case and explaining why the block is no longer necessary. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 11:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
15:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering why you have been extensively tagging military history articles with "need of expert attention" and "disputed" boxes without actually leaving any reason on the talk pages. You did this with the Unified Task Force article, for example. What are your grounds for saying that this article needs expert attention and contains factual innacuracy? -- Mat Hardy ( talk) 23:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Copy_of_agreement.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot ( talk) 00:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Johor fc logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Johor fc logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted your restoration of the non-free logo to this page. As my edit summary notes, the use of the item violates WP:NFCC #10c and must be removed until it complies. Thank you, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 19:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Go to discussion page of 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup and state your reason and argument before making any edit. Thank you ( Gunkarta ( talk) 16:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)).
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
17:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Shah 88, your post on Gunkarta's page is threading WP:CIVIL. That, and the fact that you have definely crossed 3rrr, insisting on POV pushing with sources that are unacceptable by wikipedia standards. Please follow community rules here, and take this as a fair warning. Zhanzhao ( talk) 18:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Coba bahasa inggeris disini - WP:3RR - hati hati - you have broken that rule already - also - the page is now protected Satu Suro 02:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Do not call me names like "indon" and please be polite. Your recent posts can be considered violation of WP:CIVIL and Wikipedia:no personal attack. If there will be another anonymous IP attacks on me, I'll considered it was came from you, as it was happened before ( Gunkarta ( talk) 16:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)).
I don't care..pity u inferior indonesia..country without vision..even u speak english, it can't change the fact that u r indonesian..loser always loser.. Shah 88 ( talk) Shah 16:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
That should have already gone to ANI. But, there's now a number of people watching Shah. I suggest he treads carefully. -- Merbabu ( talk) 12:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Warning! Here in wikipedia we have rule against multiple account WP:SOCK. I believe you have violated this rule by creating multiple accounts next to your current account User:Shah 88: User:Shah 88/Free Aceh, User:Shah 88/Proud Johorean. Your other user page might be blocked ( Gunkarta ( talk) 12:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)).
These actually are user pages - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/User:Shah 88/ with flagcruft/userboxes - rather than alternative accounts - but note what Gunkarta says - you keep your enthusiasms to one account - and you are ok - take it to more than one account and you will be blocked if you use multiple accounts for no valid reason Satu Suro 12:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
hahaha..Am I care?? Shah 12:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Merbabu ( talk) 13:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Once again..Am I care?? hahaha Shah 13:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Moonriddengirl
(talk)
14:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Shah 88 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Moonriddengirl..Firstly. I would like to say sorry..I was frequently provoked by some person from Indonesia..They always revert my edit..I hope you revoke this block because I want to contribute to Malaysia-related and soccer-related pages.. Shah 18:16, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You do not convince me that you understand the reason for your block and will not make such edits again. See also WP:NOTTHEM. Sandstein 19:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shah 88, Wikipedia is not the place to wage battles. See WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND. One of the conditions of your contribution here — the same conditions imposed on all contributors — is that you must prioritize the well-being of Wikipedia itself, and to do that you must keep this environment civil. Given this incident, any future attacks are likely to lead to more serious sanctions, including an outright ban from the site. No matter what provocation you may receive, there is absolutely no place for that kind of behavior here. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
I found this similarly offensive user name with same modus operandi from last week. [1]. I've posted it on the ANI board and requested a check user. Also, from memory, late last year there was another account like this interacting with Shah and Gunkarta with a relatively short user name. If someone can remember who please let us know. -- Merbabu ( talk) 00:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
I have serious doubts about your capacity to maintain a WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF edit history in the future - in view of your responses to date:-
It would be good if you can actually edit without causing problems and maintaining a non antagonistic neutral edit history for a while, in other words not using offensive or combative terms or trying to blame Indonesians for your problems. Best of luck Satu Suro 23:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Moonriddengirl
(talk)
14:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)I have blocked this user from editing the talk page here. If Shah 88 wishes to be unblocked, please send an email to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org stating your case and explaining why the block is no longer necessary. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 11:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)