|
I've left a comment at commons. 89.243.33.170 ( talk) 10:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Please have a look at the SVG-file File:WidespreadWrongUsageOfRomanianDiacritics.PNG you've put in romanian alphabet and review it. It says that the "a", "s" and "t" letters are out of the romanian alphabet. Thank you 188.25.28.82 ( talk) 21:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
for the capital-form S- and T-diacritics with cedilla, as of Windows Vista, it will use the international standard iso/iec8859-2/1998. The capital letters bare unicode U+015E, U+0162.
The official romanian standard is SR13411-1999, "character set encoded for the romanian language" and assign diacritics with codes U+0218, U+021A, unicode compliant. These are each written using commas.
The use of lines in diacritics is incorect The use of curves is also incorrect The use of plain letters with no diacritics is tolerated, and it's done in respect to the english alphabet. Same goes for the small-form diacritics familly, 188.25.104.76 ( talk) 16:54, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
The vandal is back. -- Olahus ( talk) 20:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
This map is all well and good, except:
Some time ago it was decided (as part of the Romanian Wikiproject) to merge all the articles concerning the villages to the communes they belong to. Have a look here: Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedians'_notice_board/Archive10#Villages. I fully agree with the policy, since 1) the villages are just informal subdivisions of a commune, and 2) most of village articles would be stubs forever. I do admit that some villages are worth having their own articles, but in order to keep it consistent, I don't see anything wrong with describing a village within the article for its parent commune. Cheers, Mentatus ( talk) 21:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Geography Barnstar | |
For your extensive work on Latin Europe related maps 78.146.228.71 ( talk) 13:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC) |
I don't know what to say. It's just an esthetic effect, which adds nothing to the information. In heraldry science and in law texts, there are no such things as shadow and transparency. You'd better open a pool in each discussion page. -- Alex:D ( talk) 18:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
On this image, you have written "Germanic Europe". Germanic Europe is a different idea from "Germanic-speaking Europe", which is what the map that you have created, should be called. 78.149.218.56 ( talk) 10:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I see you've been making lots of great maps lately, and I congratulate you on that - you are possibly the best map-maker here. ;)
However, there's just a couple of things with this picture...
Cheers, and keep up the good work 78.147.159.55 ( talk) 21:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
It would be great if you would change your map of protestantism in Europe by making England Grey ,to keep consistent with the rest of Wikipedia and the protestantism Article that Anglicanism is a distict branch of Christianity, i will remove the map from the page until then, thank you-- Sfcongeredwards ( talk) 23:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you appear to be the main map-producer for the Germanic/Latin Europe articles. I would like to ask you, as a neutral party, since we are having some content disputes, what your view is on the placing of this map (or perhaps even your version) in the opening section of Germanic Peoples? Lingamondo ( talk) 14:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Greece is not in Western Europe, if this is not corrected I will request deletion due to inaccuracy. Izzedine ( talk) 06:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Greece is on the Balkan peninsula which is in Southeastern Europe, if this is not corrected I will request deletion due to inaccuracy. Izzedine ( talk) 06:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Britain and Ireland are in Northern Europe, if this is not corrected I will request deletion due to inaccuracy. Izzedine ( talk) 06:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Cyprus and Rhodes are geographically in Western Asia, if this is not corrected I will request deletion due to inaccuracy. Izzedine ( talk) 06:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Could you turn-on the email function? It's in the "my preferences tab" at the top of your screen. Once you turn it on you can send and receive email. Hobartimus ( talk) 13:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Scooter20, I'd like to comment on the map showing the geography of Slavic languages you uploaded to a number of Wikipedia articles. There are a number of inaccuracies which I'd like to point out to:
1. Russian is not spoken by a minority in Leningrad Region (around St Petersburg);
2. Russian is not spoken by a minority in areas between Moscow and St Petersburg;
3. According to a 1970 census 92.000 people claimed they were speakers of Karelian dialects while the overall population of the then Karelian Autonomous Socialist Republic was at 715.000 people. If you can provide updated data on that, that'll be fine. If we rely on the data I provided there is no way for Russian to be spoken by a minority in Karelia.
4. Russian is the native language of ethnic Russians in Estonia and Latvia who make up around 25 percent of Estonia's and Latvia's population respectively.
These are some of the inaccuracies I spotted in your map. If you claim to have a good knowledge of the geography of Slavic languages, please, be more accurate and edit your map. If you are not qualified enough, please do not upload inaccurate maps. Thank you. Denghu ( talk)
Hi there! I just mentioned the map about Albanian diaspora and its last version [ [1]] with some dots in Greece. Although there are Albanian speaking (bilingual) villages in nw Greece, Alb. speaking populations dont form a clear majority (in a municipicality or town) as far as i know. This map [ [2]], shows that there'snt an Albanian majority, in this region. Some sources would be in handy about the majority claim. Thank you. Alexikoua ( talk) 16:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
By the way, very nice map-job (according to Balkan related topics). Thanks too Alexikoua ( talk) 13:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for creating the map on the Albanian-inhabited areas ( AlbaniansOutsideAlbania.png). However, I do have concerns regarding the Albanians in Macedonia. There are regions where they constitute at least a significant minority and those should be added to the map to increase accuracy. I understand the vulnerability of the issue at stake; there is just too much nationalism in the Balkans to get honest work done, but I would suggest you consider foreign sources. A lot of Albanians live especially in Skopje, Kumanovo, and Struga; in the latter they may constitute a plurality if not a majority. Again, thank you for your contribution!-- Getoar TX ( talk) 02:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for updating the map. I am happy with the improvements, but I am unable to endorse them from a professional point of view. It is easier to tell whether something is missing, or it is exactly how it should be. Thank you again and keep up with the good work on Wikipedia!-- Getoar TX —Preceding undated comment added 09:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC).
Hello! The names of the cities on the map you have created do not parallel to wikipedi guidlines. Please fix them. The cities should be mentioned under their official names. Example: Debreţin should be changed to Debrecen "Bichişciaba" to Békéscsaba, Vârşeţ to Vršac, Vidin is ok, Cetatea Albă to Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi etc. Please check all names. Cheers, B@xter 9 14:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You added a move request tag on the description page of Romanian adi.png. Unfortunately, the requested moves page does not handle the renaming of files. See here for more information. I've re-uploaded the image as File:RomanianTerritories.png, changed the links to point to that location, and filed the old one for deletion at Files for deletion. Jafeluv ( talk) 11:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for correcting this map! It's much better now :) Ælfgar ( talk) 19:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
This is a image showing the number of cases in Romania. I you want please modify. Thanks! TouLouse ( talk) 16:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations with the map! Please allow me to point out some inconsistency concerning Belgium, however. Either the whole of Belgium should be highlighted in orange (since Dutch is co-official nationally), or Flanders should be highlighted in dark brown (since only Dutch is official there). Making Flanders orange and leaving Wallonia out would imply that French is also official in Flanders (but Dutch that is not co-official in the south), which is not correct. I suggest you make Flanders dark brown, since there actually is no language is official everywhere in Belgium (we have language areas). To be completely accurate, Brussels should be orange (since both languages are official there - and only there). I hope you will take my comments into account. Kind regards, -- Roofbird ( talk) 09:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Can you add the Russian-speaking minority in Estonia to this map please? They're in majority in the east, in Narva for instance 94% of the population consist of Russian speakers. Aaker ( talk) 16:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! I saw you made a map of distribution of ethnic Romanians in South-Eastern Europe, and I saw wondering if you can translate it in Romanian language so we can publish it on ro.wikipedia.org. and btw, I'm from Romania too :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Radu Gherasim ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Scooter20, HappyInGeneral has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the
WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Buna ziua, ma numesc Mihai si sunt pasionat de istoria Romaniei. As vrea sa va intreb daca ma puteti lamuri si pe mine cum pot face harti? In cazul in care doriti sa imi dati o mana de ajutor adresa mea de messenger este tyras1980@yahoo.com Va multumesc! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyras1980 ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Salut, mi-ar face placere sa putem vorbi pe messenger. Promit ca nu te stresez si ca nu iti voi rapi mult timp, adresa mea de messenger este tyras1980@yahoo.com Sarbatori fericite si un an nou plin de impliniri! Multumesc! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyras1980 ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:GreatestRomaniaInEurope.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ЛенинВладимир ( talk) 22:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC) ЛенинВладимир ( talk) 22:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add maps to articles that are absurd on their face. Such as you did here [4] [5]. By doing this You will discredit yourself and all the maps you create will be regarded as nonsense. I hope there is no need to explain what's wrong with that map. Hobartimus ( talk) 22:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
I just checked the Greater Romania Party article and it has an interesting map in it, titled "Greater Romania". This party is described in the article "is a Romanian ultra-nationalist political party, led by Corneliu Vadim Tudor" after comparing the map in the article with the maps you made it's interesting that your maps are much more "hardcore" than the Greater Romania Party map in that it includes much more territory as was pointed out earlier. This is territory that even the Greater Romania Party considers as not being part of "Greater Romania". I just thought I point this out to you, as being an interesting fact. Here is the map in question [10]. Hobartimus ( talk) 03:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Happy New Year Scooter20! Please read my answer.-- ЛенинВладимир ( talk) 18:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
In that map you try to impose your own counter-factual POV, contradicted by the self-identification of those people, that "Romanians", "Moldovans" and "Vlachs" are the same. The manipulation of the sources to support your original POV is in clear breach of WP:SYNTH. Please understand that WP is not about promoting the peculiar nationalist ideas of Romanians, Hungarians or Hindutvadis, it's about building an encyclopaedia in the spirit of NPOV, and most importantly supported by reliable sources, not based on what may be considered in your entourage "common knowledge".
PS: The fact that WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not an argument. Anonimu ( talk) 15:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beius Loc.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 23:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 18:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
BTW, great maps! Regards! -- Codrin.B ( talk) 18:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, greetings. As Romanian you may haven't found all Bulgarian important cities and towns, I have already add in the article 3 Bulgarian towns bigger than the last taken ( Karnobat, Pomorie, Nesebar) and two smaller than it ( Kavarna and Balchik), if you want you may add them in your map. For Constanta as bigger, Varna is not more smaller than Constanta without city limits (330,486 compared to 302,040) and as the two largest cities of Bulgaria and Romania in the region you may take them with equal mark. I don't know is Constanta now second in Romania, but Varna now is second in Bulgaria. Pensionero ( talk) 22:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Berg Computers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the
the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you.
Gurt Posh (
talk)
19:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beius COA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 14:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm really amazed of your works. Especially the one about Armenians is particularly valuable for me, myself being Armenian.
So what I wanted to tell you is that i'm trying to improve the article called Greater Armenia (political concept) and I wanted to use this map, but I noticed some problems.
So, I would like to ask you to make another map. I can’t because when I try to erase “Greatest extent of the Kingdom of Armenia”, I have some problems. So I would like to ask you to make a new map with following changes to the old one:
So you have to add 2 regions – Nakhichevan and Northern Artsakh So I need a map looking almost like this. ( http://i012.radikal.ru/1109/bd/840bdb17db45.jpg) I would really be thankful. -- Yerevanci ( talk) 23:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I want a new map.
Yes, please, because it really doesn't have anything to do ith modern United/Greater Armenia idea. Although, it is for the Armenians article.
Yeah, please.
I would be really thankful. -- Yerevanci ( talk) 11:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Done, I think I addressed all your requests and also fix the map a bit here and there!
And let me know what you think!
Here's my draft. http://s45.radikal.ru/i110/1109/21/0ddaa2f2c383.jpg
(Sources:
File:Bevölkerungsverteilung Ostmitteleuropa um 1918.jpg
or
or
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yerevanci (
talk •
contribs)
23:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Scooter20, I really appreciate your work. And I'm little ashamed to ask you to make another map. So, I'll ask you to make it whenever you have time, and whenever you want. And thank you in advance.
My draft: http://s06.radikal.ru/i179/1109/b0/5aea8419e408.jpg
http://www.iriston.com/books/cuciev_-_etno_atlas/maps/map37.jpg
http://www.ecmicaucasus.org/maps/ETHNIC_MAP_of_Georgia.jpg
File:Ethnic Groups Turkey123.png
-- Yerevanci ( talk) 18:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Scooter20, thank you again. I think it's just perfect. Thank you again. I think this should be the last one :)-- Yerevanci ( talk) 13:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Would you please change the colours on the map so they are more distinct. There have been complaints that the map is wrong because people don't see the difference between the mid-green and light-green. — Coroboy ( talk) 12:36, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
What were you thinking of? — kwami ( talk) 08:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beius Loc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Scooter!!! So, I've been trying to edit Greater Serbia and I wanted to make a new map which would show the distribution of Serbs in Yugoslavia in 1981 (according to the census) and the areas controlled by Serb forces in 1992-1995. I think it would be interesting to show how much of the controlled area was inhabited by the Serbs.
By using this two ( Serbs in Yugoslavia (1981) and Ethnic map of Montenegro according to the 1981 census.) maps I drew a new map which shows the distribution of Serbs and Montenegrins in Serbia, Kosovo, Croatia, Bosnia and Montenegro.
This map shows the areas controlled by Serb forces in 1992-1995.
So, could you make a new map that would show both distribution of Serbs (and Montenegrins, because they are so close to Serbs) and areas controlled by the Serb forces in 1992-1995?-- Yerevanci ( talk) 20:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 04:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to congratulate you on your works and maps that you've made over the years. I have noticed this ethnic map you made.
I was wondering whether you could correct the areas in Ukraine as per the latest censa and get rid of the 'green shade' about Greater Romania as they may be interpreted as irredentist and then the map could perhaps be used in articles dealing with Romanians and the areas they inhabit. Dapiks ( talk) 19:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
It looks much better! Thanks for that! Regarding the historical map of all the Vlachs, I would start with the references/external links already present in the articles like Vlachs, Moravian Wallachia and others in the Category:Eastern Romance people etc. as well as look at commons:Category:Maps of the Vlachs. It is not an easy feat, and I'll try to help as well, but it would be quite a unique work. I haven't seen such a comprehensive map anywhere, but I'll look for examples. I would also suggest you chat with commons:User:Asybaris01 and commons:User:Spiridon Ion Cepleanu unless you already done it. They are working on similar maps/topics, know many sources and are great to collaborate with. Also I suggest to move most of map related conversations on commons talk pages as it is where the mentioned users are more active, is more relevant for the maps and the use of other languages is encouraged.-- Codrin.B ( talk) 21:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, could you make Serb inhabited Balkan areas map as you have done with the Romanian map? thanks Drax90 ( talk) 17:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey i have posted a reply in case you didnt notice it on my page :) Drax90 ( talk) 13:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I reverted your edit because one of the potential title holders (Bayern Munich) have already qualified for the group stage. If they win, their place in the group stage will be transferred to Belgian champions Anderlecht (see 2012–13 UEFA Champions League#Distribution for details). Hence the flags insert an inaccuracy which may confuse readers. -- Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 13:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Could you correct Szecin to Szczecin? BartekChom ( talk) 20:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Could you update the map Islam in Europe [11] adding Muslim population in Montenegro based on this map [12] and also removing the eastern orthodox [13] population from some Montenegrin territories. The map of montenegro is based on 2011 census. Also could you update this map [14] with some informatios from this [15]. With respect -- Ammartivari ( talk) 21:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 05:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CarpatEuroreg.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I was wondering...Look at the map of Europe (complete one): http://todayinsocialsciences.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/wednesday-october-272010.html Don't you think that Romania is actually not in the crossroads between Central and Southeastern Europe but actually between central Europe and the Balkan region of southern Europe (not necessarily sooutheastern geographically - southern Russia, Georgia and Armenia would be, but nor Romania)? Do Romanians consider themselves southeastern Eurpean? It would be irrational if they would -- 81.100.242.0 ( talk) 00:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
There is no colouring of the Orthodox community in Croatia in your map ( File:OrthodoxyInEurope.png), which is widespread: File:Croatia-Religion-2001.png.-- Zoupan 20:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Josani.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Scooter20. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scooter20.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 00:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Scooter20. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:EasternOrthodoxyInEurope.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ~
Rob13
Talk
16:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Scooter20. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Could you add a version of the Romania timeline map that starts in 1850, ie to show the borders of Wallachia and Moldovia. A fuller timeline would be good from even longer before too — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.186.70.147 ( talk) 02:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
I like the maps you have made! Super Ψ Dro 16:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC) |
The file File:RomanCatholicismEurope.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused map with no clear encyclopedic purpose
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Logan
Talk
Contributions
19:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
|
I've left a comment at commons. 89.243.33.170 ( talk) 10:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Please have a look at the SVG-file File:WidespreadWrongUsageOfRomanianDiacritics.PNG you've put in romanian alphabet and review it. It says that the "a", "s" and "t" letters are out of the romanian alphabet. Thank you 188.25.28.82 ( talk) 21:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
for the capital-form S- and T-diacritics with cedilla, as of Windows Vista, it will use the international standard iso/iec8859-2/1998. The capital letters bare unicode U+015E, U+0162.
The official romanian standard is SR13411-1999, "character set encoded for the romanian language" and assign diacritics with codes U+0218, U+021A, unicode compliant. These are each written using commas.
The use of lines in diacritics is incorect The use of curves is also incorrect The use of plain letters with no diacritics is tolerated, and it's done in respect to the english alphabet. Same goes for the small-form diacritics familly, 188.25.104.76 ( talk) 16:54, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
The vandal is back. -- Olahus ( talk) 20:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
This map is all well and good, except:
Some time ago it was decided (as part of the Romanian Wikiproject) to merge all the articles concerning the villages to the communes they belong to. Have a look here: Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedians'_notice_board/Archive10#Villages. I fully agree with the policy, since 1) the villages are just informal subdivisions of a commune, and 2) most of village articles would be stubs forever. I do admit that some villages are worth having their own articles, but in order to keep it consistent, I don't see anything wrong with describing a village within the article for its parent commune. Cheers, Mentatus ( talk) 21:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Geography Barnstar | |
For your extensive work on Latin Europe related maps 78.146.228.71 ( talk) 13:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC) |
I don't know what to say. It's just an esthetic effect, which adds nothing to the information. In heraldry science and in law texts, there are no such things as shadow and transparency. You'd better open a pool in each discussion page. -- Alex:D ( talk) 18:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
On this image, you have written "Germanic Europe". Germanic Europe is a different idea from "Germanic-speaking Europe", which is what the map that you have created, should be called. 78.149.218.56 ( talk) 10:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I see you've been making lots of great maps lately, and I congratulate you on that - you are possibly the best map-maker here. ;)
However, there's just a couple of things with this picture...
Cheers, and keep up the good work 78.147.159.55 ( talk) 21:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
It would be great if you would change your map of protestantism in Europe by making England Grey ,to keep consistent with the rest of Wikipedia and the protestantism Article that Anglicanism is a distict branch of Christianity, i will remove the map from the page until then, thank you-- Sfcongeredwards ( talk) 23:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you appear to be the main map-producer for the Germanic/Latin Europe articles. I would like to ask you, as a neutral party, since we are having some content disputes, what your view is on the placing of this map (or perhaps even your version) in the opening section of Germanic Peoples? Lingamondo ( talk) 14:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Greece is not in Western Europe, if this is not corrected I will request deletion due to inaccuracy. Izzedine ( talk) 06:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Greece is on the Balkan peninsula which is in Southeastern Europe, if this is not corrected I will request deletion due to inaccuracy. Izzedine ( talk) 06:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Britain and Ireland are in Northern Europe, if this is not corrected I will request deletion due to inaccuracy. Izzedine ( talk) 06:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Cyprus and Rhodes are geographically in Western Asia, if this is not corrected I will request deletion due to inaccuracy. Izzedine ( talk) 06:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Could you turn-on the email function? It's in the "my preferences tab" at the top of your screen. Once you turn it on you can send and receive email. Hobartimus ( talk) 13:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Scooter20, I'd like to comment on the map showing the geography of Slavic languages you uploaded to a number of Wikipedia articles. There are a number of inaccuracies which I'd like to point out to:
1. Russian is not spoken by a minority in Leningrad Region (around St Petersburg);
2. Russian is not spoken by a minority in areas between Moscow and St Petersburg;
3. According to a 1970 census 92.000 people claimed they were speakers of Karelian dialects while the overall population of the then Karelian Autonomous Socialist Republic was at 715.000 people. If you can provide updated data on that, that'll be fine. If we rely on the data I provided there is no way for Russian to be spoken by a minority in Karelia.
4. Russian is the native language of ethnic Russians in Estonia and Latvia who make up around 25 percent of Estonia's and Latvia's population respectively.
These are some of the inaccuracies I spotted in your map. If you claim to have a good knowledge of the geography of Slavic languages, please, be more accurate and edit your map. If you are not qualified enough, please do not upload inaccurate maps. Thank you. Denghu ( talk)
Hi there! I just mentioned the map about Albanian diaspora and its last version [ [1]] with some dots in Greece. Although there are Albanian speaking (bilingual) villages in nw Greece, Alb. speaking populations dont form a clear majority (in a municipicality or town) as far as i know. This map [ [2]], shows that there'snt an Albanian majority, in this region. Some sources would be in handy about the majority claim. Thank you. Alexikoua ( talk) 16:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
By the way, very nice map-job (according to Balkan related topics). Thanks too Alexikoua ( talk) 13:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for creating the map on the Albanian-inhabited areas ( AlbaniansOutsideAlbania.png). However, I do have concerns regarding the Albanians in Macedonia. There are regions where they constitute at least a significant minority and those should be added to the map to increase accuracy. I understand the vulnerability of the issue at stake; there is just too much nationalism in the Balkans to get honest work done, but I would suggest you consider foreign sources. A lot of Albanians live especially in Skopje, Kumanovo, and Struga; in the latter they may constitute a plurality if not a majority. Again, thank you for your contribution!-- Getoar TX ( talk) 02:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for updating the map. I am happy with the improvements, but I am unable to endorse them from a professional point of view. It is easier to tell whether something is missing, or it is exactly how it should be. Thank you again and keep up with the good work on Wikipedia!-- Getoar TX —Preceding undated comment added 09:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC).
Hello! The names of the cities on the map you have created do not parallel to wikipedi guidlines. Please fix them. The cities should be mentioned under their official names. Example: Debreţin should be changed to Debrecen "Bichişciaba" to Békéscsaba, Vârşeţ to Vršac, Vidin is ok, Cetatea Albă to Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi etc. Please check all names. Cheers, B@xter 9 14:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You added a move request tag on the description page of Romanian adi.png. Unfortunately, the requested moves page does not handle the renaming of files. See here for more information. I've re-uploaded the image as File:RomanianTerritories.png, changed the links to point to that location, and filed the old one for deletion at Files for deletion. Jafeluv ( talk) 11:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for correcting this map! It's much better now :) Ælfgar ( talk) 19:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
This is a image showing the number of cases in Romania. I you want please modify. Thanks! TouLouse ( talk) 16:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations with the map! Please allow me to point out some inconsistency concerning Belgium, however. Either the whole of Belgium should be highlighted in orange (since Dutch is co-official nationally), or Flanders should be highlighted in dark brown (since only Dutch is official there). Making Flanders orange and leaving Wallonia out would imply that French is also official in Flanders (but Dutch that is not co-official in the south), which is not correct. I suggest you make Flanders dark brown, since there actually is no language is official everywhere in Belgium (we have language areas). To be completely accurate, Brussels should be orange (since both languages are official there - and only there). I hope you will take my comments into account. Kind regards, -- Roofbird ( talk) 09:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Can you add the Russian-speaking minority in Estonia to this map please? They're in majority in the east, in Narva for instance 94% of the population consist of Russian speakers. Aaker ( talk) 16:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! I saw you made a map of distribution of ethnic Romanians in South-Eastern Europe, and I saw wondering if you can translate it in Romanian language so we can publish it on ro.wikipedia.org. and btw, I'm from Romania too :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Radu Gherasim ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Scooter20, HappyInGeneral has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the
WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Buna ziua, ma numesc Mihai si sunt pasionat de istoria Romaniei. As vrea sa va intreb daca ma puteti lamuri si pe mine cum pot face harti? In cazul in care doriti sa imi dati o mana de ajutor adresa mea de messenger este tyras1980@yahoo.com Va multumesc! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyras1980 ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Salut, mi-ar face placere sa putem vorbi pe messenger. Promit ca nu te stresez si ca nu iti voi rapi mult timp, adresa mea de messenger este tyras1980@yahoo.com Sarbatori fericite si un an nou plin de impliniri! Multumesc! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyras1980 ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:GreatestRomaniaInEurope.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ЛенинВладимир ( talk) 22:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC) ЛенинВладимир ( talk) 22:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add maps to articles that are absurd on their face. Such as you did here [4] [5]. By doing this You will discredit yourself and all the maps you create will be regarded as nonsense. I hope there is no need to explain what's wrong with that map. Hobartimus ( talk) 22:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
I just checked the Greater Romania Party article and it has an interesting map in it, titled "Greater Romania". This party is described in the article "is a Romanian ultra-nationalist political party, led by Corneliu Vadim Tudor" after comparing the map in the article with the maps you made it's interesting that your maps are much more "hardcore" than the Greater Romania Party map in that it includes much more territory as was pointed out earlier. This is territory that even the Greater Romania Party considers as not being part of "Greater Romania". I just thought I point this out to you, as being an interesting fact. Here is the map in question [10]. Hobartimus ( talk) 03:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Happy New Year Scooter20! Please read my answer.-- ЛенинВладимир ( talk) 18:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
In that map you try to impose your own counter-factual POV, contradicted by the self-identification of those people, that "Romanians", "Moldovans" and "Vlachs" are the same. The manipulation of the sources to support your original POV is in clear breach of WP:SYNTH. Please understand that WP is not about promoting the peculiar nationalist ideas of Romanians, Hungarians or Hindutvadis, it's about building an encyclopaedia in the spirit of NPOV, and most importantly supported by reliable sources, not based on what may be considered in your entourage "common knowledge".
PS: The fact that WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not an argument. Anonimu ( talk) 15:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beius Loc.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 23:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 18:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
BTW, great maps! Regards! -- Codrin.B ( talk) 18:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, greetings. As Romanian you may haven't found all Bulgarian important cities and towns, I have already add in the article 3 Bulgarian towns bigger than the last taken ( Karnobat, Pomorie, Nesebar) and two smaller than it ( Kavarna and Balchik), if you want you may add them in your map. For Constanta as bigger, Varna is not more smaller than Constanta without city limits (330,486 compared to 302,040) and as the two largest cities of Bulgaria and Romania in the region you may take them with equal mark. I don't know is Constanta now second in Romania, but Varna now is second in Bulgaria. Pensionero ( talk) 22:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Berg Computers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the
the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you.
Gurt Posh (
talk)
19:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beius COA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Drilnoth ( T/ C) 14:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm really amazed of your works. Especially the one about Armenians is particularly valuable for me, myself being Armenian.
So what I wanted to tell you is that i'm trying to improve the article called Greater Armenia (political concept) and I wanted to use this map, but I noticed some problems.
So, I would like to ask you to make another map. I can’t because when I try to erase “Greatest extent of the Kingdom of Armenia”, I have some problems. So I would like to ask you to make a new map with following changes to the old one:
So you have to add 2 regions – Nakhichevan and Northern Artsakh So I need a map looking almost like this. ( http://i012.radikal.ru/1109/bd/840bdb17db45.jpg) I would really be thankful. -- Yerevanci ( talk) 23:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I want a new map.
Yes, please, because it really doesn't have anything to do ith modern United/Greater Armenia idea. Although, it is for the Armenians article.
Yeah, please.
I would be really thankful. -- Yerevanci ( talk) 11:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Done, I think I addressed all your requests and also fix the map a bit here and there!
And let me know what you think!
Here's my draft. http://s45.radikal.ru/i110/1109/21/0ddaa2f2c383.jpg
(Sources:
File:Bevölkerungsverteilung Ostmitteleuropa um 1918.jpg
or
or
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yerevanci (
talk •
contribs)
23:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Scooter20, I really appreciate your work. And I'm little ashamed to ask you to make another map. So, I'll ask you to make it whenever you have time, and whenever you want. And thank you in advance.
My draft: http://s06.radikal.ru/i179/1109/b0/5aea8419e408.jpg
http://www.iriston.com/books/cuciev_-_etno_atlas/maps/map37.jpg
http://www.ecmicaucasus.org/maps/ETHNIC_MAP_of_Georgia.jpg
File:Ethnic Groups Turkey123.png
-- Yerevanci ( talk) 18:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Scooter20, thank you again. I think it's just perfect. Thank you again. I think this should be the last one :)-- Yerevanci ( talk) 13:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Would you please change the colours on the map so they are more distinct. There have been complaints that the map is wrong because people don't see the difference between the mid-green and light-green. — Coroboy ( talk) 12:36, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
What were you thinking of? — kwami ( talk) 08:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beius Loc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Scooter!!! So, I've been trying to edit Greater Serbia and I wanted to make a new map which would show the distribution of Serbs in Yugoslavia in 1981 (according to the census) and the areas controlled by Serb forces in 1992-1995. I think it would be interesting to show how much of the controlled area was inhabited by the Serbs.
By using this two ( Serbs in Yugoslavia (1981) and Ethnic map of Montenegro according to the 1981 census.) maps I drew a new map which shows the distribution of Serbs and Montenegrins in Serbia, Kosovo, Croatia, Bosnia and Montenegro.
This map shows the areas controlled by Serb forces in 1992-1995.
So, could you make a new map that would show both distribution of Serbs (and Montenegrins, because they are so close to Serbs) and areas controlled by the Serb forces in 1992-1995?-- Yerevanci ( talk) 20:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 04:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to congratulate you on your works and maps that you've made over the years. I have noticed this ethnic map you made.
I was wondering whether you could correct the areas in Ukraine as per the latest censa and get rid of the 'green shade' about Greater Romania as they may be interpreted as irredentist and then the map could perhaps be used in articles dealing with Romanians and the areas they inhabit. Dapiks ( talk) 19:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
It looks much better! Thanks for that! Regarding the historical map of all the Vlachs, I would start with the references/external links already present in the articles like Vlachs, Moravian Wallachia and others in the Category:Eastern Romance people etc. as well as look at commons:Category:Maps of the Vlachs. It is not an easy feat, and I'll try to help as well, but it would be quite a unique work. I haven't seen such a comprehensive map anywhere, but I'll look for examples. I would also suggest you chat with commons:User:Asybaris01 and commons:User:Spiridon Ion Cepleanu unless you already done it. They are working on similar maps/topics, know many sources and are great to collaborate with. Also I suggest to move most of map related conversations on commons talk pages as it is where the mentioned users are more active, is more relevant for the maps and the use of other languages is encouraged.-- Codrin.B ( talk) 21:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, could you make Serb inhabited Balkan areas map as you have done with the Romanian map? thanks Drax90 ( talk) 17:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey i have posted a reply in case you didnt notice it on my page :) Drax90 ( talk) 13:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I reverted your edit because one of the potential title holders (Bayern Munich) have already qualified for the group stage. If they win, their place in the group stage will be transferred to Belgian champions Anderlecht (see 2012–13 UEFA Champions League#Distribution for details). Hence the flags insert an inaccuracy which may confuse readers. -- Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 13:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Could you correct Szecin to Szczecin? BartekChom ( talk) 20:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Could you update the map Islam in Europe [11] adding Muslim population in Montenegro based on this map [12] and also removing the eastern orthodox [13] population from some Montenegrin territories. The map of montenegro is based on 2011 census. Also could you update this map [14] with some informatios from this [15]. With respect -- Ammartivari ( talk) 21:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 05:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CarpatEuroreg.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I was wondering...Look at the map of Europe (complete one): http://todayinsocialsciences.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/wednesday-october-272010.html Don't you think that Romania is actually not in the crossroads between Central and Southeastern Europe but actually between central Europe and the Balkan region of southern Europe (not necessarily sooutheastern geographically - southern Russia, Georgia and Armenia would be, but nor Romania)? Do Romanians consider themselves southeastern Eurpean? It would be irrational if they would -- 81.100.242.0 ( talk) 00:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
There is no colouring of the Orthodox community in Croatia in your map ( File:OrthodoxyInEurope.png), which is widespread: File:Croatia-Religion-2001.png.-- Zoupan 20:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Josani.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound ( talk) 22:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Scooter20. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scooter20.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 00:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Scooter20. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:EasternOrthodoxyInEurope.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ~
Rob13
Talk
16:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Scooter20. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Could you add a version of the Romania timeline map that starts in 1850, ie to show the borders of Wallachia and Moldovia. A fuller timeline would be good from even longer before too — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.186.70.147 ( talk) 02:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
I like the maps you have made! Super Ψ Dro 16:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC) |
The file File:RomanCatholicismEurope.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused map with no clear encyclopedic purpose
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Logan
Talk
Contributions
19:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)