|
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Pharmaceutical industry in India. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please also note that Wikipedia is not here to be your
soapbox against a particular industry. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
07:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Pharmaceutical industry in India, you may be
blocked from editing. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
18:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you make
personal attacks on other people, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
18:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
You're not citing anything; everything you post must be verifiable, and we cannot rely on unsourced material. I also saw that you made a personal attack to Gogo Dodo. First, calm down, He was not insulting your intelligence, "challenging" you, or trying to revoke your rights of Free Speech. There are some policies Wikipedia has for citing material, that you do not have any knowledge of. You can always gather sources and attempt to reinsert your information with them, try doing that.
No more attacks, control yourself.
Abigail was here :D Talk to Me. Email Me. 10:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
10:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
I am a Ninja, and this is my master. 12:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Abigail was here :D Talk to Me. Email Me. 18:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and
trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
19:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here What is the problem for the writing true things? You want reference, I can provide you the reference, but stating me as a "profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia" isn't sounds bad or biased. As you can see, why you people have a rude tone of replying? People can claim that I am attacking them, but do not see that they are attacking the other people, on humble request for an explaination, it is stated as a "default template"???
There is nothing that stops me from publishing my views on the internet other then Wikipedia, but sure, the faith which I had placed in the Wiki has vaporized and you will be surely telling me "to fuck off/leave" as wiki seems to be a moderator's choice and not really What I know but What Mods wants.
From this Year, I pledge, that I will not contribute (my knowledge or money) for the Wikipedia as It is not a portal for a free speech, but something where speech which can be easily suppressed at whim of a moderator.
Sorry for the "F" Word but this is the most suitable word used for the attitudes of the moderators.
Saynotopharmacareer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Saynotopharmacareer ( talk) 12:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your current username is clearly promoting an agenda (which is backed up by your edits). If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to choose a more acceptable username and agree to stop pushing your personal agenda, and stop attacking the admins who rightly blocked you. And no, Wikipedia is not a free speech forum, it is an encyclopedia. -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 13:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What is the problem for the writing true things? You want reference, I can provide you the reference, but stating me as a "profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia" isn't sounds bad or biased. As you can see, why you people have a rude tone of replying? People can claim that I am attacking them, but do not see that they are attacking the other people, on humble request for an explaination, it is stated as a "default template"???
There is nothing that stops me from publishing my views on the internet other then Wikipedia, but sure, the faith which I had placed in the Wiki has vaporized and you will be surely telling me "to fuck off/leave" as wiki seems to be a moderator's choice and not really What I know but What Mods wants.
From this Year, I pledge, that I will not contribute (my knowledge or money) for the Wikipedia as It is not a portal for a free speech, but something where speech which can be easily suppressed at whim of a moderator.
Sorry for the "F" Word but this is the most suitable word used for the attitudes of the moderators.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the bottom of this page, replacing "Your reason here" with the reason you think you should be unblocked. But please note that Wikipedia is most definitely *not* a place for you to publish your own views - it is an encyclopedia, and its articles must only contain
verifiable material, written in a
neutral way, and supported by
reliable sources (click on those blue links to learn more). So if you wish to be unblocked, you will need to pursue a very different line of reasoning. --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
21:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Saynotopharmacareer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
That was my own message, would you like me type over again or we can revert the comment automatically, Also, for your "he has already formatted one request properly" comment, sure the first block request was a "block" and had a option for filing of the request.Please, it is ok for me if even you change positively my page as a human we must trust each other, else as a God, you can abuse me and delete my pages or comments. Regards, email redacted Saynotopharmacareer ( talk) 16:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not seeing a request to be unblocked here actually, just some commentary with unclear purpose. You are going to have to indicate what new username you would like if you want to be unblocked, you cannot use the one you have now. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As you have confirmed the IP message was indeed from you, I think it's OK to reinstate the unblock request message...
Sir I am logged in, I can provide you the screen shot of "login status" and I was also while doing the unblock comment. I verify I am the same. Is my unblock request is going to be restored or I have to type again? Saynotopharmacareer ( talk) 12:17, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Saynotopharmacareer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Am I going to have a free and fair trial, My unblock reasons are always deleted for some or the other reasons, Is wiki not going to atleast revert back the reasons I had stated earlier??? Looking forward for a fair learning on the same Saynotopharmacareer ( talk) 14:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked because your username is not acceptable, as has been explained to you. Please use {{ unblock-un}} to request a new username. There is no question of a free and fair trial; you are required to follow wikipedia guidelines. You will need to be logged into your account if you choose to post a further unblock request; and please recognise that this is an encyclopedia, and articles must be adequately referenced and must follow conflict of interest policy. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 21:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have only just seen this personal attack, and this appeal for help in pushing your personal agenda. Coupled with your refusal to listen to anything you have been told on this page, and your continuing combative attitude, I am quite convinced that you have no intention of helping us build an encyclopedia and that any further discussion here would simply waste the time of people who have more important things to do. I have therefore revoked your ability to edit this Talk page - if you wish to make any further unblock appeals, you will need to follow the instructions at WP:BASC. -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 23:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
|
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Pharmaceutical industry in India. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please also note that Wikipedia is not here to be your
soapbox against a particular industry. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
07:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Pharmaceutical industry in India, you may be
blocked from editing. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
18:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you make
personal attacks on other people, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. --
Gogo Dodo (
talk)
18:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
You're not citing anything; everything you post must be verifiable, and we cannot rely on unsourced material. I also saw that you made a personal attack to Gogo Dodo. First, calm down, He was not insulting your intelligence, "challenging" you, or trying to revoke your rights of Free Speech. There are some policies Wikipedia has for citing material, that you do not have any knowledge of. You can always gather sources and attempt to reinsert your information with them, try doing that.
No more attacks, control yourself.
Abigail was here :D Talk to Me. Email Me. 10:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
10:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
I am a Ninja, and this is my master. 12:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Abigail was here :D Talk to Me. Email Me. 18:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and
trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
19:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here What is the problem for the writing true things? You want reference, I can provide you the reference, but stating me as a "profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia" isn't sounds bad or biased. As you can see, why you people have a rude tone of replying? People can claim that I am attacking them, but do not see that they are attacking the other people, on humble request for an explaination, it is stated as a "default template"???
There is nothing that stops me from publishing my views on the internet other then Wikipedia, but sure, the faith which I had placed in the Wiki has vaporized and you will be surely telling me "to fuck off/leave" as wiki seems to be a moderator's choice and not really What I know but What Mods wants.
From this Year, I pledge, that I will not contribute (my knowledge or money) for the Wikipedia as It is not a portal for a free speech, but something where speech which can be easily suppressed at whim of a moderator.
Sorry for the "F" Word but this is the most suitable word used for the attitudes of the moderators.
Saynotopharmacareer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Saynotopharmacareer ( talk) 12:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your current username is clearly promoting an agenda (which is backed up by your edits). If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to choose a more acceptable username and agree to stop pushing your personal agenda, and stop attacking the admins who rightly blocked you. And no, Wikipedia is not a free speech forum, it is an encyclopedia. -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 13:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What is the problem for the writing true things? You want reference, I can provide you the reference, but stating me as a "profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia" isn't sounds bad or biased. As you can see, why you people have a rude tone of replying? People can claim that I am attacking them, but do not see that they are attacking the other people, on humble request for an explaination, it is stated as a "default template"???
There is nothing that stops me from publishing my views on the internet other then Wikipedia, but sure, the faith which I had placed in the Wiki has vaporized and you will be surely telling me "to fuck off/leave" as wiki seems to be a moderator's choice and not really What I know but What Mods wants.
From this Year, I pledge, that I will not contribute (my knowledge or money) for the Wikipedia as It is not a portal for a free speech, but something where speech which can be easily suppressed at whim of a moderator.
Sorry for the "F" Word but this is the most suitable word used for the attitudes of the moderators.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the bottom of this page, replacing "Your reason here" with the reason you think you should be unblocked. But please note that Wikipedia is most definitely *not* a place for you to publish your own views - it is an encyclopedia, and its articles must only contain
verifiable material, written in a
neutral way, and supported by
reliable sources (click on those blue links to learn more). So if you wish to be unblocked, you will need to pursue a very different line of reasoning. --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
21:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Saynotopharmacareer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
That was my own message, would you like me type over again or we can revert the comment automatically, Also, for your "he has already formatted one request properly" comment, sure the first block request was a "block" and had a option for filing of the request.Please, it is ok for me if even you change positively my page as a human we must trust each other, else as a God, you can abuse me and delete my pages or comments. Regards, email redacted Saynotopharmacareer ( talk) 16:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not seeing a request to be unblocked here actually, just some commentary with unclear purpose. You are going to have to indicate what new username you would like if you want to be unblocked, you cannot use the one you have now. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As you have confirmed the IP message was indeed from you, I think it's OK to reinstate the unblock request message...
Sir I am logged in, I can provide you the screen shot of "login status" and I was also while doing the unblock comment. I verify I am the same. Is my unblock request is going to be restored or I have to type again? Saynotopharmacareer ( talk) 12:17, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Saynotopharmacareer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Am I going to have a free and fair trial, My unblock reasons are always deleted for some or the other reasons, Is wiki not going to atleast revert back the reasons I had stated earlier??? Looking forward for a fair learning on the same Saynotopharmacareer ( talk) 14:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked because your username is not acceptable, as has been explained to you. Please use {{ unblock-un}} to request a new username. There is no question of a free and fair trial; you are required to follow wikipedia guidelines. You will need to be logged into your account if you choose to post a further unblock request; and please recognise that this is an encyclopedia, and articles must be adequately referenced and must follow conflict of interest policy. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 21:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have only just seen this personal attack, and this appeal for help in pushing your personal agenda. Coupled with your refusal to listen to anything you have been told on this page, and your continuing combative attitude, I am quite convinced that you have no intention of helping us build an encyclopedia and that any further discussion here would simply waste the time of people who have more important things to do. I have therefore revoked your ability to edit this Talk page - if you wish to make any further unblock appeals, you will need to follow the instructions at WP:BASC. -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 23:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)