Arguing on the Internet is kind of like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Pwnd.
I was
User:ShadowPuppet.
Note: I was
User:ShadowPuppet. --
Shadow Puppet
21:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
No problem in Rank Flags. That was the meaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.70.194.22 ( talk • contribs)
I've fiddled with you userboxes as you invited above ;), there are other ways of doing this, but this way looks fairly smart. Just follow the pattern to add any others. -- Alf melmac 14:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
WELCOME!! Hello, Shadow Puppet! I want to personally welcome you on behalf of the Wikipedia community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you haven't already, you can put yourself in the new user log and the list of users so you can be properly introduced to everyone. Don't forget to be bold, and don't be afraid of hungry Wikipedians...there's a rule about not biting newcomers. Some other good links are the tutorial, how to edit a page, or if you're really stuck, see the help pages. Wikipedia is held up by Five Pillars...I recommend reading about them if you haven't already. Finally, it would be really helpful if you would sign your name on talk pages, so people can get back to you quickly. It's easy to do this by clicking the button (next to the one with the "W" crossed out) one from the end on the left. If that's confusing, or if you have any questions, feel free to drop me a ♪ at my talk page (by clicking the plus sign (+) next to the tab at the top that says "edit this page")...and again, welcome!
---
Hi! Thanks for leaving a message on my talk page. It looks like you got your userboxes taken care of, but if you need help again, feel free to leave me another message. It's customary to give newbies a "welcome" message with helpful links, so since no one else has done so yet, I've put mine above this message. Cheers!-- Violin G irl ♪ 16:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi ShadowPuppet! I saw your note on MFP's page. He works late, but it is almost 3 AM in England. Crying babyworm, Alban Greengrocer, and Speed Worm look like WP:BJAODN to me. You did good. Remember to not to WP:BITE Frogfarmer1 (at least not too much). He is well above average and might turn into a good contributor. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
that's cool, I think it was reasonable to bring it to AfD, since probably not all of those redirects need to be made. I didn't mean you were the one needing to be spanked! bikeable (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
The "three weeks" comment in the EBaum's World article is a (snarky, rude) prediction of how long the show will run before being cancelled. DS 15:33, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm just really fast :-) I read the recent changes via IRC, and use Godmode-lite to revert. -- light darkness ( talk) 08:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Looking at it, I would say it would be 100% accurate to substitute "antisocial tendencies" for "psychopathic or sociopathic" because it would seem that the story implies that these tendencies are traumatic and e
nvironmental in origin? -- Zeraeph 23:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Would help if oyu read a bigfoot book or two.+ DO NOT EXPECT official books from zoologists. also see website, http://www.bigfoot.org has some scientific backers.
Oppose DreamGuy, the most hated man in Wikipedia.
Mongo is trying for a balanced view, using NPOV. Support him.
Don't sleep clown will eat you.
Sorry, I wasn't ignoring the question I completely missed it until you removed it. I will answer it here though in case you removed for some other reason.
10. Questions from Shadow Puppet Lately there have been some admins taking it unto themselves to speedy delete articles still in debate because they just "decided" there was a consensus. Do you think admins should do this? In a few words, define what you see as an admin's place in Wikipedia. What are the limits of their authority? Do they have any real authority? Do you think the role of the "admin" is going to need sharper defining in the future? Don't feel the need to answer or respond to each question exactly, just give a general idea of your views of these things. I try to weigh my votes carefully, as I think too many immature people are being "buddied" into adminship, (I don't believe this about you by any means, otherwise I wouldn't be interested in your views.) and you almost have mine in the bag. Tell us, basically, what is an administrator?
LoveMonkey 23:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Arguing on the Internet is kind of like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Pwnd.
I was
User:ShadowPuppet.
Note: I was
User:ShadowPuppet. --
Shadow Puppet
21:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
No problem in Rank Flags. That was the meaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.70.194.22 ( talk • contribs)
I've fiddled with you userboxes as you invited above ;), there are other ways of doing this, but this way looks fairly smart. Just follow the pattern to add any others. -- Alf melmac 14:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
WELCOME!! Hello, Shadow Puppet! I want to personally welcome you on behalf of the Wikipedia community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you haven't already, you can put yourself in the new user log and the list of users so you can be properly introduced to everyone. Don't forget to be bold, and don't be afraid of hungry Wikipedians...there's a rule about not biting newcomers. Some other good links are the tutorial, how to edit a page, or if you're really stuck, see the help pages. Wikipedia is held up by Five Pillars...I recommend reading about them if you haven't already. Finally, it would be really helpful if you would sign your name on talk pages, so people can get back to you quickly. It's easy to do this by clicking the button (next to the one with the "W" crossed out) one from the end on the left. If that's confusing, or if you have any questions, feel free to drop me a ♪ at my talk page (by clicking the plus sign (+) next to the tab at the top that says "edit this page")...and again, welcome!
---
Hi! Thanks for leaving a message on my talk page. It looks like you got your userboxes taken care of, but if you need help again, feel free to leave me another message. It's customary to give newbies a "welcome" message with helpful links, so since no one else has done so yet, I've put mine above this message. Cheers!-- Violin G irl ♪ 16:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi ShadowPuppet! I saw your note on MFP's page. He works late, but it is almost 3 AM in England. Crying babyworm, Alban Greengrocer, and Speed Worm look like WP:BJAODN to me. You did good. Remember to not to WP:BITE Frogfarmer1 (at least not too much). He is well above average and might turn into a good contributor. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
that's cool, I think it was reasonable to bring it to AfD, since probably not all of those redirects need to be made. I didn't mean you were the one needing to be spanked! bikeable (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
The "three weeks" comment in the EBaum's World article is a (snarky, rude) prediction of how long the show will run before being cancelled. DS 15:33, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm just really fast :-) I read the recent changes via IRC, and use Godmode-lite to revert. -- light darkness ( talk) 08:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Looking at it, I would say it would be 100% accurate to substitute "antisocial tendencies" for "psychopathic or sociopathic" because it would seem that the story implies that these tendencies are traumatic and e
nvironmental in origin? -- Zeraeph 23:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Would help if oyu read a bigfoot book or two.+ DO NOT EXPECT official books from zoologists. also see website, http://www.bigfoot.org has some scientific backers.
Oppose DreamGuy, the most hated man in Wikipedia.
Mongo is trying for a balanced view, using NPOV. Support him.
Don't sleep clown will eat you.
Sorry, I wasn't ignoring the question I completely missed it until you removed it. I will answer it here though in case you removed for some other reason.
10. Questions from Shadow Puppet Lately there have been some admins taking it unto themselves to speedy delete articles still in debate because they just "decided" there was a consensus. Do you think admins should do this? In a few words, define what you see as an admin's place in Wikipedia. What are the limits of their authority? Do they have any real authority? Do you think the role of the "admin" is going to need sharper defining in the future? Don't feel the need to answer or respond to each question exactly, just give a general idea of your views of these things. I try to weigh my votes carefully, as I think too many immature people are being "buddied" into adminship, (I don't believe this about you by any means, otherwise I wouldn't be interested in your views.) and you almost have mine in the bag. Tell us, basically, what is an administrator?
LoveMonkey 23:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)