< Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 > |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yamcha#Edits SSJ 5 ( talk) 21:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Storm's married name was just recently revealed in Astonishing X-Men #25 as being Ororo Iqadi T'Challa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.220.74.40 ( talk) 04:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
It looks as though your case is pretty clear cut: [1], [2]. SWik78 ( talk • contribs) 20:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I filed another AN/I against Abtract for his return to stalking. He has been indef blocked for now. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 14:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the template - [4]. I forgot. - Richard Cavell ( talk) 02:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my user page from the IP vandal 157.130.162.178! — Archon Magnus( Talk | Home) 17:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
The indef block has not stuck, so I have substituted it for a fortnight tariff - of which 3 days have been served. You may wish to review the comments I have made on Abtract's talkpage. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 13:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I've been insanely bold and redid the Dragon Ball template to get it down to a more compact size, and better reflect the article structure. Whatcha think? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 19:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
The removal of the Category:Child characters in anime and manga in Gaara's page, I deemed would complicate the Gaara information. As the series and the manga progresses, their ages are also running. In Part I of Naruto, it is true and no doubt that they are child characters, thus it would be legitimate information.. but change is prevalent, the updates of information should also undergo alterations in regard to weights and biases. So I made it a point to ignite the manifestation of the process by saving and storing modifications to the page which I would consider significant so I deleted it as per Part II's behalf. As the meaning of the child now contradicts the age of Gaara now (both in the series and manga). As you will see, I did not delete the Category:Fictional orphans as that is deemed legitimate because Gaara had lost both his parents when he was still a child. That would be my point, if there are reasons and explanations that will contradicts my logic so far with wiki's rules, I apologize in advance. If at any cost, I am wrong, I will be much happy to defend the Category:Child characters in Gaara's page. Thanks. -- Axxand ( talk) 06:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
As one of the most active of the DB taskforce members, did you disagree with the changes I made to Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Dragon Ball to remove outdated material and bring it more in-line with whats actually being done and the current article structure? A very new editor, whose only actual contribs have been to complain about the merge at Dragon Ball and revert my edits to the project page (3 times so far). I've twice now left him a message saying that if he disagreed, he should start a discussion on the taskforce talk page, because no one else had disagreed with the update after 9 days of it being there until he came along and decided to be a pain (said more politely, of course LOL). Thoughts? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 14:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Sesshomaru, in keeping with the agreement between you and Abtract, would you partially self-revert this edit to restore the lead-in line to Saint(s) ? Thanks. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 19:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
You reverted my edit to Alucard on the grounds that "there is no reference to "Dracula" on linked page". I don't quite understand what you mean. I cannot imagine any literature, film, or anything else, that would use the word or name "Alucard" and not intend it as "Dracula" spelled backwards. The word "Dracula" itself is used three times in the article, and at least the first four entries in the disambiguation list are clearly related to Dracula - in Castlevania Alucard is Dracula's son, in Hellsing Alucard is implied to be Dracula himself, and the next two entries are to do with works of fiction that actually have the word "Dracula" in their titles. I might be coming across as hostile and I might be ignorant of a specific Wikipedia policy, but I don't understand the sentence "there is no reference to "Dracula" on linked page" for the reasons I have outlined. Thank you for your time.-- Codenamecuckoo ( talk) 00:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Sesshomaru, I want to really apologize for constantly asking you questions. I thought you were a staff member but you are just a user. I promise you will never hear from me ever again. Forgive Me? User:KoziKaz 26 July 2008
I am sending this because I seen you adding the {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Userbox/User Detective Conan}} userbox on your userpage. I hope I'm not spamming you here.
I have proposed for a Detective Conan/ Case Closed Wiki in December 2007, and outside for some admin issues, the wiki is close to fruition. However, I have a lack of people having wiki experience to create guidelines, to administrate the wiki, and also to create userboxes that I consider essential for a snapshot of the content.
As a result, I cordially invite you to Kudo's Bookshelf, the Detective Conan/Case Closed encyclopedia.
Since this wiki is still under construction, joining the wiki needs my approval. Please do not hesitate contacting me on my talk page.
Thank you for your attention!
-- Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 15:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I'm not understanding you. Your links explaining the "primary subject" of a disambiguation page don't explain why the page with the Japanese term for "Rabbit" should not say, "This means 'Rabbit'". Can you clarify? -- UsaSatsui ( talk) 03:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Probably Abtract should not have made this edit, and this edit definitely should not have been done. While the first is not a direct revert of your edit, it does seem to fall under "disagreeing to any edit". As I mentioned to Abtract, I could ask you to undo yours and then ask Abtract to undo his, but we'd end up with the current version. I'm open to other suggestions here too. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 10:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
True, but you do keep changing it back... so it seems that both of you are unfortunately in the wrong. There's nothing wrong with taking the higher road and leaving the page even not the way that you want it for a little while, so that consensus has been reached, leading to fewer disputes and arguments. I have protected the page for now in the form it was when I got to it - see Talk:DB#Edit_warrning_and_temporary_page_protection for my rational and general sadness. Also, just to make sure you are aware, you were one revert away from breaking 3RR (which is not even an entitlement anyway). -- Natalya 00:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Kamehameha-capable Dragon Ball characters ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 00:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
That all makes sense. I've sorted it all out. ( Emperor ( talk) 03:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC))
If you don't mind, I'd appreciate you looking at my last post from User_talk:Natalya#Your_eagle_eye_is_needed_pls - I've crossposted to Abtract and Collectonian - I know that the three of you are having some issues, to put it lightly, but it would be lovely if we could focus a bit more on the encyclopedia. -- Natalya 01:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Pardon me if I'm being dense, but what the heck does WP:PIPING (in your edit summary) have to do with your reversion of my last edit? I don't see how my last version deviates from MOS:DAB. SlackerMom ( talk) 15:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Sesshomaru,
Matt Thorn has started several sandboxes like User:Matt Thorn/Sandbox 3 for working on several manga-related entries. Sandbox 3 is about josei manga and we're putting it together now. Your help and input would be very valuable! Why don't you look at it, and see if you can help? Thanks! Timothy Perper ( talk) 20:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
...Oh, right, I was gonna reply to that, but then it fell off my watchlist, and...anyways, yeah, I'm OK with that. Thank you, it's been a pleasure edit-warring with you. Far more polite and civil than I'm used to. :) -- UsaSatsui ( talk) 21:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Sesshomaru ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There any way of getting out of this contract? Signing it didn't make things better. Or what if I adhere to JHunterJ's newest proposal? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 18:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Decline reason:
First wait out this correctly applied block, then renegotiate the contract. — MBisanz talk 19:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
They are two I've had my eye on for a bit:
So yes they do deserve to be where they are and the "(comics)" articles should probably made into a set index each. ( Emperor ( talk) 12:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC))
Hi, there, I have a confusion over these two above. My confusion is whether National Vagina Day and V-Day are same or not. While this paper states V-Day as an abbreviation of National Vagina Day, I found no mention of the term "National Vagina Day" in the article V-Day. This is why I am not sure if these two are the same events or not. I have asked another user, but he is not sure of it. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. The Commander Dante article linked on Dante (disambiguation) no longer refers to the fictional Warhammer 40,000 character any longer - if you can find a better way to word a description of the real person described in the Commander Dante article, please feel free to do so (I must confess that I couldn't think of a way to do so). Cheers. -- JediLofty User Talk 18:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
I invite you and Abtract to User talk:JHunterJ/Abtract Sesshomaru Neutral Ground. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 23:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
found this comical little page... Veggetto
what do you suppose should be done with this? i've half a mind to turn it into a redirect to the List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball#Vegetto page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishvanth ( talk • contribs) 17:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
As you may already know the Infinite World article is getting alot of users adding characters to the character list without references to help back them up. I've already added a hidden message, but people keep add them. Do you know anything that can be done to get the message across? Sarujo ( talk) 22:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Huh, I thought I did, though maybe my internet fucked up and I forgot to resubmit or something. Oh well, I'll keep an eye on it for ya. — Trust not the Penguin ( T | C) 05:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ganon. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I have declined your request for page protection because this a dispute between two people that is being discussed on the talk page. Be aware that both you and User:A Link to the Past are each one revert away from violating 3RR. Thank you. Krakatoa Katie 06:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sesshomaru...I am writing today to ask for your participation in WikiProject Media franchises. You seem to have some interest in it, since you took the time to stop by and discuss the naming convention. It is just Emperor and me at the moment, and we could really use some additional editors to help us get articles identified as ones for the projects attention and assessed as such or written from scratch. Even if your only involvement is to keep an eye on what we are doing as a liaison from another project, that would be extremely helpful. I do not know everything there is to know about all the naming conventions, infoboxes, etc from the other projects, so I would love to have a core group of editors to help me coordinate this better. So, if you are willing to spend a little time with this project and help me figure out just how far and wide this project could, should, or would be; I would be extremely grateful.
Thank you. LA (If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 07:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes that seems fine on the piping front. You do have a point on the overlinking front. There aren't any broad style guidelines (as some of them use their own unique formatting, although sometimes I suspect they might be making it up as they go along) but I offered a few general ideas which suggested flexibility in formatting like, using nested lists, etc. (although largely keeping to WP:MOSDAB) When it came to linking my thoughts were that it'd make sense to have more than one link per list item if it helped people grasp which character is which (when they are all going to be rather similar) so it might help someone if you linked in a well-known creator (like linking in Neil Gaiman at [Sandman (comics)]] or a team/title they are closely connected to but only go to 3 links if really necessary. Looking at those two examples I'd suggest the Marvel Angel is overlinked. I'd cut it back to just the first link. Where it would work to add a link like the Archangel (comics) one, would be where it goes to another SIA page, or another page on that identity (that is a longer article), for example Goliath (comics), Giant-Man, Ant-Man and Yellowjacket (comics). So bottom-line - I've overlinked in those articles and we only need the one link to the same article. It might be worth working up a few simple guidelines for comics SIA as there are plenty of things you learn from experience (that being one).
I've had a look around and there doesn't seem to be much of a problem with Doctor Strange that needs another page - it seems to all be covered with the hatnote. Although I might be missing something. ( Emperor ( talk) 19:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC))
< Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 > |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yamcha#Edits SSJ 5 ( talk) 21:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Storm's married name was just recently revealed in Astonishing X-Men #25 as being Ororo Iqadi T'Challa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.220.74.40 ( talk) 04:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
It looks as though your case is pretty clear cut: [1], [2]. SWik78 ( talk • contribs) 20:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I filed another AN/I against Abtract for his return to stalking. He has been indef blocked for now. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 14:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the template - [4]. I forgot. - Richard Cavell ( talk) 02:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my user page from the IP vandal 157.130.162.178! — Archon Magnus( Talk | Home) 17:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
The indef block has not stuck, so I have substituted it for a fortnight tariff - of which 3 days have been served. You may wish to review the comments I have made on Abtract's talkpage. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 13:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I've been insanely bold and redid the Dragon Ball template to get it down to a more compact size, and better reflect the article structure. Whatcha think? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 19:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
The removal of the Category:Child characters in anime and manga in Gaara's page, I deemed would complicate the Gaara information. As the series and the manga progresses, their ages are also running. In Part I of Naruto, it is true and no doubt that they are child characters, thus it would be legitimate information.. but change is prevalent, the updates of information should also undergo alterations in regard to weights and biases. So I made it a point to ignite the manifestation of the process by saving and storing modifications to the page which I would consider significant so I deleted it as per Part II's behalf. As the meaning of the child now contradicts the age of Gaara now (both in the series and manga). As you will see, I did not delete the Category:Fictional orphans as that is deemed legitimate because Gaara had lost both his parents when he was still a child. That would be my point, if there are reasons and explanations that will contradicts my logic so far with wiki's rules, I apologize in advance. If at any cost, I am wrong, I will be much happy to defend the Category:Child characters in Gaara's page. Thanks. -- Axxand ( talk) 06:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
As one of the most active of the DB taskforce members, did you disagree with the changes I made to Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Dragon Ball to remove outdated material and bring it more in-line with whats actually being done and the current article structure? A very new editor, whose only actual contribs have been to complain about the merge at Dragon Ball and revert my edits to the project page (3 times so far). I've twice now left him a message saying that if he disagreed, he should start a discussion on the taskforce talk page, because no one else had disagreed with the update after 9 days of it being there until he came along and decided to be a pain (said more politely, of course LOL). Thoughts? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 14:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Sesshomaru, in keeping with the agreement between you and Abtract, would you partially self-revert this edit to restore the lead-in line to Saint(s) ? Thanks. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 19:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
You reverted my edit to Alucard on the grounds that "there is no reference to "Dracula" on linked page". I don't quite understand what you mean. I cannot imagine any literature, film, or anything else, that would use the word or name "Alucard" and not intend it as "Dracula" spelled backwards. The word "Dracula" itself is used three times in the article, and at least the first four entries in the disambiguation list are clearly related to Dracula - in Castlevania Alucard is Dracula's son, in Hellsing Alucard is implied to be Dracula himself, and the next two entries are to do with works of fiction that actually have the word "Dracula" in their titles. I might be coming across as hostile and I might be ignorant of a specific Wikipedia policy, but I don't understand the sentence "there is no reference to "Dracula" on linked page" for the reasons I have outlined. Thank you for your time.-- Codenamecuckoo ( talk) 00:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Sesshomaru, I want to really apologize for constantly asking you questions. I thought you were a staff member but you are just a user. I promise you will never hear from me ever again. Forgive Me? User:KoziKaz 26 July 2008
I am sending this because I seen you adding the {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Userbox/User Detective Conan}} userbox on your userpage. I hope I'm not spamming you here.
I have proposed for a Detective Conan/ Case Closed Wiki in December 2007, and outside for some admin issues, the wiki is close to fruition. However, I have a lack of people having wiki experience to create guidelines, to administrate the wiki, and also to create userboxes that I consider essential for a snapshot of the content.
As a result, I cordially invite you to Kudo's Bookshelf, the Detective Conan/Case Closed encyclopedia.
Since this wiki is still under construction, joining the wiki needs my approval. Please do not hesitate contacting me on my talk page.
Thank you for your attention!
-- Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 15:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I'm not understanding you. Your links explaining the "primary subject" of a disambiguation page don't explain why the page with the Japanese term for "Rabbit" should not say, "This means 'Rabbit'". Can you clarify? -- UsaSatsui ( talk) 03:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Probably Abtract should not have made this edit, and this edit definitely should not have been done. While the first is not a direct revert of your edit, it does seem to fall under "disagreeing to any edit". As I mentioned to Abtract, I could ask you to undo yours and then ask Abtract to undo his, but we'd end up with the current version. I'm open to other suggestions here too. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 10:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
True, but you do keep changing it back... so it seems that both of you are unfortunately in the wrong. There's nothing wrong with taking the higher road and leaving the page even not the way that you want it for a little while, so that consensus has been reached, leading to fewer disputes and arguments. I have protected the page for now in the form it was when I got to it - see Talk:DB#Edit_warrning_and_temporary_page_protection for my rational and general sadness. Also, just to make sure you are aware, you were one revert away from breaking 3RR (which is not even an entitlement anyway). -- Natalya 00:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Kamehameha-capable Dragon Ball characters ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 00:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
That all makes sense. I've sorted it all out. ( Emperor ( talk) 03:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC))
If you don't mind, I'd appreciate you looking at my last post from User_talk:Natalya#Your_eagle_eye_is_needed_pls - I've crossposted to Abtract and Collectonian - I know that the three of you are having some issues, to put it lightly, but it would be lovely if we could focus a bit more on the encyclopedia. -- Natalya 01:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Pardon me if I'm being dense, but what the heck does WP:PIPING (in your edit summary) have to do with your reversion of my last edit? I don't see how my last version deviates from MOS:DAB. SlackerMom ( talk) 15:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Sesshomaru,
Matt Thorn has started several sandboxes like User:Matt Thorn/Sandbox 3 for working on several manga-related entries. Sandbox 3 is about josei manga and we're putting it together now. Your help and input would be very valuable! Why don't you look at it, and see if you can help? Thanks! Timothy Perper ( talk) 20:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
...Oh, right, I was gonna reply to that, but then it fell off my watchlist, and...anyways, yeah, I'm OK with that. Thank you, it's been a pleasure edit-warring with you. Far more polite and civil than I'm used to. :) -- UsaSatsui ( talk) 21:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Sesshomaru ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There any way of getting out of this contract? Signing it didn't make things better. Or what if I adhere to JHunterJ's newest proposal? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 18:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Decline reason:
First wait out this correctly applied block, then renegotiate the contract. — MBisanz talk 19:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
They are two I've had my eye on for a bit:
So yes they do deserve to be where they are and the "(comics)" articles should probably made into a set index each. ( Emperor ( talk) 12:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC))
Hi, there, I have a confusion over these two above. My confusion is whether National Vagina Day and V-Day are same or not. While this paper states V-Day as an abbreviation of National Vagina Day, I found no mention of the term "National Vagina Day" in the article V-Day. This is why I am not sure if these two are the same events or not. I have asked another user, but he is not sure of it. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. The Commander Dante article linked on Dante (disambiguation) no longer refers to the fictional Warhammer 40,000 character any longer - if you can find a better way to word a description of the real person described in the Commander Dante article, please feel free to do so (I must confess that I couldn't think of a way to do so). Cheers. -- JediLofty User Talk 18:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
I invite you and Abtract to User talk:JHunterJ/Abtract Sesshomaru Neutral Ground. -- JHunterJ ( talk) 23:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
found this comical little page... Veggetto
what do you suppose should be done with this? i've half a mind to turn it into a redirect to the List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball#Vegetto page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishvanth ( talk • contribs) 17:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
As you may already know the Infinite World article is getting alot of users adding characters to the character list without references to help back them up. I've already added a hidden message, but people keep add them. Do you know anything that can be done to get the message across? Sarujo ( talk) 22:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Huh, I thought I did, though maybe my internet fucked up and I forgot to resubmit or something. Oh well, I'll keep an eye on it for ya. — Trust not the Penguin ( T | C) 05:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ganon. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I have declined your request for page protection because this a dispute between two people that is being discussed on the talk page. Be aware that both you and User:A Link to the Past are each one revert away from violating 3RR. Thank you. Krakatoa Katie 06:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sesshomaru...I am writing today to ask for your participation in WikiProject Media franchises. You seem to have some interest in it, since you took the time to stop by and discuss the naming convention. It is just Emperor and me at the moment, and we could really use some additional editors to help us get articles identified as ones for the projects attention and assessed as such or written from scratch. Even if your only involvement is to keep an eye on what we are doing as a liaison from another project, that would be extremely helpful. I do not know everything there is to know about all the naming conventions, infoboxes, etc from the other projects, so I would love to have a core group of editors to help me coordinate this better. So, if you are willing to spend a little time with this project and help me figure out just how far and wide this project could, should, or would be; I would be extremely grateful.
Thank you. LA (If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 07:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes that seems fine on the piping front. You do have a point on the overlinking front. There aren't any broad style guidelines (as some of them use their own unique formatting, although sometimes I suspect they might be making it up as they go along) but I offered a few general ideas which suggested flexibility in formatting like, using nested lists, etc. (although largely keeping to WP:MOSDAB) When it came to linking my thoughts were that it'd make sense to have more than one link per list item if it helped people grasp which character is which (when they are all going to be rather similar) so it might help someone if you linked in a well-known creator (like linking in Neil Gaiman at [Sandman (comics)]] or a team/title they are closely connected to but only go to 3 links if really necessary. Looking at those two examples I'd suggest the Marvel Angel is overlinked. I'd cut it back to just the first link. Where it would work to add a link like the Archangel (comics) one, would be where it goes to another SIA page, or another page on that identity (that is a longer article), for example Goliath (comics), Giant-Man, Ant-Man and Yellowjacket (comics). So bottom-line - I've overlinked in those articles and we only need the one link to the same article. It might be worth working up a few simple guidelines for comics SIA as there are plenty of things you learn from experience (that being one).
I've had a look around and there doesn't seem to be much of a problem with Doctor Strange that needs another page - it seems to all be covered with the hatnote. Although I might be missing something. ( Emperor ( talk) 19:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC))