|
Would you also please read WP:OR on original research and WP:TALK as your comments on the Stonehenge talk page were inappropriate (you aren't the only one). Thanks Doug Weller ( talk) 13:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Please have a look at the external links guidelines for an reason why I reverted your recent edits to Stonehenge. They were probably to great to be considered minor edits, by the way. -- Old Moonraker ( talk) 13:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to
Aubrey holes, but we regretfully cannot accept
original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. your self-published work is classed as 'original research' and does not belong in WIkipedia
Doug Weller (
talk) 13:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not use talk pages such as
Talk:Aubrey holes for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See
here for more information. Thank you. You have already been asked not to do this on the Stonehenge talk page. Not only are you idea 'original research' and self-published, you are using Wikipedia as a forum to publicise them.
Doug Weller (
talk) 14:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
|
Would you also please read WP:OR on original research and WP:TALK as your comments on the Stonehenge talk page were inappropriate (you aren't the only one). Thanks Doug Weller ( talk) 13:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Please have a look at the external links guidelines for an reason why I reverted your recent edits to Stonehenge. They were probably to great to be considered minor edits, by the way. -- Old Moonraker ( talk) 13:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to
Aubrey holes, but we regretfully cannot accept
original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. your self-published work is classed as 'original research' and does not belong in WIkipedia
Doug Weller (
talk) 13:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not use talk pages such as
Talk:Aubrey holes for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See
here for more information. Thank you. You have already been asked not to do this on the Stonehenge talk page. Not only are you idea 'original research' and self-published, you are using Wikipedia as a forum to publicise them.
Doug Weller (
talk) 14:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)