Your image for "facial" has been heavily criticized as offensive. It contains what can be perceived as rape as the woman does not appear consensual nor enjoying the action. It also could be perceived as racial stereotyping by the image of a dark skinned male ejaculating on a light skinned female. If you could redraw it in a more tasteful light that would be great. The "bukkake" image has been similarly criticized.
Also, mammary intercourse is in desperate need of a replacement image as the general consensus is that the current image is uhh... unsatisfactory. 71.232.101.78 ( talk) 00:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Seedfeed i think all the images are great and wouldnt mind if you sent me all of them —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.211.113 ( talk) 03:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Snowballing (sexual practice) has recently had several sources added to it to allow it to satisfy notability requirements. However, it is now clear from external material that the primary use of the term "snowballing" is when semen is swapped between the mouth of someone performing fellatio and the male donating the sperm. Accordingly, I have removed your image from the page, as it is misleading about the primary use of the term. It would be appropriate for a paragraph on the modified form of snowballing used in pornographic films, but as yet, I can't find an external source to justify the inclusion of that material. In any case, we need another image for the page, of a woman passing semen into a man's mouth, which should go at the top of the page, to be followed by your other image if a source can be found for the material it would be depicting. I was hoping you'd do the new picture, as your last one was pretty good, despite the fact that the paragraph it was drawn for needed to be cut. MrNerdHair ( talk) 01:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
Thank you for much needed high quality illustrations of sexual topics. Simon Speed ( talk) 02:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC) |
I'm sorry to hear that you've given up on the sexuality Wikiproject, but I do understand. I think it may be the most frustrating area of the Wikipedia to work on and the one where editors get burned out the fastest. The sheer volume of vandalism is phenomenal, it's the censor's favourite target and its emotive nature adds fuel to the battles that bedevil all subjects. I do think sexuality is the most important area of the Wikipedia though: on what other subject do you have the religious and sex (porno) industries pouring out misinformation? Just the existence of the Wikipedia articles helps break the taboo on talking about it. In one country, South Africa, AIDS deaths are now well over 800 a day and knowledge is the potential victims' only defence. -- Simon Speed ( talk) 02:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
What's the history here? It looks like it started off as it is now, then somewhere along the way it was changed to have a white guy. From reading your responses here, it seems this was not your doing, so I'm wondering how that came about. For the record, I think the image does a great job at its purpose, and I think it is totally ridiculous that someone found it racist. Definitely a case of someone imprinting their own subconscious racism on a neutral subject. So what happened there? Did someone else change it? Conical Johnson ( talk) 07:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for creating new images. Your work is really quite good and adds a lot to the articles. 66.191.19.68 ( talk) 20:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
Your work is always appreciated. Exxolon ( talk) 03:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
It's nice having better quality pictures for the articles. Thanks. Now if we could only get some of the other idiots to stop uploading their personal porn stash because "it's relevant". 71.123.24.84 ( talk) 07:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
It is good to see that you're back, your work is top notch! Might you be able to provide a picture for the handjob article? The one they have is too... artsy. Quite a bit is lost in translation. If I may offer a suggestion, how about a dark complected woman providing a handjob to an East Asian male? Thanks again for your work!! Keyuehan ( talk) 23:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I understand, it's nice just that you took the time to reply to my request. I'm anxious to see your next work! Keyuehan ( talk) 02:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad to see you are back. Found your images while "surfing for porn" on Wikipedia. Must admit I was quite surprised, both, by the level of detail, and your valor, for putting your unique talents at the service of this wonderful project. Criticism will surely come, but please don't give up in your endeavor. Know that your efforts to provide original content to what are, at times, neglected articles, has not gone unnoticed and is truly appreciated. Keep up the good work! Ronin Distance ( talk) 22:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Exceptional Newcomer Award | |
Welcome back, I now realize you'd only just arrived. Thanks for the Mammary intercourse picture, it was much needed. Simon Speed ( talk) 02:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC) |
I see your anti-censorship barnstar. I think it's an excellent idea, but I think this version is a little too close to the anti-vandalism barnstar
File:Barnstar of Reversion2.png.--
Simon Speed (
talk)
02:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I've been having a look and a think and frankly I wouldn't know where to start. The only thing I'd say about the sexuality articles in general is that they need more referenced material. It's very hard to get in this subject area but it's what stops decent stuff getting deleted and helps us filter out the rubbish. I suspect the article could have a good ethnographic/sociological section if you had access to that sort of material. And then there's Psychoanalysis :-) . -- Simon Speed ( talk) 13:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the image you provide on Wikipedia and I hope you get discouraged by the negative comments or edits. A picture is worth a thousand words they say and I believe that. Justgetmein ( talk) 12:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if you could make an image for the above article, Instead of the actual photo that's allready on there-- DFS454 ( talk) 21:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
(unindent) Yes I fully agree, having seen the article you mentioned. P.s. Thanks for signing my sock page! If you need anything don't hesitate to ask. Best Wishes -- DFS454 ( talk) 15:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm a big fan of yours; I'm sure you could make a great image for this page.
62 Misfit ( talk) 03:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Seedfeeder, well done with your artwork. I'm sure you've heard that before, of course, but I'll say it all the same. I was looking at one of them today and it occurred to me that they look like they were created with a 3d modelling program, like Blender or Maya, and was rendered using a cell-shader or the like. As I, myself, am starting out in 3d modelling, I am curious to know, is this the case? James.Denholm® Talk to me... 10:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
I agree. Fellatio image is wonderful....... It contributed to my understanding of it a lot.
Would you be able to create an image for this article? -- MZMcBride ( talk) 07:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi I was wondering if you could make Gordon Brown's signature ? I notice most other political leaders currently in office have their signature on their article except Gordon. Thanks -- DFS454 ( talk) 11:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello Seedfeeder. I'm just curious what image tools you use to make your images. Thank you. Surv1v4l1st ( Talk| Contribs) 23:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
SeedFeeder, where did you get the image for the vector art? Some of the women depicted looked East Asian/Japanese. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyuzoaoi ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Your image for "facial" has been heavily criticized as offensive. It contains what can be perceived as rape as the woman does not appear consensual nor enjoying the action. It also could be perceived as racial stereotyping by the image of a dark skinned male ejaculating on a light skinned female. If you could redraw it in a more tasteful light that would be great. The "bukkake" image has been similarly criticized.
Also, mammary intercourse is in desperate need of a replacement image as the general consensus is that the current image is uhh... unsatisfactory. 71.232.101.78 ( talk) 00:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Seedfeed i think all the images are great and wouldnt mind if you sent me all of them —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.211.113 ( talk) 03:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Snowballing (sexual practice) has recently had several sources added to it to allow it to satisfy notability requirements. However, it is now clear from external material that the primary use of the term "snowballing" is when semen is swapped between the mouth of someone performing fellatio and the male donating the sperm. Accordingly, I have removed your image from the page, as it is misleading about the primary use of the term. It would be appropriate for a paragraph on the modified form of snowballing used in pornographic films, but as yet, I can't find an external source to justify the inclusion of that material. In any case, we need another image for the page, of a woman passing semen into a man's mouth, which should go at the top of the page, to be followed by your other image if a source can be found for the material it would be depicting. I was hoping you'd do the new picture, as your last one was pretty good, despite the fact that the paragraph it was drawn for needed to be cut. MrNerdHair ( talk) 01:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
Thank you for much needed high quality illustrations of sexual topics. Simon Speed ( talk) 02:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC) |
I'm sorry to hear that you've given up on the sexuality Wikiproject, but I do understand. I think it may be the most frustrating area of the Wikipedia to work on and the one where editors get burned out the fastest. The sheer volume of vandalism is phenomenal, it's the censor's favourite target and its emotive nature adds fuel to the battles that bedevil all subjects. I do think sexuality is the most important area of the Wikipedia though: on what other subject do you have the religious and sex (porno) industries pouring out misinformation? Just the existence of the Wikipedia articles helps break the taboo on talking about it. In one country, South Africa, AIDS deaths are now well over 800 a day and knowledge is the potential victims' only defence. -- Simon Speed ( talk) 02:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
What's the history here? It looks like it started off as it is now, then somewhere along the way it was changed to have a white guy. From reading your responses here, it seems this was not your doing, so I'm wondering how that came about. For the record, I think the image does a great job at its purpose, and I think it is totally ridiculous that someone found it racist. Definitely a case of someone imprinting their own subconscious racism on a neutral subject. So what happened there? Did someone else change it? Conical Johnson ( talk) 07:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for creating new images. Your work is really quite good and adds a lot to the articles. 66.191.19.68 ( talk) 20:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
Your work is always appreciated. Exxolon ( talk) 03:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
It's nice having better quality pictures for the articles. Thanks. Now if we could only get some of the other idiots to stop uploading their personal porn stash because "it's relevant". 71.123.24.84 ( talk) 07:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
It is good to see that you're back, your work is top notch! Might you be able to provide a picture for the handjob article? The one they have is too... artsy. Quite a bit is lost in translation. If I may offer a suggestion, how about a dark complected woman providing a handjob to an East Asian male? Thanks again for your work!! Keyuehan ( talk) 23:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I understand, it's nice just that you took the time to reply to my request. I'm anxious to see your next work! Keyuehan ( talk) 02:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad to see you are back. Found your images while "surfing for porn" on Wikipedia. Must admit I was quite surprised, both, by the level of detail, and your valor, for putting your unique talents at the service of this wonderful project. Criticism will surely come, but please don't give up in your endeavor. Know that your efforts to provide original content to what are, at times, neglected articles, has not gone unnoticed and is truly appreciated. Keep up the good work! Ronin Distance ( talk) 22:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Exceptional Newcomer Award | |
Welcome back, I now realize you'd only just arrived. Thanks for the Mammary intercourse picture, it was much needed. Simon Speed ( talk) 02:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC) |
I see your anti-censorship barnstar. I think it's an excellent idea, but I think this version is a little too close to the anti-vandalism barnstar
File:Barnstar of Reversion2.png.--
Simon Speed (
talk)
02:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I've been having a look and a think and frankly I wouldn't know where to start. The only thing I'd say about the sexuality articles in general is that they need more referenced material. It's very hard to get in this subject area but it's what stops decent stuff getting deleted and helps us filter out the rubbish. I suspect the article could have a good ethnographic/sociological section if you had access to that sort of material. And then there's Psychoanalysis :-) . -- Simon Speed ( talk) 13:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the image you provide on Wikipedia and I hope you get discouraged by the negative comments or edits. A picture is worth a thousand words they say and I believe that. Justgetmein ( talk) 12:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if you could make an image for the above article, Instead of the actual photo that's allready on there-- DFS454 ( talk) 21:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
(unindent) Yes I fully agree, having seen the article you mentioned. P.s. Thanks for signing my sock page! If you need anything don't hesitate to ask. Best Wishes -- DFS454 ( talk) 15:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm a big fan of yours; I'm sure you could make a great image for this page.
62 Misfit ( talk) 03:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Seedfeeder, well done with your artwork. I'm sure you've heard that before, of course, but I'll say it all the same. I was looking at one of them today and it occurred to me that they look like they were created with a 3d modelling program, like Blender or Maya, and was rendered using a cell-shader or the like. As I, myself, am starting out in 3d modelling, I am curious to know, is this the case? James.Denholm® Talk to me... 10:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
I agree. Fellatio image is wonderful....... It contributed to my understanding of it a lot.
Would you be able to create an image for this article? -- MZMcBride ( talk) 07:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi I was wondering if you could make Gordon Brown's signature ? I notice most other political leaders currently in office have their signature on their article except Gordon. Thanks -- DFS454 ( talk) 11:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello Seedfeeder. I'm just curious what image tools you use to make your images. Thank you. Surv1v4l1st ( Talk| Contribs) 23:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
SeedFeeder, where did you get the image for the vector art? Some of the women depicted looked East Asian/Japanese. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyuzoaoi ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)