![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Uhh...nt? -- Spring Rubber 10:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
With regard to your no-doubt well-intentioned admonition about my removal of content from the Wiki, can you please cite a specific example of inappropriate content removal? I have removed content that does not belong in an encyclopedia. Trivial content such as lists of games that feature a particular mythological entity do not constitute any meaningful or substantitive contribution, at least as I understand it. According to the trivia essay (admittedly, not a formal policy or guidline, but still a pursuasively argued viewpoint), the general approach should be that content be both interesting and important. I believe that all my deletions are well justified. Thanks for your interest and help. -- BehemothCat 00:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. I've raised the issue of Inane Pop Culture References over at the Village pump, so perhaps some clarification will ensue. -- BehemothCat 02:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Find the definition of trivia and you will see it can be interpreted many different ways. Remember what Zelda said my friend, be bold, but don't be wreckless.\
User such and such... ( Risenfromthedead 21:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC))
It can't be denied. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.76.114.84 ( talk • contribs) .
Okay, we won't let you hold us back and keep on the vandalizing.-- 150.243.204.64 07:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
So, Khakain was like a drug to you that you had to kick? You're the one following us around. How are we the ones that haven't moved on? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.243.204.64 ( talk • contribs) .
You expect us to believe you found our handywork at random? Also, we wouldn't be doing inane talk page and gamefaqs stuff if you were on aim. Lord knows I don't like setting foot in either place. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.243.204.64 ( talk • contribs).
How dare you revert my edits of the Alex Trebek article. He is a very close friend of mine and I happen to know for a fact that his pubes are dyed, and he's notorious here in L.A. for noting the fact constantly. In the future I suggest you do some research before labling edits that seem silly as vandalism. Thank you. 213.140.19.119 09:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Nicely reverted on those vandals on Durham. The IP has now been blocked (yet again), and the user account permamently locked as a vandalism only account. Ben W Bell talk 08:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for vandalism, I stopped after you messaged me.
-- 198.102.159.206 08:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, however the text on the tag on the page in question reads "If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." Well, I believe that the page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, and I did not write or create the article, so therefore the text quoted implies I can remove the notice. Perhaps the notice needs reworded if only admins are allowed to remove it? I have stated my beliefs on the discussion page of the said article and I apologise if I did something wrong with the notice. GWidley 12:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Why exactly is it that you think Defunkitated needs to be deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SlimJimmy ( talk • contribs).
You've got to help me with this guy. He's tagging my pages with deletion notices (a.k.a. vandalism). I think he's a sockpuppet of Suthernreb, the original author. - SpLoT / ( talk) 10:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. - SpLoT / ( talk) 10:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
If you're in the mode, can you help me with something?
There's an issue with Khakiwiki and I haven't seen any documentation of the problem. All the help areas are a bit deserted. If you're for the promotion of proper wiki use or whatever you're obligated under some code or oath to help, but I hope you do it because we're still special friends.-- Archdeco 16:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
So you've seen Yu Gi Oh Abridged?-- Archdeco 23:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Women's frocks, suck my cocks, etc. :)
So, you seriously were just clicking around the recent changes at random and found ours completely by chance, and then followed us around? Forgive me if that just seems really unlikely.-- Archdeco 18:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
'kay, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But you're being a mule about the "yar no moar khakain evar" thing.-- Archdeco 03:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Then you're a creepy, got-less-funny, introverted mule. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.173.40.254 ( talk • contribs).
congratulations, you took the bait I laid to make a point.
really look at pickelbarrel's contributions. The guy spent his time posting pictures of pierced cocks on people's talk pages and trolling Jimbo's talk page, yet was treated like an errant puppy who widdled on the rug.
guys like him (whichever current alias he's using) go unchecked because they know better than to do anything that alerts a vandal bot (as I did, intentionally), yet they're the biggest problem with this whole project.
look closer A. Swearengen 09:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Evidently the high schoolers at "team blurr" didnt appreciate my prod of their article. Thanks for watching my user page. :) Resolute 17:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice on his talk page - I would suggest that a few people watch this IP for blocking as I think he/she will do more vandalism..etc -- Mikecraig 00:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I was just trying to improve User:Steve356's article about Alaska cruises. I, too, agree that it may be too close to an advertisement to be in Wikipedia, but that should be a decision of an AfD review, don't you think? User:Lucky 6.9 seems to have a very aggressive deletionist agenda, and he doesn't seem to care for proper policy (such as deleting my comment on his Discussion page, and then chastising me on my own). -- JossBuckle Swami 03:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Just wondering what exactly would I have to do to make this page assert its importance more? I do belive its well known as many a large number of people have seen it, and it has been on YouTube for a few weeks now and does deserve coverage on Wikipedia.
Thanks -- Doyler 20:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
We miss you. ;_; LtK 07:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Even after your warnings, the creator of this article continues to delete the nominations.
TheRingess 07:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
I understand why you think that WiiVolve should be deleted, but I request that you reconsider. I don't want to be in-your-face with the "I told you so" later on when it becomes more important. Read the discussion for the WiiVolve article and the actual article again. I didn't have much time right now, but I'll be making that a full page soon (maybe tomorrow).
-- WiiVolve 11:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for undoing that vandalism on my talk page. Keep on truckin', Dar- Ape 23:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the work you're doing on identifying candidates for speedy deletion.
Please would you consider also notifying the creating user by copying the template to the user's talk page. The template is created for the purpose of notifying users and can be found in italics at the bottom of the speedy deletion dialogue box. I realise that it is not your intention, but failure to notify new users is considered newcomer biting.
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Uhh...nt? -- Spring Rubber 10:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
With regard to your no-doubt well-intentioned admonition about my removal of content from the Wiki, can you please cite a specific example of inappropriate content removal? I have removed content that does not belong in an encyclopedia. Trivial content such as lists of games that feature a particular mythological entity do not constitute any meaningful or substantitive contribution, at least as I understand it. According to the trivia essay (admittedly, not a formal policy or guidline, but still a pursuasively argued viewpoint), the general approach should be that content be both interesting and important. I believe that all my deletions are well justified. Thanks for your interest and help. -- BehemothCat 00:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. I've raised the issue of Inane Pop Culture References over at the Village pump, so perhaps some clarification will ensue. -- BehemothCat 02:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Find the definition of trivia and you will see it can be interpreted many different ways. Remember what Zelda said my friend, be bold, but don't be wreckless.\
User such and such... ( Risenfromthedead 21:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC))
It can't be denied. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.76.114.84 ( talk • contribs) .
Okay, we won't let you hold us back and keep on the vandalizing.-- 150.243.204.64 07:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
So, Khakain was like a drug to you that you had to kick? You're the one following us around. How are we the ones that haven't moved on? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.243.204.64 ( talk • contribs) .
You expect us to believe you found our handywork at random? Also, we wouldn't be doing inane talk page and gamefaqs stuff if you were on aim. Lord knows I don't like setting foot in either place. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.243.204.64 ( talk • contribs).
How dare you revert my edits of the Alex Trebek article. He is a very close friend of mine and I happen to know for a fact that his pubes are dyed, and he's notorious here in L.A. for noting the fact constantly. In the future I suggest you do some research before labling edits that seem silly as vandalism. Thank you. 213.140.19.119 09:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Nicely reverted on those vandals on Durham. The IP has now been blocked (yet again), and the user account permamently locked as a vandalism only account. Ben W Bell talk 08:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for vandalism, I stopped after you messaged me.
-- 198.102.159.206 08:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, however the text on the tag on the page in question reads "If this page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." Well, I believe that the page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, and I did not write or create the article, so therefore the text quoted implies I can remove the notice. Perhaps the notice needs reworded if only admins are allowed to remove it? I have stated my beliefs on the discussion page of the said article and I apologise if I did something wrong with the notice. GWidley 12:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Why exactly is it that you think Defunkitated needs to be deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SlimJimmy ( talk • contribs).
You've got to help me with this guy. He's tagging my pages with deletion notices (a.k.a. vandalism). I think he's a sockpuppet of Suthernreb, the original author. - SpLoT / ( talk) 10:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. - SpLoT / ( talk) 10:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
If you're in the mode, can you help me with something?
There's an issue with Khakiwiki and I haven't seen any documentation of the problem. All the help areas are a bit deserted. If you're for the promotion of proper wiki use or whatever you're obligated under some code or oath to help, but I hope you do it because we're still special friends.-- Archdeco 16:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
So you've seen Yu Gi Oh Abridged?-- Archdeco 23:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Women's frocks, suck my cocks, etc. :)
So, you seriously were just clicking around the recent changes at random and found ours completely by chance, and then followed us around? Forgive me if that just seems really unlikely.-- Archdeco 18:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
'kay, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But you're being a mule about the "yar no moar khakain evar" thing.-- Archdeco 03:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Then you're a creepy, got-less-funny, introverted mule. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.173.40.254 ( talk • contribs).
congratulations, you took the bait I laid to make a point.
really look at pickelbarrel's contributions. The guy spent his time posting pictures of pierced cocks on people's talk pages and trolling Jimbo's talk page, yet was treated like an errant puppy who widdled on the rug.
guys like him (whichever current alias he's using) go unchecked because they know better than to do anything that alerts a vandal bot (as I did, intentionally), yet they're the biggest problem with this whole project.
look closer A. Swearengen 09:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Evidently the high schoolers at "team blurr" didnt appreciate my prod of their article. Thanks for watching my user page. :) Resolute 17:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice on his talk page - I would suggest that a few people watch this IP for blocking as I think he/she will do more vandalism..etc -- Mikecraig 00:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I was just trying to improve User:Steve356's article about Alaska cruises. I, too, agree that it may be too close to an advertisement to be in Wikipedia, but that should be a decision of an AfD review, don't you think? User:Lucky 6.9 seems to have a very aggressive deletionist agenda, and he doesn't seem to care for proper policy (such as deleting my comment on his Discussion page, and then chastising me on my own). -- JossBuckle Swami 03:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Just wondering what exactly would I have to do to make this page assert its importance more? I do belive its well known as many a large number of people have seen it, and it has been on YouTube for a few weeks now and does deserve coverage on Wikipedia.
Thanks -- Doyler 20:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
We miss you. ;_; LtK 07:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Even after your warnings, the creator of this article continues to delete the nominations.
TheRingess 07:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
I understand why you think that WiiVolve should be deleted, but I request that you reconsider. I don't want to be in-your-face with the "I told you so" later on when it becomes more important. Read the discussion for the WiiVolve article and the actual article again. I didn't have much time right now, but I'll be making that a full page soon (maybe tomorrow).
-- WiiVolve 11:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for undoing that vandalism on my talk page. Keep on truckin', Dar- Ape 23:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the work you're doing on identifying candidates for speedy deletion.
Please would you consider also notifying the creating user by copying the template to the user's talk page. The template is created for the purpose of notifying users and can be found in italics at the bottom of the speedy deletion dialogue box. I realise that it is not your intention, but failure to notify new users is considered newcomer biting.