 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk) 00:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC) |
Sbhatt ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Kindly tell me why am I blocked ? I had given enough resources for the edits I made on the Communist Party of India(Marxist-Leninist)Liberation page . And I didn't evade any rules. Sbhatt ( talk) 15:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; no reason given to consider unblocking. The block is clearly explained, above. Yamla ( talk) 15:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
hi Yamla, kindly riview the last edit I made. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Communist_Party_of_India_(Marxist%E2%80%93Leninist)_Liberation&oldid=751301947
did I do any violation? I have given enough references and did not copy a single text from anywhere. kindly riview what violation did I do. The charge of sock block is not right too. please check the last edits made by Samyab502. and compare it with the edits I made. Thank you.
Sbhatt (
talk) 16:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, Samyab502 has (essentially) confirmed the violation of WP:MEAT. -- Yamla ( talk) 16:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
I read the rule: WP:MEAT. Thanks for the replys. Atleast i can communicate with you right? The administrator who blocked samyab502 that is Diannaa never replys.This makes us the new users like me and my friend samyab502 much more confused. Is there any way that this can be resolved? Sorry for everything. Hope you understand where is the problem. My friend was not able to communicate with Diannaa since she never replied.she just gave one advice that is to add more resource and thats what i did for samyab502. Please advice if there is any way to resolve this issue.Thank you. Sbhatt ( talk) 19:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Sbhatt ( talk) 19:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have replied at User talk:Samyab502. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 22:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
hello, finally you replied. Thanks for your response. hope you can help in getting some advice for how to resolve this problem. I hope you will be help full to samyab502 too. Kindly check the last edit made by me. I assure you that you will find not a single copyright violation. and I have given as much resource I can, cited to many lines that I wrote. Thank you. Sbhatt ( talk) 12:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The last two edits, from 2016-11-24, are indeed copyright violations. It looks to me like you have taken the content from your citation and simply reworded it a little. It's not enough to simply reword it. Additionally, you have been editing on behalf of your friend who was blocked at the time. That's not permitted. Now, Wikipedia's policies on copyright and fair use are very stringent and can be hard to follow. There's not necessarily a clear line between citing content and violating copyright. I'd be happy to go into more detail if you are unsure, here. -- Yamla ( talk) 16:10, 26 November 2016
thanks for replying again. Yes I did so. I reworded it because if I copy it you will say its copyright violation and if I right it entirely myself you will say absence of proper citation. You will remove it and say "Remove off-topic material, unsourced material"(see the edits of 19-11-16)Yes I will be really grateful if you can help me out of this. Please tell me in more detail. Thank you for taking your time and communicating with me. Thank you very much . :) Sbhatt ( talk) 18:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Yamla . Kindy help me to understand in detail as you said in your last reply that you will be happy to help me.And I will really remain greatful to you for such a help about this critical issue of the difference between citation and copyright . I am eagerly waiting for your help. Thank you. Sbhatt ( talk) 21:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Sbhatt ( talk) 21:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk) 00:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC) |
Sbhatt ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Kindly tell me why am I blocked ? I had given enough resources for the edits I made on the Communist Party of India(Marxist-Leninist)Liberation page . And I didn't evade any rules. Sbhatt ( talk) 15:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; no reason given to consider unblocking. The block is clearly explained, above. Yamla ( talk) 15:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
hi Yamla, kindly riview the last edit I made. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Communist_Party_of_India_(Marxist%E2%80%93Leninist)_Liberation&oldid=751301947
did I do any violation? I have given enough references and did not copy a single text from anywhere. kindly riview what violation did I do. The charge of sock block is not right too. please check the last edits made by Samyab502. and compare it with the edits I made. Thank you.
Sbhatt (
talk) 16:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, Samyab502 has (essentially) confirmed the violation of WP:MEAT. -- Yamla ( talk) 16:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
I read the rule: WP:MEAT. Thanks for the replys. Atleast i can communicate with you right? The administrator who blocked samyab502 that is Diannaa never replys.This makes us the new users like me and my friend samyab502 much more confused. Is there any way that this can be resolved? Sorry for everything. Hope you understand where is the problem. My friend was not able to communicate with Diannaa since she never replied.she just gave one advice that is to add more resource and thats what i did for samyab502. Please advice if there is any way to resolve this issue.Thank you. Sbhatt ( talk) 19:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Sbhatt ( talk) 19:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have replied at User talk:Samyab502. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 22:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
hello, finally you replied. Thanks for your response. hope you can help in getting some advice for how to resolve this problem. I hope you will be help full to samyab502 too. Kindly check the last edit made by me. I assure you that you will find not a single copyright violation. and I have given as much resource I can, cited to many lines that I wrote. Thank you. Sbhatt ( talk) 12:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The last two edits, from 2016-11-24, are indeed copyright violations. It looks to me like you have taken the content from your citation and simply reworded it a little. It's not enough to simply reword it. Additionally, you have been editing on behalf of your friend who was blocked at the time. That's not permitted. Now, Wikipedia's policies on copyright and fair use are very stringent and can be hard to follow. There's not necessarily a clear line between citing content and violating copyright. I'd be happy to go into more detail if you are unsure, here. -- Yamla ( talk) 16:10, 26 November 2016
thanks for replying again. Yes I did so. I reworded it because if I copy it you will say its copyright violation and if I right it entirely myself you will say absence of proper citation. You will remove it and say "Remove off-topic material, unsourced material"(see the edits of 19-11-16)Yes I will be really grateful if you can help me out of this. Please tell me in more detail. Thank you for taking your time and communicating with me. Thank you very much . :) Sbhatt ( talk) 18:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Yamla . Kindy help me to understand in detail as you said in your last reply that you will be happy to help me.And I will really remain greatful to you for such a help about this critical issue of the difference between citation and copyright . I am eagerly waiting for your help. Thank you. Sbhatt ( talk) 21:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Sbhatt ( talk) 21:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)