< Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 > |
<Message removed. Please view this link, [1], if you wish to see why.> Lord Sesshomaru 15:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
ISBNs can be added to the actual refs. The only reason the section exists is because most Naruto articles lack references. Adding it to an article that does not have this problem is pointless. ~ Snapper T o 20:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
<Messages removed. Please view these links, [2], [3], if you wish to know why.> Lord Sesshomaru 18:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
As you remove valid concerns such as you did to this post, I am becoming concerned. Transparency is imporatnt part of this project. While there is no hard and fast rule, it is generally a good idea to not remove edits of good faith editors. I have NO reason to believe that this edit was done in bad faith and your treatment of this editor is a little dickish personally. Please make an effort to get along with this editor. I am sure you will erase this message as you erase all of my concerns, I however hope you choose to take it to heart. Thanks! Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for asking. I've been away a few days.
It's just that the Comics Project "Exemplar" page specifically uses Superman as the example at "Comic Book Characters":
It just seems odd to have Superman used as the example of this wording on the exemplar page but not on the Superman article. And, really, unless you want to unilaterally go in and change Spider-Man, Batman, Captain Marvel (DC Comics) and dozens if not hundreds of other major comics characters, it makes Superman inconsistent with much of the rest of the Comics Project.
But if you want to do that, I'm not gonna fight. If you want inconsistence, fine. -- Tenebrae 00:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
ISBNs are already listed in the Naruto chapters article, let that be one of their jobs while we concentrate on page numbers and other stuff. I'll try and find the chapters they were released in, though. And the first one doesn't need a reference, only the second one does. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 16:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi David. Doesn't ABBA need to be moved/renamed to Abba (band)? Perhaps just Abba per MOS:CAPS (take a look at the shortcut box there BTW). Lord Sesshomaru 22:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Reminder: How about that shortcut proposal you were planning? Lord Sesshomaru 22:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm unsure about B.A.T.M.A.N.. Is the hatnote there necessary? Lord Sesshomaru 23:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
"Superhero" would be adequately terminology to describe Batman, since he is described as such in popular and academic contexts. While he doesn't have superpowers, lots of other superheroes don't, ranging from the Golden Age to now. Despite the lack of superpowers, he does consist of various traits attributed to superheroes, including a career as a crime fighter, a secret identity, a costume and motif, and a rogues gallery. WesleyDodds 01:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey Sesshomaru I have just got back from an unanounced Wikibreak, I know we have had our differences in the past but I hope we can look past (no pun intended there) that and help improve wikipedia, DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 22:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For working tirelessly to improve Dragon Ball related articles I present you with the Original Barnstar, keep it up! DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 23:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC) |
I know I should start a AFD but if I do the damn IP's will come running and I won't be able to handle that BS from them. We each bring up good pionts but I still satnd by my reasonings that no information will be lost in the merge. Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 00:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
It depends, on if it is the Manga or Anime. Since the Anime has a small Toei based plot were some persons wear technological armors. Which can count as Sci-fi, but since this is a rather small part of it, i am doubtfull. And about the other question, some of them can fly, and they have superhuman strength. :D Refuteku 19:11 August 12 2007
Sorry about that. I didn't revert all of it to prove my point, it was just a mistake. It wasn't necessary to accuse me of doing that in order to prove my point. -- Zeno McDohl (talk) 17:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
As far as the source, I checked the Job Posting that was linked and I see nothing there. -- Zeno McDohl (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, missed the cat notice. I'd say clear it. As for the ref, it's quite unnecessary to repeat the same ref in one sentence. It's relevant to the entire sentence. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 01:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I have left a comment on Talk:Son Goku (Dragon Ball). -- Ghostexorcist 00:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I actually don't think that Google test (as it stands) says much. Check out my reply on the talk page for my reasoning. I'll check out the other comment now and reply on that page as well. Onikage725 11:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
After a bit of absence, I return! Any more trouble from Blueshrek while I was gone? Lychosis T/ C 20:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm seriously geting tired of A Link to the Past. How are we going to get rid of this guy? Ryu-chan
<Uncivil / trollish messages removed again. Please view these links, [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], if you wish to know why.> Lord Sesshomaru 17:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
<Message by SineBot removed. Please review this false claim if you wish to understand why.> Lord Sesshomaru 16:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Definately WP:LTA. He's really getting on my nerves with his Androids on AH. We'll beat him though. Ryu-chan 18:56 20 August, 2007 (UTC)
What Happen?
Some one set us up the bad article!
We Get Post
Hello Users
All your Article are belong to us!!!
What!?
Sorry couldn't resist an AYBABTU reference. Anyway, Majin Buu needs some massive clean up, are you up for it? DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 23:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the whole Majin Buu page I just did not like the picture (probably not the best reason huh?) anyway again I am sorry.-- The K.O. King 8/23/07
I responded to your post to my talk page a few days ago, and I just saw the one you recently posted to User talk:SineBot. I'll try posting here in hopes that you will get my reply. Your signature does not contain a link to your user page or your talk page; instead, it has a link to your contribs page. Per signatures guideline on internal links, you must have either a link to your user page, a link to your talk page, or both in your signature. The bot is programmed to follow guidelines as best as it can.
If you would like to ignore all rules in hopes of making the encyclopedia better for everyone, you shall have my warmest encouragement. If you you choose that path, however, I would suggest that you might consider opting out of automatic signing, otherwise the bot will continue labeling your posts as unsigned so long as your signature points to your contributions list. I apologize for any inconvenience this might cause you. -- slakr ( talk) 02:42, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Not that A Link to the Past is blocked, how are we gonna make Artificial Human 17's page back to what it use to be? Ryu-chan 17:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Far. I feel a list is unencyclopedic anyway, just prone to bloat... but whatever. I will renominate later when the suggested rewrite never happens.~ Zythe Talk to me! 15:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I actually intended to move Son Goku (disambiguation) to "Son Goku" (not Sun Goku) per consensus here. Can you lend a hand David? I'll manage the redirects once this is done. Thanks. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 01:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
the one where snapper posted last. or if you want to start a new topic if you're consused. Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 19:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
<Messages by ip sockpuppets of Recoome removed again. Please view these links, [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], if you wish to understand reasoning.> Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 21:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I can see from your page that your used to dealing with vandals and i was wondering if you could help me. On the page Superboy prime their is a editor vandalising and removing sourced information. Can you help me or point me in the right direction? Thanks. BIG Daddy M 05:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Sesshomaru, I was wondering, seeing as you have linked your signature to your user page now if it is ok for me put the barnstar I gave you on your page? DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 21:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi David, I was wondering if you could sprotect my user page and talk page. There is a sockpuppet who uses a hopping ip and continues to edit around my user pages despite his indef. block. See User:Recoome. Do you semi-protect user pages by personal request or is that against policy? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 19:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
You can find the over all CfD here... for the later telekinesis see here. - J Greb 00:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Consensus does not always need to be determined in order for an action to be taken, and in the absence of consensus, editors are free to be bold in such cases. Consensus at WP:FICT overrides any local consensus at Talk:Itachi Uchiha anyways. In any case, you still have not, and cannot really, refute WP:FICT. List of Akatsuki members was deleted over this reason, and such a deletion was then endorsed at deletion review. Now, Akatsuki (Naruto), Itachi's parent article, is in danger of deletion for the same reason. There have been no reasons from the opposite side to keep Itachi except a lot of WP:ILIKEIT, which does not, in any way, shape, or form, refute WP:FICT. I am going to revert your edits - please discuss this with me on my talk page, or at Talk:Itachi Uchiha before reverting me. Also note that if you cannot bring forth an argument to refute WP:FICT, then please do not continue. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
As for your WP:CONS argument, Wikipedia's consensus policy deals with disputes between versions of a page. Namely, it applies to the addition, removal, or alteration of material on a small scale due to differences in interpretation of the subject or of what is or is not noteworthy. Per WP:CONEXCEPT], it may not override the application of a policy or guideline, such as WP:FICT, as those have already garnered a greater level of consensus. You Can ' t Review Me!!! 06:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
My apologies. I intended to revert it to a redirect, but for some reason I accidentally left out the redirect line. You Can ' t Review Me!!! 06:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Not necessarily. They are used to help us kep track, but if an IP was used just once or twice in the past by a puppeteer, I'm not sure that a mass tagging is appropriate. -- Avi 18:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Dragon Ball Z (film) has been updated with the history of this project since your last recommendation using sources like Variety and The Hollywood Reporter. Would you consider this content worth merging to Dragon Ball Z in a Live-action film adaptation section? — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 23:30, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Variety and THe Hollywood Reporter are very big and accurate sources. The news about dragonballz being filmed in montreal is not internet gossip. -cman7792 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cman7792 ( talk • contribs) 03:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I asked you to consider a merge because the primary opposing editor does not think any information about the history of the project should be kept anywhere. I think that verifiable coverage from Variety and The Hollywood Reporter about the project would warrant mention on the article of the source material. I'm not concerned about the fate of the article itself, whether it gets merged or deleted (but preferably not kept), just that the content of previous attempts exist somewhere. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 15:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Available to comment? On what? I don't actually edit Wikipedia much, or really at all. I mostly just fix a mistake or two if I notice it. So, what do you want me to comment on here? Dantman 03:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
No, 'Bison' is just a shortened name not his official name. As an example, these changes are to do with people calling Ivy from Soul Calibur Isabella Valentine, when Namco themselves only ever refer to her as her nickname 'Ivy'. Mr.bonus 10:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Just signed up with Windows Live Messenger and set the same name in my preferences. You could you try e-mailing me now, I suppose? Let's deal with this "Prince Zarbon" sock vandal ASAP, as he's getting on my nerves. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 16:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Isn't it useful for the understanding of the trait of each country to classify the animation character according to the nationality? Do you support division to me without division though it proposes classifying?For instance, to the way of Peggy (JoJo's Bizarre Adventure). For instance, I have the preparation for deleting "Category:Anime and manga characters who can move at superhuman speeds" by Removing unnessary triviality per WP:CAT-RD. After observing your reaction, I arrange the category. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azukimonaka talk contribs) 13:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
About the maintenance tags, I didn't think the article was in-universe or needed further sources. You're welcome to disagree and add them once again.-- Nohansen 04:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Here's the link. [15] I can't link to the page it's on ( [16]) because for some reason the site redirects to the front page. I also didn't want to post a direct link to the video because I figured that was against the rules or something. You can find the video from the front page by clicking on Otakon 2006 (under "2006 Conventions"), and then clicking on "Cosplay and FanCam". While I agree that The Dawn should suffice as a reference, a lot of people find it hard to believe that Alucard can change gender for some reason. I added this video as a reference because someone kept changing the line to say that Alucard transforms into a "young boy". Schrödinger 14:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Check out the Android pages. Ryu-chan (Talk) 19:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
The number of genres listed on each page is supposed to be kept succinct. By listing every minor genre-related element that ever was touched on in the infobox and categories, you give them undue weight ( WP:NPOV violation) and potentially confuse readers. You also make the categories useless. This is ESPECIALLY true of Category:Drama anime and manga; none of the works in it share any sort of commonality any more so it might as well just be deleted for all the good it does us.
If you wish to show the breadth of genres that were touched on in a work's plot, I suggest doing so through prose. -- tjstrf talk 04:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. It would probably go even faster if you started working on the same task at Z though. (Also realize that you need to make sure that all the categories you're replacing are redundant with the ones on the articles, and also aren't useful for navigation. I made that mistake on a couple of them and had to go fix it.) -- tjstrf talk 08:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
< Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 > |
<Message removed. Please view this link, [1], if you wish to see why.> Lord Sesshomaru 15:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
ISBNs can be added to the actual refs. The only reason the section exists is because most Naruto articles lack references. Adding it to an article that does not have this problem is pointless. ~ Snapper T o 20:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
<Messages removed. Please view these links, [2], [3], if you wish to know why.> Lord Sesshomaru 18:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
As you remove valid concerns such as you did to this post, I am becoming concerned. Transparency is imporatnt part of this project. While there is no hard and fast rule, it is generally a good idea to not remove edits of good faith editors. I have NO reason to believe that this edit was done in bad faith and your treatment of this editor is a little dickish personally. Please make an effort to get along with this editor. I am sure you will erase this message as you erase all of my concerns, I however hope you choose to take it to heart. Thanks! Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for asking. I've been away a few days.
It's just that the Comics Project "Exemplar" page specifically uses Superman as the example at "Comic Book Characters":
It just seems odd to have Superman used as the example of this wording on the exemplar page but not on the Superman article. And, really, unless you want to unilaterally go in and change Spider-Man, Batman, Captain Marvel (DC Comics) and dozens if not hundreds of other major comics characters, it makes Superman inconsistent with much of the rest of the Comics Project.
But if you want to do that, I'm not gonna fight. If you want inconsistence, fine. -- Tenebrae 00:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
ISBNs are already listed in the Naruto chapters article, let that be one of their jobs while we concentrate on page numbers and other stuff. I'll try and find the chapters they were released in, though. And the first one doesn't need a reference, only the second one does. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 16:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi David. Doesn't ABBA need to be moved/renamed to Abba (band)? Perhaps just Abba per MOS:CAPS (take a look at the shortcut box there BTW). Lord Sesshomaru 22:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Reminder: How about that shortcut proposal you were planning? Lord Sesshomaru 22:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm unsure about B.A.T.M.A.N.. Is the hatnote there necessary? Lord Sesshomaru 23:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
"Superhero" would be adequately terminology to describe Batman, since he is described as such in popular and academic contexts. While he doesn't have superpowers, lots of other superheroes don't, ranging from the Golden Age to now. Despite the lack of superpowers, he does consist of various traits attributed to superheroes, including a career as a crime fighter, a secret identity, a costume and motif, and a rogues gallery. WesleyDodds 01:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey Sesshomaru I have just got back from an unanounced Wikibreak, I know we have had our differences in the past but I hope we can look past (no pun intended there) that and help improve wikipedia, DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 22:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For working tirelessly to improve Dragon Ball related articles I present you with the Original Barnstar, keep it up! DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 23:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC) |
I know I should start a AFD but if I do the damn IP's will come running and I won't be able to handle that BS from them. We each bring up good pionts but I still satnd by my reasonings that no information will be lost in the merge. Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 00:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
It depends, on if it is the Manga or Anime. Since the Anime has a small Toei based plot were some persons wear technological armors. Which can count as Sci-fi, but since this is a rather small part of it, i am doubtfull. And about the other question, some of them can fly, and they have superhuman strength. :D Refuteku 19:11 August 12 2007
Sorry about that. I didn't revert all of it to prove my point, it was just a mistake. It wasn't necessary to accuse me of doing that in order to prove my point. -- Zeno McDohl (talk) 17:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
As far as the source, I checked the Job Posting that was linked and I see nothing there. -- Zeno McDohl (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, missed the cat notice. I'd say clear it. As for the ref, it's quite unnecessary to repeat the same ref in one sentence. It's relevant to the entire sentence. — Someguy0830 ( T | C) 01:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I have left a comment on Talk:Son Goku (Dragon Ball). -- Ghostexorcist 00:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I actually don't think that Google test (as it stands) says much. Check out my reply on the talk page for my reasoning. I'll check out the other comment now and reply on that page as well. Onikage725 11:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
After a bit of absence, I return! Any more trouble from Blueshrek while I was gone? Lychosis T/ C 20:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm seriously geting tired of A Link to the Past. How are we going to get rid of this guy? Ryu-chan
<Uncivil / trollish messages removed again. Please view these links, [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], if you wish to know why.> Lord Sesshomaru 17:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
<Message by SineBot removed. Please review this false claim if you wish to understand why.> Lord Sesshomaru 16:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Definately WP:LTA. He's really getting on my nerves with his Androids on AH. We'll beat him though. Ryu-chan 18:56 20 August, 2007 (UTC)
What Happen?
Some one set us up the bad article!
We Get Post
Hello Users
All your Article are belong to us!!!
What!?
Sorry couldn't resist an AYBABTU reference. Anyway, Majin Buu needs some massive clean up, are you up for it? DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 23:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the whole Majin Buu page I just did not like the picture (probably not the best reason huh?) anyway again I am sorry.-- The K.O. King 8/23/07
I responded to your post to my talk page a few days ago, and I just saw the one you recently posted to User talk:SineBot. I'll try posting here in hopes that you will get my reply. Your signature does not contain a link to your user page or your talk page; instead, it has a link to your contribs page. Per signatures guideline on internal links, you must have either a link to your user page, a link to your talk page, or both in your signature. The bot is programmed to follow guidelines as best as it can.
If you would like to ignore all rules in hopes of making the encyclopedia better for everyone, you shall have my warmest encouragement. If you you choose that path, however, I would suggest that you might consider opting out of automatic signing, otherwise the bot will continue labeling your posts as unsigned so long as your signature points to your contributions list. I apologize for any inconvenience this might cause you. -- slakr ( talk) 02:42, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Not that A Link to the Past is blocked, how are we gonna make Artificial Human 17's page back to what it use to be? Ryu-chan 17:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Far. I feel a list is unencyclopedic anyway, just prone to bloat... but whatever. I will renominate later when the suggested rewrite never happens.~ Zythe Talk to me! 15:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I actually intended to move Son Goku (disambiguation) to "Son Goku" (not Sun Goku) per consensus here. Can you lend a hand David? I'll manage the redirects once this is done. Thanks. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 01:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
the one where snapper posted last. or if you want to start a new topic if you're consused. Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 19:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
<Messages by ip sockpuppets of Recoome removed again. Please view these links, [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], if you wish to understand reasoning.> Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 21:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I can see from your page that your used to dealing with vandals and i was wondering if you could help me. On the page Superboy prime their is a editor vandalising and removing sourced information. Can you help me or point me in the right direction? Thanks. BIG Daddy M 05:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi Sesshomaru, I was wondering, seeing as you have linked your signature to your user page now if it is ok for me put the barnstar I gave you on your page? DBZROCKS Its over 9000!!! 21:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi David, I was wondering if you could sprotect my user page and talk page. There is a sockpuppet who uses a hopping ip and continues to edit around my user pages despite his indef. block. See User:Recoome. Do you semi-protect user pages by personal request or is that against policy? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 19:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
You can find the over all CfD here... for the later telekinesis see here. - J Greb 00:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Consensus does not always need to be determined in order for an action to be taken, and in the absence of consensus, editors are free to be bold in such cases. Consensus at WP:FICT overrides any local consensus at Talk:Itachi Uchiha anyways. In any case, you still have not, and cannot really, refute WP:FICT. List of Akatsuki members was deleted over this reason, and such a deletion was then endorsed at deletion review. Now, Akatsuki (Naruto), Itachi's parent article, is in danger of deletion for the same reason. There have been no reasons from the opposite side to keep Itachi except a lot of WP:ILIKEIT, which does not, in any way, shape, or form, refute WP:FICT. I am going to revert your edits - please discuss this with me on my talk page, or at Talk:Itachi Uchiha before reverting me. Also note that if you cannot bring forth an argument to refute WP:FICT, then please do not continue. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 06:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
As for your WP:CONS argument, Wikipedia's consensus policy deals with disputes between versions of a page. Namely, it applies to the addition, removal, or alteration of material on a small scale due to differences in interpretation of the subject or of what is or is not noteworthy. Per WP:CONEXCEPT], it may not override the application of a policy or guideline, such as WP:FICT, as those have already garnered a greater level of consensus. You Can ' t Review Me!!! 06:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
My apologies. I intended to revert it to a redirect, but for some reason I accidentally left out the redirect line. You Can ' t Review Me!!! 06:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Not necessarily. They are used to help us kep track, but if an IP was used just once or twice in the past by a puppeteer, I'm not sure that a mass tagging is appropriate. -- Avi 18:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Dragon Ball Z (film) has been updated with the history of this project since your last recommendation using sources like Variety and The Hollywood Reporter. Would you consider this content worth merging to Dragon Ball Z in a Live-action film adaptation section? — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 23:30, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Variety and THe Hollywood Reporter are very big and accurate sources. The news about dragonballz being filmed in montreal is not internet gossip. -cman7792 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cman7792 ( talk • contribs) 03:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I asked you to consider a merge because the primary opposing editor does not think any information about the history of the project should be kept anywhere. I think that verifiable coverage from Variety and The Hollywood Reporter about the project would warrant mention on the article of the source material. I'm not concerned about the fate of the article itself, whether it gets merged or deleted (but preferably not kept), just that the content of previous attempts exist somewhere. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 15:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Available to comment? On what? I don't actually edit Wikipedia much, or really at all. I mostly just fix a mistake or two if I notice it. So, what do you want me to comment on here? Dantman 03:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
No, 'Bison' is just a shortened name not his official name. As an example, these changes are to do with people calling Ivy from Soul Calibur Isabella Valentine, when Namco themselves only ever refer to her as her nickname 'Ivy'. Mr.bonus 10:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Just signed up with Windows Live Messenger and set the same name in my preferences. You could you try e-mailing me now, I suppose? Let's deal with this "Prince Zarbon" sock vandal ASAP, as he's getting on my nerves. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 16:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Isn't it useful for the understanding of the trait of each country to classify the animation character according to the nationality? Do you support division to me without division though it proposes classifying?For instance, to the way of Peggy (JoJo's Bizarre Adventure). For instance, I have the preparation for deleting "Category:Anime and manga characters who can move at superhuman speeds" by Removing unnessary triviality per WP:CAT-RD. After observing your reaction, I arrange the category. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azukimonaka talk contribs) 13:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
About the maintenance tags, I didn't think the article was in-universe or needed further sources. You're welcome to disagree and add them once again.-- Nohansen 04:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Here's the link. [15] I can't link to the page it's on ( [16]) because for some reason the site redirects to the front page. I also didn't want to post a direct link to the video because I figured that was against the rules or something. You can find the video from the front page by clicking on Otakon 2006 (under "2006 Conventions"), and then clicking on "Cosplay and FanCam". While I agree that The Dawn should suffice as a reference, a lot of people find it hard to believe that Alucard can change gender for some reason. I added this video as a reference because someone kept changing the line to say that Alucard transforms into a "young boy". Schrödinger 14:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Check out the Android pages. Ryu-chan (Talk) 19:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
The number of genres listed on each page is supposed to be kept succinct. By listing every minor genre-related element that ever was touched on in the infobox and categories, you give them undue weight ( WP:NPOV violation) and potentially confuse readers. You also make the categories useless. This is ESPECIALLY true of Category:Drama anime and manga; none of the works in it share any sort of commonality any more so it might as well just be deleted for all the good it does us.
If you wish to show the breadth of genres that were touched on in a work's plot, I suggest doing so through prose. -- tjstrf talk 04:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. It would probably go even faster if you started working on the same task at Z though. (Also realize that you need to make sure that all the categories you're replacing are redundant with the ones on the articles, and also aren't useful for navigation. I made that mistake on a couple of them and had to go fix it.) -- tjstrf talk 08:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)