![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
I would like you to unprotect the Hollis/Brookline Middle School page, so that I can update it if something new happens to the school, or we make some kind of achievement or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.122.115 ( talk) 12:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I won't vandalize anymore. I just wish the JTF would fight racism and antisemitism as well as islamic terrorism because there are white terrorists out there like the Ku Klux Klan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.196.122 ( talk) 03:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Tell me how placing information about what we do is any different to listings for thousands of orgs or individuals on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AFroggatt ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
No need for that demeaning IP thing. Invades privacy. I have not vandalized anything nor am I a sockpuppet of anyone. So remove it please. 68.215.251.139 04:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Trying to find out why the Chris O'Rourke page was deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.162.143.21 ( talk) 15:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Ready to swab the deck! | |
Another motley scallawag has joined the crew. Thanks for your comments at my RFA. Arrrgh! - - Jehochman Talk 23:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm not sure how this reply system works so I'll lave my message here (apologies)
With regards to your comments about spamming in Online Dating.
I'm well aware of the no follow tags and their use. My inclusion was not meant to be spamming.
The relevance of the item to the subject is clear. This is an encyclopedia and people (particularly parents of the myspace/facebook generation) looking for information about online dating should be able to know that there are sites appearing on the web that deal with the problem of shyness in dating, particular in children (where most of the concern is nowadays).
I'm quite happy for other site links to be put in here and even don't mind if the link to the site I put in to be removed but I totally dissagree with removing this inormation in it's entirety. To be told, in a section for online dating, of the trends in virtual dating but not about safety concerns being addressed is simply not telling it as it is.
Once again sorry for leaving this message here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamsin250 ( talk • contribs) 11:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
I would like to know why the article was deleted, if sources were stated and Urufu Ryu is registered with the United States Martial Arts Association, under the sources cited in the article. Who was contacted in an attempt to find a reliable source to establish the notability of our style. I believe you can contact Kancho James Rosenweig at sensei1109@hotmail.com if you would like full indepth details on the founding, the members and the accreditation of Urufu Ryu Karate Do. I kindly request that the entry be undeleted as soon as possible. Thank you Trysta Rosenweig —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeepShadows2 ( talk • contribs) 06:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure how to use your program here. As for Urufu Ryu being in your online encyclopedia who ever submitted it I am honored. As for the deltetion it really doesnt affect Urufu Ryu as my daughter stated above Urufu Ryu is recognized by the grandmasters involved and By the United States Martial Arts Association. Also It was certified as a style By the International Martial Arts League. I tend to stay out of the politics of the martial arts. If this helps you in any way you are welcome to the information. If you want any other information my daughter printed my email wrong it is sensei1109@yahoo.com. I wish you well. ~~Kancho James Rosenweig-Founder Urufu Ryu Karate Do —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.22.37.94 ( talk) 07:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
...for protecting John Severin. It was crazy there. I much appreciate your looking in on it and helping. -- Tenebrae 02:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting those later/recent edits. I caught a few but I guess they decided to come back and vandalize a few more times with more graphic descriptions. Hope all's well JJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jujubey ( talk • contribs) 05:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Please take a look again at the newest edits of the Web.com article which I commented on the talk page. It's obvious that the edits are made by a company representative like often before in the history of that article (see earlier comments on talk page). Note that wrong numbers of revenue were placed in the info box and all negative facts (losses) of the newest company history have been deleted. I ask you to take appropriate action. I'm not interested in reverting over and over again. -- Peter Eisenburger 18:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I will repeat myself hear since Peter has placed his comments here and on the web discussion board but this is getting a bit absurd. "Too funny! And here I thought you were working for one of their competitors until I saw your photos (which are very nice by the way). In any event, I think you are missing my point completely. The question is what is relevant for this web page. Again, this is supposed to be an online encyclopedia. Most of this stuff does not rise to that level. As for the legal stuff, maybe the company should disclose all of this (and they do as you point out) but don’t mistake a pending case with a verdict. Just about anyone in the US can sue for anything. McDonalds was sued for millions b/c someone spilled coffee in their laps! In any event, I think you are missing my main point. Bad or good, positive or negative, let’s keep it brief and concise and try to write a good page. This page is littered with poor writing and duplicate information. At least your other pages that you seem to control tell a good story (although I would argue there is too much information there as well)..."-- Obgydd 13:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi there!
I'm a new member to Wikipedia and started to create an article called Debt Free Direct. Stupidly I saved it without putting content in it, so it has been deleted. The instructions I just read recommends I don't re-create it as could be protected against recreation. What would you recommend I do? I have content I have written for the page, perhaps I can submit the content to you to read first if you like? Or if I re-create it with content, will that be ok? Thanks! Heath —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathamanda ( talk • contribs) 22:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the barnstar. Yes, I guess all the vandals want a piece of me. At least I haven't lost my cool (yet) :) The Chronic 23:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Emailed you with a private heads up. WP:DENY and all. -- Satori Son 02:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 20:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
I got involved in Mitch Clem at AfD. Can you look at the references and let me know whether you think I'm right on his notability. He is not an important topic, but this illustrates an important application of the BIO and Notability rules. I think that the Minnesota Public Radio spot is just about enough, then the mention in PC World, while not in-depth clearly is saying this person is noticed. The other comixtalk source is marginal, but I think that it adds to credibilty. It appeares that Comixtalk has a blog section, but where he is covered is more akin to an online magazine in a scheduled and dated issue. Cheers! -- Kevin Murray 15:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Trying to understand some of the reasoning here: while I may not agree with your removal of the sub-sections, I understand that's just merely a stylistic difference from my method. However, why would you remove old warnings? They serve to show a long-term pattern of abuse by the IP. -- LeyteWolfer 20:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the proper place for this request, but can you semi-protect my user and talk page, as it is receiving the same type of vandalism from different IP addresses. Ctjf83 06:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
please refrain from reverting my talk page without a reason Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.85.96 ( talk • contribs) 07:07, November 10, 2007 (UTC)
The fact of the matter is that you reverted the talk page for no reason. I was well within my rights to remove the warning based on the user talk policy. I invite you to revert your edit back to the version that was edited by mself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.85.96 ( talk) 08:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. It woulld have been easier if Satori Son had told me that to clear up any confusion instead of just reverting my page without any explanation when i thought i was well within my rights. This should'nt happen and i think there should be a warning or somthing for people who revert eddits repeatadly with no explanation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.85.96 ( talk • contribs) 08:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
dont u dare edit my talk page. i work hard on creating appropriate pages. got a problem? see a therapist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.108.240 ( talk • contribs) 07:20, November 10, 2007 (UTC)
dont sheeple Wikipedians get it? i will NEVER create an account. NEVER ever. N-E-V-E-R. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.108.240 ( talk) 09:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the prod from his article. It had already been prodded and removed once, and with a quick search I found the man had an interview in the New York Times. He also appears to have a lot of possible reviews, although since he is a journalist his name shows up as the author in a lot of the sources. So maybe put it up for full AFD instead of deletion. Even with that interview I'm still on the fence myself, but I think it warrants more than a prod. - Optigan13 23:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
why did you block me for vandalism?? i cant edit pages and i dont know why as i have never tried to befor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.205.200.19 ( talk) 00:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
So why do you keep deleting additions to the Lucky Strike page? What makes you think it's vandalism? If you don't like the tone, fix it, but I don't see how Opie and Anthony references to Lucky Strikes are any less relevant than many of the others on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.225.139 ( talk) 04:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[1] Hey! At least you have them calling you pompous... I get them calling me jerkoff and the like... :) Jmlk 1 7 05:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Satori Son,
I have read the guidelines for posting external references. I do not understand why my edits are being reverted. Please explain. The links I am creating are to industry leading tools and interviews. Any professional or sophisticated retail investor interested in ETFs, IndexFunds or Commodities Investing would find these articles and tools of much value. As a matter of fact, the Wall Street Journal, Yahoo Finance and Barron's have all linked to and recommended the same pages I am linking to.
In the case of the Jim Roger interview, I am simply adding a link that was already there.
Thanks, Fernando —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friveraz ( talk • contribs) 15:27, November 14, 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Satori Son
I certainly understand your point about limiting the number of external links. I think I can make a valid case for a link to the ETF Data Screener, which I linked to from the ETFs page, because it is the best ETF data tool available for free anywhere on the Internet. I have made that point to the editor who originally deleted my link. I think, however, that highly regarded, specialized niche sources of data and information will be excluded in favor of more "mainstream", yet less valuable sources.
Best, Fernando —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friveraz ( talk • contribs) 15:56, November 14, 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for that. I'll keep an eye to see if I need to say anything there. -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing a little levity to my talk page. It makes it easier to deal with the abuse when you have someone to laugh with. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:03, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
I edited that article exactly twice in 17 hours. But I can see others whom had made reverts three times in 24 hours. And you warn me to stop being disruptive, yet don't say a word to any of them. To put it simply, bugger off. I know the rules quite well. Your attitude is quite insulting, so please stop. Alyeska 02:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Well with that kind of response, I have to follow your footsteps. No, I won't stop. Alyeska 06:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I normally edit under this username. Why do you ask? Can I be Frank? (Talk to me!) 01:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
May I ask you why you restricted yourself just to revert edit instead of speeding or proding it? Thanks. sharara 16:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I am dumb. I am unable to figure out whether it is attack page, advertisement, article or what? Thanks. sharara 14:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
First of all, let me apologize for the other admin's comment about you (I wasn't going to say anything, but based on your ANI report I know you must have seen it). He is an extremely talented and long-time contributor, but he certainly can be a little gruff at times. Please don't take it personally. You will quickly learn that you need a thick skin to survive around here, regardless of what any policy might say about civility and whatnot.
As far as the article goes, while it most likely is not a G10 speedy candidate, I have the same COI concerns you do. I see you have already been referred to the WP:COIN noticeboard, which was going to be my next suggestion to you. Good luck, and please don't hesitate to ask for help or advice whenever you need it. Everyone was new once, myself not very long ago, and no question about how we do things is dumb. — Satori Son 18:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
I assume you left the same warning you left me to user mhking. He is the one that started the 'edit war' and is deleting factual information regarding the trademark ownership and a trademark dispute that involved the other company listed on the page. I have read Wikipedia's guidelines and the information that I posted is completely factual, was added in good faith and directly relates to the title. In my opinion mhking's continuous deletion of this material is malicious and unwarranted. I am going to repost the information after the 24 hour waiting period. If mhking deletes it again I am going to escalate the matter within Wikipedia.
Ralph Press Tdenusa ( talk) 19:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
again - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I have commented at the WikiProject about your concerns. Though body modification is a statement of fashion, so modification for cosmetic appearance would seem to be appropriate articles for WikiProject Fashion. I also note that the TV show Extreme Makeover about cosmetic surgery was already tagged as WP Fashion prior to my tagged of other cosmetic surgery articles. 132.205.44.5 ( talk) 03:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help with She Who Photographs ( talk · contribs). I appreciate it. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 20:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Satori,
Thank you for supporting in my recent RfA. Words nor pictures can express my heartfelt appreciation at the confidence the community has shown me. I am both heartened and humbled by this confidence. I will carry the lessons learned from the constructive criticism I have received with me as I edit Wikipedia, and heed those lessons. Special thanks to Pedro and Henrik as nominators. Special thanks to Rudget who wanted to. A very special thanks to Moonriddengirl for her eloquence. |
now he uses 172.132.65.29 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) to add information of a fake move Tom & Jerry: The Great Beginning into Spike (MGM), Barney Bear, Droopy Dog, Screwball Squirrel, John Goodman, DreamWorks Animation and Nickelodeon Movies, please help these. 123.193.12.44
Hi Satori, I was going to try to save this. The info box seemed to say he was a goalkeep for Sporting Cristal. Is that a pro football/soccer team? Is he notable? Thanks, Dloh cierekim 02:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I am just so apologetically apologetic for what I did. Will you find the heart to forgive this sinful creature? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.72.47.41 ( talk • contribs) 06:21, December 2, 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I hereby award you this barnstar because everytime I reverted a vandal today, you had either reverted them previously or beat me to the revert. Everywhere I went, there you were. Nice work! -- Gogo Dodo 07:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks a lot. Looks like we're both on a roll tonight! —
Satori Son
07:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I have in fact vandalized peoples user pages and asked them if they like cakes/nachos etc. I do realize that this was unconstructive and unnecessary. Do you accept my apology as I may try to help wikipedia from now on? 159.28.161.197 ( talk) 15:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Setting new lows in thank-you spam:
Janitor's new tools
Spam must stop -- will
new mop act?
Ooops, .com
blocked
New admin, new tools
Earnest newbie furrows brow
Fare thee well
Main Page
New mess all about
Sorcerer's Apprentice mop
Not supporter's fault
A. B. so grateful
Wikipedia trembles
Watch out
DRV
A. B. wonders why
Copyright always confused
Fair use, farewell, bye
Dear RfA friend,
I will learn, chaos will fade
Thanks so much ...
A. B.
Satori Son, thank you so much for your strong support and your compelling comments during my RfA: "exceedingly civil, mature editor with a cool head and calm demeanor." You don't know just how much work it is for me maintain that demeanor some times!
I will work that much harder at pulling this off now that I have those new tools. Regards, A. B. (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
What did I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdZeNaProductions ( talk • contribs) 23:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to add some citations and references to John K. Snyder III. It's not much and I leave it to you whether to retain the PROD or not. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I removed the entry on the talkpage because it was about an article that no longer existed and the talk page is for an IP address registered to Chapman University. Leaving a message for 4,000 students is really kind of pointless 72.130.39.180 ( talk) 21:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! |
Thanks for uploading Image:LgoGoody.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
What on earth are you talking about? If you wish to discuss edits, please be more specific, otherwise I consider your message harassment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.57.107 ( talk) 10:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
"Archtransit, it appears that you still feel your block of Jehochman was justified. I am dissapointed, to say the least. My suggestion is that you let this issue go as gracefully as others have."
Ok, I'll let it go. Should we make policy more clear, perhaps in a month to let things cool down? I am willing to clarify the blocking policy at WP:BLOCK. Archtransit ( talk) 17:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up Lloyd Kaufman's article. I could hardly believe how bad it was.-- 76.84.186.222 ( talk) 04:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:She Creature DVD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 21:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
I am not going to repost the article you removed earlier today, but could you please give me the code/content for it so I can post it on another website. I worked hard on the code, and would like to have it. The article was on the Pi hi samurai robotics team. You can leave the code on my talk page. (user:alexandertmills)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandertmills ( talk • contribs) 01:51, January 24, 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Dloh cierekim 15:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Last night and this afternoon I have added sufficient notable citations to this article to justify removing the deletion prod. At this point I believe I've established sufficient notability comparable with about half of the sports club related articles I've seen on Wikipedia, better than most of the stubs. I'm not certain if the rules permit me to remove the prod myself but I did so. Any further advice would be appreciated. Trilobitealive ( talk) 22:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Is there anything else which is needed to stop the deletion process? I'm still a bit upset over it having been flagged for speedy deletion at a time when I'd put up the first few sentences. If wikipedia wants amateur editors they need to stop this sort of thing. Trilobitealive ( talk) 22:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes Satori, I will definetly study how Wikipedia truly works and not be an asshole and put things up without sources and I will also keep in mind not to insult the editors....In that note, I will say Wikipedia guidelines aside, some editors in this wiki take this WAY TOO SERIOUSLY, wikipedia guidenes aside mind you. I like wikipedia and plan to contribute constructively and would like to see this website grow more and more, being a site of good content and true knowledge, and I would like to help by doing more writing. You editors can stick together and do this website right or some of you editors can just feed your ego and do more deletes then add to articles, in the end who fucking cares?! The internet is still a massive network of computers, and real life is still a massive network of people. I like people more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilex ( talk • contribs) 04:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
I would like you to unprotect the Hollis/Brookline Middle School page, so that I can update it if something new happens to the school, or we make some kind of achievement or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.122.115 ( talk) 12:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I won't vandalize anymore. I just wish the JTF would fight racism and antisemitism as well as islamic terrorism because there are white terrorists out there like the Ku Klux Klan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.196.122 ( talk) 03:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Tell me how placing information about what we do is any different to listings for thousands of orgs or individuals on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AFroggatt ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
No need for that demeaning IP thing. Invades privacy. I have not vandalized anything nor am I a sockpuppet of anyone. So remove it please. 68.215.251.139 04:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Trying to find out why the Chris O'Rourke page was deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.162.143.21 ( talk) 15:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Ready to swab the deck! | |
Another motley scallawag has joined the crew. Thanks for your comments at my RFA. Arrrgh! - - Jehochman Talk 23:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm not sure how this reply system works so I'll lave my message here (apologies)
With regards to your comments about spamming in Online Dating.
I'm well aware of the no follow tags and their use. My inclusion was not meant to be spamming.
The relevance of the item to the subject is clear. This is an encyclopedia and people (particularly parents of the myspace/facebook generation) looking for information about online dating should be able to know that there are sites appearing on the web that deal with the problem of shyness in dating, particular in children (where most of the concern is nowadays).
I'm quite happy for other site links to be put in here and even don't mind if the link to the site I put in to be removed but I totally dissagree with removing this inormation in it's entirety. To be told, in a section for online dating, of the trends in virtual dating but not about safety concerns being addressed is simply not telling it as it is.
Once again sorry for leaving this message here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamsin250 ( talk • contribs) 11:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
I would like to know why the article was deleted, if sources were stated and Urufu Ryu is registered with the United States Martial Arts Association, under the sources cited in the article. Who was contacted in an attempt to find a reliable source to establish the notability of our style. I believe you can contact Kancho James Rosenweig at sensei1109@hotmail.com if you would like full indepth details on the founding, the members and the accreditation of Urufu Ryu Karate Do. I kindly request that the entry be undeleted as soon as possible. Thank you Trysta Rosenweig —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeepShadows2 ( talk • contribs) 06:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure how to use your program here. As for Urufu Ryu being in your online encyclopedia who ever submitted it I am honored. As for the deltetion it really doesnt affect Urufu Ryu as my daughter stated above Urufu Ryu is recognized by the grandmasters involved and By the United States Martial Arts Association. Also It was certified as a style By the International Martial Arts League. I tend to stay out of the politics of the martial arts. If this helps you in any way you are welcome to the information. If you want any other information my daughter printed my email wrong it is sensei1109@yahoo.com. I wish you well. ~~Kancho James Rosenweig-Founder Urufu Ryu Karate Do —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.22.37.94 ( talk) 07:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
...for protecting John Severin. It was crazy there. I much appreciate your looking in on it and helping. -- Tenebrae 02:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting those later/recent edits. I caught a few but I guess they decided to come back and vandalize a few more times with more graphic descriptions. Hope all's well JJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jujubey ( talk • contribs) 05:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Please take a look again at the newest edits of the Web.com article which I commented on the talk page. It's obvious that the edits are made by a company representative like often before in the history of that article (see earlier comments on talk page). Note that wrong numbers of revenue were placed in the info box and all negative facts (losses) of the newest company history have been deleted. I ask you to take appropriate action. I'm not interested in reverting over and over again. -- Peter Eisenburger 18:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I will repeat myself hear since Peter has placed his comments here and on the web discussion board but this is getting a bit absurd. "Too funny! And here I thought you were working for one of their competitors until I saw your photos (which are very nice by the way). In any event, I think you are missing my point completely. The question is what is relevant for this web page. Again, this is supposed to be an online encyclopedia. Most of this stuff does not rise to that level. As for the legal stuff, maybe the company should disclose all of this (and they do as you point out) but don’t mistake a pending case with a verdict. Just about anyone in the US can sue for anything. McDonalds was sued for millions b/c someone spilled coffee in their laps! In any event, I think you are missing my main point. Bad or good, positive or negative, let’s keep it brief and concise and try to write a good page. This page is littered with poor writing and duplicate information. At least your other pages that you seem to control tell a good story (although I would argue there is too much information there as well)..."-- Obgydd 13:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi there!
I'm a new member to Wikipedia and started to create an article called Debt Free Direct. Stupidly I saved it without putting content in it, so it has been deleted. The instructions I just read recommends I don't re-create it as could be protected against recreation. What would you recommend I do? I have content I have written for the page, perhaps I can submit the content to you to read first if you like? Or if I re-create it with content, will that be ok? Thanks! Heath —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathamanda ( talk • contribs) 22:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the barnstar. Yes, I guess all the vandals want a piece of me. At least I haven't lost my cool (yet) :) The Chronic 23:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Emailed you with a private heads up. WP:DENY and all. -- Satori Son 02:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 20:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
I got involved in Mitch Clem at AfD. Can you look at the references and let me know whether you think I'm right on his notability. He is not an important topic, but this illustrates an important application of the BIO and Notability rules. I think that the Minnesota Public Radio spot is just about enough, then the mention in PC World, while not in-depth clearly is saying this person is noticed. The other comixtalk source is marginal, but I think that it adds to credibilty. It appeares that Comixtalk has a blog section, but where he is covered is more akin to an online magazine in a scheduled and dated issue. Cheers! -- Kevin Murray 15:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Trying to understand some of the reasoning here: while I may not agree with your removal of the sub-sections, I understand that's just merely a stylistic difference from my method. However, why would you remove old warnings? They serve to show a long-term pattern of abuse by the IP. -- LeyteWolfer 20:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the proper place for this request, but can you semi-protect my user and talk page, as it is receiving the same type of vandalism from different IP addresses. Ctjf83 06:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
please refrain from reverting my talk page without a reason Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.85.96 ( talk • contribs) 07:07, November 10, 2007 (UTC)
The fact of the matter is that you reverted the talk page for no reason. I was well within my rights to remove the warning based on the user talk policy. I invite you to revert your edit back to the version that was edited by mself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.85.96 ( talk) 08:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. It woulld have been easier if Satori Son had told me that to clear up any confusion instead of just reverting my page without any explanation when i thought i was well within my rights. This should'nt happen and i think there should be a warning or somthing for people who revert eddits repeatadly with no explanation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.85.96 ( talk • contribs) 08:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
dont u dare edit my talk page. i work hard on creating appropriate pages. got a problem? see a therapist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.108.240 ( talk • contribs) 07:20, November 10, 2007 (UTC)
dont sheeple Wikipedians get it? i will NEVER create an account. NEVER ever. N-E-V-E-R. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.108.240 ( talk) 09:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the prod from his article. It had already been prodded and removed once, and with a quick search I found the man had an interview in the New York Times. He also appears to have a lot of possible reviews, although since he is a journalist his name shows up as the author in a lot of the sources. So maybe put it up for full AFD instead of deletion. Even with that interview I'm still on the fence myself, but I think it warrants more than a prod. - Optigan13 23:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
why did you block me for vandalism?? i cant edit pages and i dont know why as i have never tried to befor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.205.200.19 ( talk) 00:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
So why do you keep deleting additions to the Lucky Strike page? What makes you think it's vandalism? If you don't like the tone, fix it, but I don't see how Opie and Anthony references to Lucky Strikes are any less relevant than many of the others on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.225.139 ( talk) 04:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[1] Hey! At least you have them calling you pompous... I get them calling me jerkoff and the like... :) Jmlk 1 7 05:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Satori Son,
I have read the guidelines for posting external references. I do not understand why my edits are being reverted. Please explain. The links I am creating are to industry leading tools and interviews. Any professional or sophisticated retail investor interested in ETFs, IndexFunds or Commodities Investing would find these articles and tools of much value. As a matter of fact, the Wall Street Journal, Yahoo Finance and Barron's have all linked to and recommended the same pages I am linking to.
In the case of the Jim Roger interview, I am simply adding a link that was already there.
Thanks, Fernando —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friveraz ( talk • contribs) 15:27, November 14, 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Satori Son
I certainly understand your point about limiting the number of external links. I think I can make a valid case for a link to the ETF Data Screener, which I linked to from the ETFs page, because it is the best ETF data tool available for free anywhere on the Internet. I have made that point to the editor who originally deleted my link. I think, however, that highly regarded, specialized niche sources of data and information will be excluded in favor of more "mainstream", yet less valuable sources.
Best, Fernando —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friveraz ( talk • contribs) 15:56, November 14, 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for that. I'll keep an eye to see if I need to say anything there. -- ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing a little levity to my talk page. It makes it easier to deal with the abuse when you have someone to laugh with. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:03, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
I edited that article exactly twice in 17 hours. But I can see others whom had made reverts three times in 24 hours. And you warn me to stop being disruptive, yet don't say a word to any of them. To put it simply, bugger off. I know the rules quite well. Your attitude is quite insulting, so please stop. Alyeska 02:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Well with that kind of response, I have to follow your footsteps. No, I won't stop. Alyeska 06:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I normally edit under this username. Why do you ask? Can I be Frank? (Talk to me!) 01:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
May I ask you why you restricted yourself just to revert edit instead of speeding or proding it? Thanks. sharara 16:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
I am dumb. I am unable to figure out whether it is attack page, advertisement, article or what? Thanks. sharara 14:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
First of all, let me apologize for the other admin's comment about you (I wasn't going to say anything, but based on your ANI report I know you must have seen it). He is an extremely talented and long-time contributor, but he certainly can be a little gruff at times. Please don't take it personally. You will quickly learn that you need a thick skin to survive around here, regardless of what any policy might say about civility and whatnot.
As far as the article goes, while it most likely is not a G10 speedy candidate, I have the same COI concerns you do. I see you have already been referred to the WP:COIN noticeboard, which was going to be my next suggestion to you. Good luck, and please don't hesitate to ask for help or advice whenever you need it. Everyone was new once, myself not very long ago, and no question about how we do things is dumb. — Satori Son 18:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
I assume you left the same warning you left me to user mhking. He is the one that started the 'edit war' and is deleting factual information regarding the trademark ownership and a trademark dispute that involved the other company listed on the page. I have read Wikipedia's guidelines and the information that I posted is completely factual, was added in good faith and directly relates to the title. In my opinion mhking's continuous deletion of this material is malicious and unwarranted. I am going to repost the information after the 24 hour waiting period. If mhking deletes it again I am going to escalate the matter within Wikipedia.
Ralph Press Tdenusa ( talk) 19:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
again - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I have commented at the WikiProject about your concerns. Though body modification is a statement of fashion, so modification for cosmetic appearance would seem to be appropriate articles for WikiProject Fashion. I also note that the TV show Extreme Makeover about cosmetic surgery was already tagged as WP Fashion prior to my tagged of other cosmetic surgery articles. 132.205.44.5 ( talk) 03:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help with She Who Photographs ( talk · contribs). I appreciate it. =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 20:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Satori,
Thank you for supporting in my recent RfA. Words nor pictures can express my heartfelt appreciation at the confidence the community has shown me. I am both heartened and humbled by this confidence. I will carry the lessons learned from the constructive criticism I have received with me as I edit Wikipedia, and heed those lessons. Special thanks to Pedro and Henrik as nominators. Special thanks to Rudget who wanted to. A very special thanks to Moonriddengirl for her eloquence. |
now he uses 172.132.65.29 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) to add information of a fake move Tom & Jerry: The Great Beginning into Spike (MGM), Barney Bear, Droopy Dog, Screwball Squirrel, John Goodman, DreamWorks Animation and Nickelodeon Movies, please help these. 123.193.12.44
Hi Satori, I was going to try to save this. The info box seemed to say he was a goalkeep for Sporting Cristal. Is that a pro football/soccer team? Is he notable? Thanks, Dloh cierekim 02:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I am just so apologetically apologetic for what I did. Will you find the heart to forgive this sinful creature? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.72.47.41 ( talk • contribs) 06:21, December 2, 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I hereby award you this barnstar because everytime I reverted a vandal today, you had either reverted them previously or beat me to the revert. Everywhere I went, there you were. Nice work! -- Gogo Dodo 07:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks a lot. Looks like we're both on a roll tonight! —
Satori Son
07:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I have in fact vandalized peoples user pages and asked them if they like cakes/nachos etc. I do realize that this was unconstructive and unnecessary. Do you accept my apology as I may try to help wikipedia from now on? 159.28.161.197 ( talk) 15:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Setting new lows in thank-you spam:
Janitor's new tools
Spam must stop -- will
new mop act?
Ooops, .com
blocked
New admin, new tools
Earnest newbie furrows brow
Fare thee well
Main Page
New mess all about
Sorcerer's Apprentice mop
Not supporter's fault
A. B. so grateful
Wikipedia trembles
Watch out
DRV
A. B. wonders why
Copyright always confused
Fair use, farewell, bye
Dear RfA friend,
I will learn, chaos will fade
Thanks so much ...
A. B.
Satori Son, thank you so much for your strong support and your compelling comments during my RfA: "exceedingly civil, mature editor with a cool head and calm demeanor." You don't know just how much work it is for me maintain that demeanor some times!
I will work that much harder at pulling this off now that I have those new tools. Regards, A. B. (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
What did I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdZeNaProductions ( talk • contribs) 23:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to add some citations and references to John K. Snyder III. It's not much and I leave it to you whether to retain the PROD or not. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I removed the entry on the talkpage because it was about an article that no longer existed and the talk page is for an IP address registered to Chapman University. Leaving a message for 4,000 students is really kind of pointless 72.130.39.180 ( talk) 21:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! |
Thanks for uploading Image:LgoGoody.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
What on earth are you talking about? If you wish to discuss edits, please be more specific, otherwise I consider your message harassment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.57.107 ( talk) 10:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
"Archtransit, it appears that you still feel your block of Jehochman was justified. I am dissapointed, to say the least. My suggestion is that you let this issue go as gracefully as others have."
Ok, I'll let it go. Should we make policy more clear, perhaps in a month to let things cool down? I am willing to clarify the blocking policy at WP:BLOCK. Archtransit ( talk) 17:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up Lloyd Kaufman's article. I could hardly believe how bad it was.-- 76.84.186.222 ( talk) 04:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:She Creature DVD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 21:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
I am not going to repost the article you removed earlier today, but could you please give me the code/content for it so I can post it on another website. I worked hard on the code, and would like to have it. The article was on the Pi hi samurai robotics team. You can leave the code on my talk page. (user:alexandertmills)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandertmills ( talk • contribs) 01:51, January 24, 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Dloh cierekim 15:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Last night and this afternoon I have added sufficient notable citations to this article to justify removing the deletion prod. At this point I believe I've established sufficient notability comparable with about half of the sports club related articles I've seen on Wikipedia, better than most of the stubs. I'm not certain if the rules permit me to remove the prod myself but I did so. Any further advice would be appreciated. Trilobitealive ( talk) 22:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Is there anything else which is needed to stop the deletion process? I'm still a bit upset over it having been flagged for speedy deletion at a time when I'd put up the first few sentences. If wikipedia wants amateur editors they need to stop this sort of thing. Trilobitealive ( talk) 22:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes Satori, I will definetly study how Wikipedia truly works and not be an asshole and put things up without sources and I will also keep in mind not to insult the editors....In that note, I will say Wikipedia guidelines aside, some editors in this wiki take this WAY TOO SERIOUSLY, wikipedia guidenes aside mind you. I like wikipedia and plan to contribute constructively and would like to see this website grow more and more, being a site of good content and true knowledge, and I would like to help by doing more writing. You editors can stick together and do this website right or some of you editors can just feed your ego and do more deletes then add to articles, in the end who fucking cares?! The internet is still a massive network of computers, and real life is still a massive network of people. I like people more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilex ( talk • contribs) 04:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)