![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
@ Seany91 It appears INJ is the correct format to list her as due to the injury she sustained. Her caps are appropriately counted to reflect her playing in the April 8, 2023 match. PRE suggests they were named to the Preliminary squad and then dropped for an unknown (non injury) reason. If you look at the USMNT or any of the USYNTs you will see that injured players are listed as INJ. On the USMNT, you can see it currently with Timothy Weah and Reggie Cannon, where Chris Richards (soccer) is list as PRE because he was dropped prior to the game being played for a non-injury reason. Why would the USWNT use a different format then the other NT articles under USSF? I even did a quick check of both the England MNT and England WNT and both show INJ on players that have been injured. INJ is the standard for players who were injured rather then players who were dropped prior to matchs. Demt1298 ( talk) 15:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Seany91. Thank you for your work on Emily Madril. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating this article! Keep writing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Seany91 So I can better contribute to Wikipedia, can you please describe how you select which citations to keep when addressing WP:OVERCITE in sports articles?
For example, in three replacements between [1] and [2], you replace an editorially independent source with a primary source. What is the rationale for preferring the primary source in the context of WP:OVERCITE? Is it contextual, as in, are certain facts better served by primary sources over editorial sources? How can this best be balanced with WP:GNG and particularly WP:SPORTBASIC suggesting or requiring editorial sources in order to establish notability?
In some cases I can understand concerns about the triviality of a source's coverage/WP:SIGCOV, but particularly in [3] the editorially independent sources and primary sources cover the same subject in the same scope, which leads to some of my confusion on which should be preferred if only one is allowed, and how else to use editorially indpendent sources toward satsifying WP:GNG.
Thanks! - 71.34.68.140 ( talk) 18:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
@ Seany91 It appears INJ is the correct format to list her as due to the injury she sustained. Her caps are appropriately counted to reflect her playing in the April 8, 2023 match. PRE suggests they were named to the Preliminary squad and then dropped for an unknown (non injury) reason. If you look at the USMNT or any of the USYNTs you will see that injured players are listed as INJ. On the USMNT, you can see it currently with Timothy Weah and Reggie Cannon, where Chris Richards (soccer) is list as PRE because he was dropped prior to the game being played for a non-injury reason. Why would the USWNT use a different format then the other NT articles under USSF? I even did a quick check of both the England MNT and England WNT and both show INJ on players that have been injured. INJ is the standard for players who were injured rather then players who were dropped prior to matchs. Demt1298 ( talk) 15:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Seany91. Thank you for your work on Emily Madril. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating this article! Keep writing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Seany91 So I can better contribute to Wikipedia, can you please describe how you select which citations to keep when addressing WP:OVERCITE in sports articles?
For example, in three replacements between [1] and [2], you replace an editorially independent source with a primary source. What is the rationale for preferring the primary source in the context of WP:OVERCITE? Is it contextual, as in, are certain facts better served by primary sources over editorial sources? How can this best be balanced with WP:GNG and particularly WP:SPORTBASIC suggesting or requiring editorial sources in order to establish notability?
In some cases I can understand concerns about the triviality of a source's coverage/WP:SIGCOV, but particularly in [3] the editorially independent sources and primary sources cover the same subject in the same scope, which leads to some of my confusion on which should be preferred if only one is allowed, and how else to use editorially indpendent sources toward satsifying WP:GNG.
Thanks! - 71.34.68.140 ( talk) 18:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)