All New: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Orphaned: 500 1001 1501
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 22:08, 19 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Hi, I deleted your user page because it appears some anonymous user vandalized it. Thanks. Fuzheado 06:38, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
You see the Channel 4 News page, but look at the Channel 4 page. Go to the Channel 4 page and click on "Discuss this page" and you will see an important note if you scroll down to the bottom.
Thanks for fixing my mistake! ;) — Adam Conover † 19:47, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the Vote for Speedy deletion from The Castle of Otranto. Hopefully, it will grow into an article. I read it, but that was 20 years ago so I don't remember much. Danny 22:38, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
hi scud lee, thanks for fixing the table box on Generation Terrorists, does this mean you can't have more than three albums in the discography?? Scraggy4 02:45, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thanx lee,
it was my first attempt at the album template and you haven't put me trying another now maybe.. Scraggy4 02:53, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Hi there, Lee! I've nominated you for adminship! Good luck. (You will want to accept the nomination at the link.) -- Merovingian ↕ Talk 17:18, Apr 15, 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Merovingianss talk page: [1]
Hi Lee, I wondered if you could take a look at the table of album info. required on my user page and let me know what you think. I have posted a comment on the wikiprojectsalbum page but no-one has commented as yet. Although far from perfect I feel it does the job in letting people know what info is still required for any particular album. Even if people don't agree that it is good enough to replace the needs cover page I will try to keep it upto date. So feel free to add / remove info. After I have added the albums I will endeavour to find all of the relevant info even though this appears to be a big job I feel that the trouble some are going to to create the album boxes is spoiled by missing info. I am also still slightly confused with regard to Album / LP / Cd / Vinyl etc. A number of articles have the wording Album and a number specify the actual format ie; CD, Cassette etc. did a decision come about regarding the preferred format?? Scraggy4 19:55, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Scraggy4s talk page: [2]
Thanx Lee, I couldn't seem to get it to move to the project pages. Don't know if I had to include brackets or not but I tries both ways and it still wouldn't work. Should the re-direct pages be deleted now?? Scraggy4 02:06, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
Hi Lee, as you may have noticed I only got up to the letter I before you you started separating the list so I an now working backwards from letter Z so that we don't overlap. Scraggy4 18:43, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Scraggy4s talk page: [3]
Ha, ... Hah, Hah! ScudLee, I have solved your private joke. As you very well know, a bunch of ASBs, or whatever, were listed under Wikipedia:MediaWiki custom messages#Project namespace. You are the editor who moved them! So, at the time that I added my project namespace that usage was in common practice and hence accounts for above original use of the term namespace. I will now study the new location, to see if makes any more sense. This is what I mean by obfuscation with the aid of science / academia. -- John Gohde 20:46, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Wikipedia talk:Article series boxes policy (proposed): [4]
Originally made on John Gohdes talk page: [5]
Well, I've been called many things in my time: handsome, suave, witty, for example, are just a few of the ones I'm still waiting on. Troll, however, was not one I was expecting. This saddens me. I would like to try and clarify. - Lee (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Your accusation seems to be based on this sentence - "Where exactly have you seen the phrase used in the context you are using it?" which I admit was a slightly sly reference to Wikipedia:MediaWiki custom messages. However, my edit of that page wasn't to try and obfuscate or alter the original meaning of the Project namespace section away from the manner you chose to use it, but to reaffirm it's actual original meaning which had become occluded by the inclusion of a couple of inappropriately placed elements (two elements - yours and one other). If you do not believe me, please observe this edit [6] made only last month, in which User:Bensaccount changed the header from "Wikipedia namespace" to "Project namespace". The phrase " Project namespace" has never been used in the context in which you were using it, at least not on that page. If you mistakenly thought it was being used in that context on that page, then fair enough, but please don't accuse me of attempting to alter it's meaning. - Lee (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
The other "troll-like" behaviour you ascribed to me was from my use of this phrase "Give me a weekend and a shovel, and I'll happily bury them all." which I made in response to "...but it would probably require a strikt policy to get rid of those already existing." [sic]. I was merely indicating my willingness to swiftly and ruthlessly enforce policy, were it to become policy. Your promise to engage in a revert war over this was inappropriate. - Lee (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
I know that you've worked hard on trying to NPOV the articles on CAM, and are trying to draw all the related articles together under your wikiproject, and that this has created some opposition towards you from people who have a bias against all things CAM. I am not one of these people. Our zones of interest are so far apart that it is quite likely we'll never edit the same article (although if you ever create an album page, make sure those song titles are in quotes!). It seems to me we both got a little caught up on what, I agree with you, is currently rather a minor non-issue. - Lee (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Hi Lee,
I had realised my mistake on ONYX and was just going back to do that after I had added the msg:stub & msg:album to the pages, but you being Mr.On The Ball you beat me to it. I reckon another month and we have have our "needs and incompletes" down to a manageable size. I hope to have a little bit of free time this week to try and clear some. I realized today that with the incomplete page as it is now, it is easy to email to friends to see if they have any of the missing info in their album collection. I will start this tomorrow and if a couple reply it will hopefully speed things up. The Recorded box is rather hard to find the info for unless you actually own the album. I feel that maybe after a month of clearing up, we could possibly delete those with incomplete Recorded boxes from the incomplete list as this would then reduce the list to a manageable size????? I see you added quite a few albums to the album list today. Scraggy4 22:42, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Thank you for not letting the junk stay on. You put it into its proper format. 66.245.117.53 23:48, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
thanks for the totally disputed notice, scud. And welcome to Wikipedia! -- Uncle Ed 18:17, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Ed Poors talk page: [8]
Originally made on Duncharris' talk page: [9]
Sorry for adding a dot to your user page. It's just a pain you can change your nickname in your preferences so that your name links back to the talk page if you like. Dunc Harris | Talk 23:45, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
How do you determine what IP address a user is logged in with? You cite this on Wikipedia:Help Desk, in helping user TomS to find his original screen name. What tool do you use for this? Is this function only available to Admins? - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:36, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on DropDeadGorgias' talk page: [10]
Reply originally made on 193.77.122.102s talk page: [11]
Reply originally made by 193.77.122.102 ( TomS) on his talk page: [12]
Reply originally made on 193.77.122.102s talk page: [13]
Reply originally made by 193.77.122.102 ( TomS) on his talk page: [14]
Thank you Lee, thanks to all of you! I've fixed the problem!
TomS 15:28, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Hi, yesterday I was editing the page for the King Crimson album Starless and Bible Black. At the time I was under the misconception the all creative titles should be in italics and every time I saw the song titles appear in quotation marks I deleted them and replaced them with double apostrophes. I honestly believed it was a software glitch and didn’t bother to check the history to see if I was being corrected.
Anyway, sorry for the extra aggravation and thanks for the insight.- Justin Foote (talk) 18:21, 21 Jul, 2004 (UTC).
Reply originally made on Justin Footes talk page: [15]
If you want and if there is a consensus to do so, I can use D6 to add a year category to those years. Linking the year category to the decade category would still need to be done manually though. BTW years 1900- 2004 look good. -- User:Docu
Following your note on my talk page, see Category talk:Years. -- User:Docu
Thanks for the quick reply on the pum re: converting tables. Have a nice day!
Kokiri 15:59, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for editing the imdb templates on the Halloweentown page. I didn't know about that template. Now when I get a chance, I'll go and add them to the article from which I copied and pasted the imdb references I originally used. Glenn6502 01:37, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I was about to nominate you for Adminship, but I see you have been nominated in the past. You're not listed at Wikipedia:List of administrators, but I can't find a record of the nomination failing, nor can I imagine why it would. Are you an admin? If so, please add your name to the list. If not, why not and should I bother re-nominating you? Tuf-Kat 20:56, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Tuf-Kats talk page: [18]
Let me know if you want me to delete your userpage. Of course, you'll be able to delete yourself soon, hopefully. I moved the message Glenn6502 put there to just above this one. Tuf-Kat 03:22, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)
Figured I'd delete your user page, since you've been so vocal about wanting it to stay a red link on RfA. Let me know if you want the comment restored anyway ("well i need the address because i really need to contact them :) btw where do u live?" by 62.215.17.228). I was thinking what an irony it is that if you were an admin you could delete it yourself, but people object to you being an admin because you don't want a user page. Everyking 22:05, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Everykings talk page: [20]
I have made a start on her albums, uploaded album covers, putting in track listings etc. I have now got a dilemma.
She released a series of compilation albums with the same name: This Woman's Work Vol.s I & II and then released those 2 vols. as a This Woman's Work boxed set (96 tracks!). What should I do on the album page? Should I show the box set cover in the album box, with the complete list of tracks to the left, or should I have 2 wiki album boxes (vol. I & Vol. II - with appropriate track lists for each vol.) possible separated into two lvl 2 headings, followed by the third lvl 2 heading for the boxed set? If the latter, I assume that I won't need to add a track list unless it's different (I haven't checked yet). I lean towards the latter option but am ready to comply with 'procedure'. :=} -- Martin TB 14:01, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Martin TBs talk page: [21]
Reply originally made on Martin TBs talk page: [22]
Many Thanks -- Martin TB 10:59, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Martin TBs talk page: [23]
I posted questions about the albumbox template on the talk page. Thought you might be interested. -- Rick Block 15:05, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hi! You've been working on a lot of template footers, changing 'id=toc' to 'class="toccolours"'. I personally preferred the old light-blue background color, but that may be just because I was used to it. However, the change also expands the box vertically for some reason (on my browser at least), by putting lots more whitespace between lines of the table. Compare the old version of one page [24] with the new [25]. Is there some way to fix this? —wwoods 09:38, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Wwoods talk page: [26]
p { margin: 0.4em 0em 0.5em 0em; line-height: 1.5em; }
#toc p { margin: 0 }
.toccolours p { margin: 0 }
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man ( comment| talk) 19:34, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes -- Tagishsimon (talk)
Template:Table suffixes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Table suffixes. Thank you. — Xiong 熊 talk * 10:40, 2005 May 25 (UTC)
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. It looks like you're not active anymore, but if you come back and are at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. I've marked you on this list as "inactve". Feel free to update this as well. Thanks. -- Rick Block ( talk) July 3, 2005 18:32 (UTC)
All New: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Orphaned: 500 1001 1501
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 22:08, 19 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Hi, I deleted your user page because it appears some anonymous user vandalized it. Thanks. Fuzheado 06:38, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
You see the Channel 4 News page, but look at the Channel 4 page. Go to the Channel 4 page and click on "Discuss this page" and you will see an important note if you scroll down to the bottom.
Thanks for fixing my mistake! ;) — Adam Conover † 19:47, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the Vote for Speedy deletion from The Castle of Otranto. Hopefully, it will grow into an article. I read it, but that was 20 years ago so I don't remember much. Danny 22:38, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
hi scud lee, thanks for fixing the table box on Generation Terrorists, does this mean you can't have more than three albums in the discography?? Scraggy4 02:45, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thanx lee,
it was my first attempt at the album template and you haven't put me trying another now maybe.. Scraggy4 02:53, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Hi there, Lee! I've nominated you for adminship! Good luck. (You will want to accept the nomination at the link.) -- Merovingian ↕ Talk 17:18, Apr 15, 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Merovingianss talk page: [1]
Hi Lee, I wondered if you could take a look at the table of album info. required on my user page and let me know what you think. I have posted a comment on the wikiprojectsalbum page but no-one has commented as yet. Although far from perfect I feel it does the job in letting people know what info is still required for any particular album. Even if people don't agree that it is good enough to replace the needs cover page I will try to keep it upto date. So feel free to add / remove info. After I have added the albums I will endeavour to find all of the relevant info even though this appears to be a big job I feel that the trouble some are going to to create the album boxes is spoiled by missing info. I am also still slightly confused with regard to Album / LP / Cd / Vinyl etc. A number of articles have the wording Album and a number specify the actual format ie; CD, Cassette etc. did a decision come about regarding the preferred format?? Scraggy4 19:55, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Scraggy4s talk page: [2]
Thanx Lee, I couldn't seem to get it to move to the project pages. Don't know if I had to include brackets or not but I tries both ways and it still wouldn't work. Should the re-direct pages be deleted now?? Scraggy4 02:06, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
Hi Lee, as you may have noticed I only got up to the letter I before you you started separating the list so I an now working backwards from letter Z so that we don't overlap. Scraggy4 18:43, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Scraggy4s talk page: [3]
Ha, ... Hah, Hah! ScudLee, I have solved your private joke. As you very well know, a bunch of ASBs, or whatever, were listed under Wikipedia:MediaWiki custom messages#Project namespace. You are the editor who moved them! So, at the time that I added my project namespace that usage was in common practice and hence accounts for above original use of the term namespace. I will now study the new location, to see if makes any more sense. This is what I mean by obfuscation with the aid of science / academia. -- John Gohde 20:46, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Wikipedia talk:Article series boxes policy (proposed): [4]
Originally made on John Gohdes talk page: [5]
Well, I've been called many things in my time: handsome, suave, witty, for example, are just a few of the ones I'm still waiting on. Troll, however, was not one I was expecting. This saddens me. I would like to try and clarify. - Lee (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Your accusation seems to be based on this sentence - "Where exactly have you seen the phrase used in the context you are using it?" which I admit was a slightly sly reference to Wikipedia:MediaWiki custom messages. However, my edit of that page wasn't to try and obfuscate or alter the original meaning of the Project namespace section away from the manner you chose to use it, but to reaffirm it's actual original meaning which had become occluded by the inclusion of a couple of inappropriately placed elements (two elements - yours and one other). If you do not believe me, please observe this edit [6] made only last month, in which User:Bensaccount changed the header from "Wikipedia namespace" to "Project namespace". The phrase " Project namespace" has never been used in the context in which you were using it, at least not on that page. If you mistakenly thought it was being used in that context on that page, then fair enough, but please don't accuse me of attempting to alter it's meaning. - Lee (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
The other "troll-like" behaviour you ascribed to me was from my use of this phrase "Give me a weekend and a shovel, and I'll happily bury them all." which I made in response to "...but it would probably require a strikt policy to get rid of those already existing." [sic]. I was merely indicating my willingness to swiftly and ruthlessly enforce policy, were it to become policy. Your promise to engage in a revert war over this was inappropriate. - Lee (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
I know that you've worked hard on trying to NPOV the articles on CAM, and are trying to draw all the related articles together under your wikiproject, and that this has created some opposition towards you from people who have a bias against all things CAM. I am not one of these people. Our zones of interest are so far apart that it is quite likely we'll never edit the same article (although if you ever create an album page, make sure those song titles are in quotes!). It seems to me we both got a little caught up on what, I agree with you, is currently rather a minor non-issue. - Lee (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Hi Lee,
I had realised my mistake on ONYX and was just going back to do that after I had added the msg:stub & msg:album to the pages, but you being Mr.On The Ball you beat me to it. I reckon another month and we have have our "needs and incompletes" down to a manageable size. I hope to have a little bit of free time this week to try and clear some. I realized today that with the incomplete page as it is now, it is easy to email to friends to see if they have any of the missing info in their album collection. I will start this tomorrow and if a couple reply it will hopefully speed things up. The Recorded box is rather hard to find the info for unless you actually own the album. I feel that maybe after a month of clearing up, we could possibly delete those with incomplete Recorded boxes from the incomplete list as this would then reduce the list to a manageable size????? I see you added quite a few albums to the album list today. Scraggy4 22:42, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
Thank you for not letting the junk stay on. You put it into its proper format. 66.245.117.53 23:48, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
thanks for the totally disputed notice, scud. And welcome to Wikipedia! -- Uncle Ed 18:17, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Ed Poors talk page: [8]
Originally made on Duncharris' talk page: [9]
Sorry for adding a dot to your user page. It's just a pain you can change your nickname in your preferences so that your name links back to the talk page if you like. Dunc Harris | Talk 23:45, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
How do you determine what IP address a user is logged in with? You cite this on Wikipedia:Help Desk, in helping user TomS to find his original screen name. What tool do you use for this? Is this function only available to Admins? - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:36, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on DropDeadGorgias' talk page: [10]
Reply originally made on 193.77.122.102s talk page: [11]
Reply originally made by 193.77.122.102 ( TomS) on his talk page: [12]
Reply originally made on 193.77.122.102s talk page: [13]
Reply originally made by 193.77.122.102 ( TomS) on his talk page: [14]
Thank you Lee, thanks to all of you! I've fixed the problem!
TomS 15:28, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Hi, yesterday I was editing the page for the King Crimson album Starless and Bible Black. At the time I was under the misconception the all creative titles should be in italics and every time I saw the song titles appear in quotation marks I deleted them and replaced them with double apostrophes. I honestly believed it was a software glitch and didn’t bother to check the history to see if I was being corrected.
Anyway, sorry for the extra aggravation and thanks for the insight.- Justin Foote (talk) 18:21, 21 Jul, 2004 (UTC).
Reply originally made on Justin Footes talk page: [15]
If you want and if there is a consensus to do so, I can use D6 to add a year category to those years. Linking the year category to the decade category would still need to be done manually though. BTW years 1900- 2004 look good. -- User:Docu
Following your note on my talk page, see Category talk:Years. -- User:Docu
Thanks for the quick reply on the pum re: converting tables. Have a nice day!
Kokiri 15:59, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for editing the imdb templates on the Halloweentown page. I didn't know about that template. Now when I get a chance, I'll go and add them to the article from which I copied and pasted the imdb references I originally used. Glenn6502 01:37, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I was about to nominate you for Adminship, but I see you have been nominated in the past. You're not listed at Wikipedia:List of administrators, but I can't find a record of the nomination failing, nor can I imagine why it would. Are you an admin? If so, please add your name to the list. If not, why not and should I bother re-nominating you? Tuf-Kat 20:56, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Tuf-Kats talk page: [18]
Let me know if you want me to delete your userpage. Of course, you'll be able to delete yourself soon, hopefully. I moved the message Glenn6502 put there to just above this one. Tuf-Kat 03:22, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)
Figured I'd delete your user page, since you've been so vocal about wanting it to stay a red link on RfA. Let me know if you want the comment restored anyway ("well i need the address because i really need to contact them :) btw where do u live?" by 62.215.17.228). I was thinking what an irony it is that if you were an admin you could delete it yourself, but people object to you being an admin because you don't want a user page. Everyking 22:05, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Everykings talk page: [20]
I have made a start on her albums, uploaded album covers, putting in track listings etc. I have now got a dilemma.
She released a series of compilation albums with the same name: This Woman's Work Vol.s I & II and then released those 2 vols. as a This Woman's Work boxed set (96 tracks!). What should I do on the album page? Should I show the box set cover in the album box, with the complete list of tracks to the left, or should I have 2 wiki album boxes (vol. I & Vol. II - with appropriate track lists for each vol.) possible separated into two lvl 2 headings, followed by the third lvl 2 heading for the boxed set? If the latter, I assume that I won't need to add a track list unless it's different (I haven't checked yet). I lean towards the latter option but am ready to comply with 'procedure'. :=} -- Martin TB 14:01, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Martin TBs talk page: [21]
Reply originally made on Martin TBs talk page: [22]
Many Thanks -- Martin TB 10:59, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Martin TBs talk page: [23]
I posted questions about the albumbox template on the talk page. Thought you might be interested. -- Rick Block 15:05, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hi! You've been working on a lot of template footers, changing 'id=toc' to 'class="toccolours"'. I personally preferred the old light-blue background color, but that may be just because I was used to it. However, the change also expands the box vertically for some reason (on my browser at least), by putting lots more whitespace between lines of the table. Compare the old version of one page [24] with the new [25]. Is there some way to fix this? —wwoods 09:38, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Reply originally made on Wwoods talk page: [26]
p { margin: 0.4em 0em 0.5em 0em; line-height: 1.5em; }
#toc p { margin: 0 }
.toccolours p { margin: 0 }
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man ( comment| talk) 19:34, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes -- Tagishsimon (talk)
Template:Table suffixes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Table suffixes. Thank you. — Xiong 熊 talk * 10:40, 2005 May 25 (UTC)
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. It looks like you're not active anymore, but if you come back and are at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. I've marked you on this list as "inactve". Feel free to update this as well. Thanks. -- Rick Block ( talk) July 3, 2005 18:32 (UTC)