|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your contributions are welcomed, however, one or more of the external links you added in this edit to World Heritage Site do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thanks. Compwhiz II( Talk)( Contribs) 00:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
India is rich in heritage and culture
- Domain
-
http://www.visitindiaheritage.com
- visitindiaheritage.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot- Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Google Adsense ID: 2009759205454141
- Accounts
- Sandeepriya ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
- 80.243.114.213 ( talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
-- A. B. (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Sandeepriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Need to add great information about in articles. no futher addition to external links as i am building information to my site that would be great if i update the information at wiki articles too. please allow me to do so.
Decline reason:
This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
- Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
- Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this:
= [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it. - Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an
administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{ helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. — Yamla ( talk) 23:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{helpme}}"
- I was about to help, but I guess you found out what you needed. If you have anymroe questions, feel free to re-add the
{{helpme}}.-- Sunny910910 ( talk| Contributions| Guest) 00:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Sandeepriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
As per Irishguy's comments below. It looks like you haven't understood WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS, or WP:CITE, and probably not WP:NOT. Your addition is interesting and shows you have put in some time, but it's not quite ready for Wikipedia. Please read the policies I've linked to here and rework your contribution. To other admins, note that it is absolutely not unblock abuse for this user to rework his contributions to add reliable sources and then to re-request an unblock. — Yamla ( User talk:Yamla) 15:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sandeepriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
No reason given — Hu12 ( talk) 21:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|1=Please review my work as allow me contribute to wikki.}}
{{ helpme}}
An indef block with no warning? That seems a bit harsh. -- Ned Scott 05:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think it may seem harsh. I have removed your helpme request - as it is an unblock request, so an administrator can help by looking at the unblock requests! -- The Helpful One (Review) 15:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Waiting — I have contacted the admin who assigned the task below. --
slakr\
talk /
13:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, your changes still consist entirely of original research. There's still no evidence that you have read and understood our policies and guidelines such as WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:CITE. I am disappointed that even after pointing these out to you, you ignored them. Your unblock request is declined. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
The section you added is completely unreferenced. Wikipedia doesn't accept original research. IrishGuy talk 03:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your contributions are welcomed, however, one or more of the external links you added in this edit to World Heritage Site do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thanks. Compwhiz II( Talk)( Contribs) 00:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
India is rich in heritage and culture
- Domain
-
http://www.visitindiaheritage.com
- visitindiaheritage.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot- Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Google Adsense ID: 2009759205454141
- Accounts
- Sandeepriya ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
- 80.243.114.213 ( talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
-- A. B. (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Sandeepriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Need to add great information about in articles. no futher addition to external links as i am building information to my site that would be great if i update the information at wiki articles too. please allow me to do so.
Decline reason:
This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
- Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
- Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this:
= [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it. - Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
- When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an
administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{ helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. — Yamla ( talk) 23:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{helpme}}"
- I was about to help, but I guess you found out what you needed. If you have anymroe questions, feel free to re-add the
{{helpme}}.-- Sunny910910 ( talk| Contributions| Guest) 00:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Sandeepriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
As per Irishguy's comments below. It looks like you haven't understood WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS, or WP:CITE, and probably not WP:NOT. Your addition is interesting and shows you have put in some time, but it's not quite ready for Wikipedia. Please read the policies I've linked to here and rework your contribution. To other admins, note that it is absolutely not unblock abuse for this user to rework his contributions to add reliable sources and then to re-request an unblock. — Yamla ( User talk:Yamla) 15:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sandeepriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
No reason given — Hu12 ( talk) 21:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|1=Please review my work as allow me contribute to wikki.}}
{{ helpme}}
An indef block with no warning? That seems a bit harsh. -- Ned Scott 05:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think it may seem harsh. I have removed your helpme request - as it is an unblock request, so an administrator can help by looking at the unblock requests! -- The Helpful One (Review) 15:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Waiting — I have contacted the admin who assigned the task below. --
slakr\
talk /
13:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, your changes still consist entirely of original research. There's still no evidence that you have read and understood our policies and guidelines such as WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:CITE. I am disappointed that even after pointing these out to you, you ignored them. Your unblock request is declined. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
The section you added is completely unreferenced. Wikipedia doesn't accept original research. IrishGuy talk 03:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)