Welcome!
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask at the Village pump, or feel free to ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Refault 07:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Please give your reasons why the Large and Small section should stay on the talk page. I made mine clear there and received no reasons why it should stay for three days, so I got rid of it. I am also puzzled as to why you keep reverting people's edits where they fix spelling mistakes and rephrase the article so it makes more sense. Specifically, this. -- Steel 14:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the reverts on my talk page from that vandal you are trying to block, but the blanking was my own doing. Ryulong 21:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
The page has been deleted, as you requested. (aeropagitica) (talk) 08:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
The developers of AWB just released their latest updated today with some requested features, including the skipping of image names and external links. Just wanted to let you know I checked about 100 edits and all your concerns have hopefully been addressed. Cheers =D -- mboverload @ 08:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Why do you keep adding that unverifiable, and false information to the end of the Objection article? 80.47.201.92 03:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you reversed my edit to Wumpscut:. Specifically, undoing my change of the Template:Wrongtitle message to Template:Namespace. According to Naming Conventions, Namespace seems to be the appropriate message to use. Or am I missing something? -- kenb215 01:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Schicksal. I reverted the deletion you did on the Clan TDA section in the Allstars article. Let's discuss it at Talk:DotA_Allstars. Also, I noticed you changed the intro of Defense of the Ancients from "including DotA Allstars" to "the most popular of which is DotA Allstars. citation needed". I agree with you that Allstars is probably the most popular variant of DotA. But I think that this is a claim which is nearly impossible to verify. Adding the fact template won't change that - it will never get a citation. If it can't get a citation, I think it is better to remove it as per http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046433.html and WP:V#Burden_of_evidence. An alternative would be to say something like "Many people believe DotA Allstars to be the most popular variant.." which is something that can be verified. But that sort of statement belongs in the DotA Allstars article I think, not the DotA article. -- JRavn talk 19:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask at the Village pump, or feel free to ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Refault 07:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Please give your reasons why the Large and Small section should stay on the talk page. I made mine clear there and received no reasons why it should stay for three days, so I got rid of it. I am also puzzled as to why you keep reverting people's edits where they fix spelling mistakes and rephrase the article so it makes more sense. Specifically, this. -- Steel 14:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the reverts on my talk page from that vandal you are trying to block, but the blanking was my own doing. Ryulong 21:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
The page has been deleted, as you requested. (aeropagitica) (talk) 08:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
The developers of AWB just released their latest updated today with some requested features, including the skipping of image names and external links. Just wanted to let you know I checked about 100 edits and all your concerns have hopefully been addressed. Cheers =D -- mboverload @ 08:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Why do you keep adding that unverifiable, and false information to the end of the Objection article? 80.47.201.92 03:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you reversed my edit to Wumpscut:. Specifically, undoing my change of the Template:Wrongtitle message to Template:Namespace. According to Naming Conventions, Namespace seems to be the appropriate message to use. Or am I missing something? -- kenb215 01:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Schicksal. I reverted the deletion you did on the Clan TDA section in the Allstars article. Let's discuss it at Talk:DotA_Allstars. Also, I noticed you changed the intro of Defense of the Ancients from "including DotA Allstars" to "the most popular of which is DotA Allstars. citation needed". I agree with you that Allstars is probably the most popular variant of DotA. But I think that this is a claim which is nearly impossible to verify. Adding the fact template won't change that - it will never get a citation. If it can't get a citation, I think it is better to remove it as per http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046433.html and WP:V#Burden_of_evidence. An alternative would be to say something like "Many people believe DotA Allstars to be the most popular variant.." which is something that can be verified. But that sort of statement belongs in the DotA Allstars article I think, not the DotA article. -- JRavn talk 19:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)