![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Apperently I am a Jihadist now.
ChronicalUsual ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
SopherJihad ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
GBdinc ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Lotharsnackbar ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Sopher99 ( talk) 17:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Sal, what do you think are the odds on three different editors all registering at about the same time, all interested almost exclusively on the International Crimes Tribunal and related articles and all having a major hardon for the same blog as a source? And one of those editors only pops up now and again. Darkness Shines ( talk) 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Another question Sal, if someone edits via Opera mini proxy can you determine with the tools who it might be? Darkness Shines ( talk) 08:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey Sal. happy sunday. Got another peculiar one, uses the same source as Aminul802 internationallawbureau.com/blog Same edit summary Applesandapples as Abbasfirnas887 Very few edits and whose very first post quoted policy like a pro [6] And like the others, all registering within weeks of each other. Darkness Shines ( talk) 08:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to alert you to National Defense Forces since you just deleted an identical page ( National Defense Army of Syria) created by a blocked user. - Mr X 17:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
He won't stand down.
Sopher99 (
talk)
17:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
MaherHero ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Another sock has spawned and created this identical article under the name Neighbourhood vigilante. (I hope you don't mind me notifying you. Please let me know if I should post in SPI instead). - Mr X 18:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
...and here Commitees of defense. - Mr X 18:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
ChronicalUsual (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)
DanielUmel (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)
Salman9999 (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)
Sopher99 ( talk) 13:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting my user page. I appreciate it. 72Dino ( talk) 00:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Can I get a semi-protect for Timeline of the Syrian civil war (from January 2013) and its talk. Males always best's Ip won't stop vandalizing it. Sopher99 ( talk) 01:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
ChronicalUsual ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Jolkis_Mina ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Sopher99 ( talk) 20:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
What about constant violation by user:AndyTheGrump of WP:NPA even in this AN/I thread he was blocked many times and yet he continue.-- Shrike ( talk)/ WP:RX 19:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Salvio, I was hoping to get a second opinion on this post Media-hound made to AnkhMorpork's page, and whether it contitutes a legal threat. In my mind, it does, particularly the line "If they continue a formal complaint should be made." I've asked Media-hound to retract it; they have yet to reply, although they have been editing since I left the message. It's circumspect enough that I don't feel comfortable enough to block outright without at least geetting someone else's thoughts about it; what do you think? Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 20:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
[8]. You know the drill.... ~~ Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 06:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Good work on the Derby sex gang ANI, Salvio. But was it you that oversighted all AnkhMorpork's edits to the article? If it was, might that have been a bit over-enthusiastic? I can't indeed tell, as I can't see them, but some of them had been sitting there for at least a week, so it's hard to believe they were totally outrageous. Did they all contain BLP vios..? Below your ANI post, there is now a poll about topic-banning AM, which sounds generally like a good idea, but it would be a lot easier to research it properly if we could see the edits he'd made to Derby sex gang. :-( Ordinary admin revdel would perhaps have been sufficient? Bishonen | talk 21:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC).
Regarding the identity of the functionary who suppressed those edits, I'm really sorry, but I'm afrain I cannot disclose that information. There isn't a clear consensus among the functionary team, but the majority thinks that it's inappropriate to tell who oversighted a diff (as it happens, I disagree and, so, will inform the functionary in question, to let them know that you have expressed concerns regarding their actions, so that they can contact you, if they so choose). Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 00:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Salvio. I noticed you're the creator of Template:uw-castewarning. The information links in the community sanction templates often go to very broad-based pages like WP:General sanctions that may leave the recipient unclear on exactly which restriction applies to him or her. How about replacing the last line of text in the template:
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions
with
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at WP:General sanctions/South Asian social groups
Any complete reform would probably require adding a few sentences of explanation also to the South Asian social groups page. (It seems we explain either General sanctions, or caste, but not both on one page). If others agree, I could create some new text or links for the South Asian social groups page. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
The language approved at ANI states that "The standard set of discretionary sanctions [apply] on all pages about social groups, be they castes/communities/tribes/clans/kootams/gotras etc., explictly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal."
Thanks, I presume it was a range block? MartinSFSA ( talk) 17:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi again, Salvio. Indefinite with no talkpage access? Isn't the combination a bit draconian? You may give Media-hound the impression that we're muzzling him because we're afraid of his words, you know. That seems a bit silly. What harm if he continues to post on his talk? Nobody need go there, and Andy in particular should simply have the self-control to not watch it. I suggest you restore talkpage access. (Yes, I know it was Basalisk that removed it, but it was you that combined it with indef.) Bishonen | talk 20:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC).
Tiggerjay ( talk) 03:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I think ChronicalUsual is back. In this case, creating an article about some sporting event in 2015 ( 2015 Global Futsal Cup).
Fredy94 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Thank you - Mr X 23:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
... but I detect a distinct lack of enthusiasm :) Feel free to make any offer or proposal, though. - Dank ( push to talk) 16:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Samuile 2013 ( talk · contribs) has appeared now with a pathetically similar name to our friend Deonis 2012 ( talk · contribs). His user page also has that poorly-formatted Syrian propaganda look to it that Salman9999's had. He hasn't traipsed into Deonis's usual haunts yet, though I suspect it's only a matter of time. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 18:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Apperently I am a Jihadist now.
ChronicalUsual ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
SopherJihad ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
GBdinc ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Lotharsnackbar ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Sopher99 ( talk) 17:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Sal, what do you think are the odds on three different editors all registering at about the same time, all interested almost exclusively on the International Crimes Tribunal and related articles and all having a major hardon for the same blog as a source? And one of those editors only pops up now and again. Darkness Shines ( talk) 00:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Another question Sal, if someone edits via Opera mini proxy can you determine with the tools who it might be? Darkness Shines ( talk) 08:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey Sal. happy sunday. Got another peculiar one, uses the same source as Aminul802 internationallawbureau.com/blog Same edit summary Applesandapples as Abbasfirnas887 Very few edits and whose very first post quoted policy like a pro [6] And like the others, all registering within weeks of each other. Darkness Shines ( talk) 08:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to alert you to National Defense Forces since you just deleted an identical page ( National Defense Army of Syria) created by a blocked user. - Mr X 17:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
He won't stand down.
Sopher99 (
talk)
17:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
MaherHero ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Another sock has spawned and created this identical article under the name Neighbourhood vigilante. (I hope you don't mind me notifying you. Please let me know if I should post in SPI instead). - Mr X 18:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
...and here Commitees of defense. - Mr X 18:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
ChronicalUsual (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)
DanielUmel (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)
Salman9999 (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)
Sopher99 ( talk) 13:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting my user page. I appreciate it. 72Dino ( talk) 00:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Can I get a semi-protect for Timeline of the Syrian civil war (from January 2013) and its talk. Males always best's Ip won't stop vandalizing it. Sopher99 ( talk) 01:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
ChronicalUsual ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Jolkis_Mina ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Sopher99 ( talk) 20:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
What about constant violation by user:AndyTheGrump of WP:NPA even in this AN/I thread he was blocked many times and yet he continue.-- Shrike ( talk)/ WP:RX 19:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Salvio, I was hoping to get a second opinion on this post Media-hound made to AnkhMorpork's page, and whether it contitutes a legal threat. In my mind, it does, particularly the line "If they continue a formal complaint should be made." I've asked Media-hound to retract it; they have yet to reply, although they have been editing since I left the message. It's circumspect enough that I don't feel comfortable enough to block outright without at least geetting someone else's thoughts about it; what do you think? Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 20:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
[8]. You know the drill.... ~~ Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 06:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Good work on the Derby sex gang ANI, Salvio. But was it you that oversighted all AnkhMorpork's edits to the article? If it was, might that have been a bit over-enthusiastic? I can't indeed tell, as I can't see them, but some of them had been sitting there for at least a week, so it's hard to believe they were totally outrageous. Did they all contain BLP vios..? Below your ANI post, there is now a poll about topic-banning AM, which sounds generally like a good idea, but it would be a lot easier to research it properly if we could see the edits he'd made to Derby sex gang. :-( Ordinary admin revdel would perhaps have been sufficient? Bishonen | talk 21:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC).
Regarding the identity of the functionary who suppressed those edits, I'm really sorry, but I'm afrain I cannot disclose that information. There isn't a clear consensus among the functionary team, but the majority thinks that it's inappropriate to tell who oversighted a diff (as it happens, I disagree and, so, will inform the functionary in question, to let them know that you have expressed concerns regarding their actions, so that they can contact you, if they so choose). Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 00:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Salvio. I noticed you're the creator of Template:uw-castewarning. The information links in the community sanction templates often go to very broad-based pages like WP:General sanctions that may leave the recipient unclear on exactly which restriction applies to him or her. How about replacing the last line of text in the template:
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions
with
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at WP:General sanctions/South Asian social groups
Any complete reform would probably require adding a few sentences of explanation also to the South Asian social groups page. (It seems we explain either General sanctions, or caste, but not both on one page). If others agree, I could create some new text or links for the South Asian social groups page. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
The language approved at ANI states that "The standard set of discretionary sanctions [apply] on all pages about social groups, be they castes/communities/tribes/clans/kootams/gotras etc., explictly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal."
Thanks, I presume it was a range block? MartinSFSA ( talk) 17:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi again, Salvio. Indefinite with no talkpage access? Isn't the combination a bit draconian? You may give Media-hound the impression that we're muzzling him because we're afraid of his words, you know. That seems a bit silly. What harm if he continues to post on his talk? Nobody need go there, and Andy in particular should simply have the self-control to not watch it. I suggest you restore talkpage access. (Yes, I know it was Basalisk that removed it, but it was you that combined it with indef.) Bishonen | talk 20:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC).
Tiggerjay ( talk) 03:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I think ChronicalUsual is back. In this case, creating an article about some sporting event in 2015 ( 2015 Global Futsal Cup).
Fredy94 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Thank you - Mr X 23:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
... but I detect a distinct lack of enthusiasm :) Feel free to make any offer or proposal, though. - Dank ( push to talk) 16:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Samuile 2013 ( talk · contribs) has appeared now with a pathetically similar name to our friend Deonis 2012 ( talk · contribs). His user page also has that poorly-formatted Syrian propaganda look to it that Salman9999's had. He hasn't traipsed into Deonis's usual haunts yet, though I suspect it's only a matter of time. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 18:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)