![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
I don't think DerSpiegelNein should be banned yet...looks like editor is new and does not know that they should include edit summaries.
OkayKenG (
talk)
07:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Serols-can you please specify what in my edit of the Key Bridge page constitutes vandalism? I added easily verifiable historical information. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthpatrol2 ( talk • contribs) 17:56, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me out on reverting the 'RAT! Treated like dirt by many admins since 2016 DEAD RAT! GET LOST YOU DEAD RAT!' edits on the house mouse page. Do you know how to protect the page or ban the vandalizing editor? BlacknoseDace ( talk) 15:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. It looks like he's blocked now. BlacknoseDace ( talk) 15:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Serlos
I found message as my changes being vandalism without further details. While per guidelines it can be a link vandalism only if the link is "disruptive, irrelevant, or inappropriate targets while disguising them with mislabeling".
my changes were immediately reverted by yours when posted without any verification of content as per guidelines and tagged as vandalism. Was it automated ? Do you mind cancelling reverting after content verification ?
Rbtcpn ( talk) 15:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC) rbtcpn
That was fun.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
15:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I think you are being a bit quick with the rollback feature. How do you looked at the edit comments you would see why I removed this material. It has zero sources. If this is a topic you are knowledgeable on please return the material with sources. In the meantime I shall re-edit. Springnuts ( talk) 08:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Having looked a bit further, ( burial at sea) you put the message on the wrong talk page. You reverted an IP edit. However, my edit did reverse your edit so if you wish to restore material please do. However, please add sources. Otherwise it is likely to be removed again as original research. Springnuts ( talk) 08:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
This is for your outstanding performance in saving Wikipedia from the threat of vandalism. I appreciate your selfless service. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 10:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Almost every time I go to revert an edit, you've either already done it or have previously reverted vandalism on the page. Thanks for the hard work and for keeping Wikipedia free of vandalism! OliverEastwood talk 07:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Are you from UK Referencer ? Roseirena ( talk) 12:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks for your work reverting and reporting vandalism, however this edit which you reported to AIV looks like a good faith addition of sourced content to me. Could you please explain why you believe this is vandalism in case I am missing something? – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 18:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Why are you undoing edits to The Dover Boys article?
The anachronism can be verified in 10 seconds, yet it stands thanks to your reverts! Better to have a note than to be wrong!
If it is formatted improperly, fix that, but you are supporting obvious inaccuracies and degrading the usefulness of Wikipedia by lording over a page without benefit of fact.
From Wikipedia: “Not all edits by new or unregistered contributors are vandalism. Check out the content added or removed before reverting blindly, and remember not to bite the newcomers.”
Reporting others for vandalism without following Wikipedia Guidelines (ie reverting blindly without making clear your reasoning, and falsely accusing others of vandalism) is hypocritical.
Please help fix the problem, don’t be the problem. This kind of activity unfortunately reinforces an unfair stereotype of the know-it-all unyielding Wikipedia Editor who lords over the page and edits by ego and rollback button, rather than accuracy and community.
−
I am the sole copyright holder of all exploitation, distribution and intellectual rights worldwide to the film The Virgin Queen of St. Francis High. I have attempted to make corrections to the page, but you have blocked me. Remove your block so that I may make the proper corrections. If you refuse, just remove the entire page completely. Otherwise you are infringing on my rights.
Hello Copyright123, please use references, without that will be changed again soon. Regards -- Serols ( talk) 17:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
What do you mean by "use references"?
Have attempted several times to edit the page to correct the information you insist on retaining. Provide your attorney contact details. We will now pursue legal action to get this situation rectified.
Hi! I am Soratako ( talk). I cant't understand this reversion. Please be more specific about it? Japanese part of the translating were comment out.-- Soratako ( talk) 18:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
FROM Richosr:
Why are you removing my edit Land Beyond Productions produced Ben's video and the link is to the video produced and is valid.
What is the point of Wikipedia if you cannot link to valid content?
I am sorry, I thought I was in the Sandbox. I am new, I tried to edit it back though so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabbawiki ( talk • contribs) 18:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
There not vandalism Bedrooms60 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Serols. The information in the agency overview sidebar is outdated. Elizabeth Gorman hasn't been the executive director since March 2019. She was succeeded by Jose Alvarez in April.
The current numbers for employees and revenues are in the Tollway's 2019 Budget. I should have added the citation right away. I'm new at this, so I didn't realize edits would be reversed so quickly. Thank you.
Regards,
Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Illinois Tollway ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey Serols,
Please be patient with first time editors. Honest editing mistakes happen.
Regards,
Satyanarayan Satyanarayan101 ( talk) 13:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I really need to thank you for that. It was a mistake I made when I was going to press the Publish button, the removal button for the inbox got mistakenly tapped from my touchscreen. I also did message I JethroBT and ColinFine to revert it back. But as you've just did it, it seems all is good now. Thanking you again. Absol069 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:03, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
CVU Anti-Vandalism Award | |
This is for your outstanding performance in saving Wikipedia from the harmful threats of vandalism. I appreciate your efforts and hardwork. You are a great defender of Wikipedia. Thank you for your selfless works. Regards. PATH SLOPU 16:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC) |
apparently you didn't notice that I'd already indef blocked Bigpapijohn20000, because you warned him after I'd already blocked him. You might want to slow down and check the talk page and block log before warning. Killer Chihuahua 18:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
How do you revert edits so fast? By the time I see a page's edit history, you've already reverted something. I just want to say thank you for all your hard work. ∞ southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 17:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Please take a look at Badshah (rapper), I think it is vandalism. However, in the spirit of avoiding the three revert rule, I will not participate in reverting the changes. Thanks! Hurricane111 ( talk) 17:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
The French text of the medal is reinstallation, as you can read : In 1909, the Catholic University celebrated its 75th anniversary, and struck a medal where for the first time it officially used the French word "réinstallation" (ressetlement), and the Dutch word "herstelling" (restoration) beginning of a new "official" history : 75e ANNIVERSAIRE DE LA RÉINSTALLATION DE L’UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE 75e VERJAARDAG van de HERSTELLING des KATHOLIEKE HOOGESCHOOL 1834-1909. Who is the problem ? Thank you for your attention.-- Viator ( talk) 07:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
75e ANNIVERSAIRE DE LA RÉINSTALLATION DE L’UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE 75e VERJAARDAG VAN DE HERSTELLING DES KATHOLIEKE HOOGESCHOOL 1834-1909.
It is interesting to see that the frenc word "reinstallation" is not totally the same as the Dutch word "herstelling" (repair, restoration) Thank you--
Viator (
talk)
08:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
-- Viator ( talk) 08:13, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
It looks like he edit-conflicted with the vandal / your reversion and restored the vandalism accidentally. His other edits are all reverts of vandalism. Thanks! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 14:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
You beat me to reverting him and warning him. (insert grumpy face). Tknifton ( talk) 17:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
I don't think DerSpiegelNein should be banned yet...looks like editor is new and does not know that they should include edit summaries.
OkayKenG (
talk)
07:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Serols-can you please specify what in my edit of the Key Bridge page constitutes vandalism? I added easily verifiable historical information. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthpatrol2 ( talk • contribs) 17:56, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me out on reverting the 'RAT! Treated like dirt by many admins since 2016 DEAD RAT! GET LOST YOU DEAD RAT!' edits on the house mouse page. Do you know how to protect the page or ban the vandalizing editor? BlacknoseDace ( talk) 15:20, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. It looks like he's blocked now. BlacknoseDace ( talk) 15:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Serlos
I found message as my changes being vandalism without further details. While per guidelines it can be a link vandalism only if the link is "disruptive, irrelevant, or inappropriate targets while disguising them with mislabeling".
my changes were immediately reverted by yours when posted without any verification of content as per guidelines and tagged as vandalism. Was it automated ? Do you mind cancelling reverting after content verification ?
Rbtcpn ( talk) 15:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC) rbtcpn
That was fun.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
15:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I think you are being a bit quick with the rollback feature. How do you looked at the edit comments you would see why I removed this material. It has zero sources. If this is a topic you are knowledgeable on please return the material with sources. In the meantime I shall re-edit. Springnuts ( talk) 08:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Having looked a bit further, ( burial at sea) you put the message on the wrong talk page. You reverted an IP edit. However, my edit did reverse your edit so if you wish to restore material please do. However, please add sources. Otherwise it is likely to be removed again as original research. Springnuts ( talk) 08:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
This is for your outstanding performance in saving Wikipedia from the threat of vandalism. I appreciate your selfless service. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 10:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Almost every time I go to revert an edit, you've either already done it or have previously reverted vandalism on the page. Thanks for the hard work and for keeping Wikipedia free of vandalism! OliverEastwood talk 07:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Are you from UK Referencer ? Roseirena ( talk) 12:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks for your work reverting and reporting vandalism, however this edit which you reported to AIV looks like a good faith addition of sourced content to me. Could you please explain why you believe this is vandalism in case I am missing something? – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 18:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Why are you undoing edits to The Dover Boys article?
The anachronism can be verified in 10 seconds, yet it stands thanks to your reverts! Better to have a note than to be wrong!
If it is formatted improperly, fix that, but you are supporting obvious inaccuracies and degrading the usefulness of Wikipedia by lording over a page without benefit of fact.
From Wikipedia: “Not all edits by new or unregistered contributors are vandalism. Check out the content added or removed before reverting blindly, and remember not to bite the newcomers.”
Reporting others for vandalism without following Wikipedia Guidelines (ie reverting blindly without making clear your reasoning, and falsely accusing others of vandalism) is hypocritical.
Please help fix the problem, don’t be the problem. This kind of activity unfortunately reinforces an unfair stereotype of the know-it-all unyielding Wikipedia Editor who lords over the page and edits by ego and rollback button, rather than accuracy and community.
−
I am the sole copyright holder of all exploitation, distribution and intellectual rights worldwide to the film The Virgin Queen of St. Francis High. I have attempted to make corrections to the page, but you have blocked me. Remove your block so that I may make the proper corrections. If you refuse, just remove the entire page completely. Otherwise you are infringing on my rights.
Hello Copyright123, please use references, without that will be changed again soon. Regards -- Serols ( talk) 17:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
What do you mean by "use references"?
Have attempted several times to edit the page to correct the information you insist on retaining. Provide your attorney contact details. We will now pursue legal action to get this situation rectified.
Hi! I am Soratako ( talk). I cant't understand this reversion. Please be more specific about it? Japanese part of the translating were comment out.-- Soratako ( talk) 18:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
FROM Richosr:
Why are you removing my edit Land Beyond Productions produced Ben's video and the link is to the video produced and is valid.
What is the point of Wikipedia if you cannot link to valid content?
I am sorry, I thought I was in the Sandbox. I am new, I tried to edit it back though so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabbawiki ( talk • contribs) 18:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
There not vandalism Bedrooms60 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Serols. The information in the agency overview sidebar is outdated. Elizabeth Gorman hasn't been the executive director since March 2019. She was succeeded by Jose Alvarez in April.
The current numbers for employees and revenues are in the Tollway's 2019 Budget. I should have added the citation right away. I'm new at this, so I didn't realize edits would be reversed so quickly. Thank you.
Regards,
Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Illinois Tollway ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey Serols,
Please be patient with first time editors. Honest editing mistakes happen.
Regards,
Satyanarayan Satyanarayan101 ( talk) 13:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I really need to thank you for that. It was a mistake I made when I was going to press the Publish button, the removal button for the inbox got mistakenly tapped from my touchscreen. I also did message I JethroBT and ColinFine to revert it back. But as you've just did it, it seems all is good now. Thanking you again. Absol069 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:03, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
CVU Anti-Vandalism Award | |
This is for your outstanding performance in saving Wikipedia from the harmful threats of vandalism. I appreciate your efforts and hardwork. You are a great defender of Wikipedia. Thank you for your selfless works. Regards. PATH SLOPU 16:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC) |
apparently you didn't notice that I'd already indef blocked Bigpapijohn20000, because you warned him after I'd already blocked him. You might want to slow down and check the talk page and block log before warning. Killer Chihuahua 18:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
How do you revert edits so fast? By the time I see a page's edit history, you've already reverted something. I just want to say thank you for all your hard work. ∞ southernkangaroo ∞ talk∞ 17:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Please take a look at Badshah (rapper), I think it is vandalism. However, in the spirit of avoiding the three revert rule, I will not participate in reverting the changes. Thanks! Hurricane111 ( talk) 17:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
The French text of the medal is reinstallation, as you can read : In 1909, the Catholic University celebrated its 75th anniversary, and struck a medal where for the first time it officially used the French word "réinstallation" (ressetlement), and the Dutch word "herstelling" (restoration) beginning of a new "official" history : 75e ANNIVERSAIRE DE LA RÉINSTALLATION DE L’UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE 75e VERJAARDAG van de HERSTELLING des KATHOLIEKE HOOGESCHOOL 1834-1909. Who is the problem ? Thank you for your attention.-- Viator ( talk) 07:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
75e ANNIVERSAIRE DE LA RÉINSTALLATION DE L’UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE 75e VERJAARDAG VAN DE HERSTELLING DES KATHOLIEKE HOOGESCHOOL 1834-1909.
It is interesting to see that the frenc word "reinstallation" is not totally the same as the Dutch word "herstelling" (repair, restoration) Thank you--
Viator (
talk)
08:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
-- Viator ( talk) 08:13, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
It looks like he edit-conflicted with the vandal / your reversion and restored the vandalism accidentally. His other edits are all reverts of vandalism. Thanks! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 14:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
You beat me to reverting him and warning him. (insert grumpy face). Tknifton ( talk) 17:08, 25 September 2019 (UTC)