Your recent editing history at K-Trumpism and Chinilpa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mureungdowon ( talk) 07:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Stop the edit war. Join the Talk page right now. ( Talk:Chinilpa) Mureungdowon ( talk) 13:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Roundish. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Liberal Unification Party without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. (
Roundish
⋆
t)
16:08, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Your Korean-language ability, political interests, grammar mistakes, and style all resemble that of @ Storm598. I know you've engaged with that person's confirmed sockpuppet @ Mureungdowon in the past, but Storm598 was known to use multiple accounts to generate the appearance of discourse. A distinct trait of that user's discourse was consistently analyzing things themselves and stretching beyond the scope of sources given, instead of directly using and only using the analysis of scholars.
If you're not the same person, please rein in the original research. You need to, as conservatively as possible, stick to what's being said in the source. But if you are the same person, please please please stop making new accounts and step away from Wikipedia. I'm begging you. toobigtokale ( talk) 08:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at K-Trumpism and Chinilpa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mureungdowon ( talk) 07:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Stop the edit war. Join the Talk page right now. ( Talk:Chinilpa) Mureungdowon ( talk) 13:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Roundish. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Liberal Unification Party without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. (
Roundish
⋆
t)
16:08, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Your Korean-language ability, political interests, grammar mistakes, and style all resemble that of @ Storm598. I know you've engaged with that person's confirmed sockpuppet @ Mureungdowon in the past, but Storm598 was known to use multiple accounts to generate the appearance of discourse. A distinct trait of that user's discourse was consistently analyzing things themselves and stretching beyond the scope of sources given, instead of directly using and only using the analysis of scholars.
If you're not the same person, please rein in the original research. You need to, as conservatively as possible, stick to what's being said in the source. But if you are the same person, please please please stop making new accounts and step away from Wikipedia. I'm begging you. toobigtokale ( talk) 08:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)