![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, in the Afd that was closed and relisted for the second time, I feel that there was a consensus supporting DELETE, per WP:DEFINECONSENSUS While comparing the numbers of deletes vs keeps were a tie, there's a pretty solid agreement among participants that the article fails to meet the general notability guidelines, thus a generally consensus against inclusion is formed. 16:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Because of the nature of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 arbitration case and the importance of the exact wording of remedies, the Arbitration Committee would like to invite public comment and workshopping on the proposed decision, which will be posted soon. Accordingly, the workshop in this case is re-opened and will remain open until Friday, December 13. To opt out of further announcements, please remove yourself from the notification list. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you've closed this AfD as delete, which is a shame because most of the delete votes didn't reflect the changes that I had made since they were cast, which introduced a lot of content including citations in the Local Government Chronicle (a national publication) and an interview in The Guardian. Are you able to restore the old content in my userspace or in the draft namespace so that I can keep working on it? There is still a lot to add; if I do work it up further, at what point can I consider recreating the article? -- Noswall59 ( talk) 10:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC).
A bit early, but do you want to close? I am currently drafting up a detailed closing statement. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 17:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Phishing emails, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Phishing emails and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:Phishing emails during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
funplussmart (
talk)
19:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
I worked very hard and spend most of my day rebuilding, attributing and providing sources for the Byron House page you deleted. Can you give me the exact reasons it was deleted so my next one will stay put? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.186.58.125 ( talk) 00:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I have seen that you have been closing some deletion discussions about Dungeons & Dragons subjects, of which there are many at the moment. In cases where you come to the conclusion to delete the article, would you perhaps consider changing the article into a redirect rather than outright deletion? Some more secondary sources have been found during the notability discussions, and there are probably still more out there. It would be helpful to still be able to access the old articles, to see if notability can be established at some future point. Thank you very much for your consideration. Daranios ( talk) 15:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
This editor has called Tamsier a "dick" on the the deletion discussion in which you blocked Tamsier for but took no action against this editor. I disagreed with that block anyway because I found nothing in Tamsier's remarks that deserved a block, and they also did a great job improving that article, but that's beside the point. @ Toa Nidhiki05: also went on to make personal attacks against another editor by calling them "an imbecile", and believes that we are here to mock or ridicule other editors with this statement: "Sometimes, when responding to sockpuppet trolls, ridicule is an adequate solution". How many passes is this editor going to get before any action is taken against them for their behaviour, or are we only in the habit of blocking our Black and African editors? Just curious! Senegambianamestudy ( talk) 11:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Please resolve this elsewhere. Sandstein 20:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
What on earth? Yes, I called a sockpuppet troll account an imbecile. Sue me. Toa Nidhiki05 12:23, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Toa Nidhiki05 13:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Hi Sandstein,
Today I come the page Bandari_(AVC) and sadly find it is been deleted. I propose to recover it.
From the page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bandari_(AVC), I read several reasons for its deletion. In one sentence that is "Not finding any significant coverage for this band. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND".
I admit that there are few material can be found about this "band". Actually, from the Chinese news paper dated 2015-07-29 (which is an interview of the founder of Bandari), we know that the "Bandari" as a stable band never exist. But its musics and the styles are real, the musics are performed by invited musicians and some songs are composed by invited composers. And all these arrangements are done by Peter Pozza, the founder of AVC. AVC is producing [ meditation musics].
Bandari not only confuse you people outside China, but also confuse us. In a stackoverflow-like chinese ask-and-answer website called Zhihu, there is a question about [ the existence of Bandari]. The top answer there is convincing, and the most vital evidence is the Chinese news paper interview mention in the above paragraph and the existence of [ AVC].
I think, Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia, should not miss such a (countrywide) famous music production team. They are not typical band, thus the rules of WP:BAND should not apply. Instead, to my understanding, Bandari is a brand of a small company. This brand is almost unknown to the rest of the world because it is a cooperation between AVC and a Taiwan company, and the CD was released only in Chinese regions.
If anyone need assistance about Chinese language (e.g. in order to understand related reference), I could do it, although I'm not wikipedia-online every day.
Wanttoknow ( talk) 15:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() Atsme Talk 📧 18:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC) |
Happy Holiday Cheer!! |
in the spirit of the season. What's especially nice about this digitized version: *it doesn't need water *won't catch fire *and batteries aren't required. |
and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉 |
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Devlin Waugh. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Richard75 ( talk) 09:11, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure why a relist wouldn't have been useful. I've already said that if I thought the AFD was anywhere close to a delete, I'd have tried to improve the article and find more references - which I've never tried to do - and isn't a part of the DRV process. Given the false claims that GNG isn't a guideline, but a policy (?!?) surely the DRV should be closed by someone who is comfortable commenting on the the relationship between specific notability guidelines and the GNG! Nfitz ( talk) 16:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Damon Runyon's short story
"Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the
hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well S. MarnetteD| Talk 01:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oromo migrations
Why the discussion was closed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotohelp ( talk • contribs) 10:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Enverus
Hello Mr. Sandstein, I was hoping you could relist the Enverus page so that we could have a more detailed conversation about this page before being deleted? I feel someone has deleted it before any changes or counter arguments could be made. Most appreciated De-Stavness ( talk) 21:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Buddy , i have also contacted the person RHawort he protected the page , he said kindly wait and be patient if its accepted then protection will be remove. You have deleted an article in feb 2019 , i realized that few people have created the article before with no notable links or it was not passing wp:actor or wp:gng but i recreated the article and added the latest news references and newspaper sources and i am sure it is now notable. can you have a look dear ? /info/en/?search=Draft:Nabeel_Zuberi it will be good if you can pass your comments or help me to make this article better as you're most senior administrator and i help wikipedia by expanding articles/creating on public figures voluntarily.
Thanks Memon KutianaWala ( talk) 09:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!
|
Hope you enjoy the Christmas eve with the ones you love and step into the new year with lots of happiness and good health. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ToTok (app) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ToTok (app) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UA3 ( talk) 10:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはSandsteinたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
02:17, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
I found out about the AfD after it was closed. Would you tell last name, or any other identifier of Chloe (actress) please? —usernamekiran (talk) 10:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
I consider your deleting Caucasian Journal as a clear case of Wikipedia:Overzealous deletion (WP:OZD), as in talk page there were numerous comments in favor of keeping that page.
See abstract from article on WP:OZD:
"So, an article or edit is not perfect. It is tagged for multiple issues. Its notability is in question. It has few if any references. It has some inaccurate or questionable information. It has loads of original research. But still, it has just the little spark of hope of being a viable article.
If this is the case, the deletion process is not the route to take to solve the problem. That's what the talk page is for. Deletion of an article where the subject's notability can be evidenced by reliable sources contradicts the overall goal of the Wikipedia project
"Overzealous deletion refers to an overwhelming desire to get articles or other materials on Wikipedia deleted. In other words, it is the act of getting an article deleted in order to feel like a "winner", to feel a sense of superiority, or "just for the heck of it".
Blanes 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Sir, I hope you checked it thoroughly before deletion. I am asking because I put reasons [1] on how it passes WP:NACADEMIC. There are more sources when searched without the middle name. If you are not convinced then can you please provide me the content so I can work on it and submit again for review please? Regards, -- Sambhil32 ( talk) 11:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
– 2020 is a
leap year –
news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (
#0F4C81), Pantone's
2020 Color of the year
– North America 1000 22:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, in the Afd that was closed and relisted for the second time, I feel that there was a consensus supporting DELETE, per WP:DEFINECONSENSUS While comparing the numbers of deletes vs keeps were a tie, there's a pretty solid agreement among participants that the article fails to meet the general notability guidelines, thus a generally consensus against inclusion is formed. 16:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Because of the nature of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 arbitration case and the importance of the exact wording of remedies, the Arbitration Committee would like to invite public comment and workshopping on the proposed decision, which will be posted soon. Accordingly, the workshop in this case is re-opened and will remain open until Friday, December 13. To opt out of further announcements, please remove yourself from the notification list. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you've closed this AfD as delete, which is a shame because most of the delete votes didn't reflect the changes that I had made since they were cast, which introduced a lot of content including citations in the Local Government Chronicle (a national publication) and an interview in The Guardian. Are you able to restore the old content in my userspace or in the draft namespace so that I can keep working on it? There is still a lot to add; if I do work it up further, at what point can I consider recreating the article? -- Noswall59 ( talk) 10:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC).
A bit early, but do you want to close? I am currently drafting up a detailed closing statement. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 17:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Phishing emails, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Phishing emails and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Wikipedia:Phishing emails during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
funplussmart (
talk)
19:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
I worked very hard and spend most of my day rebuilding, attributing and providing sources for the Byron House page you deleted. Can you give me the exact reasons it was deleted so my next one will stay put? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.186.58.125 ( talk) 00:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I have seen that you have been closing some deletion discussions about Dungeons & Dragons subjects, of which there are many at the moment. In cases where you come to the conclusion to delete the article, would you perhaps consider changing the article into a redirect rather than outright deletion? Some more secondary sources have been found during the notability discussions, and there are probably still more out there. It would be helpful to still be able to access the old articles, to see if notability can be established at some future point. Thank you very much for your consideration. Daranios ( talk) 15:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
This editor has called Tamsier a "dick" on the the deletion discussion in which you blocked Tamsier for but took no action against this editor. I disagreed with that block anyway because I found nothing in Tamsier's remarks that deserved a block, and they also did a great job improving that article, but that's beside the point. @ Toa Nidhiki05: also went on to make personal attacks against another editor by calling them "an imbecile", and believes that we are here to mock or ridicule other editors with this statement: "Sometimes, when responding to sockpuppet trolls, ridicule is an adequate solution". How many passes is this editor going to get before any action is taken against them for their behaviour, or are we only in the habit of blocking our Black and African editors? Just curious! Senegambianamestudy ( talk) 11:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Please resolve this elsewhere. Sandstein 20:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
What on earth? Yes, I called a sockpuppet troll account an imbecile. Sue me. Toa Nidhiki05 12:23, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Toa Nidhiki05 13:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Hi Sandstein,
Today I come the page Bandari_(AVC) and sadly find it is been deleted. I propose to recover it.
From the page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bandari_(AVC), I read several reasons for its deletion. In one sentence that is "Not finding any significant coverage for this band. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND".
I admit that there are few material can be found about this "band". Actually, from the Chinese news paper dated 2015-07-29 (which is an interview of the founder of Bandari), we know that the "Bandari" as a stable band never exist. But its musics and the styles are real, the musics are performed by invited musicians and some songs are composed by invited composers. And all these arrangements are done by Peter Pozza, the founder of AVC. AVC is producing [ meditation musics].
Bandari not only confuse you people outside China, but also confuse us. In a stackoverflow-like chinese ask-and-answer website called Zhihu, there is a question about [ the existence of Bandari]. The top answer there is convincing, and the most vital evidence is the Chinese news paper interview mention in the above paragraph and the existence of [ AVC].
I think, Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia, should not miss such a (countrywide) famous music production team. They are not typical band, thus the rules of WP:BAND should not apply. Instead, to my understanding, Bandari is a brand of a small company. This brand is almost unknown to the rest of the world because it is a cooperation between AVC and a Taiwan company, and the CD was released only in Chinese regions.
If anyone need assistance about Chinese language (e.g. in order to understand related reference), I could do it, although I'm not wikipedia-online every day.
Wanttoknow ( talk) 15:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() Atsme Talk 📧 18:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC) |
Happy Holiday Cheer!! |
in the spirit of the season. What's especially nice about this digitized version: *it doesn't need water *won't catch fire *and batteries aren't required. |
and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉 |
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Devlin Waugh. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Richard75 ( talk) 09:11, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure why a relist wouldn't have been useful. I've already said that if I thought the AFD was anywhere close to a delete, I'd have tried to improve the article and find more references - which I've never tried to do - and isn't a part of the DRV process. Given the false claims that GNG isn't a guideline, but a policy (?!?) surely the DRV should be closed by someone who is comfortable commenting on the the relationship between specific notability guidelines and the GNG! Nfitz ( talk) 16:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Damon Runyon's short story
"Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the
hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well S. MarnetteD| Talk 01:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oromo migrations
Why the discussion was closed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotohelp ( talk • contribs) 10:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Enverus
Hello Mr. Sandstein, I was hoping you could relist the Enverus page so that we could have a more detailed conversation about this page before being deleted? I feel someone has deleted it before any changes or counter arguments could be made. Most appreciated De-Stavness ( talk) 21:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Buddy , i have also contacted the person RHawort he protected the page , he said kindly wait and be patient if its accepted then protection will be remove. You have deleted an article in feb 2019 , i realized that few people have created the article before with no notable links or it was not passing wp:actor or wp:gng but i recreated the article and added the latest news references and newspaper sources and i am sure it is now notable. can you have a look dear ? /info/en/?search=Draft:Nabeel_Zuberi it will be good if you can pass your comments or help me to make this article better as you're most senior administrator and i help wikipedia by expanding articles/creating on public figures voluntarily.
Thanks Memon KutianaWala ( talk) 09:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!
|
Hope you enjoy the Christmas eve with the ones you love and step into the new year with lots of happiness and good health. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ToTok (app) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ToTok (app) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UA3 ( talk) 10:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはSandsteinたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
02:17, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
I found out about the AfD after it was closed. Would you tell last name, or any other identifier of Chloe (actress) please? —usernamekiran (talk) 10:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
I consider your deleting Caucasian Journal as a clear case of Wikipedia:Overzealous deletion (WP:OZD), as in talk page there were numerous comments in favor of keeping that page.
See abstract from article on WP:OZD:
"So, an article or edit is not perfect. It is tagged for multiple issues. Its notability is in question. It has few if any references. It has some inaccurate or questionable information. It has loads of original research. But still, it has just the little spark of hope of being a viable article.
If this is the case, the deletion process is not the route to take to solve the problem. That's what the talk page is for. Deletion of an article where the subject's notability can be evidenced by reliable sources contradicts the overall goal of the Wikipedia project
"Overzealous deletion refers to an overwhelming desire to get articles or other materials on Wikipedia deleted. In other words, it is the act of getting an article deleted in order to feel like a "winner", to feel a sense of superiority, or "just for the heck of it".
Blanes 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Sir, I hope you checked it thoroughly before deletion. I am asking because I put reasons [1] on how it passes WP:NACADEMIC. There are more sources when searched without the middle name. If you are not convinced then can you please provide me the content so I can work on it and submit again for review please? Regards, -- Sambhil32 ( talk) 11:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
– 2020 is a
leap year –
news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (
#0F4C81), Pantone's
2020 Color of the year
– North America 1000 22:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)