Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to John Zizioulas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Cebactokpatop ( talk) 14:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Fixed CWii( Talk| Contribs) 19:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Resorted and will get protection if it happens again. CWii( Talk| Contribs) 20:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey. I've removed your addition to 3O because it's not an issue that 3O deals with. If an editor is being uncivil, I would recommend you take it to WP:WQA. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Would you like me to set the mediation page to new, so another mediator to pick it up, or to closed, so it will not continue? Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 19:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/John Zizioulas, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Anthøny 17:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I want to query you on moving the RfC on Cebactokpatop. Since the page was created by Allyne, who wants an RfC on Cebactokpatop, and I signified my agreement and added to the page, it seems clear that the two-person threshhold has been met? Seminarist ( talk) 00:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Please ensure evidence of you trying and failing to resolve the dispute are provided in the forms of diffs - entire talk pages and claims of mediation without diffs are not acceptable and may result in the Rfc being delisted. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 01:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to John Zizioulas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Cebactokpatop ( talk) 14:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Fixed CWii( Talk| Contribs) 19:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Resorted and will get protection if it happens again. CWii( Talk| Contribs) 20:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey. I've removed your addition to 3O because it's not an issue that 3O deals with. If an editor is being uncivil, I would recommend you take it to WP:WQA. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Would you like me to set the mediation page to new, so another mediator to pick it up, or to closed, so it will not continue? Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 19:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/John Zizioulas, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Anthøny 17:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I want to query you on moving the RfC on Cebactokpatop. Since the page was created by Allyne, who wants an RfC on Cebactokpatop, and I signified my agreement and added to the page, it seems clear that the two-person threshhold has been met? Seminarist ( talk) 00:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Please ensure evidence of you trying and failing to resolve the dispute are provided in the forms of diffs - entire talk pages and claims of mediation without diffs are not acceptable and may result in the Rfc being delisted. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 01:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)