Hello, Seryxme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 12:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Naked Convos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 12:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 12:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adyoo3 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Naked Convos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Adyoo3 ( talk) 04:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! Seryxme, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Adyoo3 ( talk) 04:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, thanks for your question. You can go ahead and post your article again. There are many people that review them. Thank you. Adyoo3 ( talk) 01:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Adyoo3 has been asked to stand back from reviewing drafts until they gain more experience. This happens as reviewers come on board and show they are not yet quite ready. The advice above is, I am afraid, the last thing you needed to see. You asked on their talk page if an exception might be made. The answer is that exceptions might be, but the never are. At some point someone will see an article with insufficient referencing to support any notability and send it for deletion.

Our role as reviewers is to seek to ensure that an article will not immediately be subject to one of our deletion processes when it is accepted. That is why we push it back to the author. We want to accept articles. AT present this is a difficult draft to accept because I view it as having a low chance of survival. WP:BURDEN applies. It has to pass our criteria, or it is not allowed in.

You might ask for help at the Teahouse, or at the Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 13:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Thank you for this response. I'm sorry if I seem to be pushing too far. It seems to me that it will be difficult to get this out. I'll try the Teahouse to see if I can get more help because at the moment I really do not see how much I can improve the article in terms of references. I'll send it in for review again if I can get help to improve it. Thanks again. Seryxme ( talk) 01:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Your question has been replied to at the Teahouse. Rubbish computer 14:54, 30 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Naked Convos, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, Seryxme. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " The Naked Convos".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 18:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC) reply