|
I left the old format at the bottom just until the endorsements that have been added in the past few days since I had saved the article text to begin work on it can be added into the new format.
I listed them in groups by letter as opposed to one large group to make it easier searching for a name when editing to add a new endorsement, though if we eliminate the sections and make it all one, the whole list could be sorted by type of SD wether a Gov, Sen, Rep or DNC Member. ( Tjliles2007 ( talk) 22:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC))
Ya once you sort by a specific column you cant get back to the whole list alpha unless you just refresh the page. ( Tjliles2007 ( talk) 23:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC))
I noticed you updated some endorsements from the old format to the new... are they all done now? ( Tjliles2007 ( talk) 22:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC))
Thanks for your comments at Talk:Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008. I'm trying to move us quickly toward consensus on the Texas issue. Please vote here: Talk:Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008#Moving Toward Consensus. Thanks! Northwesterner1 ( talk) 08:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. -- Bouchecl ( talk) 05:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to differ but add-on delegate pre date the superdelegats. Superdeleagtes (or PLEO delegates) were first created for the 1984 primary season. Add on delegates pre date this and botht the Demoratic and Republican parties have them. I'm afraid the facts are not on your side here. I understand why people don;t want them removed from the list so I have instead changed the name of the list to match it's actually content. I think this is a good solution.-- Dr who1975 ( talk) 13:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
P.S. just reading over some of your comments... there are comments on that very blog regarding this specific issue... a user named Mark asked them to differentiate between add ons and superdelegates... this blog only supports what I'm saying.-- Dr who1975 ( talk) 14:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Where did you get that from? My biggest concern was the title of the article. P.S. stop opening new sections in the discussion.-- Dr who1975 ( talk) 21:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey Scantron2. This "vote" that has been started doesn't follow the rules of dispute resolution. I do not want uniformed people weighing in on this issue... we need to use an alternate source of dispute resolution. Where both sides make a 1 or 2 sentence summary of their points and a neutral party decides.-- Dr who1975 ( talk) 20:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
My pleasure.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Four things.
Again, it was my pleasure. Mouse is back 21:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Scantron2. I just wanted to let you know that on Talk:Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008#Highlighting cells the earlier consensus to highlight cells based on the candidate with the highest popular vote is being revisited. -- Bryan H Bell ( talk) 17:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
I left the old format at the bottom just until the endorsements that have been added in the past few days since I had saved the article text to begin work on it can be added into the new format.
I listed them in groups by letter as opposed to one large group to make it easier searching for a name when editing to add a new endorsement, though if we eliminate the sections and make it all one, the whole list could be sorted by type of SD wether a Gov, Sen, Rep or DNC Member. ( Tjliles2007 ( talk) 22:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC))
Ya once you sort by a specific column you cant get back to the whole list alpha unless you just refresh the page. ( Tjliles2007 ( talk) 23:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC))
I noticed you updated some endorsements from the old format to the new... are they all done now? ( Tjliles2007 ( talk) 22:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC))
Thanks for your comments at Talk:Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008. I'm trying to move us quickly toward consensus on the Texas issue. Please vote here: Talk:Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008#Moving Toward Consensus. Thanks! Northwesterner1 ( talk) 08:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. -- Bouchecl ( talk) 05:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to differ but add-on delegate pre date the superdelegats. Superdeleagtes (or PLEO delegates) were first created for the 1984 primary season. Add on delegates pre date this and botht the Demoratic and Republican parties have them. I'm afraid the facts are not on your side here. I understand why people don;t want them removed from the list so I have instead changed the name of the list to match it's actually content. I think this is a good solution.-- Dr who1975 ( talk) 13:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
P.S. just reading over some of your comments... there are comments on that very blog regarding this specific issue... a user named Mark asked them to differentiate between add ons and superdelegates... this blog only supports what I'm saying.-- Dr who1975 ( talk) 14:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Where did you get that from? My biggest concern was the title of the article. P.S. stop opening new sections in the discussion.-- Dr who1975 ( talk) 21:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey Scantron2. This "vote" that has been started doesn't follow the rules of dispute resolution. I do not want uniformed people weighing in on this issue... we need to use an alternate source of dispute resolution. Where both sides make a 1 or 2 sentence summary of their points and a neutral party decides.-- Dr who1975 ( talk) 20:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
My pleasure.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Four things.
Again, it was my pleasure. Mouse is back 21:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Scantron2. I just wanted to let you know that on Talk:Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008#Highlighting cells the earlier consensus to highlight cells based on the candidate with the highest popular vote is being revisited. -- Bryan H Bell ( talk) 17:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)